NVR Logo
Visitors bureau to start over
The Napa county visitors center — located in the Napa Town Center — will be closing with no plans of reopening. Jorgen Gulliksen/Register | Buy photos
Napa info center shuttered, nearby businesses surprised
Wednesday, October 01, 2008
Save and Share Share
After 18 years of economic struggle, the Napa Valley Conference and Visitors Bureau plans to shut the Visitors Bureau in Napa Town Center and go through a radical reorganization.

The conference and visitors bureau will be known by a new name, the Napa Valley Destination Council, with a new mission that relies more on a Web site — legendarynapavalley.com — than a downtown storefront, said Jeri Gill, the organization’s interim CEO.
News that the Visitors Center, which attracted 130,000 tourists last year, was closing created shock waves through downtown Napa’s business community Tuesday.

“It will definitely have a detrimental effect, especially with Mervyns closing at the same time,” said Gary Woods, co-owner of Gillwoods Cafe in Napa Town Center.
“It’s one more little thing that adds up,” Woods said. “It will be a little more like 10 years ago, maybe more of a ghost town.”

“It will be a disaster,” said Kent Gardella, whose jewelry store is within a stone’s throw of the Visitors Center. “You have 130,000 people following signs saying Visitors Center and there’s nothing here? It doesn’t make sense to me.”
Merchants at Napa Town Center were scheduled to meet today with the center owners to see if anything can be done to keep the Visitors Center in operation, Gardella said.

He would have suggested that perhaps the Visitors Center be moved to Copia, but Copia just announced that it’s scaling back to three days a week in the off-season, Gardella said.

George Altamura Jr., whose family owns Napa Town Center, said he was shocked by the abruptness of the planned closure. “Maybe there is something we could have done to keep the doors open,” he said.

The visitors bureau, now the Napa Valley Destination Council, plans to shut the Visitors Bureau before Nov. 1, Gill said. Seventy volunteers and four paid staff will be let go, she said.

Napa Valley chambers of commerce will be asked to stock the brochures and hand out advice in place of the Visitors Center, Gill said. The Napa Chamber of Commerce office is only a short distance away on First Street, she said.

Kate King, the chamber’s CEO, said her organization may need to expand hours and days of operation to serve tourists who now will not have a downtown information center. The chamber is currently closed on weekends.

Perhaps some of the center’s volunteers can be persuaded to bring their skills to the Napa chamber, King said. The chamber has many tourist-serving members who benefit from an information center, she said.

If signs are changed, a new tourist center could be in operation relatively quickly, King said. “It’s a matter of re-educating people who were here before,” she said.

First-time visitors won’t need re-education. They will go wherever the signs lead them, she said.

Internal changes

The bureau was spending about $2,500 a month to lease 2,500 square feet at Napa Town Center, Gill said. Although the bureau recouped the rent by leasing space to a vacation time share firm and a souvenir vendor, the bureau’s new board of directors decided this wasn’t the proper way to greet visitors, Gill said.

Besides the name change and the shutting of the Visitors Center, the new Napa Valley Destination Council will cease to be a member-sponsored organization, Gill said.

The bureau has 423 members — hotels, B&B, spas, restaurants and merchants — that pay a collective $167,000 in dues annually, Gill said. Unfortunately, there are 1,000 additional tourist-related businesses that are not members, she said.

Relatively few businesses were carrying the load for the entire Napa Valley, Gill said. Besides being inequitable, it distorted the advice that the bureau would give tourists looking for things to do and places to stay, she said.

If the new tourist council has no members, then every business can be treated equally on the Web site, Gill said. Legendarynapavalley.com should open within a month, she said.

For now, the council will rely on $100,000 in annual funding from the city of Napa, with a request in the works for $325,000 from Napa County, Gill said. The city council is scheduled to approve $50,000 of the $100,000 on Tuesday, she said.

To justify government funding, the tourist council will launch educational programs to enable employees in the wine and hospitality industries to better present the Napa Valley, Gill said.

The Napa Valley Destination Council should be considered a new organization that will need time to reinvent itself and sort out other ways to bring in revenue, Gill said.

“We don’t have all the answers yet as to what this looks like,” she said. “There may be some stubbed toes and some stumbles, but we know we’re on the road to success.”

In July, the bureau reshuffled its old board, bringing on high-profile new faces, including vintner Jack Cakebread as chair and Michael Chiarello, the celebrity chef who operates NapaStyle stores.

To unify marketing efforts, the bureau debuted an advertising tag line: “Napa Valley — Legendary.” A new approach is needed if the Napa Valley is to retain its luster in the competition against other wine destinations, leaders said.

Briefed Tuesday on the closure of the Visitors Center, Napa Mayor Jill Techel said the business impact may not be as dire as some predict. The chamber of commerce is easily found once signage is changed. Tourists will still have to come downtown, she said.

Techel agreed that the Web is increasingly where tourists get information before they visit a town. “To focus on that seems to make sense,” she said.

According to Gill, some four million visitors come to the Napa Valley annually, yet only 130,000 used the Visitors Center in downtown Napa.

If the city is to continue to financially support tourism marketing, the Napa Valley Destination Council will have to prove that it’s bringing in revenue for the city, Techel said.

Reynaldo Zertuche, general manager of the Embassy Suites on California Boulevard, said Tuesday afternoon that he hadn’t heard that the conference and visitors bureau was remaking itself. He said he was puzzled by the “legendary” promotion. Santa Rosa might need to rebrand itself, but to most people the Napa Valley already has the same allure as Gucci and Prada luxury brands, he said.

To keep tourists coming downtown, the downtown business community might want to consider setting up its own visitors center using revenues from its property-based promotion district, Gardella said.
14 comment(s)

musikluvr wrote on Oct 1, 2008 9:39 AM:

" Copia going under, Visitor bureau closing - didn't anyone realize that tourists don't go to Napa, they go upvalley. People keep trying to make a purse out of a sow's ear and still end up with blue collar Napa that tourists avoid. "

Beta Napan wrote on Oct 1, 2008 10:47 AM:

" That's just rude. My city is not a sow's ear. It's a place where I am proud to live, and where I am increasingly being asked for directions by people I can only assume are visitors.

And if Napa is such a must-to-avoid, why the new Westin and the upcoming Ritz-Carlton? Think those investors might know something you don't want to acknowledge?

Perhaps spelling isn't the only thing you're not so good at ... "

mom2 wrote on Oct 1, 2008 11:18 AM:

" They don't avoid Napa or Napa Valley. They flock here. Take a look at other destinations and how they are doing economically. Napa is fairing extremely well in these hard times. Change for that organization has been clearly on the horizon for many years. If the Napa Town Center businesses were banking on a Visitors Center keeping a 130,000 pairs of feet walking through their center, then I don't see why they couldn't band together and open their own visitor serving storefront?? What's the big deal the article says that the two vendors were paying the rent anyway and all volunteers were handing out information?? Seems like a no brainer to me. "

jim.beazleyhouse wrote on Oct 1, 2008 11:36 AM:

" It's taken 18 years to get back to the beginning: Napa Chamber hosting visitors.
Now just WHERE will they be doing this?
And HOW will they do it?
And WHEN will the new "legendary" website FINALLY go online?
And WHO will now represent the ENTIRE destination?
Funny how one thing leads to another and how one question begets more. "

reason-ator wrote on Oct 1, 2008 12:39 PM:

" "Destination Council ?"

THAT's goon attract the eye of visitors looking for a visitor center. It sounds even more like a government department than the bureau did. "

4gnapan wrote on Oct 1, 2008 12:45 PM:

" Joy and wonderment.... another brilllliant idea from management types who dont have a bleeding clue.

This is the dumbest move i've heard of today. That place is packed often, full of folks looking for information and buying tchotke's from the vendor. "

NapaFurriesMom wrote on Oct 1, 2008 2:28 PM:

" I just loved George Altamura Jr.'s comment. As is it was a shock. Goes to show how in touch they are with downtown. As former Napa Town Center merchant, I'm glad I bailed out early. "

kathyg wrote on Oct 1, 2008 2:29 PM:

" As a member and a volunteer at the visitors center I'm a little dismayed by the seemingly lack of foresight given this decision. I'd like to imagine that the board gave great consideration into the impact this would have on the community as a whole, but sadly I'm unable to get anyone to explain what actually happened here to me. Perhaps the board would like to hold a meeting for all members to explain their reasoning? "

jeeper16 wrote on Oct 1, 2008 3:45 PM:

" Mr. Altamura is an old pro at owning empty properties...and he's surprised??? He probably downtown Napa's biggest problem!! "

comment wrote on Oct 1, 2008 4:18 PM:

" Remember, Mr. Altamura also wants to build condos with retail space on the first floors in the present town center area. An empty town center could help him with his mission since a fully occupied and thriving area might hurt his chances of getting his project approved. If I remember right, the project he originally proposed was deemed to tall and essentially to ugly. He should look at other options before he ends up driving what could be a key area of downtown and it's resurgence into the ground. "

Napa Voter wrote on Oct 1, 2008 4:48 PM:

" Hate to tell it to you all, but the people who made this decision had much more information and insight into this type of stuff. They made the hard decisions that had to be made. And Mr. Beazley - weren't you a long time Board member that actually got them to where they must be now? "

Grommitt wrote on Oct 1, 2008 5:10 PM:

" Destination Council? Dumb name! Visitors know what a visitors' bureau is. "

cmc wrote on Oct 1, 2008 10:16 PM:

" So there was an organization with 423 members, who paid 167,000 a year to promote Napa, and someone else paid the rent.
Now there is a new organization with just the promise of a new website, no "brick and mortar" center for tourists to actually visit, -- and the city (meaning you and I) will pay for it to the tune of 100,000 -- or 450,000 per year if the County (again, you and I) kicks in its share. Get someone else to do the work (the Chamber of Commerce), and collect 450,000.
Sounds like some economic sleight of hand to me. Way to razzle-dazzle them, new Destination Council! "

mom2 wrote on Oct 2, 2008 8:49 AM:

" Sonoma County spends over 3 million a year on their destination with no designated visitors center that they fund. Their Chambers take care of that. Finally Napa will have a few measley dollars to spend on promoting Napa Valley the way is should be! Sounds like 500K would be better spent that way than funding programs that aren't working, sounds like a good plan to me. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy