All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines,
click here.
kevin wrote on Sep 1, 2008 10:34 PM:
And thats what the consumer will get from this proposition! "
Trying wrote on Oct 10, 2008 2:36 PM:
entity wrote on Oct 15, 2008 3:07 PM:
For what it's worth, I disagree on anti-nuclear stances with many proponents of this bill. Nuclear power can be cheap, safe, reliable, and pretty clean, given good safety and disposal practices.
Remember what happened the last time the legislature tried to "deregulate" energy production? ENRON was the result. Woops! "