Compassion for dog's discomfort
Dear editor, This letter is to add my passionate agreement with the letter of the woman who, after a long day’s work, has her sense of outrage triggered by the sight of a little dog lying down on the center divide at Imola and Soscol.
The dog’s master, a homeless lady, is holding a sign, appealing for money or food.
I can’t believe that this thoughtless lady, who is obviously homeless by choice, would have the effrontery to parade her joblessness by asking us to use our hard-earned money so that she can continue her obviously voluntary idleness.
And to do so while subjecting her poor little dog to the discomfort of lying on concrete. Words fail me in expressing my contempt for that lady. Has she no shame?
As with the original letter writer, I don’t feel moved so much that I am willing to contribute my own money but I call on someone in Napa to start a fund for that poor little dog.
It’s the least someone else can do. I’ve done my part by echoing the original letter writer’s outrage.
Oh, by the way, throw in a buck for the homeless lady if you’re one of those bleeding heart liberals.
Emmett Griffin / Yountville
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
pharper wrote on Jan 2, 2009 12:22 AM:
Dirty Napkin wrote on Jan 2, 2009 6:31 AM:
napaoldguy wrote on Jan 2, 2009 8:19 AM:
kbf wrote on Jan 2, 2009 9:43 AM:
bk66427 wrote on Jan 2, 2009 9:46 AM:
alucawanza wrote on Jan 2, 2009 11:43 AM:
Many people are three months away from being homeless, living month to month, and paying too much on their mortgage. Lose your job due to the recession and how long can you support your family?
Emmett: Your letter is heartless. At least we bleeding heart liberals know compassion and empathy. "Homeless by choice" You gotta be kidding! "
Teddy wrote on Jan 2, 2009 11:53 AM:
CLRAE wrote on Jan 2, 2009 12:44 PM:
kkjp wrote on Jan 2, 2009 1:07 PM:
Few people choose to be homeless, particularly women. Sleeping night after night exposed to the elements and vulnerable to physical assault is a living situation that is endured, more often than not, by people who have severe mental illnesses.
Some suggest all homeless people should just "get a job". If a person lacks the reasoning power to even come in out of the rain and take advantage of basic homeless services due to schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or other psychotic disorders, are they employable? Would you hire them? Due to the economic crisis, even treatment resources for these folks are drying up, let alone jobs.
By writing your letter, Mr. Griffin, you did your part, alright. You did your part to foster intolerance, ignorance and stereotyping.
If reserving judgment about other people's life circumstances and attempting to better understand their situation makes me a bleeding heart liberal, that's just fine with me. "
pharper wrote on Jan 2, 2009 1:14 PM:
SophiesMom wrote on Jan 2, 2009 1:24 PM:
Is it 2012 yet? wrote on Jan 2, 2009 1:41 PM:
Your way to care for animals is not necessarily everybody else's way. Some people won't walk their dogs unless is on a leash, some won't ever put their dog on one, some feed their pets once or twice a day, some leave their bowls full of food out there all day for them to feed only when they're hungry, some neuter/spade them, some don't.
Leave the homeless woman and her dog alone, they seem to be doing "just fine". I'm sure she knows where the shelters and SPCA's are.
Stop acting as if you were God 'cause you ain't! "
yamamama wrote on Jan 2, 2009 1:55 PM:
Ruff Limblog wrote on Jan 2, 2009 3:26 PM:
~Ruff "
kdbk wrote on Jan 2, 2009 7:13 PM:
They're the ones who believe we should assume the best about the lady with the dog. They're the ones who suggest that homeless people can live by a different standard of conduct in our culture. They're the ones who think that a homeless person should be able to endanger an animal, more than other citizens could, because it might be the only companion they have. They're the ones who always assume that people aren't "doing anything" to help the homeless if they object to certain irresponsible acts by homeless people (that is classically ignorant). They're the ones who believe that anyone who criticizes a homeless person has never been through tough times themselves (again, CLASSICALLY IGNORANT).
They're the ones who think they have all the compassion but who would otherwise see someone, say a non-homeless person, sued and sent to prison for harming one little hair on a "defenseless" animal.
You know who you are. "
kkjp wrote on Jan 2, 2009 8:59 PM:
The woman may be breaking the law by not leashing the dog, by creating a traffic hazard by planting herself in the median strip, and by panhandling. If so, those issues should be addressed by the proper authorities.
The fact is that many people, homeless and otherwise, CAN and indeed do live by a "different standard of conduct" than you may deem acceptable. Their behaviors may rise to the level of "irresponsible acts" in your opinion. But short of breaking the law, they have the freedom to do so.
Lastly, your first sentence demonstrates an opinion that is not only arrogant, but patently inaccurate. "
alucawanza wrote on Jan 2, 2009 9:24 PM: