Getting to know Napa Pipe
The Napa Pipe property as seen from the air in August 2008. The owners of the property are set to unveil an informational initiative to educate people about the 3,200 home Napa Pipe development proposal. J.L. Sousa/Register |
Buy photos
Developer plans informational push as project moves ahead
By DAVID RYAN
Register City Editor
November 21st, 2009
November 5th, 2009
October 28th, 2009
September 18th, 2009
August 28th, 2009
Convincing the public, take two.
Napa County residents’ mailboxes are once again going to be used by Napa Redevelopment Partners to promote a proposal for 3,200 homes at the Napa Pipe site, months after a close election deluged voters with material.
Sometime this month, the development group plans to launch an outreach program to educate residents about its Napa Pipe proposal by mail, Web, e-mail, newspaper ads and — more intimately — walking tours of the 152-acre Napa Pipe site.
The Napa Pipe proposal — complete with townhomes, restaurants, light industrial space and 44 acres of parks — is the largest single development proposal in Napa County history and a source of strain between the city of Napa and the county. While the project is firmly in the county, it borders the city, raising concerns about what kind of impact it might have on city services.
The two government entities set up a city-county study group to look at Napa Pipe’s initial reports on traffic, water and other issues. Drafts of those reports are tentatively slated to be released to the public in October.
Napa County Planning Director Hillary Gitelman told the Napa County Planning Commission earlier this month that the county plans to label Napa Pipe as a potential residential site in the housing element of the county’s General Plan, which must be completed in the coming months.
The Napa County Board of Supervisors is scheduled to receive a report from Napa Redevelopment Partners’ leader Keith Rogal on Tuesday, going over what each of the three phases of the Napa Pipe proposal would look like. According to a county staff report, each phase would take about three years to complete, with complete buildout in 2020.
Every year, the estimated construction includes 215 to 285 market-rate units, and 55 to 70 affordable units.
Rogal said he was expecting Napa Redevelopment Partners to host two walking tours per week for the next eight weeks. A Web site laying out all the details is expected to be up later this month.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
jwk wrote on Sep 10, 2008 6:55 AM:
noblindershere wrote on Sep 10, 2008 6:58 AM:
marine1/1 wrote on Sep 10, 2008 8:37 AM:
BKF wrote on Sep 10, 2008 8:45 AM:
The City of Napa is required to provide over 2,000 new homes of varying affordability by the end of this Housing Element cycle. Napa County as a whole must provide over 3,700 new homes, so this project seems to meet City and County of Napa goals. "
napagirl76 wrote on Sep 10, 2008 9:04 AM:
hawkins707 wrote on Sep 10, 2008 9:13 AM:
Paddy wrote on Sep 10, 2008 9:16 AM:
This property is not even zoned for the development they are requesting and they have the audacity to "move ahead"?! This continues to be thrown in the face of Napa despite the clear message that has been sent, and will continue to be sent, that infrastructure, water, schools are insufficient and traffic throughout Napa County will become more of a nightmare than it is today.
I agree with JWK. This is no longer the town that made Napa such a phenominal place to live.
If you developed Yosemite as you are Napa the affect would be similar. What a horrible waste of God's beauty that has been appreciated and loved by so many for so long for the financial benefit of a very few.
The drain of the spirit of Napa will continue as the influx of, whoever, creates a wasteland of fleeting opportunity. "
marine1/1 wrote on Sep 10, 2008 10:24 AM:
Bill wrote on Sep 10, 2008 10:27 AM:
The current regional housing need allocation is in the neighborhood of 569 affordable units in the time frame of 2007 to 2014. From the Napa county housing element up date.
A project this large is simply not called for by the state only the pressure Mr. Rogal and his operatives put on the community.
Most units will not be affordable and no government planning has yet addressed the concerns of the City of Napa. This site is in play because the County as in the Board of Supervisors is playing dodge ball with this site. They hope to abandon their responsibility in one blow. "
tazzmaster wrote on Sep 10, 2008 11:00 AM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Sep 10, 2008 11:11 AM:
With Dey closing, certainly to be followed by an exodus of other businesses, middle income jobs will diminish. The primary employers in Napa City/County will be those that support infrastructure (government jobs), medical jobs (note that many physicians are now joining Kaiser and that our local hospital struggles partly because of the demographics here), and of course, the wine industry (whose corporate leanings will increasing skim the wages of the middle class). Also include the hospitality industry (who will provide a minimum amount of wages to those who cannot afford to live in Napa).
A region that cannot provide strength to a middle class is bound to be unhealthy. Napa will be top heavy in retirees, vacationers and low wage workers dependent on social services and crowded into existing Napa homes.
So instead of Napa dealing with the diversification of industry, their solution is developing Napa Pipe and providing support housing for predominately low wage workers? There are few jobs left in Napa to support the prices these homes will demand. Where will these people work? How about the limitations on the amount of people who can be crowded into each living unit?
Someone needs to be truthful about this: these living units will be targeted toward which income level? There are too few middle class jobs left in Napa so I will assume if their target audience is "middle class" we are looking at a bedroom community; if targeted toward "low income" it will become an out of sight, out of mind dumping place for our low income hospitality workers (do you think their lack of medical insurance and other needs will be addressed by their employers? Who pays?) "
Native74 wrote on Sep 10, 2008 11:16 AM:
Oh nice...so when are the public hearings on this going to take place? No on N really bungled this one up. I wish Rogal would stick to the Mervn's complex and not Napa Pipe. "
napaao wrote on Sep 10, 2008 11:59 AM:
5th Generation Napan wrote on Sep 10, 2008 12:11 PM:
Mare Island should never have been closed. I could actually see a functioning blue collar naval site there building Coast Guard Ships for the navy. The Coast Guard just accepted the first new cutter built in over 30 years. They made the comment that they NEED new ships to meet the Homeland security issues of today. I cannot think of a better location than Napa Pipe to do what it was originally designed to do. BUILD ships. Mare Island and Kaiser built Napa, NOT the tourist or wineries. They have always been here (tourist and wineries) and they always will be. But lets get some people thinking of our community first. 3000 houses to what support Dey Labs that just said "screw Napa"? We need to start building OUR community the way we use to, BY BUILDING PRODUCTS AGAIN!!!! "
musikluvr wrote on Sep 10, 2008 1:34 PM:
shareathought wrote on Sep 10, 2008 1:42 PM:
Cadence wrote on Sep 10, 2008 2:21 PM:
The county has voted and the majority of Napans see no problem with this new town. The majority were SO easily duped by the last round of slick mailers - they believe that their affordable housing mandates will be taken care of into forever, that there is UNLIMITED water, that these units will become homes for their offspring, never mind JOBS for those offspring, that schools, and services will be paid for by the new residents, that the new residents will be sailing to their mortgage-paying jobs via water taxis, and most importantly - let's be blunt - that it will keep growth and congestion away from their own parts of the county.
The majority are wrong on all counts.
But gee, the siren songs on those slick mailers will work their magic again.
I think some ancient Greeks actually welcomed a lovely "gift" of a Trojan horse, too. Turns out they were as wrong as the current residents of Napa, poor saps. "
B-Side wrote on Sep 10, 2008 4:28 PM:
reader wrote on Sep 10, 2008 4:52 PM:
Joe B wrote on Sep 10, 2008 7:57 PM:
TheWholeTruth wrote on Sep 10, 2008 11:07 PM:
But wait, remember, N was NOT about Napa Pipe. Duh!!!
Good Luck Napa "
make napa better wrote on Sep 10, 2008 11:53 PM:
Build a waterpark or some sort of theme park or even put the fairgrounds out there. they could do plenty of good with that land instead of building housing, restaurants, and a park that we already have too much of (minus the park).
We also should build something for these tourists to do in the evening. I get a ton of guests that want something fun to do in the evening. We could build a ton of revenue if we only put in something else there. "
CASEY wrote on Sep 15, 2008 12:06 PM:
homes. Napa pipe is stupid. Look what happened to American Canyon. It's a misable bowel of obstruction. "
14obama wrote on Sep 19, 2008 3:18 PM: