NVR Logo
Paying for the party
City panel weighs family fines after troubling teen get-togethers
Thursday, August 21, 2008
Save and Share Share
Amanda, 16, was on the hot seat at Napa City Hall, with Napa City Councilmembers Juliana Inman and Mark van Gorder and City Manager Mike Parness sitting as her judge and jury.

The evidence was clear. Amanda had messed up royally, not once but twice. In May, police broke up a teen drinking party at her east Napa home. A month later, police did it again.
In both instances, her mother was away. In neither instance had Amanda herself been drinking. She blew .00 on her blood-alcohol tests, police said.

Napa has an ordinance against underage parties involving alcohol. Amanda’s mother had been slapped with $2,000 in civil penalties, plus another $800 to cover police costs.
At Tuesday’s appeal, the mom, a single parent who works two jobs, was both mortified by her daughter’s behavior and distraught about how to pay such stiff city fees.

“It’s huge for me,” she said. “I barely get by as it is.”
Even so, the mom said it was difficult to ask for leniency. She had appealed the first set of charges before the second party occurred.

“I’m a little embarrassed to be sitting here because of that situation,” she said. “I don’t have an argument to argue.”

Amanda (to protect her privacy, the Register is not using her real name) showed little emotion at first. “I didn’t intend to invite people over,” she said of the first incident. A planned sleep-over for two girlfriends somehow grew into a full-blown party involving a dozen kids under 18, she said.

As for the second incident less than a month later? “I invited maybe 10-12 people over,” she said. “I just wanted to have some friends over.”

Contrary to her wishes, they brought alcohol.

As she talked, her composure began to crumble. “I pretty much screwed myself over with the second one,” she said.

“After the second incident, I was so mad at myself. Why did this happen?” she said.

“I have to help my mom out now. I see how she struggles with the money,” said Amanda, now fighting back tears.

City officials were sympathetic, but they wanted to make sure that the hearing served as a teaching moment.

“I went through really difficult teen years myself. My mom kicked me out of the house,” van Gorder said.

When alcohol fuels teen parties, things can quickly get out of hand, he said. “I saw some really, really bad things happen.”

Guys who show up with alcohol “are already out of control,” van Gorder said. “They’re not listening to you.”

“What really concerns me is not being able to say no and not calling the police,” Inman told Amanda. When alcohol, older boys and younger girls are thrown into the party mix, “there can be rape and assault. Bad things can happen,” she said.

Amanda was just 15 when the first party occurred. “Before this, I’ve never done anything to make (my mother) not trust me,” she said.

Her mother concurred. “This is a whole new level I have to be aware of,” she said.

Parness proposed waiving the first set of charges, while letting Amanda pay off the second batch on the installment plan. “The goal is to change behavior,” not raise money for the city, he said later.

After contemplating how much Amanda could earn at a minimum wage job while continuing to go to school, the panel cut the charges to $1,200.

Amanda will be able to pay it off over two years at $50 per month. She can also get credit for working as a community volunteer, councilmembers said.

Her mother said it would be a good thing for Amanda to get a job. “I think she has too much time on her hands,” she said.

Amanda said these parties taught her a thing or two about her friends. “I was so mad. ‘I got a ticket for you guys drinking. Are you going to help me pay for this?’” she asked her girlfriends.

Their answer, she said: “No, we’re not even going to tell our parents.”

After the party’s over

What

The city of Napa makes parents pay the cost of enforcement when teen parties require law enforcement intervention.

How many

Police issued citations for 37 teen parties in 2005-06, according to Napa Police Chief Rich Melton. The number has declined since.

How it works

Any person who violates the city’s alcohol/loud party ordinance is subject to a $1,000 civil penalty, plus fees to cover police costs. A police officer’s time is assessed at nearly $100 per hour.
48 comment(s)

kevin wrote on Aug 21, 2008 4:48 AM:

" I am SO glad I live in the County... "

crusherfan wrote on Aug 21, 2008 7:30 AM:

" I have no sympathy.This kid should have gotten a woopen the first time but obviously only got a firm talking to (her mother understands because she had it rough and got kicked out when she was a kid,hmmm,makes sense).Then “I invited maybe 10-12 people over,” she must have really learned her lesson the first time.the city feels sorry for her.WEAK!!! I wonder if their last name is Cloud.
Pay the fines,put her on communitty service and pursue the kids who brought the alchohol as they are not friends,they are punks!gotta wonder where mom was the second time. "

mamyt wrote on Aug 21, 2008 7:39 AM:

" Why are you posting the name of an underage defendant? My understanding of the NVR policy is you don't list their names? "

anothernapamom wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:35 AM:

" crusherfan:

Mark van Gorder was the one who was kicked out as a teenager.

mamyt:

NVR said they're not using her real name. "

truthteller wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:39 AM:

" Nice Soap Opera. "

Farmgirl wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:46 AM:

" mamyt - it says it is not her real name to protect her privacy. "

mafi wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:48 AM:

" crusher- van groder said she got kicked out...

mamyt- it's an alias as stated... "

wipemedown wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:53 AM:

" This town is unreal for the police being overbearing. I had the police at my door at six am, because my neighoor filed a noise complaint about "someone playing loud music during the hours of 4-7 am. m-f I wake up at and six play music while i get ready and leave for work at 7. Never have a been awake before 6 let alone playing music LOUDLY. I don't know if the people in Napa are the problem or the police. In the town i just moved from the police left you alone if you were concious. If you were passed out in the gutter they wanted to take you to jail. It is just quiet a change and the fines for underage drinking at a private residence ..... laughable. The police should adress real crime and napa neighbors should get hobbies instead of spying on fellow citizens. Maybe go get drunk thats a hobby. "

Dwayne wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:53 AM:

" mamyt...... In the article:

"...Amanda (to protect her privacy, the Register is not using her real name)"... "

mominapa wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:57 AM:

" Crusherfan, her mother didn't get kicked out of her house, the councilwoman, Mrs. Inman said that she did. Read the article carefully before carelessly interpreting it. This puts a whole new spin on things, doesn't it? "

MP wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:02 AM:

" I think the City was reasonable. Mom is really strapped by working 2 jobs and barely getting by. By making "Amanda", (as the article says, a false name) they metered a punishment that the girl can achieve but not easily -- so she can learn from this. She is 16....I'll bet some of the posters on this site did some things at 16 that got them into hot water too. This is a teaching opportunity to allow a teenager to learn about consequences of bad choices and taking personal responsibility for them. Sounds like she has started learning. I wish her and her mom the best -- but no more parties!! "

wined0wnnapa wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:04 AM:

" mamyt -

Dwayne wrote on Aug 21, 2008 8:53 AM:

" mamyt...... In the article:

"...Amanda (to protect her privacy, the Register is not using her real name)"... " "

mominapa wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:09 AM:

" Sorry, I misstated this. It was Van Gorder who got kicked out, not Juliana Inman. My mistake. "

pbfallon wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:10 AM:

" crusherfan...cut the girl and her mom some slack. She is going to work out the problem. If you want to be stern, look at the city. They should do the "inverview" thing after one offense with underage drinkers/partiers. I commend the city though for having a common sense approach and seemingly taking an interest in the problem rather than going for the bucks! "

Straight Talk wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:17 AM:

" Amanda's mother did not say "...she had it rough and got kicked out when she was a kid." That was a quote from Mark van Gorder (aka - Straight Talk).

My mother did kick me out of the house at 18 years. To say I was a difficult teen is an understatement. Amanda’s mistake is one made too often by too many teens in Napa and across the country and she is learning a serious lesson.

The Register is not posting the name of an underage defendant. Paragraph 9: "...to protect her privacy, the Register is not using her real name."

To crusherfan.... wow. There are so few Saints in the world it's good to know there are people like you – completely without sin. Tell us, how do you do it?

When you write "This kid should have gotten a woopen...", is that code for beating? How badly would you have beaten Amanda to drive your point home? I'm not clear about how much beating a child should have before she learns her lesson. Just a little or a lot?

My mother raised my brother and me since I was six. I saw how hard it was for her to make ends meet as a single income parent. Now, as father of two daughters, I do feel sorry for Amanda and her mother.

Kids make mistakes and Amanda will work for the next two years to pay her fine. Her mother accepted full responsibility for her daughter’s actions.

Perhaps there's no Sainthood for me. Crusherfan beat me to it. No pun(ch) intended. "

cab e-girl wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:27 AM:

" "Amanda" is young and not a hardened criminal. She should be given the opportunity to work a real job and pay the fine in its entirety to relieve her mom's money pressures. This would allow her to take responsibility for her actions, redeem herself while learning a valuable lesson about friends and underage drinking. "

cab e-girl wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:30 AM:

" Some thoughts for Amanda's mom. Can't leave underage kids alone for weekend's etc. Things happen. "

Listening wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:33 AM:

" The point of breaking into a private party of teenagers drinking is twofold: one it is against the law to drink under the age of 21. Second, and more importantly, these kids - after drinking - get in their vehicles and drive home - that is DUI and dangerous to them and anyone else on the road. "

napamouth wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:37 AM:

" Geez...aren't we already paying enough taxes for law enforcement. Why is the city billing for this? What's next, billing residents everytime the PD is called? What a load of crap. We need some new city council members, yeah? "

cathyodom wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:40 AM:

" Amanda is learning a very big lesson. More expensive than Timmy hitting a window with a baseball and having to pay for it over the summer mowing lawns. She is being manipulated by her "so-called friends" and needs to hang out with some other people, more responsible, and with adults hanging around in the background. Those kids were taking advantage of her for her mom not being home. And she should turn in those kids for bringing the alcohol. They will find a new "friend" next week and go hang out there, and leave "Amanda" alone. Or they will be going to Vine Hill Park, where I will kick them out, again. I'm sure the whole high school knows who Amanda is, and these other kids, and they will have pictures up on their myspace web pages of this party and other parties. Amanda, you've been used. It felt good to be popular for a week, now it's over. "

napan007 wrote on Aug 21, 2008 9:48 AM:

" I for one am happy to see that the county is willing to help this girl restructure her life with her new job (and hopefully said job leaves little time for that bad group of "friends" she has been hanging out with). She didn't graffiti after all - she was just immature and let a situation get out of hand not once but twice. Hopefully now she feels empowered to stand up for what's right when her peers bring the booze around again.

I'm also very happy that they worked out a way to put it all on her... yes she's a minor so Mom is ultimately responsible for paying the fines but she'll be an adult in only two years so it's 100% appropriate to have her bust her own butt to pay the fines. Good learning experience and I wish her all the best. "

steph wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:10 AM:

" Good luck to "Amanda". I think she's sincere in her remorse. She seems to understand how her behavior has made things difficult for her hard-working mom. I think she'll benefit from having a job to help her pay her debt to her mother and maybe build up a little self-esteem, too.
We all make mistakes; if we can repair the damange and learn a good lesson, then the mistake can cause growth.
This is good justice, where the punishment fits the crime and will lead to restitution and rehab! I'm impressed!
"Amanda" show them how you've grown up. And give your mom a hug for working so hard for you! "

crusherfan wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:18 AM:

" Thanks Mom & Mafi
I still dont think that there should have been a second time.
I would consider underage drinking,which probably leads to under age driving and other crime "Real Crimes".Not laughable at all "

angrytoo wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:55 AM:

" Times sure have changed. Growing up my Mom wasn't stupid and knew we were going to have parties. But there were rules involved. Anybody drinking had to check in their keys before entering with the alcohol and was sleeping over or calling for a ride. No exceptions. It was always kept to a minimum for the neighbors sake. By all means, I'm not approving of what "Amanda" did but kids will be kids. The key issue is to talk to your kids before...........not after and explain the consequences. "

vocal-de-local wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:59 AM:

" When I was 13, my 15 yr old sister threw a party while my parents were out of town. My oldest sister was supposed to be watching us but she was off doing her own thing. There were maybe 10 people invited. Over 100 showed up. We couldn't control the party. A girl ran through my parents sliding glass door and broke it to pieces. People were ripping things off left and right. We finally put a chair in the hallway to try and keep people from entering the back part of the house. The cars were lined all the way up the hill and the police could not get their vehicles down there. They left. Later in the evening when things calmed down, I heard a commotion in the garage. Two guys had backed their car into my parents garage, opened the freezer and were loading ALL of the packaged meat into their car. I was only 13 but I confronted them and told them to put it back NOW!

The next morning many strangers were lying all over the floor. My grandpa showed up to pick my brother up for a 49ers game. Ordinarily he was a reserved, very patient man but he let it all out on this morning. People were scared enough to run and hide behind the trees outside!

The moral of this story is DO NOT leave teens alone at a house for very long, no matter how sweet you think they are. Evidentially, they WILL have a party and get into more trouble than you bargained for, especially if you do it often. "

chunk wrote on Aug 21, 2008 11:14 AM:

" My brother just got a bill for the police being called out to a party and he didn't live at the house. They had gotten his licence inormation but he never received a citation. Now he gets a bill in the mail out of nowhere in the range of $500. What a load of crap. They're just trying to get money from someone but he's not paying for their shotty work. Especially since it wasn't his party or his problem. "

crusherfan wrote on Aug 21, 2008 11:41 AM:

" Straight Talk: I dont, and never have claimed to be a saint so I dont know where you get off with that statement.
I do know that that there has been conversation regarding discilpine on these blogs (spanking vs talking).I think that a kid makes decisions based on the consequences and sometimes it takes more than a time out.
Maybe if you thought about your actions more on your timeouts,you would not have been kicked out at 18. See you in church "

sammy wrote on Aug 21, 2008 11:49 AM:

" sounds like it is restorative justice at its best. Amanda will do well I bet and doors of communication opened between Amanda and her Mom. Good Job All "

Straight Talk wrote on Aug 21, 2008 12:20 PM:

" crusherfan - to clarify my point. You wrote: "I have no sympathy" and "...the city feels sorry for her. WEAK!!!"

Pretty strong statements.

My comment is a reaction to your clear lack of sympathy. I beleive those of us who have sinned (isn't that all of us?) should have some sympathy and forgiveness - how else can we expect to be forgiven?

Regarding physical violence as a learning tool... I'm oposed to it. My mother did not literally"kick" me out of the house. She told me to leave, I did, and I understood why. No need for violence.

I'll be there. ;-) ~ MvG "

darkstar wrote on Aug 21, 2008 12:23 PM:

" Maybe Amanda and her mom should consider a hungar strike to raise money to pay their fines. "

crusherfan wrote on Aug 21, 2008 3:13 PM:

" Straight Talk:
Fair enough. I dont have allot of sympathy for a kid who makes a mistake,gets caught, and makes the same mistake (inviting 10-12 guest the seond time) a couple of weeks later. Irespect your opinion.I agree there is a diffrence between discipline and abuse.
This would be a long debate. See you at BM2 :-)
Darkstar :LOL "

crusherfan wrote on Aug 21, 2008 3:17 PM:

" Mominapa:
good advice, try it. "

freeport56 wrote on Aug 21, 2008 3:41 PM:

" I think the city panel handed out solid wisdom and a just punishment for "Amanda's" indiscretion. Having her friends tell her "they are not even going to tell their folks", they should not. Amanda should write them all a letter telling tyhem herself. "

Angelina Gervasio wrote on Aug 21, 2008 4:44 PM:

" Mark-
Have you ever considered having all these teens just do $2,000 worth of community service (cleaning parks, planting trees, cleaning up graffiti) as their punishment? Why do you have the parents pay? Amazingly enough, having the parents pay does NOT teach the kid a lesson!

~Not Your Average Kid "

Christabelle wrote on Aug 21, 2008 6:14 PM:

" As a single working mother of many years let me tell all the parents reading this that you only THINK you know where you kids are.
Also, why didn't the big tough boys who brought the booze help out with the fines?
Amanda's mother has all my sympathy.
Amanda will surely learn her lesson this time.
Napa...you have a good system here. About time parents were held responsible. But, the kids who brought the booze should also be held liable for the fine.s imposed rightfully so. "

i4aneye wrote on Aug 21, 2008 6:25 PM:

" $800 bucks for the cops to do what we the taxpayers already pay them to do? this is a disgrace. they rate the cops time at $100 an hour. i dont know of any cop making $100 an hour including benefits. this is a money making ripoff of the people of napa. does anyone know if they charge to get a copy of a police report like they do in fairfield? "

Napa_Native wrote on Aug 21, 2008 7:32 PM:

" It is only fair, as someone who criticizes the council when they are boneheads, that when they demonstrate leadership I offer them praise.

As I read this article I thought I was reading about another town completely. I applaud the council for their demonstration of compassion for the mother and sense of responsibility in teaching this girl a lesson.

I have seen too many young lives cut short because of alcohol. I have pulled their lifeless bodies from vehicles at all hours of the day and night. I have had to tell parents of their child's demise. Personally I think each of these kids should spend some time with the Coroner so they can see what waits for them if they continue down their current path.

I am not casting stones. I am only trying to help someone avoid seeing what I have seen. "

Straight Talk wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:22 PM:

" Just a final comment - these blogs have been some of the most constructive and supportive I have read. But I have a different perspective than some and respect the opinions of other blogs I liked less.

To Angelina Gervasio... excellent point and one that was not mentioned in the article. There was considerable discussiuon about community service. I cannot verify this, but was told, that there is not a great deal of encouragement for teens to volunteer in Napa. I still find that hard to believe but that is what we were told.

Amanda can and was encouraged to volunteer for local organizations - it's her choice - and if she does she will get credit for her time. Great comment.


Napa_Native... thank you. I'm not thin-skinned but do appreciate a positive comment now and again. Much appreciated.

crusherfan - fair enough. ;-) See you.

Finally, I have been on this committee for some time now and the Register has reported on this issue in the past. Fact is, there are times when the kids who live in the house did not start the party. Other kids get the word out that the parents are not home and "voila!" instant party. Many of these kids want the uninvited guests to leave and are too scared too call the police.

If there is a discussion parents should have with all the kids it's this: Any time there is a problem or trouble and the kids need help, ALWAYS call for help. The police are here to help. Kids and parents will be much better off if the police are notified.

~ MvG "

jmo wrote on Aug 21, 2008 10:38 PM:

" Enough already!
Let's move on to another topic. "

dreluvwine26 wrote on Aug 21, 2008 11:06 PM:

" For all of you ready to cast this young girl into purgatory , I think we should show her a little compassion. After all , it's not like she was doing keg stands and hitting the bong (I am referring to beer).... She is young, she is a TEENAGER..... We all did stupid things when we were younger, "youthful indiscretion" , she is not a hardened criminal.... People need to relax... This is called a "learning experience"... "

mamyt wrote on Aug 22, 2008 7:39 AM:

" Yes I see I missed that. Well now I know what to do if I want some one to notice my post. "

cathyodom wrote on Aug 22, 2008 10:03 AM:

" Mark, thanks for the good remarks. dreluvwin26, yes we can be harsh. My point- perhaps I'm taking it personal- kids always want to be accepted by their peers, and in with the "in" crowd, be popular. I know that I did in high school. I think she said ok to some people at school, for them to come over, to be popular, in with the "in" crowd, and got taken advantage of, not once, but twice. That's the hard thing. Amanda needs to learn to have some backbone and say NO to these kids, to risk being snubbed and "in", to take the higher road so she doesn't get into trouble. Obviously she wasn't drinking, if her BAL was 0. Things started to get out of control and she went with the flow instead of standing up to the crowd. I hope she learns from her mistakes. "

LocalChick wrote on Aug 22, 2008 11:00 AM:

" Who ever told the City that teens weren't encouraged to volunteer in Napa is an idiot. Granted, it's been 6 years since I was in high school, but I had plenty of volunteer opportunities.

Off the top of my head, may I suggest:

Napa Food Bank--they need people to help sort the food, package the bulk items, etc.

Peer Court--this is an amazing program for first time offenders who plead guilty. It is the sentencing of real cases and they use teens as the lawyers, bailiff, and jurors. They also need teens on the planning committee.

The Salvation Army is always needing volunteers. You can serve meals on holidays through them @ 1st Presbyterian Church. 1st Pres. also hosts The Table, although that may be during school hours.

If someone is really stuck for volunteer activities, they can join Interact at school. It is the high school version of Rotary and they specialize in community service projects. You make new friends, your age, and are giving back to the community. Some of the things Interact did when I was involved was a beautification project for the campus and organizing a team for Relay for Life.

It disheartens me to think that people are saying teens aren't encouraged to volunteer in Napa. I realize many locals hate Napa youth, but with positive activities such as volunteering, they won't be hanging out in parking lots or "causing trouble". I urge the members of the committee to do their research about community organizations that need volunteers before deciding to not include them in "punishments" for offenses. Many of these places can't run without volunteers. "

Sandra wrote on Aug 24, 2008 12:11 AM:

" AM I THE ONLT ONE CONCERNED BY THIS? "The evidence was clear. Amanda had messed up royally, not once but twice. In May, police broke up a teen drinking party at her east Napa home. A month later, police did it again.
In both instances, her mother was away." HER MOTHER WAS AWAY! Away where? At work, gone for the weekend, what? The register did not make this clear, as usual....If your child is not responsible enough to take care of themselves, then they should not be left alone, period. If I had needed to leave my 15 year old home alone, then you can bet a trusted neighbor would know my child was alone, and be asked to put a stop to any nonsense. My child would also know the neighbor was on watch. Geez...we were all teenagers, we know what we tried to do, and many of us succeeded in doing...How can we be so ignorant as parents? Why would you set your child up to make an idiotic decision? Why would you want to be responsible for not only endangering your own child, but other parents children? Why would you want to make it easy for your child to act as "Amanda" acted? Where is the common sense? "

steph wrote on Aug 24, 2008 11:45 AM:

" Sandra, as usual, I agree with you that this is a serious concern. I'm not sure if the mother was working while the parties were going on, and if she was then I'm more sympathetic. If, instead, she was, say, off with a boyfriend for an overnighter, then I hope this experience teaches her a lesson, too, that her teenager needs her to be a mother, and that it's quite possible the parties were a defiant request for more attention. Children--even/especially teen children--need attention and love and support from their parents. Sometimes when the parents are self-involved, though, guilt can taint the drive to discipline--one can lose ones credibility, and the discipline/collaboration breaks down. The child loses, and the parents are bewildered.

But the truth is, we don't know the truth, so we can't condemn the mom. Either way, I hope the mom and "Amanda" learned a lesson and will be more responsible to one another and their community.

I'm so impressed with the city officials who worked out this small-town agreement for reparations. It's justice that fits, that is less punitive, less monolithic, less zero-tolerance, and more compassionate and rehabilitative. Wow!

I'm curious, is there a name for this "court"? "

get a life wrote on Aug 25, 2008 12:37 PM:

" It hasn't been that long ago since I was in High School and I have no idea what you are tlaking about!! I was an honor roll student, in Honors & AP classes and I never heard about any voluntering options, ideas or suggestions! Looking back now, I wish that we would have had opportunities like that, but nope, not offered or talked about back then and probably not much different these days which is sad!!!

I concur with the majority, that this is a great town that we live in, how awesome that we are teaching instead of punishing, in that they are giving Amanda a chance to learn from her mistakes!!! What an awesome group to think outside the box for a change!! Thanks MVG, etc all! "

anticommie wrote on Aug 27, 2008 3:32 PM:

" Fair enough punishment. They lowered the fine and allowed volunteer work in lieu of fiscal pnelties. Sounds very fair to me. Anything harsher would not help the young lass. "

sobersister wrote on Sep 1, 2008 5:35 PM:

" I posted a comment Sunday night and they have not posted it yet.

Also, why isn't this listed on NAPA NEWS as the most viewed and most commented with 49+ on the front page on the web?? HHHMMMNN??

There will be more to this as I am personally going to SPEAK under PUBLIUC COMMENT at the CITY COUNCIL next meeting they have! "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy