Angwin eco-village EIR Expected by year's end
By JILLIAN JONES
Register Staff Writer
While controversy swirls over proposed development in the South County, quiet Angwin is also the subject of a development effort that may come before lawmakers later this year.
Pacific Union College originally unveiled plans for a 591-home eco-village, including a new park and community-serving stores. The project, to be built by private developer Triad Communities, has since been scaled back to 380 homes.
Napa County Planning Director Hillary Gitelman said the environmental impact report, which is already underway, could be complete by early December. The public will have the chance to comment on the draft EIR before a final report is drawn up, she said.
Possible areas of concern, according to Gitelman, are traffic, emergency access, water availability and water quality.
Also, Gitelman added, “In Angwin, you have the whole question of the character of the community. It is a rural setting, and we want to preserve the character of the community.”
But to some, development and preservation are mutually exclusive. The group Save Rural Angwin launched a campaign from the start against the eco-village, saying local roads, water and sewage services cannot handle hundreds of new homes, and that the college should settle for the 191 residential units already approved by the county.
Allen Spence, spokesperson for Save Rural Angwin, said the group is pumping up its fundraising efforts in order to keep the project in check.
SRA launched a fundraising drive to finance legal counsel, hire its own environmental consultant to review the EIR and to expand its base of 1,100 supporters, Spence said.
Fundraising efforts include two challenge grants of $10,000 each, one from Stag’s Leap Wine Cellars’ Warren and Barbara Winiarski, and one from Dario Sattui, owner of Castello di Amorosa and V. Sattui Winery.
Spence said the group has raised almost $30,000 in the past couple months.
“We are going to pursue every legal option available to us to stop this project,” Spence said.
If necessary, he said, the group might challenge the EIR in court.
PUC officials have said the project — which includes construction of homes with energy- and water-efficient features, upgrades to the PUC campus and an overhaul of Angwin’s small commercial zone — is essential for the school to remain vibrant.
At county hearings and elsewhere, they have argued that the college should not be hindered from what PUC leaders characterize as modest changes to their sprawling property, that they have made adjustments in relation to community concerns and that the county needs housing that will support locals, including workers at the college and nearby St. Helena Hospital.
Peter Bartelme, spokesperson for Triad Communities and PUC, pointed out that the school and developer have created a new Web site with information about the project, www.angwin-ecovillage.com.
In an e-mail, Bartelme said, “We welcome scrutiny of the EIR and believe it will show that the eco-village is a model of sustainability and an environmentally sensitive project that will benefit the community of Angwin in a variety of ways. We find it unusual that this group would mobilize to challenge an EIR that has yet to be completed or released, which demonstrates the group’s unwillingness to even consider the EIR findings in an open-minded or fair manner.”
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
skeptic wrote on Jul 30, 2008 6:58 AM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Jul 30, 2008 11:01 AM:
And speaking about animals, does anyone pay attention to the geese that hang out on the greens nearly full time? when we bulldoze green and turn it grey, we disrupt the balance of nature for non domestic animals too.
This is not an "eco" project. There are no regulations in how the word "eco" is used. The water and energy efficient features in homes today are now code. I hope people are not fooled by the exploitation of the word "eco".
Also, it's not the responsibility of either the Napa County Planning Commission or the Angwin residents to keep the college vibrant. PUC needs to keep itself vibrant and quit relying on outsiders to do it for them. If PUC is having difficulty attracting a student body, they need to look internally to find out what's wrong. Anything else is just a band aid. They'll be requesting bigger band aids in the future because essentially they are creating a deeper wound with this development. And guess who the costs are passed on to? Save PUC but burden the community and taxpayers? Follow the money trail. Don't forget that PUC takes advantage of tax exemptions as well. In other words, money is not being redistributed back into the community. "
sickothis wrote on Jul 30, 2008 12:27 PM:
And -it's not Angwin's residents' right to tell the College what to do with its land, which has been zoned for something like 30 years for development. "
vocal-de-local wrote on Jul 30, 2008 1:02 PM:
Here's just another area which proves how some developers (especially law firm developers), will search for any weakness to exploit. If we allow them to get away with it here in Angwin, it will set a precedence in other areas of the county. Every person in this county who does not welcome uncontrolled growth should be worried about how our zoning is being hijacked by greedy developers.
And speaking of rights: it's not the right of PUC to tell county planners how to interpret a vague pencil drawing around the boundaries of a college. Talk about arrogance. Any zoning of college property was intended for institutional expansion only. You know it, the planners know it, and hopefully the people of this county now know it. "
boots wrote on Jul 31, 2008 7:19 AM:
Folks in angwin know when they are being thrased by big city developers.
Nope, they whole concept is flawed!
It is really a crisis of leadership at Pacific Union College that is the isssue here. Building suburban sprawl on Howell Mountain on fine farm ground will do nothing to change the core problems of PUC.
Time to look to new leadership and real soultions to PUC's problems. "
Econut wrote on Jul 31, 2008 9:29 AM:
"eco," what more can be done to make it more "eco"? A model of sustainability is just what the county needs. And check out the "Comparison Chart." It looks like you'll be getting 191 new homes whether you like it or not. "
Econut wrote on Jul 31, 2008 9:48 AM:
And what is the basis for your claim that refrigerators, air conditioners and pets will be prohibited? None of these appear to be addressed in the website. Can you be more specific and name an ecovillage that actually prohibits these? If what you are saying is true, I would like to read it for myself. "