NVR Logo
Compassion for dog's discomfort
Friday, January 02, 2009
Save and Share Share
Dear editor, This letter is to add my passionate agreement with the letter of the woman who, after a long day’s work, has her sense of outrage triggered by the sight of a little dog lying down on the center divide at Imola and Soscol.

The dog’s master, a homeless lady, is holding a sign, appealing for money or food.
I can’t believe that this thoughtless lady, who is obviously homeless by choice, would have the effrontery to parade her joblessness by asking us to use our hard-earned money so that she can continue her obviously voluntary idleness.

And to do so while subjecting her poor little dog to the discomfort of lying on concrete. Words fail me in expressing my contempt for that lady. Has she no shame?
As with the original letter writer, I don’t feel moved so much that I am willing to contribute my own money but I call on someone in Napa to start a fund for that poor little dog.

It’s the least someone else can do. I’ve done my part by echoing the original letter writer’s outrage.
Oh, by the way, throw in a buck for the homeless lady if you’re one of those bleeding heart liberals.

Emmett Griffin / Yountville
17 comment(s)

pharper wrote on Jan 2, 2009 12:22 AM:

" Go, Emmett! "

Dirty Napkin wrote on Jan 2, 2009 6:31 AM:

" I agree with you, but the fact of the matter is.. I saw on 20/20 where these sort of "beggers in traffic", make hundreds of dollars in one day! Then were followed by hidden camera getting in to a Lincoln SUV in the parking lot of a near by store. I cant give them money, because its not what I beleave in, but I will buy that homless man at the 7-11 on Redwood a sandwich and a cup of joe every now and then. The dog is a mute point. It obviously loves her, or it would run away, plain and simple. "

napaoldguy wrote on Jan 2, 2009 8:19 AM:

" if you will notice the dog is not starving or under fed. I have personally given her food for the dog but will not give her money. She is able to work just chooses not to. The dog probably get more attention then most dogs locked in some ones back yard. The problem is we cater to homeless more than we should. That's why they are here. If they know the system they can eat and sleep for free. I can't do that. They are plenty of places that need to be cleaned up to earn their food. Make them earn it,. They always have money for booze. Stop giving to the lazy. "

kbf wrote on Jan 2, 2009 9:43 AM:

" I haven't seen her out there for a few days, maybe she did get some help. "

bk66427 wrote on Jan 2, 2009 9:46 AM:

" all of the people that are so concerned for that dog should do something a little more than sit and eat cookies and type nasty letters! go volenteer at the humane society or the shelter where the dogs are lying all day on the concrete floor with out a poor person to feed or pet them! at least that lady dosent just throw her dog to the way side when going gets tough. "

alucawanza wrote on Jan 2, 2009 11:43 AM:

" I thought Conservatives were Christian folk. What about the story of the Good Samaritan? Did you give a turkey to the food bank? Did you buy a toy for the Toys for Tots program? Do you volunteer your time driving seniors to doctors' appointments?
Many people are three months away from being homeless, living month to month, and paying too much on their mortgage. Lose your job due to the recession and how long can you support your family?
Emmett: Your letter is heartless. At least we bleeding heart liberals know compassion and empathy. "Homeless by choice" You gotta be kidding! "

Teddy wrote on Jan 2, 2009 11:53 AM:

" The dogs at the shelter are fed just fine, but they certainly do appreciate the volunteer dog walkers who come out to keep them company. "

CLRAE wrote on Jan 2, 2009 12:44 PM:

" IT IS A SORRY SITUATION FOR BOTH INVOLVED--I UNDERSTAND THAT WITHOUT RESIDENCE-PHONE-GOOD I.D. THE LADY MIGHT NOT BE ABLE TO GET A JOB--ANY JOB. MAYBE SHE JUST ISN'T INTERESTED--BUT--MY CONCERN IS FOR THE POOR LITTLE DOG--IF IT IS WITHOUT A LEASH ON THAT BUSY STREET--IT MIGHT GET RUN-OVER. IT IS A REALLY CUTE LITTLE DOG AND I'M SURE SOMEONE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE IT IN THEIR HOME--TOO BAD THE PERSON WON'T DONATE IT TO THE ANIMAL SHELTER--I HAVE TWO LITTLE ANIMAL SHELTER PUPPIES AND LOVE THEM SO MUCH-I WOULD ADOPT MORE IF I COULD AFFORD-- (IT'S NOT SO MUCH THE MONEY FOR FOOD--AS FOR THE VETERANARY CARE--BOY--IS THAT EXPENSIVE ! ! ! I JUST HOPE AND PRAY THAT SHE WILL LET SOMEONE ADOPT THE DOG--OR GET OFF THE CENTER DIVIDE WHERE THERE IS LESS FAST PACED TRAFFIC. "

kkjp wrote on Jan 2, 2009 1:07 PM:

" Mr. Griffin makes two bizarre assumptions: that the woman "is obviously homeless by choice" and that she chooses to "continue her obviously voluntary idleness". Without knowing the woman, her background or circumstances, how does Mr. Griffin draw this conclusion? Voodoo?

Few people choose to be homeless, particularly women. Sleeping night after night exposed to the elements and vulnerable to physical assault is a living situation that is endured, more often than not, by people who have severe mental illnesses.

Some suggest all homeless people should just "get a job". If a person lacks the reasoning power to even come in out of the rain and take advantage of basic homeless services due to schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or other psychotic disorders, are they employable? Would you hire them? Due to the economic crisis, even treatment resources for these folks are drying up, let alone jobs.

By writing your letter, Mr. Griffin, you did your part, alright. You did your part to foster intolerance, ignorance and stereotyping.

If reserving judgment about other people's life circumstances and attempting to better understand their situation makes me a bleeding heart liberal, that's just fine with me. "

pharper wrote on Jan 2, 2009 1:14 PM:

" aluzawanza, I think Emmett is being facetious. "

SophiesMom wrote on Jan 2, 2009 1:24 PM:

" Can you imagine the obstacles to getting a job and renting a home in Napa..Just a bath and clean clothes is a major hurdle to these folks to get past..and as for the little dog...It has the most important thing to a dog...a person of it's very own.All the time...It is not so difficult to imagine oneself in this same position with our economy what it is.Stop being so callous and righteous and lend a hand...and a heart. There are as many reasons for homelessness as there are homeless people and there but for fortune go you and I. "

Is it 2012 yet? wrote on Jan 2, 2009 1:41 PM:

" The friendship and understanding between the homeless woman and her dog is something some people will never understand. This dog might just be the only being she is capable of caring for (more than some dead beat moms and dads out there, I'd say) and for which she "feels" responsible for.

Your way to care for animals is not necessarily everybody else's way. Some people won't walk their dogs unless is on a leash, some won't ever put their dog on one, some feed their pets once or twice a day, some leave their bowls full of food out there all day for them to feed only when they're hungry, some neuter/spade them, some don't.

Leave the homeless woman and her dog alone, they seem to be doing "just fine". I'm sure she knows where the shelters and SPCA's are.

Stop acting as if you were God 'cause you ain't! "

yamamama wrote on Jan 2, 2009 1:55 PM:

" Does no one recognize satire when they see it? "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jan 2, 2009 3:26 PM:

" Well... it's pretty plain that the Christmas spirit has dried up very early for some of Napa's biggest grinches.

~Ruff "

kdbk wrote on Jan 2, 2009 7:13 PM:

" It's easy to spot the people who have little or no real knowledge about homelessness in America.

They're the ones who believe we should assume the best about the lady with the dog. They're the ones who suggest that homeless people can live by a different standard of conduct in our culture. They're the ones who think that a homeless person should be able to endanger an animal, more than other citizens could, because it might be the only companion they have. They're the ones who always assume that people aren't "doing anything" to help the homeless if they object to certain irresponsible acts by homeless people (that is classically ignorant). They're the ones who believe that anyone who criticizes a homeless person has never been through tough times themselves (again, CLASSICALLY IGNORANT).

They're the ones who think they have all the compassion but who would otherwise see someone, say a non-homeless person, sued and sent to prison for harming one little hair on a "defenseless" animal.

You know who you are. "

kkjp wrote on Jan 2, 2009 8:59 PM:

" kdbk - Our "standard of culture" is only a "standard" as defined by our laws, not by someone's subjective opinion of how people should conduct themselves. People expressing compassion for the woman's (and the dog's) living situation aren't suggesting she should be exempt from the law, or that the law should apply differently to homeless people.

The woman may be breaking the law by not leashing the dog, by creating a traffic hazard by planting herself in the median strip, and by panhandling. If so, those issues should be addressed by the proper authorities.

The fact is that many people, homeless and otherwise, CAN and indeed do live by a "different standard of conduct" than you may deem acceptable. Their behaviors may rise to the level of "irresponsible acts" in your opinion. But short of breaking the law, they have the freedom to do so.

Lastly, your first sentence demonstrates an opinion that is not only arrogant, but patently inaccurate. "

alucawanza wrote on Jan 2, 2009 9:24 PM:

" Buy the lady a leash and collar. Can't we problem solve here?? Do we have to have diatribes on society's ills instead? If you love the dog, help it out. It's better to light a candle than curse the darkness. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy