NVR Logo
Water wars on the horizon
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Save and Share Share
California’s water wars stretch back decades and decades, but the signs that conflict is increasing are abundant.

One obvious sign is the lawsuit that Napa County and two other counties filed last month. The theory of that lawsuit is that those counties and cities with streams that flow to the Sacramento River and the Delta — which slakes the thirst of much of the state — deserve better treatment at the state Department of Water Resources than the many counties that don’t.
The suit comes after Napa County saw a cut of nearly two-thirds in its state water allocation this year. The county has standing to seek better treatment, the suit argues, because Putah Creek flows from the shoulders of Mount St. Helena to Lake Berryessa, where it drops through the Glory Hole and on to the Delta.

It is too early to say whether Napa County and its cohorts have the law on their side. But the politics are not very favorable. Southern California counties that are heavy water users may battle for every drop.
A drop-by-drop battle, that’s how things are shaping up in California after a couple of dry years, a steady trend toward population growth and a look at projected models for how climate change might affect California.

There are some favorable changes out there. For example, Napa and many other cities are using the same amount or less water per capita than they did years ago, when their populations were much smaller, because people are using water-saving devices and practices in their gardens and homes. Orange County, in Southern California, has invested billions in a wastewater recycling system.
Yet trouble is brewing on many fronts. The pressure on the Delta comes from many sides: Municipal users, agricultural users, fish and wildlife and their advocates among humans, problems caused by toxic runoff. In addition, the health of San Francisco and San Pablo bays are largely dependent on the health of the Delta.

Lawsuits between government agencies over complex issues like water allocations have a tendency to drag on forever.

It is our hope that the Department of Water Resources sees the importance — and minimal harm — of upping the supply to the affected agencies and eases the pressure without marathon litigation.

But when the lawsuit is over, it’s a sure bet that California’s water wars will still be raging.
17 comment(s)

Ruff Limblog wrote on Aug 21, 2008 1:36 AM:

" Wait until the real droughts come. California had it's water allocation from the Colorado river cut back. Much of the Colorado river comes from snow and ice melt and the Glacier National Park glaciers are almost gone. Those thirsty Southern California folks will make it up somewhere, right? ~Ruff "

Cadence wrote on Aug 21, 2008 6:07 AM:

" I wonder why there is ample money for this lawsuit, SO obviously necessitated by local population growth that is mandated by the state, but county leaders quake in their boots at the idea of being sued for failing to meet their assigned growth numbers?
Why doesn't the county sue over the assigned growth numbers? The numbers are not "green," they are not "sustainable" and there aren't local resources to support them.
Maybe it's because the county hopes to profit from the growth and needs water to do it!
This lawsuit illustrates that whatever they may say, county leaders are in fact firmly committed to becoming exactly like their congested Bay Area brethren. "

Common Sense wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:06 AM:

" Nuclear Power + Sea Water + Desalinization Plants = Water Problem Solved "

cab e-girl wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:15 AM:

" Our beloved buerocrats are leaving California and it's infrastructure in a near state of collapse. The lack of a comprehensive energy policy, our roads are in such a state of disrepair that it is becoming dangerous, schools are failing our children, water is and will become a huge issue in the not so distant future, cities are going bankrupt because they cannot fund outrageous pensions that were awarded and we are taxed at one of the highest rates in the nation. The leeches that are in charge of this state and some counties and cities (not all) spend money like drunken sailors (no disrespect to sailors intended) on programs that benefit themselves or people connected to them. Remember that when you go to the booth in November. Vote the BUMS out. "

danmonez wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:54 AM:

" Ruff and Cadence are right on point. Here are some more facts about the State Water Project that were reported in Western Water magazine.
2008 was the driest Sierra winter since 1921
2008 snowpack at 67% of normal
2008 water runoff into streams and reservoirs at 55-65% normal
Lake Oroville, the principal source for State Water Project water is at 48% of capacity
Federal Court ruling to protect the Smelt will reduce Delta water allocations to 35% of requested
Many Climatologists claim that we are entering a drought cycle likely to last 15 to 20 years.

Lawsuit or nor lawsuit, they can't deliver water they don't have. So, when new developments do their environmental impact reviews, the finding that there is sufficient water is based on the assumption that the State Water Project will provide significant supplemental water to the jurisdiction. I don't believe that is a valid assumption. In fact, the people who deliver water to over 400 jurisdictions don't believe that is a valid assumption. Check out the State Water Agencies' website www.calwatercrisis.org for more information.

Our planners and elected officials need to take this issue very seriously when they approve major new developments. I would urge them to adopt ordinances requiring new developments to offset their water usage by at least 50% or more. "

musikluvr wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:01 AM:

" Your editorial rests on the false premise that Napa County owns the water that flows down Putah Creek. Solano Irrigation District owns the water in Lake Berryessa, Within the last 20 years Solano Irrigation District sued and won against every property owner in the Putah Creek Watershed to perfect its rights to water that flows into Lake Berryessa. "

kevin wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:35 AM:

" Canada has plenty of water. Start building pipelines... "

Cadence wrote on Aug 21, 2008 11:11 AM:

" But Kevin, the Canadians haven't made a lot of mistakes to date. Why should they start now? "

concerned citizen wrote on Aug 21, 2008 11:48 AM:

" The article states; "There are some favorable changes out there. For example, Napa and many other cities are using the same amount or less water per capita than they did years ago,..."

This, my friends, is what is commonly known as a specious argument.

Why? Because, any reasonable person who considers this quote realizes that the "per capita" to which the writer refers is constantly in a state of increase....so whatever "gains" in lower usage is offset by the continual growth in the 'per capita!'

LOL....

musikluvr, danmonez (yeah!!) , cadence, ruff, cab...you're all right! How come we see it and our elected officials choose to turn a blind eye?

Hmmmmmmmm....one wonders, don't one!?! "

sickothis wrote on Aug 21, 2008 12:45 PM:

" Concerned - If I remember correctly Napa County uses approximately the same amount of water as we did in around 1980. That's not exactly correct but I think I'm pretty close. The reasons for this are mostly improvements in landscape irrigation and toilettes. Hopefully someone in the know from the county can pipe up and clarify the numbers. "

Cadence wrote on Aug 21, 2008 1:23 PM:

" ummm - say you're correct, Common Sense, how many decades will your plan require to become effective and actually deliver potable water? And at what cost?
The developers are processing their plans right now.
Yours are where in the planning process? "

kevin wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:04 PM:

" There are some BIG desalinization plants being built in southern california using the reverse osmosis process. 50 MGD. Obviously they are becoming cost effective.

You could be drinking Napa River Water real soon! "

antipc wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:06 PM:

" Napa would not be having this problem if the supervisors had not handed over 100% of the water rights to Solano county when the damn at Berryessa was built. Damns store water that we can control, produce electricity, & provide recreation. Harnessing nature & its' powers is not a bad thing. "

Raven wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:49 PM:

" good point, about the mistakes with berryessa dam, but how does lamenting about what happened about 50 years ago help with the current situation?....Water users in other counties around the bay have been told to cut their usage by nearly 20 percent to help begin, I stress the word, begin to deal with their water shortages...without action soon, users here could be facing similar action...then watch the sparks fly between the ag community and the urbanites.... "

glenroy wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:29 AM:

" Napa County uses thousands of more acre feet of water than just a few decades ago…just because it‘s captured or pumped out of a well nobody seems to pay any attention.

I live in an area of Napa County that had abundant water until the everybody started planting grapes and now the water table is dropping faster than the drillers can keep up with it….it’s a good business to be in around here. With three golf courses pumping 2 million gallons a night doesn’t help much either….

It wouldn’t matter what the residents do with their use and they can sue anybody and everybody and it wouldn't change anything…until we have responsible vineyard and golf course management this place will continue to dry up like the Mojave… "

common sense wrote on Aug 22, 2008 4:58 PM:

" cadence says "how many decades will your plan require to become effective and actually deliver potable water?"

-What was I thinking. Surely we are better off waiting until the problem is at crisis levels (similar to the Democrat approach to our looming social security collapse).

China can build a reactor in a few short years, well under a decade. There's no way we Americans are capable of that...we can only do things like go from airplanes to a moon landing in under 10 years. "

kevin wrote on Aug 23, 2008 3:55 PM:

" That's why we "contract out". Hire the Chinese to build it for us... "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy