NVR Logo
Issues the mainstream media won’t address
Monday, September 08, 2008
Save and Share Share
Just over a month ago I met with Peter Philips, professor of sociology and the Project Censored director at Sonoma State University. For more than an hour we discussed the history and the workings of Project Censored, censored articles from past years, and how the mainstream media’s censorship of today’s newsworthy stories compares with past years.

Project Censored was founded by Carl Jensen, professor emeritus of communications, Sonoma State University, in 1976, as a result of his inability to adequately answer his students questions as to why Watergate, which happened five months prior to President Nixon’s reelection, wasn’t discovered by the mainstream media before the election. Philips was handed the reins to Project Censored when Jensen retired in 1996.
From the Project Censored Web site: “Project Censored is a media research program working in cooperation with numerous independent media groups in the U.S. Project Censored’s principle objective is training of SSU students in media research and First Amendment issues and the advocacy for, and protection of, free press rights in the United States. Project Censored has trained over 1,500 students in investigative research in the past three decades. Through a partnership of faculty, students and the community, Project Censored conducts research on important national news stories that are underreported, ignored, misrepresented or censored by the U.S. corporate media. Each year, Project Censored publishes a ranking of the top 25 most censored nationally important news stories in the yearbook, ‘Censored: Media Democracy in Action,’ which is released in September.”

The ongoing joke with the Project Censored staff is that the mainstream media censors Project Censored, as most people have never heard of it. I recently found out about Project Censored when I received an e-mail from Connie Fogal of the Canadian Action Party, informing me she had been nominated for her article “North American Union: The SPP is a ‘hostile takeover’ of democratic government and an end to the Rule of Law” (Global Research Institute).
Fogal’s article and Stephen Lendman’s, “The Militarization and Annexation of North America” (Global Research Institute), both regarding NAFTA, the Security Prosperity Partnership and the North American Union, earned them the No. 2 spot in Project Censored’s most censored news stories of 2007-2008. Fogal, along with Lendman, who is the talk radio host of the “Global Research News Hour,” will be lecturing at Sonoma Sate University in the Project Censored Modern Media Censor lecture series, on Thursday, Sept. 11.

From Project Censored’s Web site: “The lecture series will provide a forum for some of the best investigative journalists in our country today, allowing them to give an ‘insider’s perspective’ on the hard-hitting news reports that fell through the cracks of the corporate mass media. The lectures ask: How are important events covered by the major media outlets? Are there stories or subjects that are consistently left out? Do mainstream media outlets have a ‘liberal’ or ‘conservative’ bias? Do distortions in the current system rise to the level of censorship?”
A year and a half ago, while I was researching NAFTA on the Internet, I came upon the CAP Web site, discovering that their founding members, which included Fogal, formed CAP because of the dangers they perceived NAFTA would inflict on their Canadian sovereignty, something the other Canadian political parties were ignoring. I e-mailed Fogal, requesting information “from the other side of the border” about NAFTA, thinking nothing would come of it. Within a day, Fogal e-mailed me back that she would have one of her staff members contact me and provide me with information. One day later I received CAP’s list of more than 40 recommended Internet sites for information as they thanked me for my concerns, asking me to stay in touch. I have been receiving their e-mailed updates about NAFTA and their other concerns, ever since much of their information parallels and supplements what Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, is warning Americans about, most of which our mainstream media (including Rush, Hannity and O’Reilly) downplays or ignores.

Whether you consider yourself left- or right-leaning, Project Censored’s Modern Media Censorship lecture series addresses current issues that most Americans are unaware of, and offers valuable insight as to how the mainstream media functions within the United States and around the world.

Fogal and Lendman are scheduled to lecture Thursday, Sept. 11, at 7 p.m., in the Darwin building, #103. Tickets are $10 at the door or can be pre-purchased at Brown Paper Tickets at 1-800-838-3006 or online at support@BrownPaperTickets.com. For more information about Project Censored, contact Kate Sims at 664-3160 or simsk@sonoma.edu.

(Eggers lives in Napa.)
15 comment(s)

kevin wrote on Sep 8, 2008 4:48 AM:

" Let us know when they are going to reveal the space aliens that are hiding at Area 51... "

kingsbridge wrote on Sep 8, 2008 9:36 AM:

" A serious threat to our ability to make informed decisions is the control of the media by a few individuals/corporations. These families control newspapers and television in many markets. It is tough to have freedom when the press is not independent. Then add to this situation the fact that so many children are not graduating from high school and thus cannot read critically and you have the seeds for the decline of freedom.

Now we have a candidate for vice president who sought to ban books from the Wassilia library. Sinclair Lewis had it right when he said, "When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." "

Common Sense wrote on Sep 8, 2008 10:27 AM:

" I saw Elvis on First Street the other day... "

Dwayne wrote on Sep 8, 2008 10:28 AM:

" 1) Palin never banned any books.

2) The article states the motive for her inquiry as “some voters thought they had inappropriate language in them”

3) Despite the above two facts, TIME leads by stating that: Mrs. Palin inserted her religious beliefs into policy in this case, which wasn't true.

The tactic used in the above paragraph is something called Poisoning the Well.

You'd have better credibility going after her husband's DUI 20-years ago, because that really happened...

Try again..... "

sickothis wrote on Sep 8, 2008 11:05 AM:

" You're right, she never banned books, because people freaked out.

NY Times, et al: The librarian, Mary Ellen Emmons, pledged to “resist all efforts at censorship,” Ms. Kilkenny recalled. Ms. Palin fired Ms. Emmons shortly after taking office but changed course after residents made a strong show of support. "

Dwayne wrote on Sep 8, 2008 11:56 AM:

" The smear merchants who continue to circulate the list also failed to do a simple Google search, which would have showed them that the bogus Sarah Palin Banned Book List is almost an exact copy-and-paste reproduction of a generic list of “Books Banned at One Time or Another in the United States” that has been floating around the Internet for years. STACLU notes that the official Obama campaign website is also perpetuating the fraud. And it’s spread to craigslist, where some unhinged user is posting images likening Palin to Hitler.

The person who first spread the Palin smear is identified as “Andrew Aucoin,” a commenter on the blog of librarian Jessamyn West. West has done the right thing in keeping the bogus comment up and pointing out in her main post that “there appears to be no truth to the claim made by the commenter, and no further documentation or support for this has turned up.”

It's bogus..... Look it up........ "

kingsbridge wrote on Sep 8, 2008 1:03 PM:

" Dwayne, read what I wrote: "sought to ban books". I did not mention the list you describe. Banning books, or speech, is not constitutional and makes me cringe that such a person is running for vice president. "

Dwayne wrote on Sep 8, 2008 2:16 PM:

" kingsbridge wrote on Sep 8, 2008 1:03 PM:
" Dwayne, read what I wrote: "sought to ban books". I did not mention the list you describe. Banning books, or speech, is not constitutional and makes me cringe that such a person is running for vice president. "

It's bogus...... "

sickothis wrote on Sep 8, 2008 4:32 PM:

" No dwayne - it's not bogus. She fired the librarian because she wouldn't play ball. Where there's smoke... "

Raven wrote on Sep 8, 2008 5:36 PM:

" Dwayne...and if Mayor came to the Napa library and asked about banning some books...your reaction would be? "

kevin wrote on Sep 8, 2008 6:05 PM:

" Lol. I used to work at the library and the head librarian always made it PERFECTLY clear that the final selections were made by HER and HER alone! I thinks it's a point of professional honor with them.

However, I feel the library should reflect the mores of the community in the books and material it contains. I seriously doubt most American communities would accept the type of material one would find in some deviant place like San Francisco... "

Dwayne wrote on Sep 8, 2008 7:08 PM:

" The librarian supported and campaigned for the previous mayor that Palin ousted in the election, and the librarian was giving Palin a bunch of crap...

There's no evidence of anything, except he-said she-said, and the Palin leftist smear that goes with it....

Nobody banned anything.. It's bogus....

Ever heard of Google, or do you want to continue to throw gas on the fire...???

Go back to the husband's DUI 20-years ago... That really happened... "

Bauhausfan wrote on Sep 8, 2008 10:48 PM:

" "However, I feel the library should reflect the mores of the community in the books and material it contains. I seriously doubt most American communities would accept the type of material one would find in some deviant place like San Francisco... "

I suppose you would like to be the one to decide what is "deviant" for Napa and what is not? "

Sandra wrote on Sep 9, 2008 10:55 AM:

" Where there's smoke....there is a desperate liberal fanning the flames of misinformation...Check out the truth at snopes.... "

Raven wrote on Sep 9, 2008 7:54 PM:

" there were no books banned and the list floating around is bogus, but according to the LA Times, Time, and the Washington Post and other newspapers, pain did ask the librarian what her reaction would be if she was asked to remove certain books "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy