NVR Logo
Post-election analysis
Sunday, November 16, 2008
Save and Share Share
Dear editor, Barack Obama’s victory offers much food for thought and commentary. The airwaves, TV stations, newspapers and blogs will slice and dice the election results and provide a host of theories as to why he won and what his triumph portends, but I offer here a few ideas of my own.

First, as with so many elections, this was in great measure a rejection of a serving president; the Bush administration was judged a failure in so many areas by so many Americans that any Republican faced an uphill battle. Second, the financial meltdown pushed every other issue to the rear. The cliché, “It’s the economy, stupid,” has rarely been truer. Third, Obama proved to be an inspiring figure for many voters, obviously for African-Americans and the young, but also for a surprising number of older Americans, like myself, who were turned onto politics again by his messages of hope, change, civility and inclusiveness. And fourth, despite John McCain’s effort to present himself as a maverick and to usurp the mantle of “change agent,” he was seen by too many voters as out of touch (“the economy is in good shape”), too old, too negative and too tied to the failed Bush administration.
The election is also, of course, an historic step in our country’s effort to overcome its tragic history of slavery, segregation and racial prejudice. While racism has not been expunged from our midst by Obama’s victory, our nation has demonstrated — most importantly to ourselves, but also to the world — that our commitment to the principles of equality and true democracy is more than just words. We should savor this momentous step, even as we recognize that there are many more steps on this path.

As for the future, we must all hope — even those who did not vote for Obama — that he can fulfill the promise of uniting a sorely divided country, of gathering around himself a professional, bipartisan team of advisors to deal with the truly frightening world financial crisis, of reducing the poisonous atmosphere in Washington so that we can tackle our many other domestic problems, and of restoring our alliances abroad so that we can work together with other countries to confront the global challenges of war, terrorism, fanaticism, global warming and poverty. A tremendous challenge, to be sure, but new beginnings offer new hope and new possibilities.
Sam Fromowitz / Yountville
5 comment(s)

Jasper wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:56 AM:

" Thanx to this writer for an astute and articulate observation. "

glenroy wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:59 AM:

" It is foolish to think Obama is going to unite the country when his entire ‘being’ is class warfare ….who silly is that?

The libs swing between extremes every election….they just haven’t figured out the government doesn’t have the answers for the vast majority of Americans …..overnight the sky collapsed 8 years ago and just as quickly nothing but blue sky’ from now on….soon the libs they’ll do what they always do, gut the intelligence, gut the military, pile on corporate taxes, pile on payroll taxes, pass legislation that panders to the left whether it’s blocking domestic energy development or abandoning Iraq or completely destroying a crippled economy already the consequence of their policy failures….….and they’ll lose their majority in 4 years…if it lasts that long…. all we have at the federal level is another Gray Davis….

Obama's stuck between a rock and a hard spot....so are we. "

kevin wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:25 AM:

" Sam, I hate to burst your little "bubble", but B.O. has NEVER done one thing that can be considered bipartisan. Sorry, it ain't going to happen. If you really wanted bipartisan, you should have voted for someone with a record of bipartisanship like McCain.

The 48% of the country that voted against B.O. are not going to unite behind him just because he tells them to do so.

Also, even among those who supported B.O., he is going to have some very unhappy supporters, very soon.

His Muslim supporters are already miffed that he picked a strong Israel supporter as his chief of staff.

If the terrorist threats materialize (as recent "chatter" has indicated), in a "test" against the new president, and more Americans are killed here at home, that will also wake people up to the fallacy of B.O.'s policies to "negotiate" with the terrorists. Don't expect high approval ratings if that happens.

For all President Bush's faults, he did what he said he would, he kept the country safe after 9/11. Time will tell if B.O. has what it takes to do the same.

So far, his stated policies would indicate otherwise... "

Bauhausfan wrote on Nov 16, 2008 1:01 PM:

" Glenroy - By the way the sky is far from blue as you put it. The country is a disaster as a direct result of right wing Republican ideology in the form the extremist Bush administration. Most non delusional people realize we are on the verge of another Republican depression. "

cordell wrote on Nov 16, 2008 3:32 PM:

" Wow! 9/11 wasn't Bush's fault because the table was set by Clinton. Yet if there is another attack on the USA it already is being blamed on Obama who isn't even in office at this date. The thought processes of some of these commenters is mind boggling. I'm so glad that Bush kept the country safe AFTER 9/11. Great work. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy