NVR Logo
What does the financial bailout plan mean to you?
Monday, October 06, 2008
Save and Share Share
Are you doing anything different in today's tough economic times?

Was your money in a bank that failed, like Washington Mutual?
How are you coping, and what are you expecting to see happen as legislators try to hash out a bailout plan for lenders?
13 comment(s)

14obama wrote on Sep 30, 2008 11:24 AM:

" Yes,my money was in WaMu and,hopefully,still is. Personally,I'm preparing for the worse. I take the situation very serious. We've been 'hoodwinked' by this administration for the last time. We,as citizens,must come together and help those in need or we all will fall by the wayside. It wouldn't bother me to see the rats locked up for the rest of their lives for the damage they've done. "

msdemo wrote on Sep 30, 2008 12:01 PM:

" When I heard the news about this, my first thought was Weapons of Mass Destruction once again. I think any bailout should be done in stages with lots of oversight. And should be carefully considered. There need to be a series of steps taken, not just give them our money. The whole mortgage system needs a revamp. I would want to have mine with one company that I could trust rather than the trickle down effect that has been happening. "

suze wrote on Sep 30, 2008 1:47 PM:

" I have yet to be greatly affected by this crisis. I tend to be frugal anyway, If it ain't broke, I don't replace it until it is, (10yr old TV etc.) I am against rampant consumerism and don't rack up my credit cards on stuff I technically can't afford; but most of the folk I know have lost money in the financial markets. That's the game though isn't it? I also do not know much about how the financial industries operate, though I am paying a lot more attention now. I do know that expansion cannot and does not go on forever. What expands to its utmost, will then naturally contract. We have allowed corporations and financial industries to get so big they have now 'popped.' A contraction and change of course, in the way we do business is inevitable. I am among those who feel corporate welfare and socialism is unjust when it is denied to the neediest of Americans. The rest of us are expected to take our medicine if we fail, or make mistakes of some kind. Yes it will be tough before it gets better, but to prop up a failing system is just postponing further and probably deeper problems. "

hudds5 wrote on Oct 1, 2008 7:31 AM:

" It sounds like a bunch of rich CEO's are trying to save their millions in personal assests instead of taking responsibility for their mistakes. With Bush on his way out, it's a shame that we cannot wait for the next President to come into office and sort this matter out. However, since Bush is partially to blame for this disaster, he should try to get people in their who can fix this problem for the American taxpayers...not the millionaire screw ups!
These CEO's created this mess and they should not be allowed to keep their money while others are going to be broke as a result of their poor judgement. "

Unclestuy wrote on Oct 1, 2008 8:56 AM:

" Agree with the above. Why should we bail out big companies that made poor judgement, cheated and lied to homebuyers and creating this mess ? I say "No to the bail out plan". Let them sit with there losses and cut the strings of golden parachutes. Hold them accountable for there actions. "

14obama wrote on Oct 1, 2008 4:06 PM:

" Thank you,'unclestuy' ! I,totally,agree with ya ! I had a premonition of things to come when this pres. was put in there. His attack on Iraq sealed the deal, so I painted on both sides of my red '59 chevy pickup truck,"Morally Wrong --Impeach" ! It's still there after 7years of Republican criticism. Some people are really blind ! To me the whole thing was very obvious. I give credit to God as I understand Him. Another gift from Him.
I SEE !! "

KawaiiMira wrote on Oct 2, 2008 12:02 PM:

" I agree with Unclestuy. That's why I took all my money out of WaMu. I heard they were going belly-up and got out of there ASAP.

Hopefully JPMorgan Chase will be able to figure out the mess that is WaMu. "

Paddy wrote on Oct 2, 2008 1:38 PM:

" WaMu is not part of JP Morgan Chase so it's still solvent and will operate as WaMu for the time being... I'm concerned about the tax implications that the bailout will cause but I won't be as concerned if I'm layed off and don't have an income.

Assuming I get layed off I'm even more concerned my 401(k), mutual funds, stocks, etc have lost so much value that I'll now have to rely on social security and possibly welfare to get buy. With the bailout I'm hoping that dependency doesn't become reality.

If all us 'boomers' suddenly lost all our jobs and our nest eggs, eggs we've worked hard for these past decades, the disaster in store for the US economy for generations to come can hardly be fathomed.

Bless all of you still employed and paying taxes who will have to support all of us about to be tossed out on "Main Street" by the Wall Street debacle. "

KawaiiMira wrote on Oct 2, 2008 3:19 PM:

" Paddy, have you looked at WaMu's website lately?

"WaMu customers, Welcome to JPMorgan Chase!

We're proud to welcome you to one of the nation's largest banks; as of September 25, 2008, all WaMu customer deposits are now JPMorgan Chase, one of the strongest finacial institutions in the world."

To my understanding, WaMu is now part of JPMorgan Chase Bank. "

amazed wrote on Oct 3, 2008 9:50 AM:

" Funny, I don't remember anyone who made big bucks in the stock market offering to share the bounty with me, but now I get to share the loss with them. "

shareathought wrote on Oct 4, 2008 8:57 PM:

" Sadly, it seems that the greedy and the CEO's will still get theirs (or should that be, they will still get ours?).

This bailout will still give the CEO's their severance packages yet, it will not give those going through foreclosure (either currently or over the past year), any reprieve.

Rather then helping those at the top of pyramid, perhaps just this one time, they (our representatives), could have started with the bottom of the pyramid.

A "grant" of some 100 thousands of dollars, for the sole purpose of paying off home loans (followed by home improvements, medical bills and college loans), say capped at $250,000, could have kept hundreds and thousands of people from becoming homeless.

This would be known as "the trickle-up" approach (banks would still get "theirs", just not first), and we could all live much happier, ever, after...

Instead we get to pay off the debt incurred by the "war" and the failed economy (that is those of us that are lucky enough to have a job, an income and perhaps even a home).

If it affects a brother, a sister, a family member, a friend or a neighbor, someone walking down the street... negatively, then it affects me. "

jeepracer10 wrote on Oct 5, 2008 11:25 AM:

" Other than my home being 300k less than I paid for it my personal economy is great. My wife and I are making largest salaries of our careers, we have a large sum of money in the bank, and we are putting lots of money in savings towards a new home. We have no debt other than our home and 2 cars. The type of work we do has no threat of downsizing, in fact we are looking at raises. "

freeport56 wrote on Oct 5, 2008 5:52 PM:

" Although Frank now blames Republicans for the failure of Fannie and Freddie, he spent years blocking GOP lawmakers from imposing tougher regulations on the mortgage giants. In 1991, the year Moses was hired by Fannie, the Boston Globe reported that Frank pushed the agency to loosen regulations on mortgages for two- and three-family homes, even though they were defaulting at twice and five times the rate of single homes, respectively.

Three years later, President Clinton’s Department of Housing and Urban Development tried to impose a new regulation on Fannie, but was thwarted by Frank. Clinton now blames such Democrats for planting the seeds of today’s economic crisis.

"I think the responsibility that the Democrats have may rest more in resisting any efforts by Republicans in the Congress or by me when I was president, to put some standards and tighten up a little on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac," Clinton said recently. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy