Building a better trail
By MICHAEL HALEY
I have agreed to be on the board of the Napa Valley Greenway, or as it was referred to in the paper yesterday, Napa Valley Vine Trail.
I was heartened to see all the positive feedback in the comments after the article. As someone mentioned, it was unusual to see such community-wide agreement. I am just as enthusiastic about it myself. I enjoy bike riding but I haven't done too much of it since I have been here, because unlike many I don't like riding on a main road in traffic. I am not quite sure how Napa got to be such a Mecca for bike riders with the roads we have, but nonetheless we are.
There are a couple points I would like to emphasize about the Greenway, which is my understanding of what it is going to be called. First is that it is in its bare infancy, and very few things have been settled so far, at all. Chuck McMinn is a great leader for this project and he has studied it a lot himself, but few if any details have been worked out so people should hold their judgments and especially their predictions of what will happen until more work has been done. Our first official meeting as a board is taking place tomorrow, so nothing has really happened yet.
The other thing and what my agreement to be on the board turned on is that any private property that is used has to be done strictly on a voluntary basis. No government control in any manner. Property owners may have some legitimate concerns, and as one of the potential property owners I know that is true. But I also believe that those things can be worked out if it is handled correctly, which is one of my reasons for wanting to be on the board.
I believe that the financing is there without using local tax dollars either. That is not a deal breaker for me necessarily, but I don't think we are going to need it. There is a lot of private interest as well as various state and federal grants that can pay for it, so let's see what happens on that front as well before jumping to any conclusions.
There are so many positives about this project that it excites everyone who hears about it. This has the potential to become yet another "legendary" aspect of the Napa Valley and a huge addition to our community. It will be something that those who contribute to it can be proud of for many years to come.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Bill wrote on Oct 7, 2008 2:48 PM:
How about a grant for medical infrastructure, housing for medical workers, library expansion or deferring street maintenance (believe bicycles have less wear and tear than all other traffic other than pedestrian)? A grant for an environmental impact report? A grant for bicycle racks through the county and improved access, something smart community responsible business might think about.
Or a grant for developing a plan to incorporate bicycle surface travel aimed at the residents of the Napa valley including but not limited to the “Green Trail” which should be developed as a “Toll Trail.” Charge resident users one price and non-county residents another price.
What is the total benefit envisioned? A pretty bike lane up the valley or something that provides the citizens with substantial use other than superficially adding to the counties “marketability.” I am not opposed to bike trails or paths but I would oppose the use of tax money to serve a narrow purpose that does not include the larger need for safer and saner bicycle travel in the cities and the county of Napa.
If there are not sufficient funds to maintain the current surfaces why should we, as in state and federal grants, be spinning our wheels on a fluffy feel good plan that really only serves the “week ender” and does not address an overall need to seek different modes of healthy transportation no matter how minimalist a bicycle may appear.
Repackaging this idea as part of a broader agenda bringing some sense of a real, broad and immediate benefit to the residents of the Napa valley is better than becoming a legend in our own minds.
Where is a link to what this piece is referring to?” "
LMW wrote on Oct 7, 2008 10:13 PM:
cordell wrote on Oct 8, 2008 9:01 AM:
notpc wrote on Oct 8, 2008 1:15 PM: