The $72 million question
Construction continues on The Riverfront development at Main and First streets in downtown Napa. Developers hope that condominiums on the top floors and retail on the lower floors will entice buyers. J.L. Sousa/Register |
Buy photos
The Riverfront seeks to be special in soft economy
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
November 26th, 2009
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
If you build a fancy mixed-use project in downtown Napa in a tough economic climate, will the restaurateurs, retailers, offices and residential condo buyers come?
The Riverfront, a $72 million project finishing up construction on Main Street, is about to find out.
With the opening planned for early spring, the project is mounting a multi-pronged sales and leasing effort.
When the first 10 of 50 condos went up for sale in mid-September, they were snapped up at prices ranging from $695,000 to $1.67 million by customers who put down reservation deposits.
A second batch of five condos priced from $575,000 to $1.15 million were offered at a sales event last Thursday. No reservations to buy were made, but the sales team identified a pool of enthusiastic prospective buyers, Michael Carreno, president of the sale company, the Reiser Group, said Friday.
Those who made reservations to buy in September were mostly familiar with the project, representing a “pent-up demand,” Carreno said.
Last Thursday’s crowd of 50 interested buyers had curiosity, but now need to learn more about living on the river, he said. Private tours will be scheduled, he said.
The Riverfront needs commitments for the new batch of five condos before it releases additional units for sale, Carreno said.
Office and retail leasing, at some of the highest rates in downtown history, is going slowly. Morgan Stanley has committed to leasing 8,000 square feet of the project’s 30,000 square feet of office. No tenants have yet been signed for 40,000 square feet of first-floor retail.
Were the developer/owner, Channel Properties, willing to accept just any store or restaurant, the project would likely be fully leased by now, Craig Semmelmeyer of Main Street Property Services said last week.
“The ownership won’t let this become a mall. They won’t let it become ordinary,” Semmelmeyer said. “They’re demanding that we bring in unique restaurants and retailers. They want this to be something truly special.”
Semmelmeyer said he is negotiating to lease 15,000 square feet to three restaurants, including a prestige anchor who would take 10,000 square feet.
It’s crucial to the project’s success that the first tenants be the right tenants, making the Riverfront a compelling destination for tourists and residents, he said.
Semmelmeyer cited the patience of Harry Price, the developer of Napa Mill next-door, who has slowly developed his property with compatible tenants.
Napa Mill is a success because of all the deals that Price didn’t do, he said.
Semmelmeyer acknowledged that today’s economic situation is “unfortunate,” with retailers nationally folding or pulling back on expansion plans. “We’re in a softened market,” he said.
Semmelmeyer professed to be upbeat. “The doom and gloom is for ordinary, not the special. The special is thriving,” he said.
Downtown Napa is in better shape for a new project to succeed than most places, he said. “It helps us tremendously to see La Toque be very successful (in the Westin Verasa hotel). It helps us to have Taylor’s Refresher with lines out the door.”
Once an anchor restaurant is signed, Semmelmeyer said the other retail pieces would fall into place. He has rejected leases for smaller spaces until he knows what the requirements of the main tenants will be, he said.
Semmelmeyer predicted that office space, which is being leased by Channel Properties, would begin moving as the project comes closer to completion.
The owners and their representatives organized a press tour last week as some 150 construction workers swarmed over the four-story project to complete the interior.
The exterior is largely buttoned down and cannot be hurt by wet weather, said Ryan Parlett, who works in real estate development for Channel Properties.
The first 10 condos went to mostly older buyers who are opting for something that never existed before — an urban wine country lifestyle, Parlett said.
Downtown’s restaurants, cultural attractions and now the beautified riverfront appeal to affluent buyers who don’t want to be always dependent on their cars, he said.
Living in the Riverfront’s upscale condos will put residents in the center of the action, Parlett said. “You’ll smell Celadon, you’ll smell Angele,” he said of two upwind restaurants.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
clonapa wrote on Oct 27, 2008 6:41 AM:
aCaringNapkin wrote on Oct 27, 2008 8:32 AM:
WatchDoggie wrote on Oct 27, 2008 8:35 AM:
db76 wrote on Oct 27, 2008 8:51 AM:
LMW wrote on Oct 27, 2008 9:27 AM:
steph wrote on Oct 27, 2008 9:35 AM:
I like the new development a lot. It looks really nice. But I can imagine having people upset about the inconvenient location of the jail--sorta like people who move by the airport then want the airplanes to be quiet or move? As a taxpayer who doesn't live in an upscale home, I'll be unhappy if I have to help pay to move the jail. Of course, we'll be told that it is due to overcrowding or some other need. But the development is nice.
How about those of you who wish for certain businesses either start one yourselves, or launch a letter-writing campaign to the chains and ask them to consider looking at Napa? Complaining and wishing solves nothing. "
Demo Cracy wrote on Oct 27, 2008 10:03 AM:
b14him2 wrote on Oct 27, 2008 11:41 AM:
comment wrote on Oct 27, 2008 12:22 PM:
napabicycler wrote on Oct 27, 2008 1:55 PM:
dominus wrote on Oct 27, 2008 4:55 PM:
Annabella wrote on Oct 27, 2008 6:49 PM:
LMW wrote on Oct 27, 2008 7:03 PM:
comment wrote on Oct 27, 2008 7:53 PM:
jmo wrote on Oct 27, 2008 7:58 PM:
I enjoy Celadon and Angele...both are excellent. However I won't describe the aroma down there as being from them. Come on it stinks at low tide and the eastern river view is awful especially at low tide. Of course owners, customers etc can always look westward and watch Dano book um for entertainment. -:)
Remember those "Luxury Townhouses" on California Blvd. across from Lucky... Those had sold signs in most if not all of the windows and none of them closed and they are still vacant. Sure hope this doesn’t become a future bailout candidate project for the lender holding the Riverfront mortgage.
I am anxious like most Napans to see this and other downtown projects completed to see how the projects do and so we can get the downtown traffic moving again.
As for moving the jail...not going to happen at tax payer expense in this town for a long time.... if we do, gee does that mean we will be moving the Courthouse also??? "
otto wrote on Oct 27, 2008 10:16 PM:
Rich wrote on Oct 28, 2008 10:38 AM:
Sign me up. "
LMW wrote on Oct 28, 2008 4:15 PM:
The units across Lucky's?
They went into default and rippled down to their other project in american Canyon, valley vista....which went under too.... "