City has concerns about new jail
Some wonder if it will mean more trouble for downtown
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
November 26th, 2009
November 25th, 2009
November 24th, 2009
November 22nd, 2009
November 26th, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
The county’s plan for a larger jail in downtown drew anxious questions Tuesday from Napa City Council members who wouldn’t have minded if the jail had gone elsewhere.
Council members praised the county’s efforts to minimize the jail expansion by creating a day treatment program intended to reduce repeat criminal behavior.
“The attempt to reduce recidivism is one of the most admirable things that could be done,” Councilman Jim Krider said.
At the same time, Krider wanted to know if leaders of the criminal justice system had taken a serious look at moving the jail out of the city.
“There are huge difficulties siting a jail where a jail doesn’t exist,” said Britt Ferguson, the county’s assistant CEO.
Other practical considerations dictated that the jail stay in downtown, Ferguson said. It would be both expensive and a security risk if up to 400 prisoners a month had to be transported from an outlying jail to court appearances, he said.
As it is, the criminal courthouse and the jail are connected by a secure underground tunnel, he said.
Under the new master plan, all or part of the current jail would be torn down and replaced with a new facility. Capacity would be expanded from 277 to 360 beds. Although financing has not been lined up, the county would like to complete the jail project within five years.
The county is betting that 360 beds will be sufficient for the next two decades if an innovative day treatment center cuts repeat criminality by up to 30 percent.
Housed initially in the Hall of Justice, which includes part of the jail, the Community Corrections Service Center would apply tested techniques to promote future law-abiding behavior.
Initially, 50 people from the jail or out on probation would receive help with substance abuse, education and job readiness and psychological issues.
This approach has borne fruit on the East Coast, but is new to California, officials said.
Krider wondered whether a larger jail, combined with the Community Corrections Service Center, would result in more troublesome people hanging out downtown and in Old Town.
“The reality is these folks will be very well supervised,” Mary Butler, the county’s chief probation officer, said.
While the number of people with criminal histories using county facilities may increase, some 75 probationers already come to her downtown offices daily, she said.
Mayor Jill Techel asked if the service center would result in more group homes for criminals being established nearby. Creating such housing is not part of the program, Butler said.
Techel said she was pleased that county officials had come to City Hall to brief the council on jail plans, but asked that the county do more. Although the county is able to build on county-owned land without city planning review, Napa would like to review aesthetics and parking issues, she said.
Police Chief Rich Melton, who was part of the criminal justice committee that studied jail issues for four years, lauded the new direction.
“I really think they have something here,” Melton said. If police have fewer low-level repeat offenders to deal with, they can devote more attention to serious crimes, he said.
The new county program will increase the number of convicted criminals coming and going downtown, with an impact on parking, the chief said. But police appreciate having a jail close at hand so officers don’t have to transport suspects out of town, he said.
“We can’t do business as usual,” said District Attorney Gary Lieberstein, noting that 70 to 80 percent of first-time jail inmates now have another run-in with the law.
“You’ve heard many people talk about being tough on crime. We’re going to be smart on crime as well,” Lieberstein said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
kevin wrote on Oct 30, 2008 4:50 AM:
Am I the only one that gets tired of paying for big ticket items that are obsolete in just a few years?
No wonder they never have enough of our money... "
Cadence wrote on Oct 30, 2008 7:03 AM:
And while they're at it, busy stuffing the garage with dense infill projects for low income tenants, homeless shelters, a bigger jail and a day program (and is there anyone who doesn't believe the day program will bring even more undesirables into downtown? Anyone at all?), they're able to get a nice dig into the side of the town's burgeoning hotel industry.
A double play for the county! "
psoren wrote on Oct 30, 2008 8:59 AM:
jmo wrote on Oct 30, 2008 9:18 AM:
Perfect timing!! Remember the article about the $72 million riverfront project. You knew moving the jail would be the next topic. Please the developers by having the topic so conveniently come up as more phases come on line. Just tell the prospective buyers well they are discussing plans to move the jail out of town/site.
Who's going to pay for the new jail and the added on going costs of transporting detainees/inmates and additional security. Table this discussion until the current economic situation is reversed.
75 probationers a day??? WOW! That’s 375 a week. Seems like a large number. I wonder what the breakout of the crime types are. "
pbfallon wrote on Oct 30, 2008 9:53 AM:
amazed wrote on Oct 30, 2008 10:30 AM:
And how many millions were spent on the Criminal Courthouse, which was built in order to be adjacent to the jail and allow safe transportation of inmates? Walking inmates across Third Street to the old courthouse was considered unsafe, but now there's talk of moving the jail, and bringing inmates to court appearances by bus?
Where's the communication between the criminal justice community, county planners, and real estate types? "
Paddy wrote on Oct 30, 2008 11:39 AM:
antipc wrote on Oct 30, 2008 12:11 PM:
He knows how to save money & run a jail. "
y2kcbr wrote on Oct 30, 2008 2:16 PM:
Pink jumpsuits!
Overcrowding in the jail is bad. I've been there (as a contractor!!), not a 'guest'. The new jail will go smack dab where the County Administration building has it's current parking lot. So between the Administration building and the new parking garage.
I will be dividing by 83 to get an idea of the total cost.
Also, the current jail is 30 years old... "
MarshaMarsha wrote on Oct 30, 2008 2:22 PM:
And for all of you "elitists" that are concerned about "more troublesome people hanging out downtown and in Old Town", do you know where the Courthouse is? It's located at Third and Main. Every single person in the Napa jail was in and out of that courthouse MANY times. Are you proposing that we move that NEW courthouse too? Get your checkbook, because you're not using MY taxes for another courthouse.
I say use some other empty City building for a jail annex to house work furlough and use the newly emptied space for more beds. Then use all that "new-jail" money to fix our rotten roads! "
hudds5 wrote on Oct 30, 2008 3:25 PM: