Wrong-way traffic driving neighbors to complain
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
November 21st, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 18th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
November 13th, 2009
November 12th, 2009
A one-way street does not good neighbors make.
Residents of the Green Meadows subdivision in south Napa are asking the city to crack down on scofflaws from Sheveland Ranch who ignore one-way street restrictions between the two neighborhoods.
When the city approved the homes at Sheveland Ranch in 2003, the extension of Greenbach Street into Sheveland Ranch was limited to southbound traffic.
This restriction was intended to prevent the new residents at Sheveland Ranch from using Greenbach as a northbound shortcut to Imola Avenue.
Green Meadow residents have been complaining ever since that motorists from Sheveland Ranch ignore the “Do Not Enter” signs.
Thirty-two vehicles broke the one-way rule during a one-week survey in late October, the city’s Traffic Advisory Committee learned Thursday.
“These are flagrant violations to us,” John Paul, a Green Meadows resident, told committee members. Over a year’s time, that’s 1,664 violations “that nobody seems to want to do something about,” he said.
Green Meadow residents have tried flagging down the violators, many of whom speed, and talking to the Sheveland Ranch homeowners’ association, but with little success, the committee was told.
“These people are very arrogant,” Betty O’Grady said of the worst of the scofflaws.
The city’s Public Works Department conceded that frequent police stakeouts hadn’t stopped the violators. “We’ve created an almost impossible situation,” Public Works Director Mike O’Bryon said.
Over the past 26 months, police reported issuing 10 citations for wrong-way driving into Green Meadows. A radar trailer was parked on Greenbach 11 times in response to complaints about speeders.
Officers have monitored Greenbach Street many times without observing any violations, while noting that Greenbach carries a low level of traffic, the Public Works Department reported.
The city could install a gate triggered by southbound vehicles or close the street connection entirely, city staff said. A spike strip that shredded the tires of violators was also mentioned.
The best solution might be to leave the street connection as it is, but increase police enforcement, public works said.
Traffic-actuated gates could turn out to be a major expense to maintain, officials said.
Helena Allison, a city traffic consultant, said some cities have had success handing out radar guns to residents who could build court cases against violators.
This was rejected as too confrontational, putting Green Meadows residents at risk.
Police Chief Rich Melton suggested installing a camera that snapped a picture of violators.
Tom Trzesniewski, a planning commissioner who sits on the traffic committee with two council members, suggested dramatically raising the fine for one-way violations. “Bring it up to a thousand bucks,” he said.
The city’s police and fire departments do not want the street connection closed, saying that Green Meadows residents need a second way to exit their subdivision in an emergency.
The Traffic Advisory Committee asked the police department to look at the feasibility of boosting citation fines and installing a camera.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
jpcrash wrote on Nov 16, 2008 2:20 AM:
jwk wrote on Nov 16, 2008 3:52 AM:
Dirty Napkin wrote on Nov 16, 2008 5:27 AM:
FaithNHope wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:00 AM:
I am talking about the kind that is used at the Disneyland parking lots and also at other big events/parking lots. The spikes will slash the driver's tires if they are going against the accepted flow of traffic. Usually there are BIG warning signs posted which tell the driver that their tires will be severely damaged if they proceed further.
I'm not trying to be mean by suggesting this. I am just saying that it is a method that would work. "
jluros wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:38 AM:
Get a grip, people. "
SouthNapa wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:47 AM:
kevin wrote on Nov 16, 2008 8:59 AM:
Another idiotic law that no one obeys.
When will they learn... "
nan03 wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:12 AM:
reason-ator wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:19 AM:
They shouldn't get a disproportionate share of our resources unless they pay extra. "
Kiddo Young wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:37 AM:
If it's that big of a deal, why not just close it off? So what if the residents of Greenbach St. don't have a second exit from their neighborhood in case of an emergency? I certainly don't. The only way out of my neighborhood is by going down Atrium Pkwy to S. Jefferson St. The Green Meadows subdivision had been there for decades before the second exit was created back in 2003.
If there was an emergency, and I needed to get out of here quickly by going the wrong way down a one way stretch of road that's about 150 ft in length, I'd do it in a heartbeat. So, to Mrs. Betty O'Grady...if that makes me arrogant, then so be it. "
old_napan wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:43 AM:
napanana wrote on Nov 16, 2008 11:38 AM:
I guess I can complain about the fact that when I bought my home 30 some odd years ago.....the traffic on my street was just about nill. Now with all the new development ...I have CARS driving down MY street and I just don't like it! Oh What to do...what to do..... "
John Richards wrote on Nov 16, 2008 3:13 PM:
Seriously though, a tire shredder strip might not be good for fire engines and ambulances responding to an emergency. California law does not permit such a thing on public streets for a good reason. "
asdfa2355 wrote on Nov 16, 2008 3:51 PM:
mafi wrote on Nov 16, 2008 4:50 PM:
npma wrote on Nov 16, 2008 7:52 PM:
old_napan wrote on Nov 16, 2008 10:14 PM:
whoa cowboy wrote on Nov 17, 2008 12:49 AM:
smoothsailin1234 wrote on Nov 20, 2008 11:48 PM:
smoothsailin1234 wrote on Nov 21, 2008 12:02 AM: