The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
JustMy$.02 wrote on Sep 8, 2008 4:15 PM:
But hey lets vote for Obama and the whole nation can join us in hating companies that actually provide decent wages.
Ya that'll work "
C'mon reg get it right wrote on Sep 8, 2008 4:40 PM:
doscentavos wrote on Sep 8, 2008 4:41 PM:
Escalating insurance costs, medical premiums are the main reasons companies relocate..in this case, to the Northeast. "
les wrote on Sep 8, 2008 4:43 PM:
RichardS wrote on Sep 8, 2008 4:47 PM:
I for one have been predicting the loss of employment for some with the possible sale, but now that the facility will be closed I just dont know what 500 of my co-workers and I will do.
This is a big loss for Napa as well since it is the largest employer in the valley, but hopefully the valley will gain an new and better buyer of the land and facility.
For more information look at: www.mylan.com "
common sense wrote on Sep 8, 2008 5:26 PM:
jmo wrote on Sep 8, 2008 5:39 PM:
I think the state hospital, Queen of the Valley and the insurance firm at 12/29 intersection are bigger employers in the valley. Correct anyone? "
russ wrote on Sep 8, 2008 5:58 PM:
I suppose some would say good riddance to an evil greedy corporation.
Remember that successful, profitable corporations employ many people and spend lots of money in their communities. "
misfit wrote on Sep 8, 2008 6:03 PM:
Dwayne wrote on Sep 8, 2008 7:00 PM:
Care to venture a guess as to why...??? "
db76 wrote on Sep 8, 2008 7:12 PM:
db76 wrote on Sep 8, 2008 7:19 PM:
Care to venture a guess as to why...??? "
Probably because the American economy is in the dumps because all of our tax dollars and being sent to Iraq by the boat load. "
Dwayne wrote on Sep 8, 2008 7:49 PM:
Try again...... "
napan1961 wrote on Sep 8, 2008 8:00 PM:
Napa State Hospital: 1778 Full time employees
Queen of the Valley Hospital: 1200 Full time employees
Dey L.P.: 850 Full time employees
Cultured Stone: 700 Full time employees "
orange99 wrote on Sep 8, 2008 8:14 PM:
db76 wrote on Sep 8, 2008 8:47 PM:
keepinitreal wrote on Sep 8, 2008 9:53 PM:
musikluvr wrote on Sep 8, 2008 9:57 PM:
robbys22 wrote on Sep 8, 2008 10:00 PM:
Paddy wrote on Sep 8, 2008 10:04 PM:
reason-ator wrote on Sep 8, 2008 10:10 PM:
Administrations can blame other administrations. I would love to blame consumers, but insurance companies don't give consumers any choices.
We're killing ourselves in this country, and it's all because wealthy companies want to be wealthier.
Anybody in power who could stop the bleeding would get crucified by Big Business if they ever got into power to begin with. But they wouldn't GET into power without being beholden to Big Business in the first place.
And neither the Dems or the Republicans are going to go against the Big Businesses, no matter what kind of change they say they're interested.
Am I cynical ? "
napablogger wrote on Sep 8, 2008 11:51 PM:
I used to be a recruiter in the pharmaceutical industry and Dey has a sterile facility that manufactures parenteral drugs, injectibles, which is expensive to build. At one time I believe they had two facilities, but I haven't kept up with them.
In any case, it may be attractive to another sterile manufacturer in drugs, chemicals or the food industry and I would suggest our government look into what we might be able to do to attract another company to that location.
I actually placed an engineer there in 1994 or so, and the issues then were high cost of real estate and the state income tax. There are a lot of drug companies in the Bay Area but a limited number do sterile manufacturing which is the kind of background needed there. "
past dey employee wrote on Sep 9, 2008 4:15 AM:
B-Side wrote on Sep 9, 2008 7:06 AM:
We were told we would have jobs with the new company but instead every one of us were let go. I know other people that could tell the same story. That's just the way it is in the corprate world.
napablogger-I believe they also have a plant in Texas. "
RichardS wrote on Sep 9, 2008 7:07 AM:
Dwayne wrote on Sep 9, 2008 8:59 AM:
A California migration study found that among companies that left California, 9% went to Nevada and 21% to Mexico. Texas also did well enticing California corporate refugees....
Congestion and high prices have lowered California's quality of life....
No, this is not an "American" problem, it is a left-wing whacko environmental problem, brought about by the short sighted liberals who run the most leftie state in the country...
Workers' comp costs are among the highest in the country, which is a top concern among management.
While California provides all those disincentives to do business here, other states are providing positive incentives to lure California companies to their state, and it's working..... "
napablogger wrote on Sep 9, 2008 10:22 AM:
RichardS wrote on Sep 9, 2008 11:07 AM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Sep 9, 2008 11:12 AM:
I believe that part of the problem in California involves over crowding. Our taxes pay for it on some level. Increased taxes affect business too. Consumer spending decreases and it filters down to affect business. It would be interesting to compare the employer health care costs in different states as well.
And yes, let's not hide our heads in the sand. Environmental regulation are driving costs up. California is more stringent than other states, for now. But let's evaluate WHY we are driven toward environmental regulation. It deduces down to one very big factor: over crowding.
Too many people is equated with too much garbage; too much contamination in our water; depletion of water and other resources; species impact; the impact of those species on other species; Droughts in California exacerbate the problem.
California was once mostly a desert. We managed to channel all that water into building bigger cities to house more people. But the people keep coming (immigration) yet our resources are limited. We have no checks and balances for this influx. Perhaps someone has seen the writing on the wall and is getting out while it's still profitable to do so. "
napamouth wrote on Sep 9, 2008 11:17 AM:
Chardonnay wrote on Sep 9, 2008 11:30 AM:
However I will agree that California is becoming increasingly harder to do business in. The bureaucratic red tape, regulations and tax burdens are making it increasingly more difficult. When our state is governed at the nation level as democrats do, it is only going to get worse. Bigger government means more regulations.
Hat's off to the Dey Employees, you will find other jobs. Our northern bay area is in short supply of educated and qualified workers regardless of what the media says. "
someguyinnapa wrote on Sep 9, 2008 12:46 PM:
thanks for the dose of reality! Much appreciated, mon! "
popoweb wrote on Sep 9, 2008 1:34 PM:
I am fortunate to have left Dey when I did. My condolensces to those of you still there.
The rest of you, get off of the blame game. The decision by Mylan was monetary, they owe lots of money. Selling Dey would have given them the cash needed to pay down their debt. A decent suitor was not forthcoming, so they have done what makes fiscal sense, move Dey east closer to their headquarters. "
yamamama wrote on Sep 9, 2008 1:53 PM:
Dirty Napkin wrote on Sep 9, 2008 5:21 PM:
bchiloquin wrote on Sep 9, 2008 7:24 PM:
that is probaly the real storie with dey. "
skeptic wrote on Sep 10, 2008 12:27 PM:
this is a national problem and will increase to depression era levels of unemployment. as more millions are fired, there will be less incomes to propel the economy and pay taxes and buy things, which will lead to more layoffs and greater unemployment.
a local newscaster bemoaned the fact that we are putting no money into savings accounts, which would help the economy and create jobs. he failed to point out that, with inflation at %14, it makes little sense to put money into savings at 1/4th of 1%.
the federal reserve is doing this in purpose to limit savings and continue to entice people to buy houses when theyshouldn't. "
14obama wrote on Sep 13, 2008 4:08 PM: