NVR Logo
Do the crime, do the time ... Really!
Thursday, September 25, 2008
Save and Share Share
In the past few years, crime rates have been gone way up. I wonder why? I think the fact that it is now very rare that a person gets the punishment they deserve plays a very major role. Same with some people that seem to get away with tons of very serious stuff before being put in jail for a longer time than you go on vacation.

Personally, I like the idea of "an eye for an eye,” you kill someone, you get killed. When I brought this up with some family friends, they replied, "an eye for an eye makes the whole world blind.” The truth is, it doesn't. Criminals won't break laws for fear of their punishment. Sure, some people will break the law still, but others will see how severely they were punished and most likely choose against it.  
Another really big issue with our prison system is that prisons and jails are starting to look more and more like vacation spots. You get free food, a place to sleep, TV, dental and medical, which most law abiding citizens don't even have!

 
We received an e-mail once about a sheriff in Arizona that ran a very successful prison. I liked his ideas a lot:

1) He has jail meals down to 40 cents a serving and charges the inmates for them.
2) He stopped smoking and porno magazines in the jails, and took away their weightlifting equipment and cut off all but "G" movies ("Little Mermaid", Pinochio, Pooh Bear", etc.).

3) He started chain gangs so the inmates could do free work on county and city projects (removal of graffiti is a good option).

4) Then he started chain gangs for women so he wouldn't get sued for discrimination.

5) He took away cable TV until he found out there was a federal court order that required cable TV for jails. So he hooked up the cable TV again only allowed the Disney channel and the weather channel (when asked why the weather channel he replied, so they will know how hot it's gonna be while they are working on the chain gangs).

6) He cut off coffee since it has zero nutritional value.

7) When the inmates complained, he told them, "This isn't the Ritz-Carlton. If you don't like it, don't come back...It's 120 degrees in Iraq and our soldiers are living in tents, and they have to wear full battle gear, but they didn't commit any crimes, so shut your mouths!"

Way to go, Sheriff!  

Maybe if all prisons were like this one there would be a lot less crime or at least less repeat offenders.  

Criminals should be punished for their crimes - not live in luxury until it's time for their parole, only to go out and commit another crime so they can get back in to live on taxpayers money and enjoy things taxpayers can't afford to have for themselves.

Even though most of the facts came in a chain e-mail, I checked their veracity. This is true (snopes.com), and I definitely agree with a different view in punishment.

Angelina Gervasio is a seventh-grader at Redwood Middle School in Napa. She writes weekly, when she's caught up on homework, on a variety of topics.
8 comment(s)

pharper wrote on Sep 28, 2008 5:50 PM:

" I saw a special about that sheriff--all he's doing is making the inmates hate him. I don't think it reduces the crime rate.

And your family friends are right. An eye for an eye does make the whole world blind. Revenge is not pretty, and it isn't justice. it's just revenge. "

Angelina Gervasio wrote on Sep 28, 2008 7:07 PM:

" pharper-
He's making the prisoners hate prison/jail. Hopefully they are smart enough to not come back if they hate it that much.

If someone killed someone in your family, would you want them dead or locked up in a prison for a couple of years and then going back onto the streets? I would want them dead so no other person has to go through the ordeal of having a member of their family killed. "

pharper wrote on Sep 28, 2008 11:07 PM:

" I'd want them locked up forever--but it wouldn't give me any satisfaction to know that I was indirectly responsible for killing another human being. If killing is wrong, then why would we allow it? "

diehard4ever wrote on Oct 4, 2008 6:25 PM:

" pharper-
I wouldn't get your hopes up too high, that doesn't happen too much anymore. If you never want to see them again, the death penalty would work.

You wouldn't be responsible for killing that person either. They would be responsible for killing themselves. The moment they killed someone, their life was over. I would be their own fault that they died. "

db76 wrote on Dec 9, 2008 10:04 PM:

" After working with criminals for 4 years, studying their personalities, I can say with some certainty that what separates them from law abiding citizens is their failure to appreciate the consequences of their actions. They act on impulse. More severe punishment has never been shown to reduce the crime rate. It just costs the state more money and reduces money for rehab programs, which actually have been shown to reduce recidivism. "

Grits wrote on Dec 12, 2008 12:55 PM:

" Inmates refer to the county jail as the Napa Hilton......so do the juvies....one kid escaped last year when his co-defendant was acquitted on Napa charges because it meant he would likely receive the same "adjudication" and be sent back to Alameda County on charges he'd racked up there....DUH? "

toobuff wrote on Dec 15, 2008 10:12 PM:

" the warden of that jail could care less what the inmates think of him, what he's trying to do is what california's prison system should learn from. these criminals are a burden on our society. the last time i checked, the average cost to house an inmate in california prison system for one year is almost 40,000. look it up its availible to us. i say put them to work, pay off their debt that they owe us law abiding citizens for not only their crimes they committed but for the money it costs to lock them up because they don't know how to play nice in our society... "

Mr_Napa wrote on Dec 23, 2008 4:11 PM:

" without a doubt, this column confirms the truth of scientific findings which tell us that our brains remain immature well into our early 20's, at least when it comes to impulse control and moral relativism. keep writing kid...entertaining stuff. reminds me of college-grad ramblings about the "ways of the world". "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy