Cloudy horizon for city revenues
Sales tax revenues dropped sharply in the spring and summer in Napa. J.L. Sousa/Register |
Buy photos
Liquor store sales boost 28 percent, hotel numbers up
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
November 20th, 2009
November 19th, 2009
November 14th, 2009
November 13th, 2009
November 12th, 2009
Napa ended its fiscal year on June 30 in good shape, but trouble looms, city Finance Director Carole Wilson told the Napa City Council this week.
Revenues were 1 percent higher than projected last year due to strong property and hotel taxes, but conditions during 2008-09 could be markedly worse, Wilson said.
Sales tax revenues dipped sharply during the spring and early summer. Excluding gas stations, there was a 7 percent drop, which is likely to worsen in months ahead, she said.
“If the trend continues on, we’ll have to address those issues,” Wilson said Tuesday.
Wilson will be giving the council quarterly updates so any dramatic change in the city’s financial condition can be addressed early. The city has a $7.9 million reserve available for natural disasters and short-term dips in the economy, she said.
Wilson said the nation’s economic woes — a depressed housing market, a sell-off in stocks, rising unemployment and tight credit — will have an effect locally.
“This will be a long-term issue. We really need to hold on for a while,” Wilson said.
Property tax — the city’s largest source of revenue — came in 2 percent higher than expected last fiscal year, Wilson said. But with housing prices declining and the county lowering assessments on large numbers of properties, bets are off for this year, she said.
Hotel taxes — the city’s third-largest revenue source — performed extremely well, coming in 8 percent over expectations, Wilson said. “On a brighter note, the tourists keep coming,” she said.
The city’s largest hotels, in particular, performed better last year than they had the year before, Wilson said.
In the April-to-June quarter, city retailers did 5 percent less business than the year before. Because of higher gas prices, service stations saw a revenue increase of 28 percent, she said.
New auto sales revenues were up 2 percent in the quarter, while used vehicle revenues dropped 27 percent, Wilson said.
The food sector was up 6 percent, propelled by a 28 percent jump in liquor store sales, she said.
Although the stock market is off sharply, the city’s reserve funds are safe, Wilson said. Most are invested in U.S. Treasury notes, she said.
In trying to balance its own budget, the state took away nearly $300,000 in downtown redevelopment funds. State cuts will have little impact on city activities for now, but the prospects for the future are worrisome, Wilson said.
The state could face an even larger budget deficit next year, Wilson said. With state revenues behind projections, the Legislature may have to revisit the budget in coming months, she said.
The county’s preliminary unemployment rate was 5.3 percent in August, compared to 4 percent a year ago, Wilson said. “We’re not immune,” she said. “It’s happening here, too.”
General fund revenues totaled $64.2 million last year, $867,000 more than projected. Expenditures were $59.1 million, $2.4 million less than budgeted.
The gap between revenues and expenditures was appropriated earlier this summer to a variety of one-time uses, Wilson said.
The city will spend an extra $1.5 million on sidewalks and streets, $2 million on Napa Creek flood control, $1.2 million toward a west side fire station, $500,000 toward building repairs and $100,000 for a new Fourth Street dock, she said.
With the stock market plunging, Councilman Mark van Gorder asked if the city could expect a sharp increase in its contribution to employee retirement.
California’s Public Employees Retirement System tries to smooth rate increases and decreases from year to year, so the hit should not be as great as Wall Street’s recent performance might indicate, City Manager Mike Parness said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
CouncilmanMott wrote on Oct 11, 2008 7:51 AM:
Over the past eighteen months we have established strong reserves, revenues driven by TOT remain strong, and virtually all expense catagories came under budget. Although we may see an adjustment in property tax in the coming year it should be more than made up in additional TOT from the new Westin Verasa and additional sales tax from stong businesses like the new Toyota dealership.
Your current City Council and the City management remain diligent in planning, tracking, and adjusting to economic trends. Our City remains fiscally strong and balanced because of that focus and will continue to do so in the future. "
musikluvr wrote on Oct 11, 2008 7:58 AM:
This is odd! 10 days ago Mayor Techel was quoted in Kevin Courtney's interview as stating that revenues from the new hotels and other developments would provide the city adequate funds to provice for services.
Have we been politicized? Which of the lovely ladies is to be believed? "
jwk wrote on Oct 11, 2008 8:22 AM:
localmama wrote on Oct 11, 2008 9:20 AM:
comment wrote on Oct 11, 2008 11:42 AM:
skiph wrote on Oct 11, 2008 5:05 PM:
misfit wrote on Oct 11, 2008 5:21 PM:
Annabella wrote on Oct 11, 2008 5:31 PM:
ProudLady wrote on Oct 11, 2008 8:01 PM:
I think some of these comments are funny. In regards to "trouble looms" I took it as, yes, we're great now, but the winter could be bad. According to musikluvr, he mayor's quote was, would provide the city adequate funds to provice for services. Key word adequate. Napa won't have to cut services, and in fact we're still expanding. I'm not saying everything is wonderful, but for right now Napa isn't really hurting. "
mofosheee wrote on Oct 12, 2008 6:54 AM:
Fancy tourist hotels and tourists traps will be the first to fail. "
jimmie wrote on Oct 12, 2008 10:57 AM:
tfytmp wrote on Oct 12, 2008 1:35 PM:
notshocked wrote on Oct 12, 2008 2:32 PM:
Also, there was a follow up in the article about Liquor Sales, enough to satisfy a link the bi-line that you require (“The food sector was up 6 percent, propelled by a 28 percent jump in liquor store sales, she said.”.
I, for one, feel fortunate to live close enough to drive and able to stay with my parents to come visit Napa… if I didn’t have that opportunity, there is no place to stay in my price range. Your “dive hotels” are not fit for humans – I know this based on much feedback from friends who have visited the area. "
14obama wrote on Oct 12, 2008 3:48 PM:
amazed wrote on Oct 13, 2008 2:00 PM:
wasnapagirl wrote on Oct 14, 2008 3:44 AM:
14obama wrote on Oct 14, 2008 9:21 AM:
jimmie wrote on Oct 14, 2008 11:12 AM:
14obama wrote on Oct 16, 2008 8:55 PM: