NVR Logo
Ramble on?
Monday, December 29, 2008
Save and Share Share
November 22nd, 2009
November 15th, 2009
November 8th, 2009
November 1st, 2009
October 25th, 2009
Cadillacs, Mercuries and V-8 Fords. Maybe a GTO. Those are the cars songwriters think about when they pen odes to automobiles.

Considering the current troubles in Detroit, this suggests the songwriting biz might be next in line for an economic bailout. But no one writes songs about my car.
My ride is sturdy, though. Very sturdy. So sturdy that it will almost certainly outlive me if I take care of it properly.

That presents an environmental dilemma. Do I keep driving my indestructible, 25-year-old, finely-crafted miracle of engineering until the end of its natural life (or mine?), squeezing every last inch of productivity out of it? Or would the more responsible decision be to acquire a vehicle that is less polluting and more in tune with the times when it comes to carbon emissions and energy efficiency?
I drive a 1983 Mercedes Benz diesel mo-chine. My wife and I bought it second-hand from a local gent and graduate of Mount George Elementary School, who told us it was his dad’s car and that it spent its life rambling around the North Bay.

The car has close to 200,000 miles on it, though there was a three-year gap when the odometer didn’t work, so —  like any lovely gal who’s been around for a spell — it does not reveal its true age.
Non-essential parts are crumbling. The glove box opening mechanism was tetchy even when we bought the car, and other imperfections are apparent to anyone who witnesses when I rumble to Alston Park or Napa Valley Register world headquarters.

Yet the heart of that beast will live forever. Diesel engines are models of stability and durability.

Every other part eventually may need a replacement, but the old ticker inside my diesel is better than the one in most cars a quarter of its age.

So why trade it out or recycle it? It’s fine. It’s healthy.

Seems to me that one model for being economical and energy-efficient is to squeeze every last drop of productivity from a machine that required the use of hundreds of pounds of precious metals, was crafted to the highest standards of its day and then shipped all the way from Germany to live a productive life in the Napa Valley.

On the other hand, diesel engines are polluting and my ride is a dinosaur compared to the energy-efficient vehicles of today and tomorrow. Relying on this car would appear to hamper my chances of ever being a carbon-neutral human being.

But wait a minute, the solution is to buy (setting aside for the moment the financial discussion) something else that required new extraction of metals and chemicals and more heavy fabrication.

What’s a better use of our precious natural resources? Riding this old metal horse until its done, or giving up on it before its time and acquiring a newer one more in tune with the times?
11 comment(s)

glenroy wrote on Dec 28, 2008 9:30 AM:

" Trade it in for an SUV....the biggest one you can afford, you'll pollute less, keep the United Auto Workers happy....you'll have a roof over your head if the Register down sizes...and you'll get a lot more people moved per mile per gallon of fuel. "

Bill wrote on Dec 28, 2008 11:12 AM:

" Ride baby ride. Ole diesel horses never die they just smell that way. "

PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Dec 29, 2008 9:38 AM:

" I can hardly wait for ruff to promote his environmentally damaging battery cars again. What is it about lefties that they don't like protecting the environment?

I don't know what an editor makes these days but I wouldn't think you will be endangered by Obama's tax increase. Besides, those old M-B diesels were pretty good cars. Diesel fuel requires less refining than gasoline, so you're getting more gallons of usable fuel per barrel of oil. Also there are people who make a living out of making spare parts and repairing old cars, and those are important jobs.

And there is a song about your car!

Oh Lord, wontcha buy me
A Mercedes-Benz "

Rich wrote on Dec 29, 2008 12:05 PM:

" Well Bill, My piece of diesel happiness is a 37 foot smoke belching 300 horsepower 28,000 pound motor home that has a carbon footprint that you could park five of your vehicles in.
Of course you could park ten RV's in the footprint created by one of the thousands of smudge pots in this valley.
Al Gore may hate you but drive my friend .... drive. "

ping wrote on Dec 29, 2008 2:00 PM:

" If you do a search including the term "dust to dust" you can find pretty convincing evidence that says to keep your old car in the name of ecology. A famous case is the old Caddy vs, a new Prius.

But if you really want to help the world get involved with changing the DMV / CARB policy of not allowing engine swaps. They have a written policy that makes it nearly impossible to put a newer / cleaner engine in an old car. "

PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Dec 29, 2008 9:52 PM:

" Agree with ping. It's a much needed change. "

kevin wrote on Dec 30, 2008 5:02 AM:

" What is the current law regarding diesel vehicles?

I don't even see new ones on the market. Ford allegedly has one selling in Europe that gets great millage, but our Eco Nazis wouldn't let it be sold here in the US. No wonder Ford is going broke.

I'm sure your going to hear from all the asthmatics who are going to blame you and your car for their (imagined) health problems... "

PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Dec 30, 2008 9:51 AM:

" Besides trucks, there are now diesel engined vehicles available from M-B, VW, BMW, and Jeep has or will have one shortly in the Grand Cherokee. These are all the new clean burning technology. It's not your grandfather's diesel any more. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Dec 30, 2008 4:16 PM:

" More Republican-enabler ignorance on display here. Just reading their blather makes it easy to tell. They use terms like 'Eco-Nazis' while expecting their ravings to be treated with respect.

And they LIE and say the people who want higher fuel economy cars available in the USA want to keep those kinds of cars out.

So here's Ruff saying...

If your car is running well, KEEP IT.

'Reduce, Re-Use, Recycle' is the idea. So if you are in no hurry to replace it - KEEP IT!

You might consider anything available to reduce emissions, including finding out if you can reasonably afford to dual fuel your car with biodiesel.

There is are new super-low-sulphur diesel fuels and new biodiesel fuels coming but they are still off in the near-future and not ready just yet.

But it's nice to know you are at least thinking about what is best for the environment as well as your personal financial picture.

I call that BALANCE vs BRAIN-DEAD!

For those who are considering a new car, shortly an electric car will end up being a better deal, cheaper and better mileage for most family's drive patterns.

We are currently a two hybrid family, and the timing seems to be working out to make our family a one hybrid, one full electric family.

But then I'm adventurous by nature and I don't give a fig what the 'Get a Horse' groupthink is.

I mean who is ignorant enough to take anyone seriously who is dumb enough to believe that recycling batteries is more environmentally damaging than dumping them in a landfill?

Ignorance is a Laff-a-Minute!

~Ruff "

kevin wrote on Dec 31, 2008 5:03 AM:

" French Government Censors Report on Electric Cars

Published December 18, 2008

President Nicolas Sarkozy is accused of squelching a negative report about electric cars because of personal connections.

The French government commissioned a report earlier this year analyzing the best options for building more efficient mass-market cars in the coming decades, but is preventing the public from reading the results. The 129-page report produced by Jean Syrota, a former French energy industry regulator, warns that the cost of all-electric cars—roughly double that of conventional cars—is not economically viable. The report also identifies limited driving range and performance, and unsatisfactory battery technology, as major obstacles.


Facts must be so annoying to some people... "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Jan 2, 2009 3:03 PM:

" Quote: "Facts must be so annoying to some people..." by kevin.

Hmmmm, let's discuss facts just a bit.

Very capable AMERICAN-built electric cars already exist and Republican-enablers have been informed many times about them. They just forget facts they don't like amazingly fast.

Fact: The AMERICAN-built Tesla roadster can go some 300 miles on a charge and can accelerate faster than a Ferrari. Fuel cost? A coupla bucks.

Ferraris and Teslas are expensive because BOTH are not mass produced. Expensive sports car technology ends up in family cars after proven on the track.

Fact: Current fully-recyclable battery technology can take a car 100 miles at freeway speeds and weigh as little as 66 pounds.

When these batteries are mass produced in AMERICA, they will usher in the age of AMERICAN-built electric cars.

Fact: Some 90% of American families would find an electric car would fit their usual driving pattern. Many 'two car' families use one car for commuting and another one for 'around town'.

I'm evaluating existing AMERICAN-built cars for our first electric car now.

My current favorite is so efficient that it has less wind resistance than 'Tour de France' bicyclists. It only requires about 4 horse power to travel at 60MPH, but has plenty more horsies too.

There's a solar roof to run climate control and keep the car cool inside even sitting in the sun. It's a REAL luxury compared to getting into a HOT Mercedes or BMW which cost MUCH MORE.

So much for FRENCH bureaucratic 'facts' vs AMERICAN engineering facts.

It's REAL PATRIOTISM vs. ersatz flag-waving to buy an AMERICAN-built and AMERICAN-powered electric car.

Why do so many self-styled patriots constantly put down AMERICAN-built ingenuity?

~Ruff "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy