Palin's a poor choice for the presidential ticket
By Georgiann Kite
Now that all the excitement of the conventions is over, it is time to get serious about the candidates who are best-suited to run this country.
John McCain is too old and Sarah Palin is not only inexperienced, but scary on so many levels that even traditional Republican voters are supporting Barack Obama.
Ed Koch, who is a longtime Republican supporter, was quoted as saying that Sarah Palin “scares the hell out of him.” I have to concur with Mr. Koch and others. I urge voters, particularly women, to take a long, hard look at the candidates before they vote in November.
Sarah Palin is a disaster waiting to happen. She is completely against abortion, even in the case of rape or incest. She brought her last child into the world with complete disregard for what issues and quality of life that boy will face. Mothers are supposed to protect their children, not subject them to a horrible, inadequate existence.
That boy’s only saving grace is that she and her husband have enough money to pay for all the services that he will need during his life. I know that maybe my remarks sound cruel, but I would not have wished to been born into a very narrow and limited life that she is subjecting this innocent boy to endure.
Then, there are her other enormous inadequacies to deal with. There are the earmarks, the “bridge to nowhere,” obvious warmongering issues, the fact that she hunts down innocent animals. The image of her with a gun is just wrong on so many levels as well. But, the biggest reason is, I hear women saying they will vote for McCain just because he put her on the ticket.
I am sorry, but that is just foolish and again paints a negative image of women. Please, I am speaking to people of my gender: Do not do this. In the first place, it is just wrong to vote for John McCain (who also is against women’s rights) on that basis alone.
Secondly, a vice president has very little power and will be in the background.
Thirdly, and most importantly, the woman has almost zero experience and would be unprepared to lead if John McCain dies in office.
There are also the problems of her own family and their “supposed” family values and backgrounds. Her husband, Todd Palin, was issued a subpoena and refused to appear because he is saying that the investigation of his wife is political grandstanding.
Here we have another Republican placing himself above the law. This from a man who belonged to a group that wanted to secede from the United States! She said in one of her speeches that she was an ordinary person, just like us. That is not true, either. The woman and her family are well off and are not representative of the normal population.
Personally, I don’t want an ordinary person in the White House. We have had that for the last eight years and look at the shape of this country.
The unemployment rate is the highest it’s been in years; the economic infrastructure is crumbling; the war in Iraq rages on and we have Sarah Palin announcing that we should maybe take on Russia and Iran as well. What is wrong with this picture?
Barack Obama and Joe Biden are intelligent, thoughtful men. They will bring a mixture of intelligence, passion and respect for the United States back to our nation and the world. We have real problems facing this country and we need extraordinary leadership and a new direction.
We do not need a man that voted like his predecessor 90 percent of the time and wants to continue the same failing policies and a woman who is just there for being a woman.
Please think about your choices and make your vote count this November. We need new ideas, and real help, not politics as usual.
(Kite lives in Napa.)
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines,
click here.
kevin wrote on Oct 1, 2008 5:05 AM:
Then why is it OK for Dems to vote for (or against) B.O. just because he's black? Poll after poll has shown that to be true...
Personally I am voting FOR Palin and McCain because they are NOT lawyers, like both B.O. and Biden! "
kbf wrote on Oct 1, 2008 6:31 AM:
antipc wrote on Oct 1, 2008 7:14 AM:
It’s o.k. to kill an unborn child with a birth defect, but not o.k. to hunt? What great logic.
The same inexperience that disqualifies Palin from being V.P. qualifies Obama for Pres?
Questioning Palins family values while giving Obama a free pass for attending Rev. Wright’s church for 20 Years?
Just who would paint a more positive picture of women, Rosie O’Donnell?
You would rather see another lying, elitist, career politician as V.P. than an ordinary person that understands everyday issues?
Obvious warmongering, how is that war with Aleuts going anyway?
Sorry Georgiann, the kool-aid served up by the mainstream leftist media has blinded you to reality. "
republican mom wrote on Oct 1, 2008 8:29 AM:
muffy245 wrote on Oct 1, 2008 8:54 AM:
Lastly, Kite then states the VP has no power. Obviously, Kite knows little about how the organization of goverment functions. The VP has a significant role in the administration with as much influence as the desire to make.
Lastly, her opinion of what Obama and Biden will do is so misguided and is based upon their statements which contain absolutely no substance.
jean abadie "
luv1mom wrote on Oct 1, 2008 9:17 AM:
just sayin wrote on Oct 1, 2008 9:21 AM:
Your comments on little Trig and his Downs Syndrome showed appalling ignorance about people with disabilities and the implication that he would be better off not having been born is offensive on so many levels, I can't even go into it with you.
Aside from that, there are so many good reasons not to vote for McCain-Palin based on their politics and her lack of experience and knowledge, why in the world would you opt to delve into the whole family values thing? I don't make vitally important voting decisions based on those peripheral issues and it's embarrassing to see others suggesting we should.
I believe in free speech and of course you had the right to add this commentary to the discussion. But just because we CAN do something doesn't mean we SHOULD. Next time, run your submission by a few like-minded individuals and get their take on it before you submit. You've done Obama-Biden supporters a disservice here.
My opinion. Thanks. "
musikluvr wrote on Oct 1, 2008 9:47 AM:
Sandra wrote on Oct 1, 2008 9:48 AM:
That boy’s only saving grace is that she and her husband have enough money to pay for all the services that he will need during his life. I know that maybe my remarks sound cruel, but I would not have wished to been born into a very narrow and limited life that she is subjecting this innocent boy to endure."
I am applalled....I am sickend, I am angry by the total lack of decency this person is showing. What ignorance!
I would suggect the writer ride her high horse over to Napa's Vine Village and see the "narrow and limited life" developementally challenged people can lead. SHAME ON YOU! This child will grow up with many saving graces. Thank god you are not his mother. Thank god people like you are not the only ones voting in this election.
Ask the clients at Vine Village if it would of been better to have aborted them. Who are you to judge what attributes go towards making a life have quality? Sick, sick sick!
This is what our country has come to. Someone writes a letter like this, and actually signs her name to such narrow hateful words...... "
mikesmom wrote on Oct 1, 2008 10:44 AM:
winemd wrote on Oct 1, 2008 10:56 AM:
Would Ms. Kite take away a woman's choice not to abort a disabled baby?
This is the worst argument against Sarah Palin I have read. There are reasons that a voter might disagree with Sarah Palin and choose not to vote for her ticket (including her stance on abortion), but standing up to her own principles is not one of them. "
Beta Napan wrote on Oct 1, 2008 10:57 AM:
My Down syndrome cousin is nearing his 60s. I've known him all my life and he's a cool, happy guy with a large, loving family that has helped him live a very full life, hold a job, live semi-independently and compete in Special Olympics.
So I don't think little Trig is doomed at all. He's already playing an important role in his family, showing Bristol what it will be like when she's a mom.
However: Palin is a lousy choice for any place in the White House. Even the National Review has admitted she is way out of her league. She has Cheney's attitude without any of his information. It's scary. "
luv1mom wrote on Oct 1, 2008 11:04 AM:
kevin wrote on Oct 1, 2008 11:30 AM:
What's interesting is that in the past they have always had to hide their true beliefs and it now appears that the mask is beginning to slip a little. More and more they are showing us who they really are and what they really believe... "
News_Chick wrote on Oct 1, 2008 11:53 AM:
Anyone can point the finger at others shortfalls. "
post-it wrote on Oct 1, 2008 12:03 PM:
I guess if "Mothers are supposed to protect their children, not subject them to a horrible, inadequate existence." we should deny poor people and those on welfare the right to have children too? And this!!!! "I would not have wished to been born into a very narrow and limited life that she is subjecting this innocent boy to endure." Are you saying only the well off and "well adjusted" should be parents?? Oh to be so pollyanna and grow up in St. Paul with Garrison Keeler narrating your life where all the kids are above average. How horrible it must be to live in South Central LA, Oakland or the projects in Chicago. No mother in her right mind would bring a child into such existence.
If this is true: "Secondly, a vice president has very little power and will be in the background" why does it even matter who a candidate chooses as his running mate? Again, some well thought out logic.
Thirdly, she states Palin has "no experience". Clearly her experience is at least equal to Sen. Obama's. Sen. McCain's experience is certainly equal to Sen. Bidens's. It is better to judge a candidate on position and accomplishments rather than experience or time served .
Really, these progressive sentiments are why the electorate has chosen "ordinary people" in the last two elections. "
selim wrote on Oct 1, 2008 12:50 PM:
But back to the point...
As much as I dislike the McCain/Palin ticket for a myriad of reasons, there are some factual inaccuracies in the letter. The most glaring of which is the statement that the VP has "very little power" and is "in the background". Ms. Kite clearly has not paid attention to the systematic restructuring of the role by Cheney in the past eight years. It's hard to remember a time when a VP has had so much power (last half of Reagan's term?)
The central compelling argument against Palin isn't because she had a boy with Down's, or whether the "first dude" is dodging subpeonas. It's the fact that she is so blatantly unintelligent, uninformed and intellectually incurious that it's frankly scary that she should be anywhere near the White House's zip code. Quite honestly, I don't know where the Republican party finds these people with IQs barely double that of their shoe sizes: Quayle...Bush43...Palin... I'm starting to wonder if upon registration as a Republican, one is sent a box of crayons and a subscription to "Highlights for Children". Seriously, since Buckley died, is there anyone on the right with a shred of intellectual credibility, or is the preferred discourse just Bill O'Reilly shouting "Shut up! Shut up!"???
Are these elitist comments? Probably, but we're talking about the most powerful position in the free world. We don't need moose hunters who have never traveled abroad, and we don't need "Regular Joes" with whom you would like to have a beer. Regular people aren't leaders...after all, we do live in a republic. "
Dwayne wrote on Oct 1, 2008 12:50 PM:
I wonder when karma will even the score...??? "
dizzy wrote on Oct 1, 2008 1:26 PM:
I wasn't planning to vote for McCain/Palin for many reasons, but this letter would never had encouraged me to vote for Obama. I listen to the debates, read articles about the candidates backgrounds, etc in an effort to make an informed decision on who I believe is most qualified to lead this country. This letter is quite frankly an embarrassment to me as a democrat in so many ways.
Your criticism of her choice to raise her son even though he has a disability is wrong on so many levels. While a candidates position on abortion is only one factor in analyzing a candidate (I do support the right to choose abortion in the case of rape and incest) I would never base my vote on the personal choice she made when faced with the issue. The key thing to underline there is that she had a choice, that "right" is what I am interested in protecting, not expecting others to make the same choice I would. Furthermore, it is uncalled for to lambast that individual for choosing to have a child with a disability. Have you ever met someone with Down's Syndrome? How can you possibly sit in judgement of their quality of life? You suggest she should have chosen to abort the child after learning he had a disability? You are really ok with that, yet you criticize her for hunting animals??
If you were hoping to influence the members of our community in the choice this November, you might try writing a letter with all the reasons you support your candidate, or at least keep your criticism of the other candidate to their policitical qualifications, experience, positions, etc. "
Hear Ye wrote on Oct 1, 2008 2:21 PM:
kdbk wrote on Oct 1, 2008 3:55 PM:
Given your obviously vast intellect, could you please provide us some real examples that would support your assertion that Palin is a particularly un-intelligent person? Could you, pretty please? You don't want us going on thinking that you're just some ranting liberal with no substance to their criticisms, do you?
Come on, selim, let us know how you've arrived at the conclusion that Palin is "blatantly uninformed". Give us some examples of what she's said and done to give you this impression...if you wish to support the integrity of your remarks, that is.
Oh, one last thing. Can you give us specific details as to how Cheney has managed to "restructure" the job description of Vice President? Come on, don't be afraid. "
a teacher wrote on Oct 1, 2008 4:09 PM:
Kevin: " Sandra, Libs have always had a disregard for life, liberty and property; all the the things this country stands for. "
That sounds more like the current crop of "conservatives". Time for a change.
Dwayne: you guys had better hope there is no such thing as karma.
As for the abortion thing, i personally think abortions are wrong, but then I'm not a woman. I do believe that woman have a right to decide what happens to their bodies, so I have to go with the pro-choice people. I would have more sympathy with the conservatives on abortion if I didn't get the impression that they believe that life begins at conception, but after birth, you're on your own. I think of that everytime I hear a rant against welfare. "
a teacher wrote on Oct 1, 2008 4:19 PM:
As for Gov. Palin, i give her more credit than selim, but some of her statements have to make you wonder. Claiming that she has foriegn policy cred because she can see Russia from Alaska or that the Russian President's plane has to stop in Anchorage is either idoiacy or chutzpah. I'll give her the benifit of the doubt and grant that it is the latter, but she makes an awful lot of those kinds of statements.
At any rate, she seems woefully under prepared to step into McCain's shoes should the need arise. "
Dwayne wrote on Oct 1, 2008 5:49 PM:
I hope you don't mean that the Reverend Wright is gonna get me... Haaaaaaa..... "
glenroy wrote on Oct 1, 2008 5:49 PM:
....community organizer who in their right mind would think that would qualify as an assistant dog catcher…who but another community organizer….. a lib..
Unlike House Democrats who combined ended up receiving a couple hundred million from the various failed lending and investing institutions for which we‘re going to pay dearly…Palin cleaned her own state house and party then refunded Alaskan residents unspent taxes….and of course McCain’s Bill to reel in Fannie and Freddie was blocked by Barney and Obama….all the while Democrats were racking in millions…..you won’t see either McCain or Palin on that long list of corrupt Democrats….
I sincerely hope the FBI follows through with the announced investigations…..there will be more than a few new Democrats residing where more than a few old Democrats once called home….state and federal prisons. "
comment wrote on Oct 1, 2008 6:54 PM:
Bauhausfan wrote on Oct 1, 2008 10:35 PM:
It is quite obvious, to someone with even modest critical thinking skills, that Palin is unprepared and would be frightening if she had to take over for McCain should he become ill or die in office, which is a real possibility with his age and multiple bouts with cancer.
The difference between liberals and democrats is this... we would be embarrassed by a choice like Palin and conservatives defend it. Actually they are quite aggressive in defending their own, no matter what. Imagine if Obama or Biden had a teenage daughter who got pregnant? Or if Obama had and affair while still married to his first wife?
Not hard to imagine what the "real" and "patriotic" conservatives would be saying about it. "
vocal-de-local wrote on Oct 1, 2008 11:09 PM:
It's not some accident that the tools used to determine chromosomal damage were discovered. We searched for and found it with the hope that suffering could be eliminated. The price we pay is that in choosing to abort an embryo, a more high functioning Down Syndrome embryo might be eliminated. The chromosomal studies cannot differentiate between high functioning and low functioning cases.
And for those wanting to play the God card: what do you think happened to Down Syndrome babies 500 or more years ago? Natural Selection selected them out once they hit adulthood because they could not care for themselves and they starved to death. More likely, once a difference became apparent in early childhood, drastic abandonment measures were taken. Personally, I think abortion is a more humane solution than subjecting a child to a life in an institution. "
comment wrote on Oct 1, 2008 11:20 PM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Oct 1, 2008 11:22 PM:
There are so many more important and relevant issues to focus on besides the Palin/Down Syndrome one. I think we should stay focused on her political weaknesses and not allow ourselves to become distracted by the emotionally charged ones. "
arnie wrote on Oct 1, 2008 11:50 PM:
Come on, I can even answer those questions, and I am not running to be VP. She was thrown because she didn't expect that to be a question, and didn't know the "right" answer. "
Sandra wrote on Oct 2, 2008 9:48 AM:
Sandra wrote on Oct 2, 2008 9:58 AM:
People cannot handle the fact that there is this woman who lives the the reality of what they say we all should have a right to live...such as being assertive, exercising the right to choose, freedom to worship as we choose, persuing a career, etc. They just hate it that she is not mirroring what they feel is the right reflection of these views.
I think he is probably correct in this. I have seen it demonstrated in other ways with other people. Look at what happened to Tammy Bruce and NOW.
There is nothing so angry as a leftist scorned...lol "
XMAN wrote on Oct 3, 2008 1:12 AM:
jwk wrote on Oct 3, 2008 7:39 AM:
bettye wrote on Oct 5, 2008 8:09 PM:
misfit wrote on Oct 6, 2008 6:16 PM:
Palin will be gone in a few short weeks. She will never be heard from again. Not only that, McCain will not even include her on his Christmas card list. He barely knew her when he picked her. She's was picked for all of the wrong reasons and it's coming back to bite them. She allowed herself to be used this way, basically as a McCain surrogate so, I don't feel too sorry for her. I'm sure she will be very disappointed in the end because her aspirations are high but, it just wasn't her time. She should go back to school and study up on the real issues in this country, learn how to be gracious and less proud of her mean spiritedness and read some periodicals now and then. Maybe she should run for Senator and learn how the real world works. She has been too isolated "Up there in Alaska", to gain the type of real world experience she will need in order to further her career in politics. "
shoot the messenger wrote on Oct 11, 2008 6:45 AM:
As to Palin's credentials: Forget all the "I can see Russia from my house, so I have foreign policy experience", or "I can solve the financial crisis because I lived across the street from a bank."
-As a well informed governor, she can't name ANYTHING she reads, when asked that good old gotcha question, "what do you read to keep up with current events". What a diabolical attempt by that liberal mouthpiece Katie Couric...
-She doesn't appear to be able to tell the difference between Russian incursions into our buffer zone and our airspace. Uh Sarah, difference between annoyance and International Incident...
-That partisan witchhunt investigation in Alaska (that would be the 4 democrat/10 republican panel) found she abused her power as governor.
-With other truly qualified, experienced Republican female candidates, why would McCain pick her? Even if she was imminently qualified (she is not), McCain should have looked at the baggage and run the other direction. If this is a Maverick pick, I'm worried about where else the Maverick attitude will come back to bite. "
misfit wrote on Oct 11, 2008 4:35 PM: