A fight over school funds
St. Helena, county office clash over tax dollars
By NATALIE HOFFMAN
Register Staff Writer
It’s still up for debate whether St. Helena Unified School District is getting the short end of the stick when it comes to property tax funding.
Why the conflict? Officials at the Napa County Office of Education and St. Helena Unified School District disagree over which entity is entitled to Howell Mountain and Pope Valley property tax proceeds.
Because SHUSD educates about five dozen Pope Valley and Howell Mountain students at St. Helena High School, officials at the Upvalley district say they are due the money.
But officials at NCOE — the recipient of the funds for decades — see things differently.
“This notion that there is a high school tuition (tax) is wrong,” NCOE Superintendent Barbara Nemko said. “The notion that funding must follow the child is incorrect.”
The situation changed in 1994, she said, when St. Helena became a Basic Aid district, meaning it received all of its funding from property taxes instead of the state. As a result, she said, St. Helena stopped receiving state payments for educating the students living in Pope Valley and Howell Mountain who were attending St. Helena High School.
“The St. Helena Unified School District officials base their belief on an obsolete law that disappeared almost 30 years ago, when school funding was based primarily on property taxes,” Nemko wrote in a recent Register letter to the editor. “In 1978, following the passage of Proposition 13, the state took over the allocation of local property taxes, a move that has never been rescinded.”
Nemko said that NCOE recently turned to the Fiscal Crisis Management and Assistance Team — an agency created out of state legislation — for a third-party legal opinion on the issue.
“The legal opinion is no, they aren’t (entitled) to that money, period,” Nemko said, adding that SHUSD funds its students at about twice the rate of most California school districts.
Because Upvalley housing growth could be on the way, for example with the possible approval of the Angwin eco-village, Nemko said SHUSD officials may be trying to secure the funding in anticipation of a growing student body.
Upvalley view
But if you ask Jim Haslip, a member of the SHUSD board of trustees, that is not the issue.
Haslip said that parents of Pope Valley and Howell Mountain students need to have some degree of control over where their property tax dollars end up.
“If it should be following our kids, it should be following our kids. ... Taxation without representation is the essence of what’s going on with (Pope Valley and Howell Mountain) families,” he said. “This is the real issue that needs to be resolved.”
Haslip added that St. Helena Superintendent Allan Gordon — who could not be reached through his office by press time — is “exploring a number or solutions through the state” regarding which entity is due the property tax proceeds.
In a recent Register letter to the editor, SHUSD Trustee Cindy Warren said the fact that Nemko’s office receives the funds is unfair to Howell Mountain and Pope Valley taxpayers.
“The winner is the Napa County Office of Education, which receives tax dollars to educate high school students that they do not educate. St. Helena’s solution is very simple; the money should follow the students,” she wrote.
Nemko said that more is spent each year on St. Helena students than on students in almost 95 percent of California’s school districts.
Citing afterschool, vocational and other programs, Nemko also said the county office serves nearly 5,000 students annually, compared to St. Helena’s 1,375.
“We are a fiscal watchdog. ... As such, how could I enrich one of the richest districts in this county at the expense of the taxpayer?” she asked.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
That's Me wrote on Dec 22, 2008 7:09 AM:
winemd wrote on Dec 22, 2008 10:58 AM:
Native74 wrote on Dec 22, 2008 1:07 PM:
Where are the other top 5% recipients in the State? Is Napa one of them? If you are going to use percentages then include the other 'few' locations. Or perhaps NVR only included part of Nemkos quotations in this press release.
In addition to property tax, is St. Helena receiving any other County Taxable items? For example of all the aircraft stationed at the Napa County Airport, about 75% of the tax goes to schools - which districts? A lot of upvalley vineyard businesses have their aircraft stationed in south napa...it would be interesting to know who prospers from this. "
napablogger wrote on Dec 22, 2008 1:33 PM:
It appears that the law is on Nemko's side. It really doesn't matter whether St Helena is rich or poor, what matters is the law. If this is the system that the voters put in place then we have to live with it. If we don't like it we should change the law. "
jt wrote on Dec 22, 2008 4:15 PM: