Don’t cut kids' programs
Dear editor, Please help us fight this crisis for our children. Forward this letter, or similar, to Senator Patricia A. Wiggins and Honorable Noreen Evans, the decision-makers. You can visit the Web site at www.cdfca.org for more information.
As an active constituent and concerned voter in your district, I urge you to support a balanced solution to the current budget crisis that includes new revenue and rejects harmful cuts to children’s programs.
While I support the Conference Committee’s plan to increase revenue as part of the budget solution, I am deeply concerned that the current proposal still fails our state’s children. There is no reason to enact new reporting requirements that will drop more than 250,000 of the poorest California children from Medi-Cal coverage over the next few years. Most of these children remain eligible, so this increased red tape will result in the State spending more money on administration and less on health care.
I urge you to put our state’s children first and reject cuts to the critical programs and services children need to grow up healthy and become productive adults. With the downturn in the economy California families are already struggling to make ends meet. Now is not the time to cut children’s coverage.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Step up and take action for California children.
Cheri Fels / Yountville
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines,
click here.
steph wrote on Aug 3, 2008 12:42 AM:
Those programs actually divert monies away from programs that actually are necessary, even if they bear a misleading title or description that involves use of the word "children".
I agree that we should protect children who need taxpayer-supported medical care.
I don't think we need to raise taxes to do it. Let's look for wasted money already in the budget, first. "
glenroy wrote on Aug 3, 2008 7:19 AM:
common sense wrote on Aug 3, 2008 8:32 AM:
Raven wrote on Aug 3, 2008 9:18 AM:
funding health care for children who do not have insurance is one of the best way to reduce long-term state spending. "
Cadence wrote on Aug 3, 2008 2:27 PM:
I'm not sure this is really too much to ask for an often free program that includes health benefits.
There is also the 10% across the board cut to pharmacies, providers, etc. I believe it's past time to institute a sliding scale copay that might help fill in for the missing 10%. Too often, "free" is interpreted as "of no value," and as a fool who must purchase health insurance, I think MediCal does provide a great value. But that's a different topic.
C'mon - can't the recipients spend a few minutes every three months to keep their subsidized benefits??? What parent would NOT be willing to do this? "
John Richards wrote on Aug 3, 2008 5:27 PM:
This is nothing but a blatant attempt to increase taxes, which is the wrong thing to do when the economy is in a downward spiral. Like it or not, cuts MUST be made. "
Raven wrote on Aug 3, 2008 6:28 PM:
common sense wrote on Aug 3, 2008 9:43 PM: