|
Now for the hard part
Share
Email
Print
CommentIn the end, the system worked, in its own halting, imperfect way. Now, we can only hope that the $700 billion package passed by the House of Representatives and signed into law by the president Friday performs the hoped-for trick of unlocking the credit markets and averting economic disaster.
The measure, as finally approved, was a dramatic improvement over the three-page, just-sign-here proposal that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson initially submitted. It still gives the administration huge leeway and will need skillful Treasury administration, but it includes increased oversight and greater protections for taxpayers. After Monday’s stunning rejection by the House and the resulting plunge in the stock market, both presidential candidates pitched in to salvage the deal; the Senate acted to revive the measure; and enough “more than enough” House lawmakers in both parties rethought their original positions, in part as callers from home districts who were fearful of economic disaster began to outpace the callers who were indignant at the idea of a bailout. House leaders, including Democrat Steny Hoyer of Maryland and Republican Roy Blunt of Missouri, worked together. Juvenile partisanship gave way, at least for the moment, to productive cooperation.
The measure, as finally approved, was a dramatic improvement over the three-page, just-sign-here proposal that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson initially submitted. It still gives the administration huge leeway and will need skillful Treasury administration, but it includes increased oversight and greater protections for taxpayers. After Monday’s stunning rejection by the House and the resulting plunge in the stock market, both presidential candidates pitched in to salvage the deal; the Senate acted to revive the measure; and enough “more than enough” House lawmakers in both parties rethought their original positions, in part as callers from home districts who were fearful of economic disaster began to outpace the callers who were indignant at the idea of a bailout. House leaders, including Democrat Steny Hoyer of Maryland and Republican Roy Blunt of Missouri, worked together. Juvenile partisanship gave way, at least for the moment, to productive cooperation.
But not without a price. One of the changes the Senate made to the package made sense: a temporary increase in federal insurance of bank accounts from $100,000 to $250,000 to deter potential bank runs. It is sad, however, that the Senate seized the opportunity to add unnecessarily to the deficit. A moment of economic peril became powerful leverage for fiscal irresponsibility in the form of another $100 billion-plus in deficit-financed tax cuts.
We refer to the Senate’s move to tack onto the package an unrelated measure: the extension of expiring tax provisions that business eagerly sought and a temporary patch in the alternative minimum tax.
We refer to the Senate’s move to tack onto the package an unrelated measure: the extension of expiring tax provisions that business eagerly sought and a temporary patch in the alternative minimum tax.
Friday’s action by no means ensures that the problem has been solved. The rough economic news continues to mount, with a drop in orders for manufactured goods and a seven-year high in claims for unemployment benefits. The credit markets have become so dysfunctional that California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger sent Paulson a letter warning that the state might need a $7 billion loan because it has not been able to borrow the money elsewhere. Meantime, the global nature of the metastasizing crisis adds to the nervousness. Maybe the only sure thing is that without the congressional action, prospects would be far bleaker.
(This editorial originally appeared in the Washington Post.)
(This editorial originally appeared in the Washington Post.)
Join the conversation
Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
|
|
kevin wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:00 AM:
And that includes our own Mike Thompson... "
Normbc9 wrote on Oct 6, 2008 8:58 AM:
Ruff Limblog wrote on Oct 6, 2008 12:42 PM:
There's no lack of so-called "Democrats" like Barack Obama, Joe Biden, Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Diane Feinstein, Barbara Boxer, and Mike Thompson that deserve a shout-out either.
There are lots of other 'Sellout America First' critters in BOTH PARTIES.
There were rescue plans passed around in the Senate and House that followed models that 'worked' in similar circumstances, but the 'Sellout America First' crowd did not want them in the public eye.
When politicians can be shown to 'know better' and vote down the best plan in favor of the sell us out plan then it is much easier to focus voter backlash.
So a plan that would have worked was carefully kept out of the media, but those who want the truth can go to Democrat Marcy Kaptur's webvid of her remarks in the Congressional Record.
As it is... I am going to be taking a closer look at the 'Paulite' Republican 'Zane Starkewolf' and 'Carol Wolman' , the Green Party candidate.
Either would be better than voting for Mike Thompson who 'regretfully' sold us out to the Wall Street Weasels.
I think a perusal of "OpenSecrets.Org" listing of where Mike Thompson gets his money is in order. It should be interesting reading.
When it comes to economics a true-blue 'Ron Paulite' or a Green would be a better vote than for a sellout Democrat.
~Ruff "
GoMommyGo wrote on Oct 6, 2008 2:19 PM:
Raven wrote on Oct 6, 2008 4:58 PM: