The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
jfz wrote on Aug 28, 2008 1:36 AM:
Dwayne wrote on Aug 28, 2008 6:54 AM:
Baraki wrote on Aug 28, 2008 7:16 AM:
Jenn wrote on Aug 28, 2008 8:33 AM:
MarshaMarsha wrote on Aug 28, 2008 8:49 AM:
psychochik wrote on Aug 28, 2008 9:33 AM:
gemini wrote on Aug 28, 2008 9:57 AM:
AO1982 wrote on Aug 28, 2008 10:37 AM:
winemd wrote on Aug 28, 2008 11:13 AM:
napasnapper wrote on Aug 28, 2008 11:17 AM:
abouttime wrote on Aug 28, 2008 12:37 PM:
Msinformd wrote on Aug 28, 2008 1:12 PM:
comment wrote on Aug 28, 2008 2:00 PM:
psychochik wrote on Aug 28, 2008 2:31 PM:
kevin wrote on Aug 28, 2008 2:49 PM:
rozilla wrote on Aug 28, 2008 3:32 PM:
Dr. Faustus wrote on Aug 28, 2008 3:33 PM:
I agree with you here.
Taking people off the road for DUI is certainly a good thing. It's a highly irresponsible act.
But stopping everyone on the road without probable cause?
That's always made me uneasy. There's an implication of assumed guilt behind that reasoning. "
renrut wrote on Aug 28, 2008 3:43 PM:
chunk wrote on Aug 28, 2008 3:49 PM:
Shawana wrote on Aug 28, 2008 4:08 PM:
Judgeknot wrote on Aug 28, 2008 4:41 PM:
Shawana wrote on Aug 28, 2008 4:51 PM:
napaoldguy wrote on Aug 28, 2008 7:44 PM:
citylights012 wrote on Aug 29, 2008 2:03 PM:
cellsitegod wrote on Sep 5, 2008 5:54 AM:
Illegals and unlicenced drivers ARE BREAKING THE LAW!
So what if the checkpoint is for DUI and they catch more illegals, unlicenced drivers and insurance violations.
I applaud the PD for being creative in catching these law breakers.
You people don't have a problem with undercover officers posing as someone else trying to buy drugs. In order to keep it out of the hands of our children.
Imagine how effective a uniformed officer would be trying to buy drugs.
If I try to comment here about how the Mexicans bother people. NVR would censor me. "
barefoot wrote on Sep 7, 2008 9:48 PM:
barefoot wrote on Sep 7, 2008 9:55 PM: