NVR Logo
Buckling down on those who don’t buckle up
Monday, November 03, 2008
Save and Share Share
California Highway Patrol officers have hit the road, keeping a keen eye out for motorists who choose not to buckle up or neglect to put their youngsters in child safety seats.

The CHP has received a $1 million grant from the state Office of Traffic Safety to make sure drivers, passengers and children are properly strapped in.
Lake County mom Jessica Rhyner is a living testimonial on the importance of seat belts and child safety seats.

Last week, the young mother was involved in a solo crash on Highway 29 near Calistoga. She was driving her Mercedes sedan with her two young daughters in the back seat when she lost control of her car, which hit the embankment and rolled.
“The car ended up on its top with my babies hanging upside down in their car seats,” Rhyner said.

Bella, 5 months, and Mia, 22 months, survived the crash without a scratch, Rhyner said. “I am just so thankful my babies are OK. I would never, ever, consider taking them in the car without making sure they were in their child car seats.”
Rhyner was also wearing her seat belt and suffered only minor injuries. She said the car seats had been inspected previously by the CHP and got the seal of approval for being installed properly.

CHP Officer Jaret Paulson could not pinpoint the actual amount of the one-year grant that will go to the Napa CHP office, but he said it would be enough to boost enforcement substantially.

“We will receive enough money to pay for 450 hours of time used to enforce the grant. That includes salaries for the sergeants, officers and clerical staff,” Paulson said.

Traffic crashes are the leading killers in California for children 14 and under. The biggest contributing factor to the grisly statistic is whether kids were not in child safety seats or were in seats that were not properly installed, according to the CHP.

The seat belt campaign enforcement kicked off in early October.

“We’ll be patrolling all of the highways and roadways within the CHP jurisdiction in Napa County,” Paulson said. ‘We will be strictly enforcing the law. We will also be going to schools, community events and other public functions giving out literature and educating the public on the importance of seat belt laws.”

Another portion of the grant money will be used to provide free child seat safety inspection for parents and guardians.

The CHP will increase the number of technicians certified by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration who will be qualified to do child safety seat inspections. Inspections are done by appointment at the CHP offices.

The CHP also assists parents obtaining a car seat if they cannot afford to purchase one. In some cases, the CHP will give replacement car seats when they find one that is defective, Paulson said.

Children must be in a child restraint safety seat until they are 6 years old or weigh 60 pounds. Youngsters should ride in the back seat until they are at least 12, because of the potential danger of front seat passenger air bags deploying in a crash, according to the CHP.

Babies must be in an infant seat in the back seat, facing backwards until they are 1 year old and weigh 20 pounds. However, the CHP strongly recommends parents keep their babies in these types of car seats for as long as possible.

Older children may be restrained in a booster seat that is fully harnessed, including across the chest.

The fine for the first seat belt offense is $88, and $360 for the first offense involving a child safety seat.

Information about child safety seats and inspections is available by calling the Napa CHP office at 253-4906.
24 comment(s)

B-Side wrote on Nov 3, 2008 1:42 AM:

" Years ago I saw a headless man in the fast lane of HWY 80. His demolished car rested about 100 yards up the freeway. I've worn the belt religiously since. "

Napa Mom wrote on Nov 3, 2008 6:32 AM:

" One big mistake in this artlice - children must remain facing backwards until they are 1 AND weigh 20 pounds, not OR. Even if they are over 20 pounds, if they are under 1 year their neck muscles have not yet developed enough to face forward should they get in an accident. "

valley_chick wrote on Nov 3, 2008 8:42 AM:

" How about the NVR print the news story from Oakland...this car accident happend yesterday where most passengers were not wearing their seatbealt...the Driver died & his 10 month old baby is still missing in some murky water...sadly he was not restrained either....Please! Please! always wear your seatbelts!!...if you dont want to as adults..then please always make sure those precious babies are!!

Also, is the NVR going to write about the accident this morning on Old Sonoma Rd.?..I briefly heard it on KTVU...possible fatality??..Please let us know whats going on. "

steph wrote on Nov 3, 2008 9:03 AM:

" I think a million dollars of taxpayer money is being wasted.

If CHP sees a person not wearing a seatbelt, give them a ticket--let the violators finance the project. No violators? No need for a grant.

Put the million dollars of taxpayer money to better use. "

MP wrote on Nov 3, 2008 9:05 AM:

" B-Side---I can see why that grisly sight changed your behavior. I started wearing seat belts regularly when we moved from CA to the east coast where the drivers tailgate and drive far more aggressively that here believe it or not. Whatever the inspiration, they do save lives. "

marine1/1 wrote on Nov 3, 2008 9:12 AM:

" B-Side - Thank you for that graffic image. I'm sure kids that read this are thankful too. Seat belts are very important but I do not understand this grant.CHP officers are required to do this very same task on a daily basis. What exactely is this grant paying for? If there is no grant then officers look the other way? I don't think so and I know this not to be true. With tough economic times at the state capitol, Wouldn't it be better for the CHP Commissioner to simply tell his officers to step up routine stops to enforce the click it or ticket policy already in place without receiving grant money that could be used somewhere else? This one seems like a waste of a grant to me. This is what they get paid for on a daily basis isn't it? "

kracker wrote on Nov 3, 2008 9:40 AM:

" This is one law I do not agree with. This law should apply to those 18 under only. The only person you are putting at risk is yourself! No more big brother laws!!!!!!!!!!!!!! "

smogone77 wrote on Nov 3, 2008 11:20 AM:

" I have to agree with Kracker. This is government trying to control our personal lives. I do wear my seatbelt now after a few a tickets. The pocket book persuasion is what did it. "

AmCan Mom wrote on Nov 3, 2008 11:33 AM:

" What I would like to know is, when are the law enforcement officers going to start obeying these laws? Just a couple of weeks ago I was on my way to Napa from AmCan and there was a SHERIFF'S DEPT SUV waiting at the light on Jameison Canyon Road, waiting to cross toward the airport. In that location, there is no doubt he had been on the road for more than a few seconds; and yet, as I passed him, he was not only holding a phone to his ear he was just then putting on his seatbelt! If he had seen ME acting as he had he could have given me a double ticket. And I must agree, this was a wasted grant! "

winemd wrote on Nov 3, 2008 11:39 AM:

" I have had my car seat inspected and it was very helpful. I am glad there is funding to continue this educational aspect for new parents. You think installing a car seat would be easy, but most people don't do it correctly. "

jeepracer10 wrote on Nov 3, 2008 11:49 AM:

" I was in a car accident about six years ago where my car flipped 8 times and went off a 30 ft cliff. I survived with no injuries thanks to my seatbelt, but sadly I lost a bestfriend because he was not wearing his. RIP Steve "

reason-ator wrote on Nov 3, 2008 11:52 AM:

" To heck with seat belts.

If we could just get a grant to enforce people being NOT stupid when driving, it would make seat belts mostly unnecessary.

Law Enforcement are just one of the groups exempt from the seat belt requirement. Look at all they have on their belts, and how quickly they need to get in and out of vehicles. I wish they'd wear seat belts, but can understand why they wouldn't. Seriously, wearing a seat belt sometimes might be hazardous for them. "

MarshaMarsha wrote on Nov 3, 2008 12:32 PM:

" Seatbelts do more than just keep you inside a vehicle or away from the windshield in an accident. A seatbelt keeps a driver where they belong.

Without a seatbelt, even a minor side-impact can throw a driver all the way over to the passenger seat. No steering wheel or brake pedal there, how in the world do you control the vehicle as it swerves into on-coming traffic or towards a huge tree? Or what if you are a passenger and end up in the driver's lap? Human airbag!

So, those of you who think seatbelts should be a choice because they only protect YOU and no one else might want to think about it again. "

Dwayne wrote on Nov 3, 2008 12:40 PM:

" ".....salaries for the sergeants, officers and clerical staff....." Are paid anyway, so now it costs extra to enforce the law...???

So....Let me speculate here... The officers sit in their cruisers and watch unbelted people drive by, and do nothing because they aren't being paid extra...??? Maybe it interferes with their donut break...

Everything doesn't have to "cost extra" folks... These positions are already staffed, so all they have to do is their jobs... "

whoknew? wrote on Nov 3, 2008 1:12 PM:

" The funds pay for EXTRA officers on duty during specified times in addition to the officers already scheduled to work. This means more eyes looking for more violators at the same time without the extra money coming out of the department's general fund. The grant isn't something to pad someone's salary who is already paid to enforce the law. Still think it's a waste of state funds? With the holidays fast approaching, I'm grateful to have more officers on the street looking out for me and my family, keeping us safe. "

MP wrote on Nov 3, 2008 2:43 PM:

" If the impact of automobile deaths and injuries due to unrestrained drivers didn't directly affect me thru cost of emergency personnel, auto insurance, health insurance, hospital costs and others, I wouldn't give a care...as a matter of fact I'd consider it an example of natural selection where those who take risks may be killed or maimed more often than those who don't. Convince me I'm not subsidizing someone else's avoidable injury or death, and I will stand back and help you in to your car. "

melimop wrote on Nov 3, 2008 2:53 PM:

" Total waste of tax dollars!!! It shouldn't even be the cops responsibility to slap people on the wrists if they don't have a seatbelt on - people who don't wear seatbelts are simply lacking some serious brain cells. Why should their stupidity cost us money??? "

SouthNapa wrote on Nov 3, 2008 5:22 PM:

" Seat belt and cell phone laws do not apply to the police. I thought everybody knew that the cops don't have to play by the same rules as us.

Anybody who doesn't wear a seat belt is playing Russian Roulette every time they drive. With that said, the police are less interested in driver safety and more in filling quotas. "

Dwayne wrote on Nov 3, 2008 6:52 PM:

" I admit that being belted in is safer, but I survived a generation of folks who didn't have them, and I never knew anyone who was killed or seriously injured because there was no seat belt...

Remember that cars were actually made of heavy metal back then, not the tin foil and plastic they are made of nowadays... "

B-Side wrote on Nov 3, 2008 6:53 PM:

" The logic of infants facing the rear is clear.
But suppose that you are hit from behind. Then the best position for the infant would be facing forward. It's really a two sided coin isn't it. "

drtymick75 wrote on Nov 3, 2008 7:20 PM:

" I dont think it's a total waste of tax payer money. It will end up being less than wasting money for cleaning services when bodies are on the road. And for babies; I hope I dont ever see someone not use a seat and belt for them. I will have no problem reporting you. "

winghunter wrote on Nov 3, 2008 7:31 PM:

" Just think... Somehow we (some of us 35 or above) survived the days of riding bikes without a helmet, riding in the back of dads truck on the highway, skateboarding without knee or elbow pads, not wearing seat belts and many many other "dangerous" tasks. Now every time little Johnny gets a hang nail from something our lawmakers jump at the opportunity to pass a new law. The best one is the latest "can't drive a train and text message at the same time", this was put in place after the L.A. train crash. How did we survive all these years without all those laws?? Sometimes you just have to say, WOW!!! "

napan79 wrote on Nov 3, 2008 8:46 PM:

" I worked a car seat checkpoint many years ago with local law enforcement agencies that was ran by a grant and it was a very good success. When working the checkpoint almost all the car seats were not properly secured, or the person had a car seat that was recalled, the person had the wrong car seat not right for the child and there were a lot of other things wrong with the car seats. A child depends on you to make sure he or she is safe and it is important that the car seat is properly secured during a car accident it can result in life or death. Go to your local CHP to go check your car seat because most likely it is not properly secured. I surely hope you would care enough about your children to get their car seat check. A lot of people will not go get their car seats checked so it is good that CHP is patrolling checking car seats and seat belts. Good Job CHP! "

db76 wrote on Nov 3, 2008 8:59 PM:

" Dwayne, the tinfoil and plastic of modern cars does a better job of protecting people than the old heavy metal cars of the past. Modern cars absorb the impact of a crash, whereas older cars transfer the impact to the body. Sure, your 2008 Volvo will be totalled in a 25mph crash, but at least your liver wont be sitting on the floorboard next to your feet. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy