Low tide at Berryessa
Islands appear as level dips, but lake not near record low
By JENNIFER HUFFMAN
Register Business Writer
July 2nd, 2009
July 1st, 2009
June 24th, 2009
June 23rd, 2009
The occasional visitor to Lake Berryessa might not notice it. But to regulars, the lake is looking different these days.
The reservoir is at its lowest level in 12 years, exposing increased amounts of shoreline and the one-time hills of the former town of Monticello.
Although the lake dropped 29 feet over the past four years, it remains substantially higher than the lowest recorded levels.
September 2008 statistics from the California Department of Water Resources measured the lake at 414 feet above sea level. Statistics from 1959 to the present day show that the reservoir reached its lowest levels in 1992, when it measured 361 feet above sea level.
Currently, Lake Berryessa has more than twice the amount of water as it had during the dry years of 1991 to 1995.
“Lake Berryessa is in much better shape than most other lakes in the state,” said Pete Lucero, chief of recreation resources for the Central California area office of the Bureau of Reclamation.
“In Folsom Lake you can’t hardly launch a boat,” he said. “At Lake Berryessa, while the levels are lower than typical, recreation is still completely available,” said Lucero.
There’s not much that can be done about water levels. “We’re not getting any rain and rain is what fills this lake,” said Lucero.
As the water level lowers, “you’ll see more land masses in places they wouldn’t normally be.”
The Oak Shores recreation area looks larger than normal, said Lucero, and the there are more islands nearby.
The main purpose of the lake isn’t recreation, Lucero said. “This lake is a reservoir first,” intended to store water to supply Solano County.
Chris Lacombe of Markley Cove Resort said lower lake levels make extra work for the marina.
“We have to constantly keep moving docks, anchors and walkways around,” said Lacombe. Visitors shouldn’t be concerned, though. “We have a lot of launch ramp to go.”
“Boaters should be careful to know where they are,” said Lucero. “As the water goes lower, more islands will pop up. They need to be cautious when they boat around the lake.”
Lacombe said a troubled economy poses more of a threat to lake business than water levels, though he said business is on a par with 2007.
Besides water levels, Lake Berryessa locals await news of lake resort concessionaire contracts. Lucero said that negotiations continue with contract winner Pensus Group, but the Bureau has nothing to announce.
“We are working diligently to get a contract signed as quickly as possible,” said Lucero.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
mofosheee wrote on Oct 17, 2008 1:49 AM:
venegas868 wrote on Oct 17, 2008 8:26 AM:
ozguy wrote on Oct 17, 2008 8:50 AM:
enapa wrote on Oct 17, 2008 9:06 AM:
danmonez wrote on Oct 17, 2008 10:04 AM:
http://calwatercrisis.org/
http://deltavision.ca.gov/
The State Delta Vision Task Force has said that the current rate of residential development poses a serious threat to the Delta system. The Delta itself is in serious disrepair and neglect and there is no funded plan to repair it.
The other State water sources, Lake Folsom, Lake Oroville, Lake Shasta, and others are all dangerously low, (some are at the lowest point in recorded history). Berryessa is just the canary in the coal mine, but maybe it will get our local elected officials' attention.
So, we have a State task force telling us that current residential growth is threatening our water system and that it may not be able to provide adequate water supplies to new populations. On the other hand, we have a state law and public policy that says local jurisdictions must continually zone for more and more residential each year, (the "regional housing allocations).
So the message from our glorious State of California is, "we probably can't provide water for significant future populations and we have no plan to enable us to, but, what the heck, let's just build, build, build...BRING US MORE PEOPLE.
I say it is time to tell ABAG that we cannot accept their artificial housing allocations. We need to adopt ordinances that require new develpment to either provide it's own water or significantly offset its water usage by some mitigation. "
asahigo wrote on Oct 17, 2008 12:23 PM:
I agree whole heartedly. "
Yikes wrote on Oct 17, 2008 12:43 PM:
Now we've had to see all those former resort concessionaires leave along with our jobs. All the money people usually spend up at the lake was not there this year I personally made only half of what I made last summer this summer due to the resort closures.
This was just poor planning and timing on the feds part. With the economy going downhill they should have rethought their decision rearding who they were going to give the new contract to. They didn't even compensate any of the former concessionsaires for there improvements. Just told them to get out and take everything with you. The gov't lost a bunch of money itself this summer because the didn't get any commissions from the closed resorts. Which is normally 3% of all gross sales from the resorts. The gave contract to Pensus, a group with big money out of AZ. Actually the group is made up of British people with ties to big comanies in AZ. Not even an American based company. Personally I think Mike Thompson is behind this and his pockets are probably lined with silk. Thanks Mike. Now Pensus isn't sure if they want to invest their money here if the feds can just tell them in 25 years, sorry you didn't win the new contract. Take all you new improvements and get out. So let's not worry about the lake water level let's worry about the low economy level induced by the fed gov't. "
baybgrl2369 wrote on Oct 17, 2008 5:01 PM:
Landshark wrote on Oct 24, 2008 10:47 AM:
In the meantime at Lake Berryessa the overall tax revenue loss, job loss and loss of personal property by former Concessionaries and Long Term users exceeds $150M in a time when the federal government is scrambling to cover the bad loan programs they came up with.
The Bureau of Reclamation is FAILURE as are the people that manage the Mid-Pacific Office. The 2006 Record of Decision related to Lake Berryessa is a complete failure and Reclamation is far too incompetent to admit or even work out some solutions.
I respectfully request that the NVR do some real in depth journalism and expose the many misconceptions that Reclamation has provided the public and the former Concessionaires.
Reclamation has cost Napa County more than simple local & federal tax revenue. The devastation of a $25 a year recreation industry where families used to enjoy Lake Berryessa has been destroyed.
Mr. Pedro Lucero is just one of the fish that swim in the BOR pool of misconception and shells. Check others such as Messrs, Frank Michney, Michael Finnegan and Kirk Rogers the parties that approved the infamous CCAO Record of Decision on June 2, 2006.
The Lake Berryessa saga has many layers including Mr. Mike Thompson as was noted above.
Dan, thank you "
notwhatyouthink wrote on Oct 27, 2008 11:11 AM: