More to drink in Napa County
Governor approves Evans bill for more liquor licenses
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
Wined out? It will be easier to find mixed drinks at local restaurants in coming years.
Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger signed legislation last week authorizing 15 more general liquor licenses — an almost 25 percent increase — in Napa County.
Liquor licenses have been in such short supply that some restaurateurs have paid as much as $300,000 to buy one from proprietors who own licenses but are closing their bars or restaurants.
The state Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control will sell the new licenses for $12,000.
Scores of restaurants now make do with wine and beer permits because liquor licenses are so expensive and in such limited supply.
Assemblywoman Noreen Evans, D-Santa Rosa, authored the bill to raise the cap on Napa County’s general liquor licenses. There are currently 62 licenses.
The liquor license cap, which is based on population, made no sense in Napa County where tourism boosts the demand for liquor far higher than it would otherwise be, Evans said.
“This bill provides some relief to local businesses struggling to meet the growing demands of our tourism industry,” Evans said in a press release.
“This bill will provide an economic stimulus and help keep visitors keep coming back to Napa.”
Craig Smith, executive director of the Napa Downtown Association, expects close to 100 applicants to seek one of the new licenses. Existing and future restaurant operators will want one, he said.
“They’re going to get what is currently a $300,000 asset for $12,000,” he said.
ABC will issue five licenses per year starting in 2009, when the law takes effect. If there are more than five applicants, the state will hold a countywide drawing.
Applicants will have to demonstrate that they are credible restaurant operators and undergo a background check. Winning applicants cannot sell their licenses for two years.
This is only the second time that California has made an exception to its population formula for issuing general liquor licenses. In 2007, the Legislature awarded 10 additional licenses to Mono County, where the resident population is low but the number of visitors to Mammoth Lakes is high.
Napa County has a population of 137,000, according to the latest state estimates. The county draws some 4.7 million visitors per year, Evans said.
Napa’s relatively small population is a function of county and city policies to grow slowly and protect agriculture. “By tying alcohol licenses to growth, state law penalizes Napa for protecting its agricultural heritage,” Evans said.
Evans’ bill, Assembly Bill 2266, passed both the Assembly and Senate on unanimous votes.
The law takes effect in January. ABC may not open applications until later in 2009, Smith said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Madison Jay Hamilton wrote on Jul 20, 2008 9:20 AM:
loomco wrote on Jul 20, 2008 10:17 AM:
rogers wrote on Jul 20, 2008 11:02 AM:
Byoung wrote on Jul 20, 2008 12:25 PM:
Dwayne wrote on Jul 20, 2008 12:31 PM:
tiredofcomplainingnapkins wrote on Jul 20, 2008 4:56 PM:
Dwayne wrote on Jul 20, 2008 6:04 PM:
I still think the wineries should pay for road repairs instead of building ego-castles. "
funnyme wrote on Jul 20, 2008 7:38 PM:
More drunks with the same amount of cops on the streets will not get the DUI numbers higher, unless the "check points" are on Silverado and 29 between St. Helena and Yountville before 6:00 PM, otherwise it would be our own locals (who, btw, should have already learned that "they're watchin ya").
Whatever you do, take a cab if you had one too many...or we will be picking you apart on the monthly "NVR DUI Report" "
BiLly wrote on Jul 20, 2008 7:49 PM:
MommaD wrote on Jul 20, 2008 8:07 PM:
doscentavos wrote on Jul 20, 2008 8:11 PM:
Of course NONE of our elected officials have the testicular fortitude to make these fiscally responsible decisions. "
kevin wrote on Jul 20, 2008 9:13 PM:
napablogger wrote on Jul 20, 2008 9:15 PM:
pernodboi wrote on Jul 20, 2008 9:50 PM:
MommaD - don't think the city of Napa will see much change.
When I was a boy it seems towns like Suisun and Younteville had many bars, all in a row. Did the state start controlling the licenses in the 80's? Or did the skid rows just disengrate and the licenses move to restaurants farther apart?
With all the new hotels coming in - I bet Napa County will actually see a decrease in liquor serving restaurants/bars until 2010, maybe 2011.
Would love to see a story of the changing bar scene in the county - my guess is that liquor consumption has decreased, per customer, over the last 30 years. I mean - Younteville was single wides and bars when I was a boy. "
chunk wrote on Jul 21, 2008 7:02 PM: