NVR Logo
Road tax should make way for bikes
Monday, June 30, 2008
Save and Share Share
Dear editor, It is my opinion that every public roadway receiving any portion of the transportation tax designated for roadway repairs and improvements must be required to have designated, striped bicycle lanes. This will foster and support responsible public effort to reduce vehicular traffic and will enhance public safety for both vehicles and cyclists.

If Napa County and municipal agencies are serious and responsible about enhancing public and traffic safety, some of this tax funding should be appropriated for bicycle lanes on all roadways benefiting from the tax.
Marc North

American Canyon
10 comment(s)

Tim Thulin wrote on Jun 30, 2008 8:07 AM:

" Hi Marc, I agree, we should make our streets safe for all users and we can. With gas prices going higher, waistlines getting bigger and the earth getting warmer it just makes sense! "

kevin wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:14 AM:

" Maybe when bicycle riders start PAYING some of the highway TAXES we can discuss it.... "

Sickothis wrote on Jun 30, 2008 11:20 AM:

" When are we going to require a license to drive a bicycle on public roads? Bicyclists are bound by the same laws as cars, but too many of them think they're exempt from everything from obeying road markings to observing right of way. "

SouthNapa wrote on Jun 30, 2008 12:45 PM:

" Sorry, but cyclists have no regard for the rules of the road. Try driving up Dry Creek Road when these spandex clad rejects are riding side by side and refuse to move out of the way. City streets are no better as I routinely see cyclists blow through red lights as if the rules of the road do not apply to them.

I have no problem sharing the road, but that means that cyclists should follow the rules of the road, which includes stopping at red lights. Arizona has a single file law which is absolutely necessary on two lane roads. Why should I have to cross a double yellow line and risk my life just to get around two or three wannabe Lance Armstrongs who refuse to get out of the way?

Cyclists have every right to be on the road, but follow the laws, and leave enough room for cars to pass you safely. "

antipc wrote on Jun 30, 2008 12:53 PM:

" What we need is fewer or no bicycles on our back roads. Roads where we have designated bike lanes are good if the riders obey the law. These cycling events on country roads with no shoulder are stupid & dangerous. I'm tired of trying to get to or from the lake, while these idiots ride 2 or more abreast & refuse to move over. Maybe they need to be told they will not win in a collision with a vehicle.
A better idea is to have the Sheriff & CHP start handing out citations. Then we would have a positive cash flow instead of a negative. "

Jenn wrote on Jun 30, 2008 3:07 PM:

" I agree that there should eb a lot more roads with bike lanes, but I also think that bike riders should learn the laws of the road as well. I agree with everyone here. I have seen on many occasions, where a bike riders has blown a light or stop sign, or the one that dont move over single file to let cars by on the narrow country roads. I also think that if a cop comes up behind these people and they dont move, pull them over and ticket them! Maybe then they will learn to stay to the side of the road if there isnt a designated bike lane. My fear though is one that many others have more than likely seen anyways. If we did use more tax money to allow for the bike lanes, are the riders going to stay in them? I dont know how many I have delt with that ride either right on the white line, so you still have to swerve around them, or ones that still wont ride in them at all. "

napan007 wrote on Jun 30, 2008 3:36 PM:

" It's not hard to see why so many bikers are drawn to our highways and roads - it's so gorgeous! I don't know how they have the cojones to bike amongst drunk tourists though - I stick to mountain trails, personally. I think the bikers who are new to the area don't realize the risk they're taking, especially on country roads like Oak Knoll where there are ditches where shoulders should be. When I lived in Davis, cops were on bikes and motorcycles as well as driving cars, and all issued tickets to bikers who failed to obey stoplights and stopsigns and who stole right-of-ways from cars and other bikers. And all bikes had to be registered or they'd get taken away - I accidently let my registration expire one year during finals week and ended up having to post bail on my bike to get it out of custody. :)

I think the moral of the story is we need more safe roads for bikers with clearly marked bike lanes (and perhaps not allowing bikers on Oak Knoll and other shoulderless roads?) and we need more bikers who remember how driving rules work. And we need cops who want to issue tickets for bikers and cars who drive in a dangerous fashion around each other but that should be the easiest piece of the puzzle to obtain, right? It’d generate a lot of $$ for the county after all and we are in need of revenue. "

musikluvr wrote on Jun 30, 2008 3:52 PM:

" Bicycles should lanes to ride in and should be required to have a license and pay fees to help provide for bicycle lanes. "

Dwayne wrote on Jun 30, 2008 4:29 PM:

" Sandra will love this one..... She wanted to shove the gay marriage debate under the rug, and get on to more 'important' things. Way to go, Marc North.....

Apparently it's more important to discuss bicycle lanes then the morality of gay marriage...??? "

John Richards wrote on Jun 30, 2008 7:53 PM:

" The problem with many of the city streets around here is that they are not wide enough to have both bike lanes and on-street parking. Imagine the howls of discontent if we removed all on-street parking, especially in residential neighborhoods! "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy