On energy and education
Americans felt a bite to their wallets like never before in 2008 as gasoline prices soared to record heights. The dependence on foreign oil supplies and the possibilities for developing alternative fuel and energy sources have become important issues in the debate over who will become the 44th President of the United States.
Senators Barack Obama, D-Ill and John McCain, R- Ariz., have laid out detailed energy proposals that share several goals but differ on many methods. Here’s look at their proposals.
Obama emphasizes the need to raise fuel standards on vehicles and developing biofuels, as he stated in an April 2008 address to the Chicago Council on Global Affairs.
He calls for eliminating the need for purchasing oil from the Middle East and Venezuela within 10 years by reducing demand and increasing the domestic oil supply. He advocates putting a million plug-in hybrid autos on the road by 2015 and offering tax credits to purchasers of ultra-efficient cars. He opposes opening more domestic sites to drilling, but would push oil companies to tap the 68 million acres of drilling sites they already possess the rights to explore.
Like McCain, Obama advocates for investment in clean coal technologies and use of a cap-and-trade system to reduce emissions from energy production. Obama proposes a windfall profits tax on oil companies enjoying the most profitable years in history, offering taxpayers an energy rebate of $1,000 with the proceeds.
McCain calls his energy plan the Lexington Project, tying his energy independence plans to the city where Americans first declared their independence from a foreign empire.
The plan includes an increase in domestic oil drilling and production, including an end to the ban on offshore drilling along the outer continental shelf. McCain advocates granting a $300 million prize to whomever can develop an ultra-efficient battery for plug-in and electric vehicles and proposes a tax credit for people who buy highly efficient cars.
McCain calls for more direct government investment in clean coal technologies than does Obama, and says 45 new nuclear power plants should be constructed in the United States by 2030 to provide clean energy.
McCain would offers tax credits to companies researching alternative energy, and opposes a windfall profits tax on oil companies.
On education, Obama calls for a quadrupling of funding for early education programs such as Head Start and a doubling of federal support for after school programs. He has said he will seek a $4,000 tax credit to apply to the first two years of college for most students, addressing concerns about growing college costs.
He has said the No Child Left Behind Act is underfunded and needs to be adjusted to support struggling schools. Obama also says he wants to introduce legislation to start programs at the middle-,school level to deter students from dropping out of high school.
McCain calls for more parental and local school control of the education process, though his campaign plan does not mention school vouchers.
McCain would route a portion of federal Title II monies directly to public school principals to spend on projects they choose, with minimal interference or oversight from federal or local administrators.
He notes that some $25 billion in federal dollars is already spent on early education programs, and advocates a program to reward top Head Start programs in each state and encourage them to pass their successful strategies to underperforming programs. McCain also sets aside close to $1 billion for advances in virtual learning programs.
Both Obama and McCain favor streamlining the college grant application process to make it easier for families to take advantage of what is available, and propose financial rewards for teachers who go to underperforming schools, geographical areas that are underserved or disciplines in which more expertise is needed.
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines,
click here.
common sense wrote on Oct 5, 2008 7:25 AM:
common sense wrote on Oct 5, 2008 7:26 AM:
steph wrote on Oct 5, 2008 9:17 AM:
As a voting mom, I see this as our #1 priority in our country--energy and economic independence.
And priority #1.1 is education. I'd fund the building of smaller, safer neighborhood schools with more local oversight and absolute results accountability--you don't perform and you get replaced. I'd favor school uniforms and extensive after-school activities--modeled after some of the most successful private acadamies around the world. I'd bring pride back to trade schools, and commission an embarrassing audit of some of our public universities to find out just how poorly they are managed financially--and fix it.
I would not fund a bunch of "programs" that are not proven and have no accountability. I hate hearing that blah-blah-blah. We end up with offices full of people and children as poor as ever. "
Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Oct 5, 2008 11:10 AM:
Ruff Limblog wrote on Oct 5, 2008 1:56 PM:
That's just the same as being against nuke-u-lar power!
All (soccer, security, hockey) moms want to know why you stick up for those America-hating commie LIBRUL Democratic candidates.
~Ruff "
common sense wrote on Oct 5, 2008 2:43 PM:
steph wrote on Oct 5, 2008 4:42 PM:
I believe McCain has, in fact, supported building close to, if not exactly, the number of reactors you cited, as a start.
In all fairness, Illinois has 11 nuclear reactors, more than any other state, and they provide 50% of that state's energy.
Perhaps Obama can be convinced, when he is elected president, of the merits of nuclear energy. "