The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
palegreen wrote on Nov 4, 2008 8:45 PM:
Hear Ye wrote on Nov 4, 2008 11:17 PM:
TrickleDown wrote on Nov 5, 2008 12:40 AM:
noblindershere wrote on Nov 5, 2008 5:51 AM:
Ruff Limblog wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:05 AM:
That would be a clear sign that the Theocrats hope to win the struggle between the Wall Street Weasels, the Theocrats, and the Military Empire Builders for ownership of the Republican Party.
~Ruff "
napawriter wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:13 AM:
GerryKP wrote on Nov 5, 2008 7:21 AM:
"We believe that the best of America is not all in Washington, D.C. ... We believe that the best of America is in these small towns that we get to visit, and in these wonderful little pockets of what I call the real America, being here with all of you hard working very patriotic, um, very, um, pro-America areas of this great nation." --Sarah Palin, speaking at a fundraiser in Greensoboro, N.C., Oct. 16, 2008 "
wipemedown wrote on Nov 5, 2008 8:18 AM:
napahistorian wrote on Nov 5, 2008 9:07 AM:
Palin is a very ambitious woman who will definitely come back to the scenes in 8 years or so. She is not the dull woman that the media was able to sell, it fact because of her political ambition she will continue to climb up the Republican ladder and secure herself a victory --of some sort-- in 2016.
Palin was also able to secure herself as a smart and appealing politician after her debate with Biden. "
a teacher wrote on Nov 5, 2008 9:07 AM:
P.L.U.R wrote on Nov 5, 2008 10:28 AM:
misfit wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:40 PM:
kevin wrote on Nov 5, 2008 1:59 PM:
antipc wrote on Nov 5, 2008 2:06 PM:
Should be a cake walk after four years of Obama, backed by a Democrat backed House & Senate. "
mytwocents wrote on Nov 5, 2008 4:43 PM:
I say God bless American, the people have made their choice and it is the dawn of a new day. "
wipemedown wrote on Nov 5, 2008 6:25 PM:
Somthinstan
North Koreastan???
Shucks .... she was almost joe the president "
krusty wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:13 AM:
winghunter wrote on Nov 6, 2008 7:49 AM:
Sandra wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:05 AM:
" wipemedown, Palin said she would name her next child Zamboni. No joke. "
Geez....YES JOKE!
I gotta wonder about some of you...what a bunch of sore winners. "
PlasticPinkFlamingo wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:26 AM:
Native74 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:40 AM:
notshocked wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:59 AM:
I hope Palin chooses her family and special child over an uber-demanding role in world politics, for which most people feel she is not capable. A delightful woman, I'm sure, but not ready/able for the world's stage. Maybe she can get a job in broadcast journalism? She's got the looks and with a teleprompter she might actually sound credible. "
Napa_Citizen wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:01 AM:
I hope and pray she doesnt let ignorant people who have nothing better to do then tear others down, and attack get her down. I think she is a wonderful lady, with a good heart, and a great family. I think its also awesome she made history in 2008 being the 1st WOMAN VP candidate.... Women are amazing - and its fantastic to see us making strides in our own country's political system by getting in there and making change happen.
I hope she runs - she will have my vote!
Sarah Palin for President 2012 ! ! ! "
dmom wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:10 AM:
selim wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:39 AM:
Kevin, face it: supply side economics has failed the last two times it has been implemented in the United States. IT WON'T WORK. Time for something different. Deal with it. "
jmo wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:52 AM:
Laugh now but remember you read it here first. "
sunny wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:09 AM:
funnyme wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:18 AM:
We know, deep down you all wish you have grown to be like her! "
mominapa wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:21 AM:
She would better serve her country if she would embrace a cause that should be near and dear to her heart - issues relating to special needs kids. Hey, maybe she could have one of her born again, holy roller, faith healer buddies cure the problem.
She's a joke and it will be a sad day for America if she throws her hat in the political ring again. She's been up north too long. I think her brain is frozen. She might want to ponder the problem of over-population as well. "
Mr. Burns wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:41 AM:
krusty wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:56 AM:
antipc wrote on Nov 6, 2008 11:03 AM:
Your tolerance should be an example for all children. "
a teacher wrote on Nov 6, 2008 11:06 AM:
If Obama falls short as president, We may see her as a candidate. Otherwise I doubt she'll get the nomination as the republicans will try with someone more moderate. She could easilly fit into the Ronald Regan mold if she is a serious study and ambitious enough. I think she is both. "
cordell wrote on Nov 6, 2008 11:24 AM:
1wino wrote on Nov 6, 2008 11:40 AM:
You people are just plain awful. Anyone who has a different idea or thought is greeted with pure hate. Its just pathetic. Hope? Change? Obviously not in this county!
Seriously, all of this hate IS the problem. Is this really the example you want to set for our children? We are ALL Americans, including Sarah Palin. Its time all of you got off the "Hate BUs" and started to have some respect for one another. Take a look at yourselves. Its embarrassing. "
b14him2 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:02 PM:
Sandra wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:17 PM:
There is a comedian called Ron White. Have you ever seen his act? One of his best lines is, "You can't fix stupid."
I read the article. "Zamboni" ....It was very funny. That is one of the things I liked about Palin. She has a sense of humor. "
Mr. Burns wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:23 PM:
reason-ator wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:38 PM:
What I DIDN'T expect was that so many otherwise-intelligent people would let mainstram media lead them around by the nose. "
1wino wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:42 PM:
Irregardless of who drove the hate bus in the run up to the election, it appears that you are now at the wheel. Do any of you truly feel that this kind of hate toward our fellow Americans and leaders is really going to make this a better place? Lets hear thoughts about how, perhaps, this "change" will bring us together as a nation. Isnt that what Obama said he wanted? I, for one, am all for it. All of the uneducated hate mongering is getting pretty boring. "
reason-ator wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:43 PM:
I read a news report recently about an African-American from Canada. Why isn't he an African-Canadian ?
Or even better, just a Canadian ?
People are people. Why do they even have to have a label ? "
NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:43 PM:
--Dan "
nanner wrote on Nov 6, 2008 12:59 PM:
North to Alaska I hope....
WAY NORTH......... "
krusty wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:05 PM:
krusty wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:42 PM:
reader wrote on Nov 6, 2008 1:43 PM:
Funny thing, the Palin didn't know that Africa was a continent, but thought it was a country. "
NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Nov 6, 2008 2:10 PM:
luv1mom wrote on Nov 6, 2008 2:18 PM:
Mr. Burns wrote on Nov 6, 2008 2:21 PM:
luv1mom wrote on Nov 6, 2008 2:21 PM:
jmo wrote on Nov 6, 2008 3:10 PM:
vago69 wrote on Nov 6, 2008 5:14 PM:
And Napa_Citizen, Gov. Palin was hardly the first woman VP candidate. I think you meant to say Republican VP candidate as Geraldine Ferraro ran in 1984 and there have been a whole host of minor party candidates dating back to 1884. Sorry for being so pedantic. "
antipc wrote on Nov 6, 2008 6:58 PM:
Joe B wrote on Nov 6, 2008 7:06 PM:
kevin wrote on Nov 6, 2008 7:07 PM:
Sandra wrote on Nov 6, 2008 7:11 PM:
wyngyrl wrote on Nov 6, 2008 8:08 PM:
Duck wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:41 PM:
Mr President elect Barack Obama: Yes we can!!!! "
kevin wrote on Nov 6, 2008 9:49 PM:
Can you imagine our founding fathers running around during the Revolution shouting "Yes we can"?
Pathetic isn't it? "
krusty wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:10 PM:
It's a terrible thing isn't it? Decades of struggle by African-Americans and they finally feel like they have a voice in this country. Millions of young people and millions of minorities finally taking part in the election process because someone inspired them and gave them reason to believe our country can be better. A global respect for the man we just elected President of the United States.
Pathetic isn't it? "
TheDudeAbides wrote on Nov 6, 2008 10:44 PM:
Injoy wrote on Nov 6, 2008 11:00 PM:
Like it says in my child's classroom...
Be nice or leave... "
Hear Ye wrote on Nov 7, 2008 1:10 AM:
noblindershere wrote on Nov 7, 2008 6:25 AM:
Does it also say in your child's classroom, "pay attention and learn something, so that you are not embarrassed in the future" Or is the focus on being nice?
We are talking about a top leader of the US. Are we being mean? No, just having expectations of a leader that are not out of the question. We expect our third graders to know that Africa is a continent!
Kevin, you are so out of touch...
How anyone can not see this moment in history as nothing but outstanding is beyond words.
Obama will not disappoint....the team he is putting together is already outstanding. "
grape wrote on Nov 7, 2008 8:00 AM:
To me Palin is the perfect example of a woman that has it all and she got there by being smart, beautiful and with the support of a non-sexist husband. "
JimClark wrote on Nov 7, 2008 9:32 AM:
James Madison’s offering in his offering that became the Federalist number 5 explained differences between “factions” and true philosophy. In my humble opinion Sarah Palin is a philosophical Conservative as opposed to a factional republican. I could not in proper philosophical conscience vote for either “party” (faction). Both political parties have been and continue to be on self-destruct. That affects us all; The People our Constitution considered us to be and become. karl marx referred to us as the “people”; most marxists do. That demeans the individual and that has given the American People status unworthy of The Law of our land; no matter how factions abuse and misinterpret our Constitution. What is so wrong being a “soccer” Mom? To my mind, Sarah Palin is a fleeting moment that needs to be captured and retained. Feminism is definitely Not some 1980s political guilt trip created by a faction. "
transplant wrote on Nov 7, 2008 10:42 AM:
wyngyrl wrote on Nov 7, 2008 12:11 PM:
Raven wrote on Nov 7, 2008 1:36 PM:
but yeah i think it is kind of important for a VP to know the continents... "
leah wrote on Nov 7, 2008 2:14 PM:
rogers wrote on Nov 7, 2008 2:37 PM:
Folks are tired of bottom-of-the-class poor performers. Palin could use another degree (perhaps in international relations?) before she thinks about running again. I would rather have "Joe the plumber" be a real plumber (perhaps with a real business license?) and Sarah Palin a governor of a state with less than a million people. She needs to prove an understanding of complexities within the lower 49 states (including Hawaii).
Palin needs to prove her long term competence and ability to understand national and world issues. Perhaps in 2012 she should look toward a position in Congress if she can deflate her ego enough. She was not presidential material at the time of the election and McCain made a huge mistake picking her. This time America chose smarts over an energizer. We'll be the better for it. "
luv1mom wrote on Nov 7, 2008 2:56 PM:
Transplant: Ha ha, that is what my husband said too! "
1wino wrote on Nov 7, 2008 3:05 PM:
Most of you act as though you know Sarah Palin personally. You also take what the media feeds you and then run with it. You end up looking and sounding like a bunch of uneducated hate mongers. have any of you achieved what she has been able to accomplish? I dont necessarily agree with her politics but that aside, she is a pretty amazing woman. Do I want her as my President? No. Do I respect her as a person. You betcha. Whats shes done for her state is pretty amazing if you care to get past all of your childish hate and actually read some non biased factual information. 5 kids, a small successful business, a good marriage and the Governor of Alaska. I'd say that pretty solid and unless any of you can say you've achieved more, I think you should give her a little credit. The whole "I hate you because of your politics" thing is boring and totally played out. Generally speaking, hate is reserved for those who are not educated enough to discuss the issues. I'd say we have a whole bunch of dummies in here if thats the case. "
antipc wrote on Nov 7, 2008 3:19 PM:
She has more experience governing than Obama & doesn't have the skeletons in the closet that he has. How blind can people be? Truly amazing. "
Maya wrote on Nov 7, 2008 5:26 PM:
dreluvwine26 wrote on Nov 7, 2008 6:16 PM:
antipc wrote on Nov 7, 2008 8:10 PM:
Imagine the mainstream media espousing the same garbage about Hillary two years ago.
There's your reality check. "
bettye wrote on Nov 7, 2008 9:07 PM:
Bauhausfan wrote on Nov 7, 2008 9:33 PM:
I, personally, am thankful that she will lead the party to where it needs to be. "
Sandra wrote on Nov 8, 2008 8:12 AM:
Grape as for women being the true minority....isn't it interesting that many of us "women" were thrilled to perpetuate that during this campaign?
Lot's of self hate? I think it was because Palin just did not measure up to the small minded unwritten rules of what a feminist should be. How dare she be successful, and not hold every view the liberal left holds? The audacity of her. I have to say, that while I did not agree with many of her personal beliefs, the strength of character that she displayed through this hate fest impressed me tremendously. I also loved her sense of humor. It is obvious to me that most people just were so full of venom and a lack of a sense of humor, it just went over their heads....Some great examples of Palin's humor...naming a child Zambone, and being good at foriegn relations because she can see russia from her porch.....Kind of similar to Obama's statement that there were 56, or was it 57 states. "
Paddy wrote on Nov 8, 2008 10:31 AM:
reader wrote on Nov 8, 2008 10:37 AM:
Sara Palin does not have strenth of character. Palin does have enormous strength of ego and a belief of self-entitlement, which over-shadows what should be her good judgement. In psychology, it is called narsissistic personality disorder.
I predict the Palin will soon begin to publically defend herself against the criticism instead of reflecting on what went wrong, looking at her own short-comings, and educating herself. Blaming others vs. taking responsibility is a symptom of narcissism, as well. "
Bauhausfan wrote on Nov 8, 2008 10:53 AM:
reader wrote on Nov 8, 2008 11:27 AM:
She definitly needs to go back and take English 101 and learn how to speak a grammarically correct and full sentence.
Can you imagine her speaking to foreign diplomates as VP? If you think foreigners laugh at us now just be thankful the Palin is out of sight for at least 4 more years. "
napanabroad wrote on Nov 8, 2008 12:56 PM:
I grew up in Napa and now work in the Middle East at a sovereign wealth fund. Why, because the US is killing itself by turning itself into slow growth, big government Socialist Europe. This new administration is on a fast track there
On a side note, the 10% drop after the election was investors dumping US assets because of Obama’s rhetoric. Your growth will stall under his administration, like it does everywhere else in the world when government begins to play a large role.
Sarah Palin was a breath of fresh air in a stale world. She may not have had the polish of Obama, but she was far more real. She believes in small government, self determination, low taxes and a strong commitment to family values. I like the vast majority of Americans believe in the same.
She energized many people like me….people who believe that people should make decisions, not the government and it is better to incentivize people rather than patronize them.
She does not believe in government dependence, high taxes, and an anything goes culture. I was an independent until I saw the REAL democrat agenda of hatred and fear of dissenting voices.
If Ms. Palin decides to run in 2012 against the “Chosen One”, she will receive as much support from free thinking Americans as Obama did from the Kool-aid drinking masses. I for one hope she does run, I will donate heavily as will other conservative Napans, who believe in America and its founding principles. "
49er wrote on Nov 8, 2008 2:58 PM:
misfit wrote on Nov 8, 2008 4:50 PM:
Raven wrote on Nov 8, 2008 6:30 PM:
and your explanation of the drop in the Dow is not the one held by the vast majority of analysts....their take was a selling off of assets ahead of anticipated bad economic news this week, such as the earning reports and the new, higher unemployment figures.... "
tiredofcomplainingnapkins wrote on Nov 8, 2008 9:41 PM:
Hear Ye wrote on Nov 8, 2008 10:18 PM:
Africa is NOT a country, South Africa is. Also, the election is over so you can quit with the tired talking points, lies, and half-truths. If Palin energizes you then great but the majority of the country doesn't agree. From my standpoint the "free thinkers" won the election. "Kool-aid" drinking is just another tired expression that everyone uses to describe anyone that disagrees with them. "
napanabroad wrote on Nov 9, 2008 1:11 AM:
Raven, most analysts are dead wrong and are reactive rather than proactive. They follow the herd as it is too dangerous to stick your neck out negatively. The same goes for portfolio managers who are typically very late into a stocks move. But that is a longer story.
Foreign investors (the life blood of the American credit system) are assessing his statements and so far there is extreme alarm. Capital gains, large social engineering programs….where is all this money going to come from?
Yep, tax increases on businesses and "the wealthy". These are the very sources that create growth and jobs. Guess what? After he raises taxes on these two groups, where will he go to fund all these programs?
Just wait until you get the bill from the auto industry and the airlines.......anyone else we forgot in this bailout? Hospitality industry, Hollywood, Manufacturing?
We will see how the great social experiment works out, but I doubt I will be buying assets in America anytime soon. "
Raven wrote on Nov 9, 2008 7:35 AM:
we have seen the era of lowering taxes on business and the wealthy and you can see the current results....more than 750,000 jobs lost so far this year.... "
Sandra wrote on Nov 9, 2008 9:30 AM:
You must have a very short memory....Have you forgotten all the acusations of Condaleeza Rice being Bush's "Girl", Or "Aunt Tom". Condi Rice received much venom in her early days. Accusations of low inteligence, being a Bush mouth piece, puppet, not really being black, etc. I think the only thing not similar was attacks about motherhood, as she doesn't have 5 kids...It was as sickening as what has happened to Palin. And I just bet if Palin was in the public's eye as long as Rice has been the nastiness would die down around her also.
Another example of "Proper" liberal feminist venom was what happened to Tammy Bruce. If you do not know her story, pick up a copy of her book, "The Death of Right and Wrong".
Bauhausfan,
She absolutely was joking about Russia....I am amazed at how low people will sink to spread nastiiness...I should be surprised that people of supposed intelligence revel so much in wallowing in the filth of spreading rumor and innuendo. Anyone who would actually think someone is serious in saying they would be good at foriegn relations because they can see Russia from their porch...well it certainly makes me wonder about the I.Q. of that person.
I get Palin's humor because I have a very similar sense of humor. It is too bad so many Palin haters have lost theirs. "
Sandra wrote on Nov 9, 2008 9:59 AM:
We have people criticising her choice of names, and actually believeing "Zambone" is a serious choice for her next child (if she had another). We have someone putting down her education because she has not achieved a master's degree (seems she been very busy to me, I am amazed at what she has achieved), and we have a person displaying the superiority of thinking they "see" the big picture of the republican agenda better than others, and they want to watch it crash and burn as exampled by "I hope she does lead the party into the future she sees. It is my fondest wish. "
(and if this person is who I think it is...well it's very alarming to me, to say the least). We have another denegrating Alaskans in general (I wonder how Miss Fit even sees Alaska from her high pinnacle of superiority).
I really wonder at the self satisfied attitude displayed here. I wonder if they all look in the mirror every morning and revel in just how special they are. It is not easy to maintain this level of specialness...after all, reality must try to creep in on occasion...But, I guess as long as they maintain their illusion of being so much more enlightened and superior to everyone else they do not notice the dark side they so gleefully display for all to see.
Gosh, makes me proud to be a fellow human being....LOL and this is after their side won...OMG, can you even begin to imagine the whining if they had lost???? "
Joanne wrote on Nov 9, 2008 11:41 AM:
On the matter of us "small minded feminists" failing to embrace Palin: I think some of the policies that she has implemented while in office, like requiring rape-victims to pay for their own forensic rape kits, when she was mayor of Wasilla may have more to do with our negative view of her than did our "small-mindedness." But then, maybe that's just me bein’ all, ya’ know, “small minded.”
And frankly, Sandra, perhaps a little self-reflection is in order here. For, with all due respect, there are many, many people who participate in these discussions who could just as easily have made this observation about you, based on the consistent tone of your posts on this venue:
“I really wonder at the self satisfied attitude displayed here. I wonder if [she looks] in the mirror every morning and revel[s] in just how special [she is]. It is not easy to maintain this level of specialness...after all, reality must try to creep in on occasion...But, I guess as long as [she maintains her] illusion of being so much more enlightened and superior to everyone else [she does] not notice the dark side [she] so gleefully display[s] for all to see.” "
reader wrote on Nov 9, 2008 12:02 PM:
Not to mention our extreme relief for not having to live with one more inarticulate, self absorbed, my-way-or-the-highway, dim light bulb for another 4 years. Whoopi!
The republican party has four years to get it right and make a smart choice for the next election. I really don't think they will choose to self-distruct a second time, by picking Palin. She had her chance, she blew it, she's done. "
bettye wrote on Nov 9, 2008 1:28 PM:
wipemedown wrote on Nov 9, 2008 3:51 PM:
Sandra wrote on Nov 9, 2008 4:46 PM:
So with all due respect towards you, I would ask you to read this blog in its entirety, and then deny the tone has been small minded, or not shown people to continue to be very sore winners.
I am just astounded by the behavior exhibited by the winners. It is a sad reflection on them. You can claim that me pointing out this very disapointing behavior is engaging in the same behavior, if you want. After all, you have a right to your opinion. I however disagree with your point.
I heard Palin in an interview about the Russian remark, and she said that while she was "Joking" about the foriegn relation experience by having Russia so close, that she was aware of how small the world was by being able to see Russia. Now why everyone ran with this as a reason to denegrate her is beyond me. It is the same kind of behavior people displayed about Obama and the 57 states remark as proof he did not know there was 50.
Did you approve of that or think it was valid?
To Reader (also)
I object to this double standard, especially from feminists towards a fellow woman. I take this behavior seriously, because it is just nasty and wrong. "
Sandra wrote on Nov 9, 2008 4:59 PM:
I also like a good joke, probably better than the next guy. I thought the comment about going home to put lipstick on her dog was funny, or going home to name her next children rake, pruple, and maverick.....now that is funny also...BUT, I do not think inferring all Alaskans are stupid is funny. It is mean spirited. It is the mean spirited small minded comments I object to. There have been far too many. And yes I do take it seriously. The childish comments mainly reflect on those making them. I do not care if people are giddy, or not. Giddy should equal happy, not mean and childish. There is a wolf pack mentality being displayed on this blog by those who should be giddy and happy. You don't find that the least little bit sad? "
misfit wrote on Nov 9, 2008 6:12 PM:
misfit wrote on Nov 9, 2008 6:25 PM:
reader wrote on Nov 9, 2008 6:40 PM:
I did compare Palin to inarticulate, dim light bulb Bush. "
watchin&listenin wrote on Nov 9, 2008 7:51 PM:
Joanne wrote on Nov 9, 2008 8:26 PM:
“Couric: You've cited Alaska's proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that?
Sarah Palin: That Alaska has a very narrow maritime border between a foreign country, Russia, and, on our other side, the land-boundary that we have with Canada. It's funny that a comment like that was kinda made to … I don't know, you know … reporters.
Couric: Mocked?
Palin: Yeah, mocked, I guess that's the word, yeah.
Couric: Well, explain to me why that enhances your foreign-policy credentials.
Palin: Well, it certainly does, because our, our next-door neighbors are foreign countries, there in the state that I am the executive of. And there…
Couric: Have you ever been involved in any negotiations, for example, with the Russians?
Palin: We have trade missions back and forth, we do. It's very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia. As Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there, they are right next to our state.”
On throwing stones: you, Sandra, live in a glass house. Go back and read your own posts. "Small minded unwritten rules" looks and feels like a stone to me, as does much of what you have additionally posted here. "
Joanne wrote on Nov 9, 2008 8:51 PM:
But it has now emerged that her demagogic tone may have unintentionally encouraged white supremacists to go even further.
The Secret Service warned the Obama family in mid October that they had seen a dramatic increase in the number of threats against the Democratic candidate, coinciding with Mrs Palin's attacks."
So let’s be honest about this: Her behavior went beyond mean. It was actually dangerously inflammatory. It’s no wonder so many of the comments on this Web page reflect a less than charitable attitude toward Governor Palin.
What’s that old saying again? Oh, yeah: You reap what you sow. I’d say, by comparison, even if everyone of the negative comments about her that have been offered here are considered altogether, they still fall far short of the inflammatory rhetoric that she dished out during the campaign. "
Ruff Limblog wrote on Nov 9, 2008 9:53 PM:
In our country there lots of living Americans who remember where they were when they heard that MLK was shot.
In our country there lots of living Americans who remember where they were when they heard that RFK was shot.
It is NOT OK to stir up the lunatic fringe to kill political opponents... NOT EVEN if you are a Republican.
~Ruff "
bubble wrote on Nov 9, 2008 9:56 PM:
The nomination of Sarah Palin as VP was the nail in the coffin, so to speak, for this life long Republican woman. I proudly voted for Barack Hussein Obama.
I do not think that I have left the Republican Party; it is the party who has left me.
Napanabroad, thank you for looking back in on your old home town paper, but please do not spread (or try to confirm) misinformation that Africa is a country. It kind of wrecks your credibility. "
Bauhausfan wrote on Nov 10, 2008 5:52 AM:
To put it in a nutshell, they believe they lost because they weren't conservative enough. What do they base that on? Not the exit poll questions that were asked of voters priorities, but on their own conviction and knowledge.
I sincerely hope they purge those moderate elements and make the party even more extremist that it already is. See, in their minds, the Bush years have been wonderful and fantastic and history will proof them right. They really and truly believe this. Chew on that thought for a moment and ask yourself what kind of person could think that. "
Bauhausfan wrote on Nov 10, 2008 6:00 AM:
Authoritarian conservatives are primarily anti-government, except where they believe the government can be useful to impose moral or social order (for example, with respect to matters like abortion, prayer in schools, or prohibiting sexually-explicit information from public view). Similarly, Republicans' limited-government attitude does not apply regarding national security, where they feel there can never be too much government activity - nor are the rights and liberties of individuals respected when national security is involved. Authoritarian Republicans do oppose the government interfering with markets and the economy, however -- and generally oppose the government's doing anything to help anyone they feel should be able to help themselves."
The excerpt above was written by John Dean. It is a good summary of the ideology of the extreme right wing, which you can now call the Republican party. "
jefferson wrote on Nov 10, 2008 8:13 AM:
Sandra wrote on Nov 10, 2008 9:12 AM:
I did not mean to infer that you were the one saying Alaskans were stupid. That was Miss Fit, up to her usual .....well civil words escape me here.
I was addressing you saying I was taking the giddiness too seriously. I was using that as an example of what was giddy. I was pointing out to you that I did not find wolf pack mentality akin to giddy, that was all.
And it does not surprise me in the least that the wolves did not even take pause but continue to chew on Palin with giddy abandon.
Bauhausfan,
I have a recommendation for you. Pick up Tammy Bruce's book, "The Death or Right, and Wrong". There is quite a bit on group think, and how the democratic party has veered so extremely to the left, that many of us former liberals are now being called republicans by the same left. Group think is very interesting, and it abounds here. "
grape wrote on Nov 10, 2008 9:21 AM:
Secondly, there are still a lot of people who believe Obama is not who he claims to be. He really did have friendships with many radicals and that's a fact. I guess it all depends on what you personally think is radical.
Becoming President Elect does not automatically prove Obama didn't associate with the wrong crowd and that Palin was lying...it just means a lot of people don't care or don't believe the associations and voted for the man.
I for one don't trust him and my feeling comes from many hours of research on the man, not from Palin saying he associated with radicals. "
JimClark wrote on Nov 10, 2008 12:32 PM:
James Madison’s offering in his offering that became the Federalist number 5 explained differences between “factions” and true philosophy. In my humble opinion Sarah Palin is a philosophical Conservative as opposed to a factional republican. I could not in proper philosophical conscience vote for either “party” (faction). Both political parties have been and continue to be on self-destruct. That affects us all; The People our Constitution considered us to be and become. karl marx referred to us as the “people”; most marxists do. That demeans the individual and that has given the American People status unworthy of The Law of our land; no matter how factions abuse and misinterpret our Constitution. What is so wrong being a “soccer” Mom? To my mind, Sarah Palin is a fleeting moment that needs to be captured and retained. Feminism is definitely Not some 1980s political guilt trip created by a faction. "
reason-ator wrote on Nov 10, 2008 12:45 PM:
But it's OK to spew hatred here, because it just inspires love and not anger. I can tell. "
Raven wrote on Nov 10, 2008 1:26 PM:
as for 'the people' show me a politician anywhere who does not refer to 'the people'....demeaning? Naw....because as much as we would like to espouse our rugged individualism, we are a part of a larger group, the people.. "
napanabroad wrote on Nov 10, 2008 2:04 PM:
But since you insist on "proof" (already old news once it hits any form of the media). Morgan Stanley's report 2 days ago highlighted 25%+ losses in Sov funds.
Its conclusion: “We cannot rule out some SWFs becoming sellers of risky assets.”----between the lines----US equities.
But, I really cold care less if you believe me or not.
As for the 750,000 jobs. How many have been created since 2001? It is the business cycle Raven and due to some poor choices by home owners, banks, and the politicians that pushed for agressive lending and the idea EVERYONE should own a house whether you can afford it or not.
If someone would have asked you how the economy was in mid 2007, what factors would you have credited?
Bungle: Thanks, America and Napa are special places on the globe. I was arguing context and symantics, but I can see it went right over some peoples heads. I apologize if I confused anyone. "
a teacher wrote on Nov 10, 2008 2:47 PM:
During this campaign Obama has been called a terrorist (we're at war with terrorists) and a muslim (we're at war with those, too). He has been acused of consorting with all manner of people (inspite of clear evidence to the contrary). He has been the subject of numerous death threats. The level of demogogry on the part of McCain and particularly Palin has been astounding.
I won't argue that the left has been unkind to the Governor, but mostly they have made fun of her, a far more effective tool. That is not the same as hate. "
Raven wrote on Nov 10, 2008 4:12 PM:
and in the 8 years of the Bush administration we are still behind the number of jobs created in the Clinton administration, a net gain of 22.4 million vs a net gain over just over 5 million so far ...how was the economy in 2007, if you were wealthy great....but the incomes for the middle and lower classes continued to fall as the number of job losses continued to rise...so I would have said and did say it was lousy....
Regarding the SWF's...the total paper losses may reach 25 percent but no here in the Morgan Stanley report released today does it say they are selling....the losses are due to a number of factors, including lower oil prices and the general decline in the markets overall...
have a great day "
Joanne wrote on Nov 10, 2008 10:32 PM:
misfit wrote on Nov 10, 2008 10:35 PM:
TINAMAC wrote on Nov 11, 2008 7:43 AM:
2012/2016/2020 ..... she is young, ambitious, HAS A BACKBONE, and moral fortitude.
No wonder the media hates her! "
Sandra wrote on Nov 11, 2008 9:09 AM:
You can dish this venom out, but you do not care to be called on it?
" Where are Deewaaayne and Kevin? "
" I'm not sayin' but...having a high approval rating from people who re-elected a convicted felon to Senator doesn't say much about their standards. "
" I'm all for just leaving the woman alone at this point. However, she was about as mean spirited as one could get when she came on the scene and immediately began spewing her venom.......No one wants to align with a loser."
"And yes, the people of Alaska are close to re-electing Senator Ted Stevens, a corrupt politician and a convicted felon. What does that say about them? "
You know Misfit, I would love an answer to that...What exactly does it say about Alaskans? And while you are at it, what does this say about you? "
Hear Ye wrote on Nov 11, 2008 10:38 AM:
Hawaiian0712 wrote on Nov 11, 2008 11:02 AM:
reader wrote on Nov 11, 2008 11:48 AM:
My favorite Palin line, "I'm like, OK, God, if there is an open door for me somewhere, this is what I always pray, I'm like, don't let me miss the open door.. . Even if it's cracked up a little bit, maybe I'll plow right on through that and maybe prematurely plow through it. . . And if there is an open door in 2012 or (she hesitates here)four years later (she couldn't add up to 2016 quick enough), and if it is something that is going to be good for my family, for my state, for my nation, an opportunity for me, then I'll plow through that door."
Another of my favorites:
When the Palin was questioned about her record and credibility she blamed and lashed out at "bloggers sitting in their parents' basement, wearing their pajamas."
Excuse me? Does she really think that it was NOT intelligent, educated, hard working younger and older adults who voted her ticket down, but instead kids in pajamas, blogging in their parents basement?? HA!
This woman needs a comedy show, she'd be a HUGE success.
Go Palin! Keep those interviews "comin." PLEASE run again in 2012 for another guaranteed republican defeat! We love you! Yea, like, you betcha! "
reader wrote on Nov 11, 2008 11:56 AM:
What's wrong with this picture? Seriously, can someone clear this up for me? "
misfit wrote on Nov 11, 2008 1:35 PM:
The original post that I responded to stated that Sarah Palin's approval ratings were high. My response was that Alaskans' voted for a convicted felon, (Ted Steven's), the point beng that their standards are low for their politicians. Was my math wrong?
As to your question regarding what does it say about me; Everything I state in my posts is true and accurate. The secret service has stated that threats to Obama went up after Palin began campaiging on his "Palling around with terrorists" rhetoric. I call that spewing venom...that kind that could get someone killed.
Another point I'd like to make...I hardly take anything so seriously on this site. It's a way to play with anonimity and to say things a bit on the edge at times.
I hardly take myself so seriously as you do, evidenced by your incessant number of postings. They should hire you at the NVR. You'd be a tireless employee. "
Joanne wrote on Nov 11, 2008 2:12 PM:
What makes you a Republican is checking the little box on the voter registration form next to "Republican Party." Presumably, Sarah Palin has done that. So yes, she is, indeed, a Republican. "
Joanne wrote on Nov 11, 2008 2:19 PM:
reader wrote on Nov 11, 2008 2:56 PM:
Bill wrote on Nov 11, 2008 4:02 PM:
AKNRA wrote on Nov 12, 2008 5:23 AM:
TINAMAC wrote on Nov 12, 2008 8:07 AM:
Sandra wrote on Nov 12, 2008 8:07 AM:
That and more. She is a successful woman with a supportive husband, a large family, who is a Governor. How did she get there? Through hard work and ability. Now from this feminists perspective, that is an acomplishment that should be applauded. I disagree with many of her personal choices, but I will defend her right to make them, as she has the same freedoms as I do.
I've mentioned before the book called "The Death of Rght and Wrong". It is a interesting read and gives a lot of insight to this phenomena of women turning on their own. But, it is not just limited to women, but to most of the extreme left, and to be fair, the extreme right. It talks about Group Think, which is shown to be alive and well on this blog.
I saw the same interview Reader saw, but without my group think glasses on. I saw a whole different interview.
Even the reactions of those called on their behavior is textbook group think reaction.
We are losing the ability to think individually and critically. It is really sad. "
JimClark wrote on Nov 12, 2008 10:32 AM:
Joanne wrote on Nov 12, 2008 10:44 AM:
The first line of my last post was actually meant to read:
"AKNRA, first of all, the proper use of the word in that context is Democratic, not 'democrat.'" "
Joanne wrote on Nov 12, 2008 11:06 AM:
Joanne wrote on Nov 12, 2008 11:37 AM:
AKNRA, first of all, the proper use of the word in that context is Democratic, not "democrat."
Next: Sarah Palin is no sister of mine. Any woman who could put in place a policy that requires rape victims to pay for their own forensic exam kits clearly does not have the best interests of women at heart.
And talk about dissin' your sisters! It is both chauvinistic, shallow, and “simple” to view women as driven to their disapproval of Sarah Palin primarily by -- as you call it -- "feminine envy." "
Joanne wrote on Nov 12, 2008 12:00 PM:
esanoche wrote on Nov 12, 2008 12:36 PM:
"Let's be real in a way the national media seems incapable of: this person should never have been placed on a national ticket in a mature democracy. She was incapable of running a town in Alaska competently. The impulsive, unvetted selection of a total unknown, with no knowledge of or interest in the wider world, as a replacement president remains one of the most disturbing events in modern American history. That the press felt required to maintain a facade of normalcy for two months - and not to declare the whole thing a farce from start to finish - is a sign of their total loss of nerve. That the Palin absurdity should follow the two-term presidency of another individual utterly out of his depth in national government is particularly troubling. 46 percent of Americans voted for the possibility of this blank slate as president because she somehow echoed their own sense of religious or cultural "identity". Until we figure out how this happened, we will not be able to prevent it from happening again. And we have to find a way to prevent this from recurring.
It happened because John McCain is an incompetent and a cynic and reckless beyond measure. To have picked someone he'd only met once before, without any serious vetting procedure, revealed McCain as an utterly unserious character, a man whose devotion to the shallowest form of political gamesmanship trumped concern for his country's or his party's interest. " "
Joanne wrote on Nov 12, 2008 1:58 PM:
Andrew Sullivan is a man whom many would consider to be a "true conservative." "
luv1mom wrote on Nov 12, 2008 2:32 PM:
reader wrote on Nov 12, 2008 2:53 PM:
Amy Holmes, a CONSERVATIVE COMMENTATOR on CNN, said
"We saw sassy Sarah, sexy Sarah. Hopefully over the next four years, we'll see smart Sarah. From CNN's "Larry King Live." "
Hear Ye wrote on Nov 12, 2008 3:52 PM:
antipc wrote on Nov 12, 2008 6:54 PM:
Personal attacks by the Sarah haters are the best they've got. Obama's historical record along with his future ineptitude will make her a powerful force. "
grape wrote on Nov 12, 2008 7:24 PM:
She was continued to be looked upon as a sex object, someone that couldn't be both smart and pretty. Then the media set her up to destroy her.
The women who believed the only reason McCain picked Palin was because she was a woman and not for her years as a Governor, didn't want to be looked at as being stupid enough to fall for such a trick but the truth is Palin actually had a lot to offer the ticket but they were so worried of looking dumb they voted for Obama. Dumb. "
antipc wrote on Nov 13, 2008 6:03 AM:
Feel a little silly? "
Hear Ye wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:10 AM:
Not as silly as you will feel when you go back and actually read the article you sighted. Nice try though! lol "
antipc wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:42 AM:
Hear Ye wrote on Nov 13, 2008 10:05 AM:
Seriously Antipc, READ the story. Either one. No where does it say that the Africa is a country story is made up. "
Raven wrote on Nov 13, 2008 11:31 AM:
Joanne wrote on Nov 13, 2008 4:22 PM:
Disclosure: I added the text in the brackets for clarity. It did not appear in the original AP article.
And taking the view that Palin was not qualified for the office she was seeking is vastly different than being a "Sarah hater." I don't hate the woman at all. In fact, I actually admire some things about her. Among other things, her political instinct is uncanny and it is hard not to admire her "chutzpah." But I don't thing she is ready for, and therefore don't want her in a position that places her but a heartbeat away from the most powerful office on the planet. Maybe she'll grow and learn and become more qualified with the passing of time, but I don't think she's there yet. If that does happen, it is still not likely that I would vote for her, because she has a vastly different worldview than I do. But I won’t continue to criticize her lack of readiness for the job if she has demonstrated that that is no longer an issue at some time in the future. Labeling everyone who criticizes a candidate as a “(fill in the name here) hater” is unfair, inaccurate, and suggests a close-mindedness on the part of the person indiscriminately applying that label. "
Joanne wrote on Nov 13, 2008 8:19 PM:
As I understand it, the remaining ballots to be counted there are overwhelmingly "early voting" and provisional ballots, which -- based on the voting patterns virtually everywhere else -- are almost certain to have been cast in disproportionately greater numbers by Democratic and/or otherwise pro-Obama (and, thus, likely also anti-Stevens) voters. So the probability is extremely high that Begich will continue to increase his lead over Stevens all the way up to the end of the count.
Looks like another win goes into the “D” column, which has the additional benefit of blocking any fast-track attempt by Palin to almost immediately hopscotch her way into the U.S. Congress by way of a square vacated by an elected-then-removed-from-office-by-an-alternative-process-Stevens.
It seems there may really be an “Election God” after all. So I am now finding it increasingly more difficult by the minute to overcome the temptation to dare to dream next of an upset in the Minnesota Senate race.
Senator Al Franken. It has such a nice ring to it, no? It trips off the tongue almost as nicely as does “FORMER Minnesota Senator Norm Coleman.” "
ADark1 wrote on Nov 13, 2008 9:31 PM:
Personally, I would think she could use a little humble and crow pie! "
Rocco wrote on Nov 14, 2008 5:39 AM:
Joanne wrote on Nov 14, 2008 9:08 AM:
Viewing Palin as unqualified for the office she was seeking is vastly different than being a "Sarah hater." I don't hate the woman at all. In fact, I actually admire some things about her. Among other things, her political instinct is uncanny and it is hard not to admire her "chutzpah." But I don't think she is ready for, and therefore don't want her in a position that places her but a heartbeat away from the most powerful office on the planet. Maybe she'll grow and learn and become more qualified with the passing of time, but I don't think she's there yet. If that does happen, it is still not likely that I would vote for her, because she has a vastly different worldview than I do. But I won’t continue to criticize her lack of readiness for the job if she has demonstrated that that is no longer an issue at some time in the future. Labeling everyone who criticizes a candidate as a “(fill in the name here) hater” is unfair, inaccurate, and suggests a close-mindedness on the part of the person indiscriminately applying that label.
On the matter of those "many left-leaning feminists" you speak of, who think Governor Palin is "wonderful," kindly name a few, please.
And as described in the AP (source) article "THE HOAX WAS LIMITED TO THE IDENTITY OF THE SOURCE IN THE STORY ABOUT PALIN -- NOT THE FOX NEWS STORY ITSELF. While Palin has denied that she mistook Africa for a country, THE VERACITY OF THAT REPORT WAS NOT PUT IN QUESTION BY THE REVELATION THAT EISENSTADT IS A PHONY." "
14obama wrote on Nov 14, 2008 10:57 AM:
antipc wrote on Nov 14, 2008 1:16 PM:
I don't think so. "
Rocco wrote on Nov 14, 2008 3:38 PM:
Please forgive me if I unfairly swept you up as a mere “hater.”
You asked for left-leaning feminists that support Gov. Palin and at the risk of subjecting these women to the scrutiny of the far left “I love free speech as long as it’s MY speech.” crowd, here are two. Elaine Lafferty is the past editor of Ms. Magazine and after spending an extended period of time with her felt that Sarah Palin was an extremely intelligent woman. Shelly Mandell, serving as the LA Chapter Pres for NOW, introduced her as an example of what the Feminist Movement was all about. Now, I’ll admit that I never have met Sarah Palin. So, on what basis do I decide if she is qualified to be our leader? Do I base it on blog postings, SNL comedy sketches, and highly biased interviews like the rest of the media-suckling drones? Or do I do a little reading on my own and listen to honest fair-minded reasonable people that actually know her? Umm... "
grape wrote on Nov 14, 2008 3:43 PM:
That makes about as much sense as your comment about Governor, yes she is a Governor not a community organizer, Palin. "
Rocco wrote on Nov 14, 2008 3:46 PM:
msdemo wrote on Nov 14, 2008 5:21 PM:
reader wrote on Nov 14, 2008 5:49 PM:
What may appear on the surface of one's behavior to be admirable (chutzpah) is, in reality, an over compensation for a perceived or real short-coming, which one is attempting to draw attention from. Those with true chutzpah are often not well balanced individuals.
My own suspicion is that Palin has either a serious dyslexic disability or she has narcissistic disorder. There is nothing wrong with having either. However, both can produce dangerous results when they are not properly understood and/or treated/compensated for.
Those with dyslexia often learn success stratagies that don't require reading and/or writing, and which frequently includes the development of a rewarding and winning personality, which can be fascinating and confusing at the same time. This would explain Palin's lack of academic success, marginal grades in high school and college, and her inability to cite any of her reading material.
Narcissism reflects one who has a grandiose sense of self-importance and entitlement. Symptoms include:
A tendency to be attracted to leadership or high-profile positions, often without sufficient achievement to back it up.
A pattern of alternating between unrealistic idealization of others and equally unrealistic devaluation of them
Hypersensitivity to criticism.
Exploitative towards others and takes advantage of them, often valuing others based on their usefulness.
Strongly opinionated, viewing people and issues through a lense of black/white, right/wrong, good/bad.
In my opinion, Palin does not have the country's best interest at heart, but only that of herself. Being a successful politician does not always equate to being a good polititian. "
grape wrote on Nov 14, 2008 8:12 PM:
Reality Check wrote on Nov 14, 2008 10:24 PM:
Joanne wrote on Nov 15, 2008 8:15 AM:
Merriam-Webster Online defines “chutzpah” simply as “supreme self-confidence,” which some “climbers” do indeed have. But most of the people I know with ”chutzpah” are not “climbers.”
Considering that what constitutes "stepping over the boundaries of accepted behavior with no shame" is highly dependent on the beholder, sometimes a little "chutzpah" is a good thing. Thank heavens, for example, for the women who were willing to shamelessly step over what, to many at the time, were the boundaries of accepted behavior to finally bring about women's suffrage. Or that Rosa Parks had the courage to do likewise on that bus in Montgomery decades ago. Or that a man who was born of a union between two people who shamelessly stepped beyond the boundaries of accepted behavior more than forty-five years ago to marry across racial lines, a man who "doesn't look like all those other presidents on the dollar bills," had the audacity to think that an African American could make a serious run for the office of President of these United States and then seek to make that happen.
Yes, I do, indeed, think that sometimes a little boundary-trampling “chutzpah” is a very good thing. "
AKNRA wrote on Nov 15, 2008 4:32 PM:
misfit wrote on Nov 16, 2008 9:05 AM:
reader wrote on Nov 16, 2008 10:37 AM:
ADark1 wrote on Nov 16, 2008 12:23 PM:
I've noticed not one of the *usual suspects* have admitted to seeing the Ayers Interview on CNN.
That interview would prove out my previous statement that Ayers didn;t know Obama but was doing a political favor for someone else!
All of the accusations that have been made have been slowly but surely being proven false concerning Obama. How about waiting until he's sworn into office before attributing all the USA's Problems he has to NOW clean up?
As far as Palin goes? I truly believe the tatters of the OLD Republican Guard will NOT allow her to take the reins of the Party and lead it. Not because they may or may not be sexist, but because she isn't capable. The repubs have many stars and it all boils down to Palin not being the brightest or the best.
When it comes to the Alaskan voters, seems in fact Stevens is LOSING NOT winning as previously thought. I guess my belief on the un - dumbing down of Aericans is proving to be true. I persoanlly do not hate Palin, I just find it insane any thinking voter would want to see her at the top of anyone's ticket for POTUS. "
Joanne wrote on Nov 16, 2008 7:43 PM:
"AKNRA wrote on Nov 12, 2008 5:23 AM:
' Such hating from the very people who profess a desire for equal rights; women, women, women, why are you hating on Governor Palin? Could it be feminine envy? Or is it the fact that she doesn't support the [sacred democrat mantra] of abortion on demand? Did I get that right ladies? Quit dissin your sister!'" "
misfit wrote on Nov 17, 2008 5:13 PM:
Remember when Grampy McSame was going around yelling, "Stand up! Stand up! Stand up! Fight with me! Fight! Fight with me! It was hilarious as well.
As for Palin...I've found the perfect job for her. She could use her comedic talent, her looks as well as her degree and probably make a boat load of money to boot. How about her being on "The View'? That would be great!! "
AKNRA wrote on Nov 17, 2008 7:07 PM:
misfit, those females on The View; a gaggle of so-called caring, compassionate and giving egotistical battleaxes are the best examples of the worst that the democrat culture can scrape from the sides of the trash bin at the rear of your local neighborhood planned parenthood office... "
misfit wrote on Nov 18, 2008 6:56 AM:
I guess by "Battleaxes," that would include Republican Elizabeth? Also, if you are a male...You should have NO say on the topic of abortion or the choices women make. "
Joanne wrote on Nov 18, 2008 9:50 AM:
On the matter of your Nov 17th "explanation" for your improper use of the word "democrat" in an earlier post to this page:
Under no circumstances that I am aware of in the English language is there a stand-alone word that begins with a capital letter, nor that ends in the suffix "ic" that is also a verb. (I think you are confusing verb -- "a word used to show that an action is taking place..." -- with adjective -- "a word that qualifies or describes a noun or pronoun.")
That notwithstanding, there is no election authority within the United States that recognizes the "democrat party," because it doesn't exist. There is, on the other hand, a Democratic Party that is recognized by elections officials in all fifty states. Perhaps that is the one you are thinking of here. (Sorry, but you do not get to single-handedly rename the Democratic Party to any as-you-wish alternative. So you might as well refer to it correctly.)
In the spirit of bipartisanship, I should probably point out that, similarly, as a practical matter, there is also no such thing as the “republic party” here in the United States… "
AKNRA wrote on Nov 19, 2008 7:15 PM:
Tell me why then, people say they are a democrat but belong to the Democratic Party when a Republican identifies themselves as a Republican and belong to the Republican Party? I understand that referring to the party that democrats belong to as the democrat party makes them angry; if true, I say… GOOD. "
Joanne wrote on Nov 20, 2008 10:11 PM:
To fully explain why this is so would require me to delve into far more detail about the linguistic characteristics of the English langauage than this forum would allow for. However, the short answer to your question is this:
In this context, "Democrat" is a noun; "Democratic" is an adjective. (It is the [place the ADJECTIVE “Democratic” Here] Party.) You cannot properly use a noun in the place of an adjective
So, if you have any interest at all in using what I presume to be your native language properly, you should not be using a noun in place of an adjective.
Please also note: In this context, "Republican," on the other hand, is a word that can take either form. "
AKNRA wrote on Nov 24, 2008 6:31 PM: