NVR Logo
Supervisors dump November road tax
File photo | Buy photos
Wrong time to seek local increase, county decides
Wednesday, August 06, 2008
Save and Share Share
Acknowledging low odds of success at the polls, the Napa County Board of Supervisors on Tuesday ditched a proposal to place a half-cent sales tax increase on the November ballot to pay for local road repairs.

Board members and Napa County Transportation and Planning Agency Executive Director Jim Leddy cited factors ranging from the high price of gas and the crowded November ballot to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s most recent proposed budget fix — a statewide 1 percent sales tax hike — in jettisoning the ballot measure.
“I recommend that we not call the election at this time,” said Leddy.

“It’s no secret that Napa County roads are among the worst in the Bay Area,” he said, adding that “they are just going to get worse over time.”
But he said the perceived advantage of seeking the road tax during what is anticipated to be a high-turnout election was being “swamped” by higher-profile ballot issues.

He said the governor’s new sales tax hike proposal, the latest in a series of possible solutions to the budget stalemate in Sacramento, was “the nail in the coffin.”
Supervisor Bill Dodd, who also serves as chair of the regional Metropolitan Transportation Commission, acknowledged that withdrawing the road measure “is something we’ve been looking at closely for about four weeks.”

Dodd reeled off adverse factors: a lengthy ballot, starting with the presidential and congressional races and including a dozen or more state initiatives; city council and supervisor races up and down the valley; and the high price of gas.

“We just didn’t want to put this burden on voters at this time,” said Dodd.

“We all recognize this was going to be a tough sell,” said Supervisor Brad Wagenknecht.

Rough roads ahead

The road tax measure, which received the endorsement of every city council in the county in the last month or so, would have been the second bid at a so-called self-help tax in Napa County.

Measure H on the June 2006 ballot also would have raised the local sales tax by half a cent to pay for road repairs and projects. It received support from 52 percent of the voters, well shy of the two-thirds support needed.

Leddy and Dodd have said Napa County must approve a specialized source of funds for roadwork to successfully draw state and federal matching dollars. NCTPA projections showed that this year’s proposed 30-year tax would have raised more than $460 million locally and drawn an additional $600 million in state and federal monies.

The NCTPA had outlined several projects to be paid for with the tax. These included $194 million worth of road repairs in Napa County, $189 million in the city of Napa, smaller but substantial pots of funds for repairs in other cities, the construction of three Upvalley traffic roundabouts, safety improvements to Silverado Trail, the widening of Napa’s First Street bridge over Highway 29 to four lanes, construction of a Soscol flyover at the Southern Crossing, improvements to the intersection of Airport Road and Highway 29 and extension of Devlin Road south of the Napa County Airport.

A recent MTC study shows roads are subpar throughout Napa County, with every city except American Canyon — where congestion is a bigger problem than poor road conditions — getting a failing grade.
8 comment(s)

tfytmp wrote on Aug 6, 2008 6:39 AM:

" They should have still had it on the ballot, but with a clauase if a state-wide sales tax increase is done then the county only tax increase does not happen. Wording is not correct, but menaing is clear. Just another example of how poor the elected leadership at all level is. "

valleylocal wrote on Aug 6, 2008 8:56 AM:

" A half cent sales tax would probably be less than the cost of repair and maintanence on our vehicles and would benefit all in Napa County. I hope they will re-think this short-sighted decision. "

marine1/1 wrote on Aug 6, 2008 9:12 AM:

" I do not think the tax payers need to bail the county out of the problem they created.Millions of dollars have been "borrowed" out of the road funds in recent years and where is the accountability on this? I don't remember voting to borrow money from the road fund to fund other projects.Why do all these other counties receive millions of dollars in Grant money for their roads and we always seem to miss the boat? It would be nice to see our county get some of this.When will the " borrowed money" be put back in the road funds it was taken from to begin with? Are we to assume now that the up-keep on the roads will only get worse now?What about the already promised roads that were to be fixed this year? Is that on hold now? Napa County roads got one of the worst rattings and it will only get worse if the up-keep is not kept up. Maybe there should be an public appointed oversight committee just for the road funds since it has become an out of control problem.Maybe then money would not be "borrowed" for other projects.Get on these Grants supervisors.Tax payers should not have to bail you out.If a tax was to be approved there would still be no accountability for all your borrowing of funds designated for road funds only. "

napablogger wrote on Aug 6, 2008 9:16 AM:

" tfy I doubt if they could legally do that, and besides if they already know it is unikely to pass why put the voters through all that?

I think they made the right decision, and if conditions improve over the next year they can always do it then.

I think there should be more citizen input to let them know what you want. The people who are against taxes also ought to be for cutting spending and they should let the government know where they think spending should be cut. "

kevin wrote on Aug 6, 2008 4:09 PM:

" 10% across the board cuts in spending... "

me2you wrote on Aug 6, 2008 4:28 PM:

" Gee, hasn't this happened before? Have fun Napa... what about ALL the additional cars with Ritz & Westin AND God only knows what else they have up their sleeve...
AND wasn't it to be reversed??
Oregon here I come..sad..lived here since 1951 (many of my friends are moving to Nevada and Colorado)..sad, sad..what's happening here. I'm glad my parents are no longer here to see what's happened - NOT NAPA ANYMORE, can ANYONE FIGURE OUT WHAT NAPA'S NEW NAME SHOULD BE? I've got one but unable to share it. "

MarkMiwords wrote on Aug 6, 2008 10:08 PM:

" We've already voted in every kind of tax you can think of to repair our roads and help implement mass transit. With the shape of the roads as they are, one has to ask the question, "what happened to all the money we already gave them?" Why didn't they spend it on what it was intended for? I would be voting "no" on a new tax because they haven't been held accountable on all the old ones. "

musikluvr wrote on Aug 7, 2008 2:05 AM:

" I think the reason they caved was that the Napa County voters' opposition to taxes has only grown stronger and more militant. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy