NVR Logo
Cuts threaten developmentally disabled
Sunday, December 07, 2008
Save and Share Share
Yes, we can!

Boy, were those exciting words Barack Obama spoke to thousands of Americans in Chicago and millions more of us watching on television after the new president-elect was declared the winner on election night.
There are so many things in our country that need fixing and so many opportunities for building a brighter future. And then, just like that, we have a new champion who says, “Yes we can!”

So much hope. But so short-lived.
It’s hard enough to try to understand the global economic meltdown. And now, we’re told California’s state budget that was late, but passed in September, is in much deeper trouble than we ever dreamed. The

$15 billion crunch we thought we dealt with is now projected to hit $28 billion over the next two years.
And the political leadership is saying, “No we can’t!”

Thus, the budget fight resumes.

Politicians in Sacramento have gone to their usual corners. Democrats say we have to raise revenues. No way, say stalwart anti-tax Republicans, we have to cut spending. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger says we have to do both. Some leaders say Washington needs to give California one of those bailouts everybody is looking for.

Meanwhile, here at Becoming Independent the battle continues on behalf of people living with developmental disabilities. Our agency, the largest such nonprofit organization in the North Bay serving this special group of citizens, provides assistance to some 1,100 men, women and children in Sonoma, Solano and Napa counties.

We are dedicated to making sure people with disabilities enjoy all the opportunities they can manage. We help them find work. We help them to live as independent as possible. We challenge their creative talents through the arts. We open up the world of education to them. We advocate for their civil rights.

In the process of all this, Becoming Independent helps support a community of workers and taxpayers, people who are living meaningful lives and contributing to society just like everybody else, except that they are doing it while overcoming huge challenges caused by cognitive disabilities, autism, Down syndrome, learning and physical disabilities, or some other condition they were born with.

Now, the state is facing this fiscal and economic calamity and among the first solutions is to reduce the amount of money that supports the people Becoming Independent and other organizations like ours exist to help.

The governor’s latest budget proposal calls for cutting billions of dollars and much of the cutting begins very low on the economic ladder.

People with disabilities will have their SSI checks cut by $40. That may not sound like a lot until you realize that they’re living on only $870 a month now.

North Bay Regional Center, part of a network of state centers that distributes state funds to agencies like Becoming Independent throughout California, will be cut 3 percent. We can expect that North Bay, which was on track to provide Becoming Independent with about $13.3 million this year, will pass that 3 percent cut on to Becoming Independent, a $408,000 revenue reduction.

Many of the people Becoming Independent serves are able to live independently thanks to the help of already very low paid “in-home supportive services” workers. These workers help people with disabilities prepare meals, bathe, and run their small households. The governor suggests reducing state support for these indispensable workers to minimum wage plus 60 cents an hour for health benefits. How long can these workers survive on that income?

Becoming Independent is not a special case in this budget nightmare, although our cause is very special. Many other vital organizations that serve disabled people and others with serious physical, emotional and other challenges are facing funding shortfalls. So are public schools and higher education. So are our cities.

I’m not sure just what Sacramento or Washington should do to solve this financial crisis. But here at Becoming Independent, we have no choice but to continue to provide services for the people in our community who have developmental disabilities.

Eliminating services is just not an option.

Is the state suggesting that we cut people as the legislature cuts funds? Our answer is simple.

No, we won’t.

(Weaver is CEO of Becoming Independent.)
9 comment(s)

db76 wrote on Dec 7, 2008 8:25 AM:

" It's usually the case that the most vulnerable populations have the least political power, so they're the most likely to be get the biggest cuts. You won't see cuts like these in the dept of corrections. "

kevin wrote on Dec 7, 2008 10:16 AM:

" On the contrary db76, Arnold is trying to make changes in the way that department is run, but the Democrats in the Legislature refuse to include those changes.

The only thing on their mind is to raise taxes... "

Raven wrote on Dec 7, 2008 11:02 AM:

" kevin, db is right....the most vulnerable see the biggest cuts....and when was the last time corrections even saw a freeze, much less a cut....answer, never...instead we always cut from the politically weakest. "

Dwayne wrote on Dec 7, 2008 12:10 PM:

" How do you run your household when things go sour financially...??? You prioritize your spending... No other option...

However, when you can control the income by gouging taxpayers, there's no need to prioritize...

Unfortunately, the Democrats have never learned that when they raise taxes, tax revenue decreases...

That's what happened with Copia, and also the bailout... Like pouring tons of water on an out of control fire, just for effect, because it's too late to do any good... "

glenroy wrote on Dec 7, 2008 2:07 PM:

" Should have thought about that when they were all ‘slap happy’ over Gray Davis’s fiscal insanity…..go back to the old budgets like the rest of us do in periods of economic calamity….government agencies aren’t suffering nearly as much as private citizens who had nothing to do with creating this multifaceted meltdown, other than electing the idiots that caused it….and many of us were opposed to that too.

Welcome to the real world…...or the consequences which ever... "

diehard4ever wrote on Dec 7, 2008 2:45 PM:

" Maybe if every kid with a discipline problem wasn't diagnosed with ADD or ADHD and then drugged, we wouldn't have this problem! "

manxkat wrote on Dec 7, 2008 3:55 PM:

" No government program is too big to be cut. I will quote Jon Coupal, President of the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn:
Those in power in the Capitol -- as well as many local politicians
-- make skillful use of those who rely on government services to
advance their spending agenda. They use children, the disabled, the
elderly, and others who appear vulnerable, to justify increasing
taxes. When reasonable arguments are made that higher taxes in an
already high-tax state could lead to fiscal ruin and less for
everyone, politicians and bureaucrats use these dependent classes as
human shields. " "

db76 wrote on Dec 7, 2008 5:05 PM:

" what does having ADD/ADHD have to do with this article? This article is about developmental disabilities, which are COMPLETELY different. "

steph wrote on Dec 7, 2008 6:12 PM:

" I'm really so curious about how this money is managed.
I don't believe this money provides living expenses, right? I'm curious--does it provide for home care or home visits, and what is the caseload for each manager?
This letter makes it sound like Northbay Center takes a cut of the funding, rather than have it come from the state and go directly to the agency that serves the citizens who need the help. Is that so? Can that agency cut back without affecting care for the mentally challenged folks served by Becoming Independent? The program has some great objectives, and I've actually seen with my own eyes that developmentally disabled (we're talking very, very low IQ, and autistic people, btw) have jobs! They love to go to work, and this is a great end result. I wonder if the same thing can be done with less money? Status quo doesn't work here. A little creativity in the cost-cutting process is in order. Where I work, we are always having to cut back to provide affordable services--just a fact of private-sector life. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy