McCain's solid speech
By MICHAEL HALEY
Sept.5, 7 a.m.McCain gave a great speech tonight, very good. He is certainly a better speaker than Bush, and seems very genuine. What stood out in my mind is that he has gotten older and wiser, and that is incredibly important in a President. He is the only one of the four, the Presidential and VP candidates, that are in that position.
Some people get older and whinier, constantly complaining about everything, A few of the more enlightened become wise, and it is clear that McCain has done that. He made me feel a lot more comfortable with him being President, and I think he has heard the message about stupid dishonest negative campaigning. I thought his kind comments for Obama showed a lot of class.
He also talked about cutting spending and about school vouchers. Both are things that are badly needed, but can he deliver? He can help with cutting spending, but I will believe it when I see it. I don't think he can help with school vouchers as President. He can end No Child Left Behind which has not helped at all.
At least he is saying the right things. I can't wait to dig in deeper to the actual plans of both candidates. I have yet to make up my mind, I continue to vacillate. When I do you all will be the first to know. Then you can have fun calling me either lefty or neocon.
Last thought about both conventions, the only two speeches that actually had any policy in them were the final ones, from Obama and McCain, respectively. Both parties played the culture war game and just threw up a lot of jetsam and flotsam and blasted confetti propaganda in our faces. The main message is that we should vote for them because we are like them culturally. Culturally I am a liberal, but intellectually I agree with Republicans. Maybe that is why I cause so much pain for my readers. :)
Palin continues to have a scandal a day, the latest by the Enquirer that she is having an affair with her husband's business partner. It wouldn't have traction except the Enquirer just nailed John Edwards and no one took them seriously for a long time.
She gave an outstanding speech but the fact is we don't know her and have two months to get to know her. That is part of the reason there has been such a media frenzy around her. I think they should stay away from her kids, but let's face it she is putting them so out front as one of her qualifications that it isn't surprising they get all that focus. But all the questions about trooper gate, about her attendance in some pretty way out there evangelical Christian churches, her flip flop on the Bridge to Nowhere, etc, etc. are legit.
I can see that this decision is going to come down to two things for me, can we trust McCain not to be trigger happy a la Bush and define the war on terror down to a real level, and is there a snowball's chance in hell that Obama's economic plans will be good for the economy. Not too sure about either one of those.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Sandra wrote on Sep 5, 2008 8:58 AM:
One thing that struck me about the two camps and the speeches given was that the democratic ones were full of platitudes designed to make us all feel good about ourselves and what the GOVERNMENT COULD DO FOR US. And they were really well delivered and inspiring.
The republican ones seemed to have more actual content on what they intended to actually do if elected, and also what WE COULD DO FOR OUR COUNTRY. And I for one was very impressed by the attitude of service.
There was certainly a contrast between the two camps and I would expect JFK would be turning in his grave if he saw what the Democratic party has become. "
JustMy$.02 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 9:08 AM:
1. will McCain be as trigger happy as Bush? Honestly, anyone who has survived being tortured certianly has a perspective on thinks far beyond Bush or Obama and the sheltered lives they have lead. McCaines a Hero, anyone saying otherwise is being dishonest with themselves. This man honored a code of trust between military personal at the expense of his physical well being. I know for a fact I wouldnt have the cahoanees to do the same, how about you?
2. Obamas economic plan is simple, tax and spend. There is no other way to provide all the services this man is promising. Dwelling on the fact that lower income brackets will get a tax break is narrow minded of his proponents. There are many ways to 'tax' people, all people. So you and I get a break on our income tax, but who do you think the big Oil Companies are going to pass these extra taxes Obama plans for them down to? Thats right you and me, there goes your income tax break! And thats just one example. Tax and spend is not the answer, oversized government (tons of social programs) is not the answer, the most liberal senator in congress is NOT the answer.
I hope that helps you with your decission! "
Bill wrote on Sep 5, 2008 9:58 AM:
Can he truly distance himself from the much more powerful and angry right or what one economic wag calls “The raging rajas of resentment?” The total misfortune is that he is still policy light but sound bite savvy with great visuals of a bigger flag, if smaller and non-inclusive venue than the Democrats, undulating in the background. The whole convention definitely gave the effect of uniformed solidarity and the religion of patriotism unbound but all that was expected. Did it exceed expectations? Only Palin really did that but then no one knew what to expect. She delivered the speech the campaign wrote for her and very well but where’s the Beef?
Nothing new under the sun, no energy policy out side of “drill baby drill” or sops to nuclear plants, asides to “clean coal” or wind, merely wagging the base with the right to life but not to choice and pounding the same super patriot themes that only leave thinking people to suspect the real motives involved.
Nothing substantive was expected and nothing was presented by either convention, so let the games begin. "
kevin wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:14 AM:
Contrary to your assertions, NCLB IS working:
Between 2003 and 2005 (latest data available): –Fourth-grade reading proficiency increased by eight percentage points–Fourth-grade mathematics proficiency increased by five percentage points (California Report Card)
What's more important is that parents have the right to know when their child's school is NOT performing and they can move their child to one that IS performing.
Sarah gave a great speech introducing herself, her experience and her background, including details on what needs to be done to solve the problem of inadequate domestic energy production. Obviously you didn't see B.O.'s children at his convention. I am waiting for the media to start hanging out at their grade school, watching to see if they cheat at dodgeball or have other moral failings. According to you and the other liberal media they are fair game now... "
napablogger wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:42 AM:
There is no doubt about McCain's incredible heroism, and I love hearing the stories. But how much of a qualification is that for President? It speaks to his character, but we still need creative new policies.
I am not sure about Obama's tax plan. If it reduces the deficit there is a big positive benefit there.
McCain is better on the torture issue than Bush, but he sure isn't highlighting it because the Republicans seem to have bought the idea that we are only torturing evil terrorists who are everywhere.
Torture is a huge important issue that isn't being talked about enough, I would write about it but you need at least 2000 words to begin to do it justice. "
freeport56 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 10:48 AM:
Unless you have been in that hole none of us could ever imagine thge horror Sen. McCain has been through. It is even more true that the last two Presidents tha actually fought for this country were Bush 1 and JFK.
I believe John McCain has a deep love of this country. I believe Se. Obama does not. I'll stand with guy who is standing by America. "
wipemedown wrote on Sep 5, 2008 12:12 PM:
napablogger wrote on Sep 5, 2008 1:05 PM:
The fact is that this was a good speech. Period. That is all I am talking about.
The Republicans are at each others throats. That is a sure sign of a loser. "
Bill wrote on Sep 5, 2008 2:11 PM:
AND I honor the service of Bush senior who Frpt56 would over look. "
a teacher wrote on Sep 5, 2008 2:45 PM:
The problem is that we've heard this in 2000. Bush was a uniter, not a divider, would work across the aisle. Would change Washington, yada, yada. It was a complete lie then. I tend to beleive that McCain means it, but I'm a little skeptical. "
freeport56 wrote on Sep 5, 2008 4:11 PM:
Unless you only read the NVR, we are winning the War in Iraq. Maybe it should be "moppedup"
Bill- re-read my post "Bush 1 and JFK".
As the son of a bomber pilot I honor all service men and women. "
Hear Ye wrote on Sep 5, 2008 5:29 PM:
I do find some humor in the fact that they just constantly force the "McCain is a POW" down our throats.
"What will McCain do for the economy?"
"Well when he was in the Hanoi Hilton he didn't..."
"What will he do about energy?"
"When he was a POW he only had the energy to..."
If they're not careful they are going to have people get tired of hearing about it instead of what he will do for the country. "
Bill wrote on Sep 6, 2008 9:20 AM:
"Unless you have been in that hole none of us could ever imagine thge horror Sen. McCain has been through. It is even more true that the last two Presidents tha actually fought for this country were Bush 1 and JFK."
None of this qualified either man to be presient. Bush 1 could actually boast more governmental experience as better qualifying him for the office.
Too much is made of heroes, now thats a statment that should really rile some folks. "
Raven wrote on Sep 6, 2008 11:29 AM:
I dont think he is the best man for the job.....and unfortunately, while I honor his time in hanoi, what ex-military person would not, I think we need more than that in our president ... I think his economic would increase the deficits we are facing, his health care plan wouldn't bring very many uninsured back into the fold ... and I don't trust his judgment in the picking of supreme court justices.....and we may have as many as three who may retire in the next four years ...but it was as I said, probably the best speech i have heard him give. "
russ wrote on Sep 6, 2008 7:12 PM:
Increasing supplies thereby lowering energy costs will be the greatest possible stimulus to our economy.
What is Obama's energy program? Don't do this and don't do that.
I very clearly heard McCain say what he would with the war against Islamic terror. I heard the Democrats say absolutely nothing and never mention 9/11.
The mortgage crisis will have to run it's course, just as Bill Clinton's dotcom market collapse did. The president didn't cause it and the president won't fix it.
I support John McCain and Sarah Palin. "
freeport56 wrote on Sep 7, 2008 12:12 PM:
"Ditto"
Bill- the point is leadership as learned through adversity. As for your qualifications comment, it is solidly wrong. These are men who in times of dire stress and hardship made strong decisions. Bush 1 is the oonly survivor of his air squadron, the rest were either shot down or beheaded bu the Japanese. JFK did whatever it took to take care of his sick and wounded men.
Courage and determination drove these men. That's a pretty good leadership trait if you ask me. "
Raven wrote on Sep 7, 2008 4:36 PM:
Rich wrote on Sep 7, 2008 6:03 PM:
glenroy wrote on Sep 8, 2008 9:05 PM:
And libs still wonder how and why, with 50% of the American public considering themselves to be center-right, nobody seems to be falling for their silly little name calling…and just to remove any doubt about being the party of the out of touch, Democrats nominate the most liberal candidate since McGovern as a ‘unifier‘….go figure….Clinton would have been far more formidable.
I’ve been a McCain fan for a long time, and I’ve often opposed legislation he support, particularly hamstringing Republican funding raising while opening up the flood gates for leftist causes…but you can’t question his resolve, his commitment to this countries well being and his often annoying Maverick pedigree….nor his side kicks….besides being a pragmatist what other choice is there? "