City approves Ritz-Carlton
Resort would employ 500; groundbreaking possible in fall
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
Downtown Napa will be putting on the ritz.
After a marathon meeting dominated by labor unions advocating a “living wage” and locals pleading for downtown rejuvenation, the Napa City Council approved a 351-room riverfront Ritz-Carlton resort shortly before 1 a.m. Wednesday.
A Florida-based development company will build a posh five-diamond tourist destination costing more than $200 million at the northwest corner of First Street and Silverado Trail, where not long ago garbage trucks parked at night.
Council members and business leaders bestowed accolades, saying the Ritz-Carlton Napa Valley would generate more than 500 jobs, millions in tax revenues and push downtown’s rebirth to a new level.
Councilman Peter Mott said he was initially disbelieving when he heard that Ritz-Carton, one of the globe’s most prestigious hotel brands, had eyes for Napa’s work-in-progress downtown.
“That’s kind of like the average guy being kissed by the prettiest girl in school. It doesn’t happen,” he said.
“I’m more proud than I can explain,” said Councilman Jim Krider, who said that years of planning and incremental improvements to downtown were finally paying off. “This is the best project I’ve ever seen.”
Harry Price, a long-time downtown developer, said the Ritz-Carlton had enough economic clout to boost downtown’ fortunes. “It will change downtown in a way that a lot of people here tonight have waited for for 20 years,” he said.
Environmentalists applauded the Ritz for promising to build to “green” standards and neighbors praised its quality. But the project was challenged by labor unions and social service agencies who wanted the city to mandate a “living wage” of $15 per hour and affordable health insurance for employees.
Napa lost high-paying blue collar jobs when Mare Island Naval Shipyard and Napa Pipe closed, with lower-paying service jobs taking their place, said Martin Bennett, representing Unite Here, a hotel workers union.
With this luxury project, the City Council has the opportunity to insist on wages and benefits that allow workers to live here without relying on welfare services, Bennett said.
The Napa Valley Coalition of Non-profit Agencies echoed the union position. The city should tell developers that “working families are our priority,” said Bob Orser, the coalition’s executive director.
In unanimously approving the project, council members accepted Ritz-Carlton assurances that its pay and benefits would be at the top of the hotel industry, with training and promotional opportunities that could launch careers.
Hotel representatives said the project would create the equivalent of 524 full-time jobs, with 75 percent of workers coming from Napa County. Some 95 percent of jobs will be full-time, with employer-subsidized benefits. Pay would be at the top of the hotel industry. Many of the lowest-paid workers earning $8.53 to $12.10 per hour will have their wages tripled by tips, Ritz officials said.
Council members showed no desire to negotiate wages as part of project approval. “I truly believe the employees will be well compensated,” Mayor Jill Techel said.
Attorney Kevin Teague, representing the developer, said one project should not have to solve a community-wide economic or social problem.
Of the 41 speakers who pushed the hearing past midnight, only a few were Alta Heights neighbors. Several raised traffic, lighting and noise concerns. The hotel will be required to work with the city and neighbors on plans to reduce traffic and prevent overflow parking in residential areas.
The developer, River House Land Company of Miami, will pay $33,441 toward future improvements to the “Five Corners” intersection of Third Street, Coombsville Road, East Avenue and Silverado. Hotel traffic will add seven seconds to the average wait at evening rush hour, a consultant said.
The developer will pay an additional $1.3 million in traffic mitigation to be used anywhere in the city as well as $15,691 toward the planned extension of Saratoga Drive to Silverado.
Concerns about the project’s impact on housing faded when the developer volunteered to pay an additional $500,000, on top of an original fee of $564,000, toward development of affordable rental housing.
Once open, the hotel will generate $400,000 in annual property tax for affordable housing, city officials said.
Francie Winnen, representing Friends of the Napa River, said the Ritz was a “gigantic leap forward” compared to a 351-room hotel approved for the site in 2002 but never built. The developer said the public will be invited to use Ritz pathways to get to a new length of river trail.
Sustainable Napa Valley and build-it-green advocate Bob Massaro gave the project their blessing after the developer agreed to build to national energy conservation standards. The project aims to be certified by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design, or LEED.
Councilwoman Juliana Inman said the Ritz was a model project, meeting the city’s economic, environmental and social equity goals. “It covers all the bases in what we need from this project and it’s beautiful to boot,” she said.
“This will be a project that shines spectacularly bright for our community,” Councilman Mark van Gorder said.
The Ritz will be a “village-like” complex of a dozen buildings from one to four stories, with a contemporary Craftsman design, the developer said. Grounds will be lushly landscaped with mostly native plants, with an “art walk” open to the community.
The 2002 hotel project covered seven acres. The new developer acquired three additional acres along First, shifting the main entry to First, opposite Juarez Street. Retail shops and a restaurant will run along the south end.
Cars will be largely invisible, with 590 spaces underground and just 14 above. Valets will park all vehicles. The hotel will need to develop a plan for off-site site parking for the largest events.
Despite the recent infusion of new hotel projects, Napa has not seen anything like the Ritz-Carlton, which will be the city’s biggest and fanciest.
The Ritz-Carlton, which will charge around $500 a night, should generate $4.1 million to $5.9 million a year in taxes for the city when it opens in 2011, an economics study said.
Local building trades asked that the developer use local contractors, rather than bringing in workers from afar as some hotel projects have done.
A spokesman for Bell Products of Napa said his company had a chance to land a contract worth more than $20 million to install ducting and mechanical systems in the Ritz.
Construction will take two years with the possibility of earth moving as early as late fall. The start of construction hinges on the project getting financing in a deteriorating lending market. Although the project was billed as costing $200 million, Techel reported Wednesday that the latest cost estimate may be $270 million.
“These are tough economic times. Can you build it?” Krider said.
“Time continues to be our enemy,” said Brad Weiser, the developer’s managing partner. “Every day’s delay is extremely costly to this project.”
River House Land Company intends to partially finance the project by selling 201 of 351 units as hotel condominiums, which would give the buyer limited visitation rights. Hotel condos in premium locations continue to sell well, Weiser said.
Another unknown is whether Unite Here might attempt to mount a referendum campaign against the Ritz-Carlton as it did last month against a proposed Kimpton hotel on Solano Avenue at Wine Country Avenue.
The city is currently evaluating whether there are enough valid petition signatures to put the 196-room Kimpton on the ballot. The union submitted 5,200 signatures, more than the 3,630 required.
Owen Li, a Unite Here organizer, said his union had nothing to say for now about this possibility.
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines,
click here.
napapete wrote on Jul 16, 2008 8:59 AM:
Dirty Napkin wrote on Jul 16, 2008 9:04 AM:
renrut wrote on Jul 16, 2008 9:07 AM:
Dhappel54 wrote on Jul 16, 2008 9:23 AM:
jenny99 wrote on Jul 16, 2008 9:25 AM:
marine1/1 wrote on Jul 16, 2008 9:42 AM:
marine1/1 wrote on Jul 16, 2008 9:55 AM:
wipemedown wrote on Jul 16, 2008 10:12 AM:
tired wrote on Jul 16, 2008 11:31 AM:
axim wrote on Jul 16, 2008 12:08 PM:
John Richards wrote on Jul 16, 2008 12:34 PM:
John Richards wrote on Jul 16, 2008 12:39 PM:
napapete wrote on Jul 16, 2008 12:48 PM:
marine1/1 wrote on Jul 16, 2008 1:11 PM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Jul 16, 2008 1:23 PM:
I love Whole Foods but the traffic situation is still a mess. "
realist2 wrote on Jul 16, 2008 2:31 PM:
abouttime wrote on Jul 16, 2008 2:44 PM:
realist2 wrote on Jul 16, 2008 3:09 PM:
napablogger wrote on Jul 16, 2008 4:03 PM:
Napans demand so much from businesses like this it is almost embarassing, the greed I mean. Everyone lines up for a piece of the pie, we expect to control everything, even how much they pay their workers, how they build their building, how the building looks, etc, etc.
Ever think about the fact that they could just go to Sonoma, or San Francisco, or a lot of other places with their investment money? If we make it hard enough for them to be here, they might.
I think a little humility is in order here, unless you plan to stop driving on the roads, needing any emergency services or flushing your toilet. "
healthnut wrote on Jul 16, 2008 10:00 PM:
noblindershere wrote on Jul 16, 2008 10:19 PM:
Paddy wrote on Jul 16, 2008 11:02 PM:
comment wrote on Jul 16, 2008 11:35 PM:
I love the changes that are taking place. Downtown is becoming vibrant again. Wait until the Avia and the Westin open. Downtown is going to be full of life. What was once the place to avoid will soon become the place to be. You folks can sit at home and peer out your windows, I'll be downtown. "
wowquebonita wrote on Jul 17, 2008 3:40 AM:
Haaa....good luck with the traffic situation! "
wowquebonita wrote on Jul 17, 2008 3:48 AM:
You've got to be kidding me?!?! That place is a waking nightmare! I avoid that shopping center all together. 1. The entrance. ..2. Parking..never enough...3....getting OUT of that shopping plaza..4..."strip" mall; it's lame, I don't understand why there are so many strip malls in town?
More high end stores such as; Neiman Marcus, Bloomingdales, maybe Nordstrom should be added for the people who will be staying at the Ritz...I seriously doubt they'll even consider the Outlets. "
funnyme wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:17 AM:
Bel Aire plaza's parking "issue"? Not too bad, at least every time I decide to go shopping.
Must be the water I drink, or the food I eat or the time in the day I'm there... Never around 5:00 PM Mon-Fri, or 12:00 PM Sat or Sun. "
marine1/1 wrote on Jul 17, 2008 7:35 AM:
jimmie wrote on Jul 17, 2008 9:35 AM:
Go Ritz! "
napadad wrote on Jul 17, 2008 10:45 AM:
tazzmaster wrote on Jul 17, 2008 12:31 PM:
axim wrote on Jul 17, 2008 12:43 PM:
You're kidding me right? You think the Bel Aire parking is not a problem? You drive the backstreets and ask any of those residents how many people park in front of their houses to shop at Whole Foods.
I love the Ritz for their high end offerings. Their Half Moon facility is breathless. I am still concerned about flow of traffic around there. Have you ever tried driving down the trail and been stopped for a block because someone wanted to turn into or out of the apartments there? Or do you drive down Soscol?
Civs don't do traffic studies. They design roads/bridges/etc. "
axim wrote on Jul 17, 2008 12:45 PM:
Take a ride with me everyday down the trail and I'll show you the congestion. There's a reason it takes two lights to get through the 5 point intersection as is with existing traffic. "
napapete wrote on Jul 17, 2008 2:24 PM:
semantics aside, if you think that parking at Bel Aire is that bad, you are a spoiled baby...I go there almost every day, at different times, while sometimes I cannot park within 5 spaces of the store I am going to, I have never had a problem finding a parking spot. Unlike you, I am apperantly not a "man of the people" who canvases the surrounding area looking for others who share in my overall discontent. Bel Aire has problems, mainly the entrence, and people not stopping correctly at the four way stop in the middle, but as far as a lack of sufficient parking, it is simply wrong. Maybe it is because I have lived places that have parking problems in the past, but again, NEVER has it been an issue for me to park, unless you define an issue as having to go up more than one isle.
Napa has a lot to offer everyone, tourists as well as locals, at the end of the day, the price of living in such a wonderful place is dealing with issues that tourists bring. People who wish this was still a small agricultural town need to grow up, this is a wine town now, and apperantly people like to come to Wine Towns. I am happy to have a new way to enjoy the river, and probably another world class restaurant, which are things that I enjoy.
I wish some of you would get over yourselves and be happy that there are people who want to make OUR city a better place, bring in tax dollars, and come to visit. I am happy to see napa going in the right direction! "
marine1/1 wrote on Jul 17, 2008 3:39 PM:
russ wrote on Jul 17, 2008 4:30 PM:
JOBS, JOBS, JOBS!
Napa is too full of NIMBYS. "
CouncilmanMott wrote on Jul 17, 2008 6:40 PM:
napapete wrote on Jul 18, 2008 12:20 AM:
By the way, councilman mott just earned my vote! "
jwk wrote on Jul 18, 2008 2:51 AM:
grannieaj wrote on Jul 18, 2008 3:33 AM:
tell me that my city is great. Napa has always been a world-class city to me! I was at the city council meeting it sounded to me like the developer was threatening to leave
if they didn't get what they wanted - and that's just wrong.
Napablogger - I have kids in Sonoma and San Francisco that I visit and what you're saying is wrong. If they built this hotel
over there, they would have to pay a living wage by law. In San Francisco, they passed Proposition G that made a new development
have living wages, hundreds of acres of parks, and hundreds of affordable apartments. You know who was behind it? A BIG DEVELOPER!
That's because without that proposition, the developer would have had to do even MORE for the people of that city. That's what it's like
when your civic leaders don't think of your town as some ugly girl. "
grannieaj wrote on Jul 18, 2008 3:34 AM:
I didn't bring thousands of cars and hundreds of poor immigrants into this town. If you're going to do that, you SHOULD do something
that makes it worthwhile for our city. The companies are making so much money by lowering our standard of living. Why should we
let them make our city a playground for the rich? This city is not for us anymore. The job of our city council should be to
stop this, not make it happen. We don't need extra taxes that badly. It's not worth losing our city. There has to be balance -
but it's not happening. We're just developing willy nilly.
Let's get something things straight. We're talking about 3000 car trips, 500 workers, a convention hall, restaurants, and on and on. You don't
need to be some engineer - you need common sense to know this is trouble.
Also, Gordon Huether's comments at the meeting were rude. He said that he didn't care if people thought he was offensive.
What kind of city councillor would he be? I want to get some new city councillors. "
axim wrote on Jul 18, 2008 6:26 AM:
And that is exactly why I have to point out to you the "problem" with the Whole Foods parking. Most people are not aware of the issue that the residents around the Bel Aire plaza have to endure. We just park and go in. As for being a baby, I'm not one to look for the closest parking stall. I usually park a few rows away to use my legs and walk and let others that need to park closer have them. "
axim wrote on Jul 18, 2008 6:29 AM:
Forum posting does make an interesting twist for people. Posting your opinion is exactly what they're here for! Kudos for defending your opinion. However it is not a place for personal attacks. I like it when people disagree and try to prove their points so others can hear both sides of an issue. "
axim wrote on Jul 18, 2008 6:30 AM:
jersey guy wrote on Jul 18, 2008 7:55 AM:
juliana wrote on Jul 18, 2008 3:20 PM:
Here's a link to the City of San Francisco website (webmaster, this is a link to a government website):
http://www.sfgov.org/site/olse_index.asp?id=27605 "
realist2 wrote on Jul 18, 2008 4:01 PM:
There are so many businesses that are desperately in need of a face lift but with no competition they won't spend the money. I deserve better than to have to shop dirty aisles with half filled shelves and visitors deserve a nice place to stay. As I said before "Napa is a world renowned attracation now" and if you don't like it you will have to move.
Congrats to the City Council for trying to move this city into the 20th century. "
vercingetorex wrote on Jul 18, 2008 5:46 PM:
You can shine the apple all you want but the core is still rotten. Money and attention is inordinately spent catering slavishly to people, that would probably visit here anyway, while our infrastructure goes to hell.
Napa becomes less and less liveable as
the fools in charge chase the golden ring around.
In the meantime by commercializing this valley we kill what made it special to begin with. It's all too sad and too funny. The river is still a smelly polluted mess. We have a third world city sprouting up where Napa used to be and crime is rampant.
World Class City? No! World Class Folly. "
me2you wrote on Jul 21, 2008 1:26 PM:
mofosheee wrote on Jul 22, 2008 2:10 PM:
I thought we were having a water crisis "
14obama wrote on Jul 25, 2008 6:22 PM:
"A Florida-based development company will build a posh five-diamond tourist destination costing more than $200 million at the northwest corner of First Street and Silverado Trail, where not long ago garbage trucks parked at night."
The old timers in Napa would prefer the garbage trucks parking there. The City approved the Ritz and all of the other money grabbing,tourist traps,not WE the people. Where or when will it end ? Napa loves "city rapists" ! C'mon ! Build em Higher ! "
mytwocents wrote on Jul 27, 2008 2:48 PM:
sickand tired wrote on Aug 1, 2008 2:44 PM:
I have watched all these "improvements" over the years and waited to see when the benefits might start. Unfortunately, what we have is worse streets, worse traffic and less evidence of police coverage than there was 30 years ago.
I have loved Napa a long time, but don't know how much longer I can stand it. I'm sure some of the people who would like to turn this into LA of Disneyland would be happy to see me go. Perhaps someday they will regret some of their decisions. "