NVR Logo
Stupid comments and more on the bailout
Friday, October 03, 2008
Save and Share Share
Those who say they won't vote for the bailout because it is socialistic — that's like having a theory that children should learn to swim by just throwing them in the water, so you throw in your kid and watch them drown to uphold your theory.

Dave Ramsey — this guy is all over the TV, saying he thinks there are better ideas than the bail out, like eliminating capital gains taxes. Even if that would eventually help the economy, it is not going to take an effect for a year or more, and will do absolutely nothing to help the current crisis. Sen. Richard Shelby said it too, that was his only idea. Palin ain't the only one that doesn't know what she is talking about.
Telling people, well, my bank is lending money today. Day to day ups and downs mean nothing. Coyote Blog, a libertarian blog, takes the cake by saying he called his local bank and they are doing fine. That is like finding out the ocean just got polluted to the point of toxicity, you live in Arizona and turn on your tap water and say, well my water is just fine.

Some guy on talk radio saying that default credit swaps really total $63 trillion and they are throwing a trillion at it to mollify people until Obama can get in office and then he will turn the whole government over to socialism. It is all a plot, see, like so much of what Obama is doing, to destroy America.
"Is there anyone that can argue against that our dollar is being purposefully destroyed so that we can enable the SPP directive for the Amero?"

Uh, yeah. The dollar is strengthening. And get back on your meds.
The version of the economy bail out bill that the Senate passed adds another $100 billion to the deficit, beyond what they need to finance the bail out. But I am glad they just passed something, and it is not a lot different than the last one, except everybody got to add pork. That is what our government has been reduced to these days. Don't read the add-ons, it will make you sick. By the time the house gets through with it, it will add a half trillion to the deficit.

Americans uniting behind hating rich people and all calling their Congressman in record numbers to make sure that the investment banks go bankrupt ... uh, except that is the system your money is in too. Ever been out in a rowboat with someone you don't like on the other end? Just bust a hole in the middle of the boat and watch them drown. That'll show 'em.

The 65-70 percent of Americans who are now conveniently forgetting that they knew housing prices were in a bubble for years but they liked watching their own home equity go up so much they looked the other way while they took out those equity loans. Just like the mortgage bankers who were collecting fees and thinking, it will be a soft landing and by then I will have so much socked away ...

On a good note, Americans seem to be starting to realize the gravity of the situation. People are massively confused by what is going on, and so are most of our elected representatives.

What is also true is that the turkeys in the media failed us badly. This is what happens with talking heads television that constantly emphasizes the extreme sides of issues to titillate their partisan viewers.
48 comment(s)

Bill wrote on Oct 2, 2008 11:30 AM:

" Another purrrty good and important rant, you are becoming very difficult to dislike. "

kevin wrote on Oct 2, 2008 12:00 PM:

" The media is doing exactly the SAME THING they do with EVERY issue. What's different?

I must be MISTAKEN. I understood you had a degree in PSYCHOLOGY not ECONOMICS. Jeffrey A. Miron, a senior lecturer in economics at Harvard University, says that we SHOULD let the bankruptcies occur, and I agee.

I might change my mind IF we had a leader who would stand up and point fingers at the guilty. Someone who would change the current regulations to prevent this from happening again. And do so BEFORE we bail out the miscreants!

But we DON'T.

So better to burn it down and start over if that's the only way to get CHANGE... "

steph wrote on Oct 2, 2008 12:34 PM:

" I called Mike Thompson's office and requested a "no" vote on this pork-infested bill.

What a flippin' joke. The sky is falling, and yet the elected representatives can't help but help themselves to more of the taxpayers' dollars, all the while acting like this is such a grave situation that it requires careful and urgent action. This is the fix?

I say, increase the FDIC insurance limits, allow people to refinance their loans, outlaw retroactively on any active loan a pre-payment penalty, enact a GD energy policy, enact a GD immigration policy.

What an outrage. Congress and the president have been asleep at the wheel and when we need them the most, all they know how to do is attach riders onto legislation that is supposed to protect Americans.

I think it's time for poorly managed institutions, including auto manufacturers, to FAIL. We are propping up poorly run companies and that is un-American. We are becoming such weaklings. "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 2, 2008 1:29 PM:

" Ditto Steph! No only that, I hate to be redundant : Go after and force Franklin Raines and Jamie Gorelick to repay the $125 Millon they took from Fannie Mae. Make the politicians return every dime they took from Freddie and Fannie Mae. Fire Paulson and Chris Cox. Reinstitute The Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, which was dismantled in 1999. Repeal the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which replaced the Glass-Steagall Act. Vote out anybody who voted for the repeal of Glass-Steagall. Force Congress to repeal the the special allowances they put into place for people who could not afford loans. "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 2, 2008 2:07 PM:

" Clean up your house before you ask for more money from me~! "

freeport56 wrote on Oct 2, 2008 3:50 PM:

" 1. End Capital Gains Tax.

2. End the Death Tax.

3. Kill Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae.

The people who started and fostered this mess are the ones trying to fix it.

This has spurred me to FIRE all my state and federally elected officials. I am sick and tired of their screwing up our economy. Heck, they are lawyers noit economists. It is time for some fresh blood and non-career politicians. "

steph wrote on Oct 2, 2008 5:10 PM:

" [steph holds a fist out for cab e-girl]

Awesome.

Send a couple women to Washington to clean up this disaster. Not Pelosi-type "women" but women who work. "

Todd Adams wrote on Oct 2, 2008 8:01 PM:

" Cabe e-girl and Steph are right on! I'd trust you to clean up this mess more than any of those Dems and Reps in Washington. "

Ruff Limblog wrote on Oct 2, 2008 8:10 PM:

" NB - the banks can be recapitalized without giving the Wall Street Weasels the money.

I am sorry to say it, but this 'Don't sink the boat because you don't like the crook on the other end' rant conveniently misses the other option -- THROW the crook OVERBOARD and row for shore!

The fact that both Republicans and Democrats voted for the Weasels, even when there were other plans available to be considered shows me that the corrupting corporate cash that I have railed about for a long long time is still KING!

Nobody is getting any attention from these corrupt DC politicians except the ones that have them bought and paid for.

~Ruff "

napablogger wrote on Oct 2, 2008 10:37 PM:

" Kevin, we are all economists like it or not, that is what you are when you are a voter. Notice how every other comment on the thread is from an "economist" too.

Voters killed the first bail out bill, now we are stuck with a worse one.

Ruff, I am not talking about particulars but I think the investment bankers are really hurting and are in a world of hurt---I mean they have lost billions and no one is going to feel sorry for them. Even that dark rightie Murdoch says they are losing billions.

I mean, everyone is right about all their criticisms, but if we had passed the bail out the first time it would have been the best one. I agree with you Steph, but we have to have the bail out.

Day by day the banking system sits on the edge of a cliff. Better hope there are no stiff breezes.

Lets not let our anger destroy our good judgement. I don't want to go through a huge depression. "

pbsm777 wrote on Oct 3, 2008 12:35 AM:

" With all due respect, napablogger, there is absolutely NO reason that Henry Paulson should have God Powers on the bailout. Paulson/Bush response was a 3 page document that represented a $700 Billion bailout and the majority of the 3 pages outlined how there was to be NO Review by Court, Comittee , or Congress on ANY decision he makes in respect to how the money is spent. FACT.

Hello, is this still America Or Socialistic America. Can You say AIG? Keep checking your mailbox for that dividend check. AfteralI, your tax dollars own 80% of this company that USED to be PUBLICLY traded. If it was Healthcare related they were talking about the Repubs would be screaming in the streets.

Socialism here we come....but at least we aren't touching the healthcare industry. That would be socialism. I wonder who is paying for the health insurance of AIG employees - oh that's right, we are. At least 80% of it since the taxpayers now own 80% of the company... but that's not Socialism.

Musat be Clinton's fault. No wait, it's Obama's Fault. No wait, it's OUR FAULT. "

kevin wrote on Oct 3, 2008 4:58 AM:

" Uh, pbsm777, some of us Reps ARE "screaming in the streets"... "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Oct 3, 2008 6:54 AM:

" There is little evidence with which to conclude that the so-called bailout plan will work. The blame for this mess rests with the current Secretary of Treasury, Chairman of the Federal Reserve, and President of the United States. The Bush Administration allowed lax regulation of the banking industry and now wants the U.S. taxpayers to pay the bills. Current legislation being considered this week is little more than legalized theft. There are other, better solutions that ought to be considered. The clowns that got the country into this mess oughtn't to be trusted to supply the solutions to get it out. "

Bill wrote on Oct 3, 2008 9:12 AM:

" Democracy is messy and capitalism is dangerous but the other choices are slavery or death. That we are all economists with limited abilities is an astute observation but at least it shows we are thinking. We also live in a mixed economy no matter how much the deregulators and free marketeers would deny it.

That mixed economy includes something that we all bury our heads and deny, it is not socialism but the welfare state. Any regime has only one legitimate purpose and that is to serve the welfare of the governed individuals. When we start recognizing and accepting this reality then perhaps the screaming in the streets would be of value.

Other wise retire to your respective estates and realize that a credit crisis threatens all homeowners. As very few have clear paper to their properties, sit on your porch with your squirrel gun and be prepared to shoot the sheriff when he comes to dispossess you of your home.

A three-page economic rescue plan is a farce of leadership showing that this administration again was totally unprepared and now that it is porked it displays even more incompetence. Doing nothing is also a choice but not a very good one so the plan in hand appears better than a squirrel in the Bush. "

napablogger wrote on Oct 3, 2008 10:54 AM:

" Every bail out like this is handled by the Treasury Secretary and the head of the Fed. When Mexico got bailed out by the US in the 90's, the whole thing was handled by Greenspan and Summers. This is the typical approach to this thing. Paulson is gone in 90 days, he did not do this to put himself in the power seat.

Not that I mind some oversight, but Congress can always pass legislation to manage the bail out if they want to.

Whenever anything happens both sides extremists come out and make up all this stuff and exaggerate all the possible negatives of something. How long are we going to keep falling for that?

This is part of what makes me think voters are unserious about change or politics, they are still rooting for their high school football team and getting off on melodrama. The Rush Limbaugh crowd is the worse, as are the Daily Kos'ers. "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 3, 2008 11:44 AM:

" YYou people are so uninformed. Just keep repeating the liberal mantra directed to the useful idiots. You can say that it is all Bush's, the Federal Reserve, and the Sec of Treasury's fault if would like. It simply isn’t the full story. These are the reasons our financial sector is failing. Take a breath and do some research instead of placing blame on one administration. The Glass-Steagall Act was repealed in 1999. Congress passed it, Clinton signed in. In its place Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act was enacted by Congress and signed by Bill Clinton. It passed the Senate (90-8-1). It passed the House (362-57-15). Make up of the Senate was 45 Dems 55 Reps and the make up of the HOR was 211 Dems 223 Reps. Therefore, I hold both parties responsible.
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Democrat Barney Frank was instrumental in pushing legislature that allowed individuals to secure loans from Freddie and Fannie that with no money down and no qualifications. My mom is a Realtor, she warned us 4 years ago of this monumental transgression that was enacted by Congress. When you are finished doing the research there, start researching an old Clinton appointee by the name of Franklin Raines. As CEO of Fannie Mae, he “earned” $100 Million dollars. Mr. Raines (a Harvard educated lawyer) has returned $26 million and is being investigated. Jamie Gorelick, another Clinton appointee served as Vice Chairman of Fannie Mae for six years and presided over a $10 billion accounting scandal. Just one of the falsified transactions helped FNMA hit earnings targets for 1998, which triggered bonuses for top executives including nearly $800,000 to Gorelick. During this 6-year period, Ms. Gorelick earned $26 million. "

pbsm777 wrote on Oct 3, 2008 2:44 PM:

" And the million dollar question cab e-girl:

How many houses did your mom sell to folks who should not have gotten the loans but were sold to anyhow? I hope she's going to return all of those commissions made off the foreclosed houses that we taxpayers just got STUCK with.

It is not a defense to say 'I knew it was going to be bad, but I went ahead and sold them because it was legal...' That's the same argument that the CEO's made - hey I knew it was going to be trouble but I still made money off them because it was legal.

I await your answer. "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 3, 2008 4:41 PM:

" pbsm777- Even though your question seems a bit hostile, I will be gracious enough to answer. First of all my mom deals in upper end estates, so mortgages are not generally part of the equation. She did however represent a buyer in the city limits that was selling a home for about $400K, when the offer came in, the financing was "creative” and the buyers obviously could not afford to buy the home. She went to the agent representing the buyer and expressed her concerns that the buyers could not afford the home. The buyer's agent said it did not matter and pushed the sale through anyway. My mom them approached her broker at which her broker responded that legally there is nothing that can be done. The buyers happened to be "minority buyers,” which added to the discrimination issue from the broker’s standpoint. Guess what? Those people are losing their home. So I blame the people buying the home, Congress for changing the rules, the selling agent for pushing it through and I blame on the mortgage broker who knew they could not afford the home. "

pbsm777 wrote on Oct 3, 2008 5:33 PM:

" Thank you for your honesty.

And the roughly $12,000 commission (3%) was then donated to charity to ease the guilt?

It is reprehensible that alot of the mortgage brokers are the one's that made a killing off of the system. I agree with you that there were a lot of underhanded things that went on. That's why there is not a lot of sympathy for the newly unemployed Real Estate agents in Napa county. There are people in higher end mortgages that certainly use "creative financing" though. You just don't hear about them losing their homes. "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 3, 2008 8:41 PM:

" Of course not, since she represented the seller. She had advertising and marketing expenses that were paid and she did due diligence in trying to prevent the sale. Why should she feel guilty? "

pbsm777 wrote on Oct 4, 2008 12:06 AM:

" Cab e-girl, thank you for making my point.

Priceless.

And regarding the "seems a bit hostile", I'll leave you with your own quote:

"YYou (sic) people are so uninformed. Just keep repeating the liberal mantra directed to the useful idiots. " Wow, I can feel the Peace, Love and Tenderness... or wait, compassionate conservative.

Thank you. :)

Still waiting to hear about your news sources, by the way. There is more going on than just Iraq. "

pbsm777 wrote on Oct 4, 2008 12:20 AM:

" cab e-girl you lost more credibility with this line - "mom deals in upper end estates, so mortgages are not generally part of the equation." A MORTGAGE IS THE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT USED IN PURCHASING REAL ESTATE. Regardless of the price or ability to pay.

Once again, thank you for proving my point. "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 4, 2008 1:00 PM:

" pbsm777: Sorry you stayed awake last night until 12:20 am wondering. I went out last evening and have been spending family time. Sorry if you took the “Useful Idiots” line personally, but many bloggers simply state this is all Bush’s fault, those were the ones I was addressing. Obviously you know very little about estate and vineyard property. Buyers that are and were buying that type of real estate are in a much different position than those first time homebuyers. I can’t tell you where to go for confirmation, all I can tell you is what I have seen through my moms experience as a real estate agent and I have seen as a home owner and a small business owner. As a homeowner, I can tell you because we sought a 30 yr fixed loan, our lender was very diligent in verifying our assets and our income. I can also tell you as a small business owner, my small local bank verified our income and assets, before giving our small business a line of credit. Clearly not all lenders were doing the same, and now Bush and Congress wants you and I to bail them out. This financial crisis can be blamed on Congress, Bush, Clinton and those running Freddie and Fannie. If you think otherwise, I can tell you simple research on the Glass-Steagall Act, Freddie and Fannie will clarify much for you and I would encourage you to do so. That means going to government web-sites, AP web-sites and watch dog web-sites. "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 4, 2008 1:04 PM:

" Cont for pbsm777 so you can get some sleep: As far as news sources, I use many and confirm through the web. For instance, I heard on a CBS radio station that Gwen Ifill, who moderated the VP debate had written a book about Barrack Obama. Come to find out she wrote “The Breakthrough: Politics and Race in the Age of Obama." Well, I don’t think that makes her a neutral moderator. I easily confirmed that indeed she did write a book to be released in January of 2009. She will financially gain if Barrack Obama wins the election. Simply by going to Amazon.com and reading the description of her book tells me all I need to know. I did watch the debate and she did seem to be fair, although her questions were a little shallow. The point is I don’t just listen to the talking airheads without confirming through credible news sources. Most of the time there is a deliberate left slant in the mainstream media. If you have not noticed, I would say that you have not done your homework. "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 4, 2008 1:12 PM:

" pbsm777: For the record real estate agents generally share the 3% of their commission with their broker, and depending on the agreement, sometimes can pay as much as 40% of their commission to the broker. Furthermore, some times real estate agents list a home for a 5% commission instead of 6%. A good real estate agent earns their money, like any valuable service provider. "

a teacher wrote on Oct 4, 2008 1:41 PM:

" "Most of the time there is a deliberate left slant in the mainstream media. If you have not noticed, I would say that you have not done your homework. "

OR...

It doesn't really exist. "

freeport56 wrote on Oct 4, 2008 3:50 PM:

" MJG is wrong!

Sorry my libbie friend they are all to blame from the policies of Bill Clinton wanting everyone to own a home, to the mismanagement of Raines, Garelick, Johnson, and others. (wait...Raines, Garelick, and Johnson work for Obama, buit thats another rant). To barney frank head of the House banking committee who said July 14 that "Freddie and Fannie were bad investments, but going forward they are in great shape".

Not one of our elected officaials yelled and screamed loud enough for any of us to hear. Now we are stuck with a $1.8 trillion dollar bill to pay. I say fire them all and let us start with a clean slate. Hang the criminals in the public square as a warning to others! "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 4, 2008 3:53 PM:

" Check with Emmy award winning CBS veteran Bernie Goldberg or read his book Bias. You can also look at the demographic make up of journalists and I know teach is capable of looking checking on that. "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 4, 2008 4:01 PM:

" pbsm777: More food for thought. Do you really believe that a real estate agent or any other commissioned individual should donate their wages and out of pocket expenses (those color brochures of homes are not free)? Did you donate anything to charity last year, because if you are most like most socialists you didn't, you would rather take it out of your neighbors pocket and let our politicians give it away.

Hey teach, I noticed that you said you tried to qualify to buy a home and that it was tough on $50K a year to qualify. Start getting your ducks in row. The silver lining in this mortgage mess is about to open it's doors for you and the young people. Since you did not go out and recklessly get a loan you could not afford, I would hate for you to miss the upcoming buying opportunity. Good luck! "

Raven wrote on Oct 4, 2008 5:07 PM:

" did we skip 6 years between the end of the clinton admin and the demos retaking control of Congress in 2007.... or was that in an alternate universe where the Republicans had complete control of Congress and the White House and did nothing ...there is plenty of blame to go round here.....let's not forget anyone..

I think what pbsm77 was trying to get across cab-e-girl was despite her misgivings about the deal, your mum went ahead and finished it off and walked away with her commission...

also can you give me one example of anything Gwen did Thursday night that showed her supposed bias? "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 4, 2008 7:33 PM:

" Raven: Reread my post, I thought that Gwen's mediation was fair but shallow. "

Raven wrote on Oct 4, 2008 8:05 PM:

" so why even bring up the book.....it was the same tactic that the GOP tossed out two days before the debate to try and discredit her... "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 4, 2008 8:18 PM:

" Which is why I am sure Gwen was on her best behavior. But do you really think the left would have stood for someone that had just written a book about their adoration of John McCain mediating the debate? I think not. "

Raven wrote on Oct 5, 2008 8:32 AM:

" Gwen's book was no surprise....it had been talked about for a couple of years...so the GOP knew about well ahead of time...the only reason to even bring it up was to change the expectations they had for palin's performance and provided an excuse if she performed badly... shows the confidence they had in her "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 5, 2008 1:27 PM:

" Raven: The GOP may have known about it but the general public did not. The honorable thing to do would have been to announce it to the viewing audience, but once again the main-stream media is not honorable or unbiased. "

Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Oct 5, 2008 7:17 PM:

" Gwen Ifill's book was the subject of a Time magazine article last July. In early August, other publications also ran articles about the book. Those articles were available and known to the McCain campaign before they okayed Ifill as moderator. Anybody doing a google search on Gwen Ifill would have known about the book. "

Raven wrote on Oct 5, 2008 9:09 PM:

" Time must have been one of those biased news magazines, MJH "

pbsm777 wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:45 PM:

" Maybe McCain and his staff should do their homework and not allow a "Talking Airhead" to conduct the debate. They did sign off on her, afterall. Talk about due diligence. YOU do a better job than his own people.

I am not a socialist, either. Thanks for trying to label me. I am a homeowner who went through the process in 1999. I jumped through the hoops and was able to by my house without the creativer financing. Iwas FHA, nobody gave me a handout and I wasn't looking for one.

Actually, I'm EMBARASSED to say I am a registered Republican. Although as, of late, the republican leaders look more and more like Socialists... I make more than 100k and live here in Napa Valley. I've worked as many as 3 jobs at a time and NEVER collected unemployment in 35 years of working in the private sector. I voted for John McCain when he ran against Bush in the primaries in 2000. Back then he was truly running on principles but the Karl Roves wanted a less educated "Joe Six Pack" to be the president. The very people that ran the slime campaign about McCain supposedly having a black baby in North Carolina (Look it up - check your RIGHT WING Leaning Media) and derailed his campaign down there. Now those SAME folks are running his campaign . Any wonder we see the SMEAR and FEAR today?

Do not make slanderous charges about being a Socialist or Communist if you can't back it up. After all, that is a bit hostile, isn't it? "

pbsm777 wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:48 PM:

" As far as charity goes, I do volunteer work at my kids High school, I constantly donate clothes to the Goodwill as my kids grow out of them, and am active in the Boy Scouts......What is it exactly that you have done to make this community a better place? "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 6, 2008 5:51 PM:

" MJH: simply go to Amazon.com and read about her love affair of BO. She in no way shape or form was a un-biased moderator. If the American people were given the information, it would have been at least intellectually honest. In my opinion her soft ball questions were because she was afraid to "appear" biased, which served nobody's best interest for the ONLY VP debate. "

pbsm777 wrote on Oct 6, 2008 7:02 PM:

" If the questions were so "softball" why the need for Palin to flat out state that she was going to talk to the American people and not answer some questions directly.

You conveniently set up a catch-22 argument: If the questions are too hard you would be whining that it was skewed to favor Obama because she wrote a book. Which by the wat hasn't even been published yet...and WILL NOT be released until January 2009 Long after the election has been decided.

So the questions are shallow because she had to be careful because the vigilant GOP handlers of McCain put her on notice! The same people that did not even realize that a book had been in the works...

Catch-22 you should read it sometime. Good Book.

Still waiting on your community service...maybe your mom could help. "

pbsm777 wrote on Oct 6, 2008 10:05 PM:

" Correction: it was South Carolina that was the turning point with the smear campaign in 2000.


Dirty Tricks, South Carolina and John McCain Campaigns & Elections

Ann Banks: Undone in South Carolina by the Bush campaign's dirty tricks in 2000, John McCain now turns to the man who smeared him. Eight years ago this month, John McCain took the New Hampshire primary and was favored to win in South Carolina. Had he succeeded, he would likely have thwarted the presidential aspirations of George W. Bush and become the Republican nominee. But Bush strategist Karl Rove came to the rescue with a vicious smear tactic.
Rove invented a uniquely injurious fiction for his operatives to circulate via a phony poll. Voters were asked, "Would you be more or less likely to vote for John McCain...if you knew he had fathered an illegitimate black child?" This was no random slur. McCain was at the time campaigning with his dark-skinned daughter, Bridget, adopted from Bangladesh. . It worked. Owing largely to the Rove-orchestrated whispering campaign, Bush prevailed in South Carolina and secured the Republican nomination. The rest is history--specifically the tragic and blighted history of our young century. It worked in another way as well. Too shaken to defend himself, McCain emerged from the bruising episode less maverick reformer and more Manchurian candidate. " from The Nation Jan. 2008.

Before you rail on it being from The Nation, just google the story and read it from any source you choose. The end result is the same.

Replace black child with "Hussein" it is his middle name afterall. wink wink. Not too mention they even get the bonus racist innuendo in that Obama is actually part black...Talk about a conspiracy.... "

Raven wrote on Oct 6, 2008 11:41 PM:

" cab-e-girl...let me get this straight...amazon.com is your source.....you are serious about using that as a source? "

kevin wrote on Oct 7, 2008 5:57 PM:

" One can only hope that McCain gets with the program and starts trying to win. If that means push polling and negative campaigning, I can live with that... "

Raven wrote on Oct 7, 2008 9:14 PM:

" so it is okay is McCain does that....does that mean you're okay if Obama were to do the same? "

cab e-girl wrote on Oct 7, 2008 11:20 PM:

" RAVEN: Amazon was not the news source, but it certainly was easy to see what her book is based on. "

Raven wrote on Oct 8, 2008 4:57 AM:

" then why suggest researching amazon....and please, educate us....what was it based upon? "

pbsm777 wrote on Oct 11, 2008 9:57 PM:

" cab e-girl - still waiting on YOUR contributions to the community.....afterall, you did call me a socialist who..."Did you donate anything to charity last year, because if you are most like most socialists you didn't, you would rather take it out of your neighbors pocket and let our politicians give it away.'

Well?????? I answered your question, can you answer the same question?

What have YOU done? "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy