Prices are down, but Realtors say mortgage crunch is easing
By JENNIFER HUFFMAN
Register Business Writer
There’s good news and bad news in the local real estate market.
The good news?
“First-time buyers can buy a home for significantly less than they could in 2005 or 2006,” said Realtor David Barker of Frank Howard Allen. “Some buyers priced out of the market can now buy.”
The bad news?
In the past 12 months, the median price of a Napa County home has fallen approximately $200,000, according to Trendgraphix, Inc. In June 2007 the median price for a Napa County home was $660,000. As of June 2008, the median was $446,000.
The number of homes for sale and sold has remained relatively steady, however. In June of 2007, 882 houses were for sale in Napa County. In June 2008, that figure was 804.
In June 2007, 97 Napa County homes sold. In June 2008, 86.
American Canyon, which like the city of Napa has witnessed scores of foreclosures in the last five months, could be seeing a turnaround. In June 2007, 157 homes were for sale in the city of about 16,000 people, with only 10 sales. This June, 102 homes were listed, and 18 sold.
But the median also dipped in American Canyon, from $604,000 in June 2007 to $434,000 in June 2008.
“For buyers, the lower prices make homes significantly more affordable,” said Barker. “Homes that are well priced receive multiple offers. Hopefully, this demand will help to stabilize the market.”
American Canyon has grown substantially in recent years, with neighborhoods of new homes cropping up on both sides of Highway 29.
While the old adage in real estate is “Location, location, location,” professionals say timing is a key factor in the foreclosure figures.
“Homeowners who have purchased or refinanced over the last year or two are the most vulnerable, so it is not surprising that newer developments in all areas of California are the perhaps the most visible foreclosure areas,” writes Doug Fowler of Coldwell Banker.
“It is not so much the area but the date of purchase,” added David Barker. “Most of these foreclosed homes were purchased in 2005 or 2006, at the top of the market.”
The for sale signs on so many homes in the low-to-medium price range is slowing the market for higher-priced homes, a phenomenon that was not common in the early stages of the crunch.
“There is a lack of a move-up market into the $750,000 to $1.5 million dollar range,” wrote Mike Silvas with Morgan Lane. “Those homes are not selling well right now.”
The industry is reacting.
“Banks are attempting to streamline systems to deal with delinquent properties,” said Lynda Jensen of Heritage Sotheby’s International Realty. “Investment buyers have entered the marketplace, particularly as the rental market becomes more lucrative. Agents are becoming more skilled at handling the market.”
“Historically Napa has shown the ability to bounce back from economic downturns,” said Jensen. “Good times are ahead.”
Silvas agreed. “My opinion is that the worst is over, especially locally.”
Silvas said that some previously troubling economic signs are evening out. “Adjustable rate loans that were to reset in 2008 did not go up the way it was forecast,” he said.
But some professionals say the wave of foreclosures is not yet over, especially since credit is not nearly as easy to get as it was a few years ago.
“I believe this is the largest loss in wealth for moderate and middle-income families in the history of the country,” said Stephen Cogswell of Fair Housing Napa Valley. “However, lower housing prices may open up opportunities for some who were otherwise unable afford to purchase ... providing they can find someone willing to lend.”
Anne Schabacker with Select Mortgage Planning in American Canyon said she is selling loans.
“I have never been busier,” said Schabacker.
“We have well-qualified buyers,” she said. Banks are still lending, she said. But, “the banks are tighter than ever in their underwriting guidelines.”
“This time a year and a half ago, you could get a loan with a Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) score of 550, 100 percent financing, stated income — you name it, lenders were standing there waiting to hand out money.”
Today, so called “stated income loans” without documentation are out, she said.
“Now we have to provide tax returns, W-2s and pay stubs. There’s more paperwork involved.”
These days Schabacker’s selling conventional loans to investors and Federal Housing Administration loans to first time homebuyers.
“I have investors buying two and three homes,” she said.
Schabacker said the bottom line for any would-be buyer should be simple: “Can you make the payment?”
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
truth wrote on Aug 10, 2008 2:02 AM:
napathoughts wrote on Aug 10, 2008 10:21 AM:
Unemployment is up, does this mean more foreclosures? Mortgage qualification is getting tigther daily as lenders struggle to survive (CountryWide). The charades (slight of pen tricks) CountryWide played with borrowers (Pay Option ARM's) should be prosecuted to the fullest extent. Even the loan officers themselves.
When buying use your head! Very few realtors are looking out for you. They are desperate for any deal. The same reason we are in this mess.
Contrary to what any realtor or mortgage pro has to say, we are not out of this yet.
Watch the economic signs. Take notes of how long your neighbor has listed their home. $50K reductions are the norm. Original listing 2 years ago at $600k, now it is listed at $425K.
A key question to ask your lender or realtor is "How many of your clients in the last four years have foreclosed?" Watch them squirm, it is fun. "
Maya wrote on Aug 10, 2008 11:08 AM:
Appraiser Gal wrote on Aug 10, 2008 12:31 PM:
Winewoman wrote on Aug 10, 2008 1:24 PM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Aug 10, 2008 2:01 PM:
mikeb wrote on Aug 10, 2008 3:06 PM:
MarkMiwords wrote on Aug 10, 2008 3:30 PM:
jeeper16 wrote on Aug 10, 2008 6:17 PM:
Appraiser Gal wrote on Aug 10, 2008 7:15 PM:
For MarkMiWords – check out zillow or dqnews.
To vocal-de-local – remember, if a house is depreciating (for the sake of argument this let’s call it 10%) and you have a 6½% loan, each year that values drop you are in a negative 16½% for this home (huge cost to carry). Where when properties appreciate (again, let’s call it a positive 10%) now your home earns equity at 3½% for that year. This is what I believe the realtor in Sac was trying to suggest. "
catsvet44 wrote on Aug 10, 2008 9:00 PM:
nuttinpersonal wrote on Aug 10, 2008 9:47 PM:
I'll make it easy for them. The median household income for Napa is probably around $50K. The median price for the few homes that sold is closer to $450K. 3-4x gross income is considered pushing things but probably doable depending on how much you want to sacrifice for your home. Let's assume it's 4. At a median household multiplier of 4, that would imply that the people buying these homes overall have a median household income of $110K. Does this sound like this makes sense? Here's a clue: making $150K a year probably puts a household in the top 5-10% of the city of Napa. Now, what do you think is going to happen when people have to put up their own money and not phony lending?
People think the worst is behind us for housing? The Alt-A loans (no documentation but higher fico scores = subprime for the middle and upper middle class) and option ARMs (pay less than your mortgage payment so that the reset is especially harsh) resets are coming in 2009-2011. Those are going to be huge. Most of CA loans fall under this category from 2005-2007, not subprime. Those are starting to reset now and the default rates look pretty similar to subprime when it first started except now those homes are 20%+ underwater.
It's going to be a bloodbath. Prices in Napa will be at least 20% lower than today in 2 years, and I'm not even adjusting for inflation.
Now, see, that wasn't so hard was it? "
funnyme wrote on Aug 10, 2008 9:48 PM:
Do you really have to sell?
Have you look at other optoions?
By taking the offer would you still be making money, breaking even, losing?
Tell your Realtor if she/he can't negotiate your price, you'll find another realtor who will. "
nuttinpersonal wrote on Aug 10, 2008 10:02 PM:
ROTFLMAO. That must be some time machine you have. A ton of appraisers put their "licenses in jeopardy." Not every one, and maybe you didn't, but as an industry, they sold out.
Guess what happened during the housing bubble when appraisers didn't meet the magic number for a mortgage? They got way less volume.
So, what did the industry do as a whole? The relaxed their standards. Just a simple Google search on "housing bubble appraiser pressure" will tell you what's been going on there during the housing bubble. I feel bad for them because it's tought to have that kind of pressure put on you for your livelihood, but the blood of this housing bubble is on the appraisal industry's hands too.
Look at this statement: "We use recent and bracketed comparable sales." This is like your mother asking if all your friends jumped off a cliff, would you jump too? When all of the sales from 2003-2007 were totally inflated due to irrational lending, appraisers were essentially extrapolating that this non-sustainable process could continue. Does appraiser analysis not include things like finance and economics? "
enapa wrote on Aug 10, 2008 10:18 PM:
Maybe the Register should do their own investigations instead of relying upon the realtors. Just research Option ARMs and you'll get a taste of what is yet to come. "
nuttinpersonal wrote on Aug 10, 2008 10:21 PM:
*Never* assume that people who have a vested interest in you taking a particular action (or have a vested interest in somebody else who wants you take a particular action) will look out for your interests. Listen to what they have to say, but think critically about what's real and what's simply convenient for them.
Brokers, lenders, appraisers, Wall Street, etc. all got a cut from the housing bubble churn. A lot of greedy and lazy homebuyers hung themselves too. The whole housing buying chain became a house of cards. Lots of blame to go along.
Don't follow the crowd just to follow it for something so important. Don't go against the crowd just to go against it. That's just thoughtlessness of a different flavor. Choose the path that makes the most sense to you and your goals and ignore everybody else who wants to make money off you taking an action.
There are plenty of Internet sources for legitimate data. Look for it. Don't just go with the "authority" source. Look for challenging, opposing views too.
Finally, I really encourage EVERYONE to take a look at old NVRs from 2005-2007 when the housing bubble was at its most ludicrous. Look for every broker that said something along the lines of "Napa will do ok, we're different, no price is too high because everyone wants to live here." Are these the people that you want helping you for one of the biggest financial commitments in your life? Some brokers told it like it is, but most didn't want to hurt their almighty commission revenue. "
steph wrote on Aug 10, 2008 11:10 PM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Aug 10, 2008 11:20 PM:
catsvet44 wrote on Aug 11, 2008 12:33 AM:
cathyodom wrote on Aug 11, 2008 8:43 AM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Aug 11, 2008 2:35 PM:
Winewoman wrote on Aug 11, 2008 6:41 PM:
enapa wrote on Aug 12, 2008 7:32 AM:
Because we all know that Napa is filled with people with 800 FICO scores and at least $100k to put down on a house. LOL "
ezryder wrote on Aug 12, 2008 10:17 AM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Aug 12, 2008 12:21 PM:
Did any of those wanna be listing agents provide you with a list of what comparable homes "sold" for in the area? Select an agent based on whether they did their homework, and also on their ability to "sell" and "represent" your interests. Here's another clue: Ask an agent for their listings; go to Realtor MLS and take a look at how an agent represents a property. Is there just one photo or several plus a video presentation on their listings? Also inquire about the original asking price of their sold listings, what these homes "actually" sold for, and length of time to sell.
It's troublesome when you don't know who to trust to establish home value, though. In this market, I'm not sure you can trust anyone except yourself. I suggest you do a little bit of research on what homes in the neighborhood are actually "selling" for. Do not use the "asking" price as a comp. A good agent will use these comps as a negotiating tool with buyers. You need to be aware of what they are so that you do not get duped. "
Paddy wrote on Aug 16, 2008 10:30 PM:
Good luck, you'll be ok. Step back and look at the positives. Number one appears to be dumping the ex! "
nuttinpersonal wrote on Aug 17, 2008 11:41 PM:
"Weak rules cripple appraiser oversight"
I encourage everybody to read it. It illustrates how the home appraiser industry caved in to pressure during the housing mania to help blow their share of air into the bubble.
But eventually you just can't blow any more air into the bubble and POP!
I hope the appraisal industry likes regulation because they're going to be seeing a lot more of it in the next few years. Or at least see a lot more enforcement of the existing regulation.
Of course, according to Appraisal Gal, appraisers would *never* put their licenses in jeopardy for $400 (it turns out they might for 100 appraisals at $400 each per year)! Not in a gazillion years! Remember, when you want the facts, ask an appraiser!
Bwahahaha! "