With pensions, county is on solid ground
Supervisors say grand jury concern on pension costs is overstated
By KERANA TODOROV
Register Staff Writer
Pension and retirement benefits won’t cause Napa County to go bankrupt like the city of Vallejo, county officials said this week in response to a critical grand jury report issued earlier this summer.
In June the Napa County civil grand jury raised questions about whether Napa County risked bankruptcy if it did not reduce generous pensions and post-employment benefits paid to county employees.
In its response, the county said it should not simply forego its pension system for a cheaper defined-contribution plan, as the grand jury had recommended.
Similarly, city of Napa officials responded to grand jury concerns earlier this year by saying pension policies are often set at the state level, and that local agencies have been working for two or three years to minimize risks.
The county spends 54 percent of its $247 million budget for wages and benefits.
Supervisor Bill Dodd said Tuesday that while the board heard the grand jury “loud and clear” on the issue, that Napa County is in far better shape than Vallejo was when it sought bankruptcy protection earlier this year.
“Everybody looks at Vallejo and looks at it as a real problem,” Dodd said. “I don’t think we’re there.”
Britt Ferguson, assistant executive officer for Napa County, said Napa County will continue to look at costs, including whether or not the system encourages employees to retire too early.
The grand jury may have underestimated the main issues that plagued Vallejo, including the turnover of top leaders, labor-relation problems, too-generous benefits for emergency workers and mismanagement, Ferguson said.
“We have been pretty conservative,” Ferguson said.
Helene Franchi, principal management analyst for Napa County, said the county will continue to review all its benefit packages for its employees. At the same time, she said, the county has to remain competitive.
“It’s important to maintain a decent benefit level to attract good employees,” Franchi said.
County employee’s retirement and health benefits are provided through the statewide California’s Public Employees Retirement System — or CalPERS.
According to the grand jury report, costs to Napa County taxpayers to fund the county employees benefits over the next two years will be $39.4 million.
Franchi said the figure is about $23.6 million.
The grand jury did not take into account the fact that many county positions are funded either by state or federal mandates, she said.
There are about 320 retired Napa County employees, and about 270 more are expected to retire within the next decade.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
kevin wrote on Aug 21, 2008 4:52 AM:
Native74 wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:39 AM:
musikluvr wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:52 AM:
steph wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:15 AM:
Why bother with a grand jury? The bureaucrats have it all figured out. What a scam.
Screw the taxpayers! They serve us! "
bill dodd wrote on Aug 21, 2008 11:03 AM:
The County will be in negotiations with the DSA and PSE unitons next year and I am sure these issues will be discussed.
Bill Dodd
Napa County Supervisor "
Cadence wrote on Aug 21, 2008 11:07 AM:
Health premiums are the unmentioned elephants when the talk is of pension costs. "
cab e-girl wrote on Aug 21, 2008 11:32 AM:
Native74 wrote on Aug 21, 2008 12:03 PM:
As for union/mgmt contracts...those can always be re-opened for negotations if things get dire! At least they can in other municipalities (they are threatening to do so in a neighboring town) "
Listening wrote on Aug 21, 2008 12:10 PM:
cab e-girl wrote on Aug 21, 2008 12:42 PM:
jonqcitizen wrote on Aug 21, 2008 1:09 PM:
cab e-girl wrote on Aug 21, 2008 2:23 PM:
musikluvr wrote on Aug 21, 2008 2:42 PM:
Bill Dodd wrote on Aug 21, 2008 3:02 PM:
Everything we do should be up for review, including employee benefits.
Bill Dodd
Napa County Supervisor "
Bauhausfan wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:46 PM:
Yeah, this country is so over unionized at about 10% of the labor force.
Organized labor is horrible. Look what the gave us:
Higher pay and the middle class.
8 hour work day.
Overtime.
Workplace safety standards.
Child labor laws.
You never hear complaints about corporations making too much money, or "downsizing" too many people, or sending production overseas or not paying their share of taxes but heaven help us if people want to get paid well with benefits.
The horror. "
jonqcitizen wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:56 PM:
Musikluvr: there are absolutely penalties involved if your elected representatives are not behaving in the manner you think they should. It's called an election. Get involved in more than blogging, find a candidate you support and go out to support him or her. "