Trouble in east county
Napa County is a special world all its own: Rugged, beautiful, isolated. Unfortunately, the isolation is now haunting people in one corner of Pope Valley, a residential neighborhood on Putah Creek called Berryessa Estates.
Berryessa Estates residents have been dealt a lousy hand that leaves some vulnerable to foreclosure on their homes.
It all starts with the isolation, but in fact several factors have led the residents of Berryessa Estates to their predicament: Strict, but beneficial, environmental regulations; the big bill ($15,000 per property owner over 30 years) for water and wastewater treatment repairs that came after years of neglect and a $400,000 fine by the state; and the shaky economic times.
Today, more than 11 percent of Berryessa Estates property owners are having trouble paying their assessment for the systems run by the Lake Berryessa Residential Improvement District.
If they don’t? County officials say the law requires LBRID to move toward “judicial foreclosure” on delinquent properties. Those property owners who haven’t paid their assessments by Oct. 1 are at risk.
While the law might require the district to take action, the situation doesn’t benefit anyone. Clearly, the property owners will lose if foreclosure proceedings begin; LBRID doesn’t want to take anyone’s property; and foreclosed-on owners don’t tend to make their sewer and water payments — which shows LBRID itself may not be out of the weeds for a few years.
County officials say they are seeking options short of foreclosure proceedings. One suggestion stems from the fact that owners have less flexibility to pay their assessment bill than they do their property tax bill. If they can pay the assessment by Oct. 1 while they seek delays or incur penalties on their tax bills, they can at least extend the period in which they can work out of a financial jam.
It would be better still if the county can help identify a grant or lending source to further minimize the risk to homeowners.
From the homeowner’s perspective, this dilemma feels like punishment for doing the right thing.
Agreeing last year to pay for major upgrades that would put their community into compliance with state environmental regulations and ensure the safety of their water supply, they now find the government sniffing around their door for failure to pay the substantial bill.
In Thursday’s Register, Napa County Supervisor Diane Dillon suggested it might have been a mistake for local officials to approve the remote residential neighborhood in the first place. That may be the case. If so, Berryessa Estates is not the only mistake out there. Rural outposts in other parts of the state are facing similar problems.
But no one can turn the clock back at Berryessa Estates. The homes are there, the improvements to the water and wastewater systems are nearly in place, stability is around the bend -- as long as people aren’t forced by hardship to abandon their beautiful corner of Pope Valley.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
boots wrote on Sep 5, 2008 7:51 AM:
Was there some thing about housing retention in the Housing element? Oh, never mind, let them play golf in Pope Valley! "
Teddy wrote on Sep 5, 2008 8:13 AM:
concerned1 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:58 AM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Sep 5, 2008 12:18 PM:
I do not object when the county allows houses to be built in rural areas which have some degree of self sufficiency. Putting dense homes in a rural area without any guarantee built in for future maintenance is what's stupid. So it's ok for the planning dept. to approve these developments without taking future maintenance into consideration? If the costs are passed onto me (remember I am already responsible for my own maintenance costs), I will be incredibly mad.
I've heard a few Angwin residents dependent on these systems say "I don't like this development but at least I can't SEE it". You may not SEE it but you WILL FEEL it in your pocketbook, especially if you are dependent on Angwin's water/sewer systems. Someone will pay; if not you, it will be county taxpayers. So, for any of those apathetic Angwin residents who are too lazy or intimidated to become vocal about this project, don't say you weren't warned. The county has no interest in protecting YOUR interests. "
musikluvr wrote on Sep 5, 2008 2:31 PM:
reader wrote on Sep 5, 2008 2:51 PM:
I too have and maintain my own well and septic system. I budget for these things but what concens me is what will happen to my water table when the proposed suburb is built. I suppose I will be told to join the suburb water system and pay through the nose like everyone else. Angwin residents not on their own well already pay upwards to $200.00 mo. for water. This proposed development is BLASPHEMY. That is the only word I have for it; and BERRYESSA ESTATES IS THE CANARY IN THE COAL MINE. ARE YOU LISTENING MS. GITELMAN, ET AL? Are you interested in the residents and the environment or only in following the big money and running from PUC/TRIAD's "pulling-the-religious-card stunt? I pray you do the right thing. "
glenroy wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:48 PM:
The county should reduce the assessed values on Berryessa Estate homes to the absolute minimum land value and give them a dollar for dollar credit the infrastructure costs…..these folks get few county benefits but are paying the same rate as us…..besides the elitist SC, NCLT, UCD and BOR ruining Lake Berryessa in turned ruined a lot of home values all around the lake…. "