Napa man helps green standards
Steve Jensen helped write California's new building code that tightens energy conservation standards. Lianne Milton/Register |
Buy photos
Building official part of commission that adopted first green building code
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
When it comes to making California an environmental model for the nation, Steve Jensen, Napa’s chief building official, is doing his part.
Jensen was part of the 11-member California Building Standards Commission that last month adopted the nation’s first “green” building code to cut energy and water usage.
When this code filters down to cities and counties, new construction standards will require that buildings drive down energy use by 15 to 20 percent compared to current averages, while water allowed for new landscaping will be cut in half, Jensen said.
California already has the toughest energy standards in the nation. By next summer, the state code will be 50 percent tougher than any other state, Jensen said.
“I’m very proud of what I’ve done,” said Jensen, who oversees the city’s building department. “I think it’s very progressive for California to take the lead.”
Green enough?
The California Building Standards Commission took a year and a half to adopt the new standards, which were vetted by experts and subjected to public hearings.
Most of the standards won’t become mandatory until the end of 2010 when a new state building code takes effect, Jensen said.
The building industry generally supported the new policies, recognizing that the status quo wasn’t good enough. Environmental groups wanted the state to aim even higher, Jensen said.
The new state rules will set the floor for environmental standards, not the ceiling. In the Bay Area, many communities will set higher energy conservation goals, wanting to do more to roll back the effects of global warming, Jensen said.
Groups such as Sustainable Napa County are expected to advocate greater energy conservation measures, he said. The city of Napa is developing new conservation requirements that may also set a higher bar, he said.
Not every part of California is competing for green honors, Jensen said “You have places in the (Central) Valley where green is not that important. With a floor, everybody has to address these issues,” he said.
The new rules give builders choices in how to improve energy efficiency. Some may choose thicker insulation and passive solar features, while others opt for other techniques for lowering a building’s carbon footprint, he said.
The new standards cover virtually all construction, including homes and commercial buildings, schools and hospitals.
New buildings will meet today’s “LEED Certified” standard of the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design organization and qualify for “Build-It-Green” honors, state officials said.
Jensen noted that “Build-It-Green” and LEED standards are likely to raise their requirements even higher, inspiring builders to do more than California’s new minimum.
After motor vehicles, the construction and operation of buildings are the second greatest producer of greenhouse gases, Jensen said. The new rules will help the state meet its goal of rolling back total greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent by 2020, he said.
Environmental groups such as the Sierra Club wanted the state’s new standards to become effective immediately. The state commission decided that local government and the private sector needed time to plan implementation, he said.
Toughening requirements on new construction is a way of picking the “low hanging fruit,” Jensen said. In the future, rather than make new buildings as tight as drums, society might get more bang for its energy conservation buck by encouraging owners of existing homes and businesses to buy more efficient heating and air conditioning and add insulation, he said.
Jensen imagines a system whereby builders pay into a conservation fund to subsidize these retrofits.
Napa is currently in the process of inventorying greenhouse gas emission of city buildings and operations. Once the information is in, plans will be developed to reduce emissions. This is a countywide effort being coordinated by the Napa County Transportation and Planning Agency.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
selim wrote on Aug 20, 2008 7:50 AM:
musikluvr wrote on Aug 20, 2008 10:16 AM:
Rich wrote on Aug 20, 2008 11:23 AM:
Go Green, LOL "
HappyHomemaker wrote on Aug 20, 2008 12:08 PM:
antipc wrote on Aug 20, 2008 7:56 PM:
Here is a direct quote from two of the founders of LEEDS given at a seminar given for architects; "I am a believer in stealth green". In other words what they don't know won't hurt them. The direct costs to the taxpayer are immense in public dollars spent & tax credits issued, not to mention the bureaucracies created to deal with implementation & enforcement. Here is an example: a $2000.00 bike rack gets you the same tax credit as $250,000.00 AC/heating unit that takes 30 years to offset the original added cost. Another example is timber harvested using the same standards as that of FSC certified does not qualify yet costs 20% (average) less. Recycled lumber can cost 3 times as much as new.
The Yountville Community center is the best example I've seen of how much can be overspent for little or zero return.
Once again the enviros have duped our bureaucrats & we are picking up the tab. "
Bauhausfan wrote on Aug 20, 2008 10:01 PM:
Imagine having a well insulated home or putting in dual pane windows and more efficient heating and air conditioning.
I have a neighbor who put in a screen door and uses a fan instead of the air conditioning as much as she used to and told me she saves a $100 a month on her power bill.
The horror.
Of course, green building is more than just insulation and more efficient appliances etc. It is about the kind of materials used, building methods and design. "
LMW wrote on Aug 20, 2008 10:53 PM:
Seek LEED 2009 Rating system it addresses your example and put rating system into a new certification process that has been criticized for being too rigid or demanding, for being too costly, and for awarding points illogically. So comments here have been addressed, a common example is that installing a bike rack gets one point, as does installing a costly HVAC system. A green building event will be held at the Gaia Hotel Sept 13 USGBC Redwood Empire Chapter, we would be more than happy to show the other family of rating systems USGBC holds and come join our chapter for workshops and reviews beneficial to any community or home and investment.
Antipc, your welcome to attend.... "
antipc wrote on Aug 21, 2008 12:47 PM:
BTW don't you think pushing it on public works projects & hiding it in specs. is a bit underhanded? "