NVR Logo
Let's cut legislator pay to minimum wage
Sunday, August 03, 2008
Save and Share Share
I can save the state of California about $1.1 million every month.

Well, I can save that much every month the state goes without a budget, like our brilliant legislators are managing to do right now.
How can I reach a seven-figure savings? By applying some of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s logic to state elected officials, including Arnold himself.

Schwarzenegger is going to cut the pay of about 200,000 state employees down to the Federal minimum wage of $6.55 per hour.
Hey Arnie, if it is good enough for the workers, make it good enough for the bosses instead.

Yep, apply the Federal minimum wage to each state legislator and the upper echelon of people like Arnie, Attorney General (and former Governor Moonbeam) Jerry Brown and the rest.
As nerdy as it sounds, I sat down and did the math, finding the monthly salary for each of the 132 elected officials and coming up with their hourly wage for the month of July. I then reduced that salary down to $6.55 per hour, coming up with the hourly difference in pay.

I multiplied that difference by an eight-hour workday, finding the state would save $518 a day making Schwarzenegger work for minimum wage, with Brown taking home $443.04 less per day, down to a daily savings of $260 per person for the 115 state legislators who don’t have an extra title (Speaker Pro Tem, etc.) with their name.

The total savings for the month of July 2008 — a time the state has operated without a budget — came to $1,123,913.68.

Yep, slightly more than $1.2 million, give or take a few cents due to my somewhat limited math skills.

I can’t take credit for the idea, however, as it came from my wife as we drove to Sacramento late Thursday afternoon. She tossed out the idea of making those we elected work for minimum wage, then went a step further with an idea I’ll toss out here.

What do you think? Should this be a ballot initiative so voters can force legislators to work for minimum wage each and every time they fail to pass a state budget on time?

Can you see how fast a balanced budget would be available if the members of the state assembly and senate knew there would be hundreds of dollars deducted from their pay each day they failed to do one of the jobs we elected them to accomplish?

Let’s add one extra item here too. The elected officials do NOT get their pay differential back once a budget gets signed. They forfeit that amount of pay for failing to come up with a budget on time.

OK, who is going to get the petitions started to get this on a 2009 ballot?

Dan Ross is the Register’s Multimedia Producer. He writes on local, state and national issues when he’s not moderating blog comments or shooting videos at the Raiders camp. He can be reached at dross@napanews.com or 256.2264.





Click here to load this Caspio Bridge DataPage.
14 comment(s)

Bill wrote on Aug 1, 2008 4:04 PM:

" Very good, include all benefits and perks and your figure should climb. Every day with out a budget should equal 1 month with out all of the above. "

glenroy wrote on Aug 1, 2008 6:30 PM:

" Dan….that’s hardly the tip of the iceberg. There are literally thousands who took early retirement and were hired back as consultants collecting retirement benefits and up to 90% of their previous salary working part time…it’s sickening to anybody with half a conscious. "

a teacher wrote on Aug 2, 2008 1:21 AM:

" Like that'll happen...

(but it would be nice...) "

Cayetano wrote on Aug 2, 2008 7:08 AM:

" Unless something has recently changed in Sacramento, I just wanted to remind Dan Ross that Gov Schwarzenegger doesn't draw a salary, so the minimum wage idea for him wouldn't work. However, he has a staff that is highly paid, perhaps he should have put them on minimum wage! "

BD4 wrote on Aug 2, 2008 8:01 AM:

" Great idea. That is what my husband & I were talking about.

From what I know, Arnold already doesn't take his salary. "

NVR-Dan Ross wrote on Aug 2, 2008 11:00 AM:

" cayetano and bd4:
I am not talking about a one-year solution, I'm saying make this permanent, so Arnie's choosing to live off his millions rather than the state's salary is not relevant.
My guess is the person elected Governor in 2010 is going to have far less personal wealth than Arnie.
Cayetano's idea of reducing the staffs of elected officials to minimum wage is excellent, but I feel we need to make the electeds have consequences for failing to pass a budget for us to HAVE a budget on time. "

CLRAE wrote on Aug 2, 2008 12:50 PM:

" DAN ROSS HAS A GREAT IDEA--SO WHY NOT TELL OUR GOV. ABOUT IT??EMAIL HIM...ALSO--THIS SHOULD APPLY TO EVERY STATE --AND--HOW ABOUT CUTTING THOSE ELECTED OFFICIALS RETIREMENT--LET THEM SAVE THEIR OWN MONEY AND HAVE TO LIVE ON IT--LIKE WE DO--THAT COULD SAVE BILLIONS-STOP GIVING MONEY TO OTHER COUNTRIES--AND FIX UP OUR OWN COUNTRY--FIRST---OUR SCHOOLS ARE FAILING-OUR ECONOMY IS FAILING-OUR CARE FOR AGED IS FAILING--HOW ABOUT TAKING CARE OF OUR OWN COUNTRY--???? DON'T ANY OF OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS HAVE ANY BRAINS--NO--THEY ARE ALL ON A MONTH'S VACATION. I IMAGINE IT IS A PAID VACATION. OUT WITH ALL OF THEM "

kevin wrote on Aug 2, 2008 1:52 PM:

" Dan, you're a little late to the game. This law is already on the books and the Legislature is NOT getting paid as we "speak".... "

plasticpinkflamingo wrote on Aug 4, 2008 5:00 PM:

" I've got an even better idea - let's vote all of the bums out! "

funnyme wrote on Aug 4, 2008 8:36 PM:

" I like PPF's idea! "

Raven wrote on Aug 5, 2008 7:02 AM:

" I hear the throw the bums out every election cycle and have yet to see very many incumbents lose..... "

plasticpinkflamingo wrote on Aug 5, 2008 10:27 PM:

" Even at minimum wage, most legislators and bureaucrats are grossly overpaid. "

diehard4ever wrote on Aug 7, 2008 8:50 AM:

" CLRAE-
Great ideas, but can you please stop with the capitals??? It's kinda annoying... "

Bill wrote on Aug 7, 2008 1:10 PM:

" Ok,Ok, trow da bums out! Get some new bums an pay ‘em minimum wage, very novel. Make them even more dependent on special interest contributions.

Eliminating permanently the special interest money that finances their campaigns might make more sense and actually be something that could come to pass, at least it has a better chance. But then aw gee that limits freedom of speech especially the speech of those who can afford to speak louder than any one else.

But in the mean time lets have fun with a funny piece of puffery. "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy