NVR Logo
The costs of battling strawberry scourge
Monday, June 30, 2008
Save and Share Share
On the front page of the May 15 Napa Valley Register (“Sell fruit, go to jail” by Marsha Dorgan), I see an excellent opportunity to help balance the Napa city budget in these troubled economic times. Simply cut back on the police department staffing and overtime that has been such a strain on city finances.

According to Dorgan’s article, the Napa Police Department has sufficient surplus resources and such slack demand for its services that it can dedicate an unmarked SUV; a black-and-white; and several officers, including an interpreter and a public information officer, to a six-week zero-tolerance sting operation against strawberry vendors.
To save the taxpayers some money and to avoid having to raise taxes, surely we can ask our citizens to make the small sacrifice of defending themselves against those dastardly fruit sellers. I mean, if push comes to shove, and the vendors’ wares seem seriously threatening, yet citizens just cannot resist buying, maybe they could band together to help each other throw the purchased fruit away. Surely, buying and destroying the fruit would be a lot cheaper than deploying several $150,000-per-year Napa police officers.

I understand that strawberries are a life-threatening scourge that must be eradicated despite the fact that no one has ever gotten sick from them. It’s just that I don’t think we can afford to have such expensive resources dedicated to the eradication. By the time you add up the salaries and benefits of the various officers, the use of the two police vehicles, the cost of towing away strawberry vans, the cost of keeping vendors in jail, the burden on the court system, and the extra gas that we will now have to burn by driving farther to get our strawberries, I think just eating the strawberries would eradicate them just as well and cost a lot less.
The simple truth is that we all want those strawberries even if they don’t carry the Napa City Council’s pompous seal of approval. If there were not a real demand for those berries, the vendors would not be able to sell them. The fact that we buy them is proof that the vendors are performing a desired service. They should be rewarded for their industriousness and willingness to serve, not harassed.

I say the police department is less than useless if this is what they do. Not only are they not performing a service of value to us, they are damaging us by depriving us of conveniently available strawberries, wasting our money on harassment, embarrassing us with their irrelevance and diverting our essential resources away from real crime. If we don’t have enough real crime to keep all our officers busy, then I think we should substantially reduce the Napa Police Department budget.
(Bachich lives in Napa.)
11 comment(s)

kbf wrote on Jun 30, 2008 6:25 AM:

" George, I don't think it is so much about the strawberries, but the other vendors that cook in their backyard then sell their goods. Re=read the article about that guy and the horrible conditions he cooked under. The strawberries you can look over and make your decision, but if you enforce the law it will have to be for everyone. I do like the strawberries and they are usually so good. "

napaisburning wrote on Jun 30, 2008 6:26 AM:

" As much as I despise the majority of Napa Police officers , not because of what they have done to me, but what I have seen them do to the least of us, ( Hispanics ), I have to disagree with Mr. Bachich at this time. There is a large and semi exposed shadow culture of underground economy elements in Napa and most cities that enjoy a reasonably sized Hispanic community. The police department should not be monolithic in it's approach to the crimes and the problems in any area. The Napa Police are sending an informational signal to those in our community who are foriegn to the way legitimate business is run in the U.S., by laws and regulations. TMS SMP "

Cadence wrote on Jun 30, 2008 7:06 AM:

" Maybe the permit fees the vendors obtain (they DID go to city hall and obtain them, right?) will offset the police costs.
There is one letter today in the Register mentioning the obvious: laws apply to ALL of us. Any question about that? "

bob2 wrote on Jun 30, 2008 7:32 AM:

" I agree with George that the time spent and cost of busting the strawberry vendors was probably excessive. I belive there is a bigger issue here and that is one of lawlessness. You have an illegal immigrant, selling unchecked fruit ,without a vendors license ,in a residential neighborhood without bathroom facilities. Is this fair to the licensed sellers of strawberries? I'll bet the strawberry growers on Silverado Trail are both here legally and have a business license, maybe not. Is being poorer a legitimate excuse for flaunting the laws of the land? I see a disturbing trend in both the Hispanic and Anglo community of lawlessness. Just read Donna Long's letter. The prevailing attitude today seems to be, I'll do what I want, legal or not, and to hell with society and the greater good. By supporting and condoning illegal activities gives me license for my own lawlessness. "

kevin wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:18 AM:

" Excellent letter, George. It might be different if the police were not crying about being "understaffed" and "overworked". Besides, we have to get out of this "nanny state" mentality: the governement must run every facet of our lives, protect us from every single danger in our lives... "

danmonez wrote on Jun 30, 2008 9:45 AM:

" To the casual observer, the strawberry vendor looks pretty inocuous. However, think about this; these men are picked up in the S.F. or Oakland produce markets. Many carry no ID. They are dropped off in the morning on a street corner and left until the end of the day. They have no place to go to the restroom, (except in nature). They stand on the corner, often in residential neighborhoods, with little to do but watch what time people leave their home and what time they return.

Their customers often make abrubpt and unsafe traffic moves to pull up and buy the product.

Their out of town bosses pay none of the things legitimate Napa businesses do, such as payroll taxes, business licenses, workers comp insurance, utilities, etc..

The point is, the issue is more complicated than it may look. The police are doing what needs to be done to prevent crime, enforce the laws on the books, and maintain some level of order and quality of life. These are all equally important as catching felons. "

napadad wrote on Jun 30, 2008 10:11 AM:

" The simple truth is that we all want those strawberries even if they don’t carry the Napa City Council’s pompous seal of approval. If there were not a real demand for those berries, the vendors would not be able to sell them. The fact that we buy them is proof that the vendors are performing a desired service. They should be rewarded for their industriousness and willingness to serve, not harassed. There is a demand for illegal narcotics too and illegal laborers and many other things that are outlawed so who gets to decide which laws are ok to enforce? I would personally love to start selling venison jerky a BBQ, there are deer running all around my neighborhood and I know there is a market for venison jerky. The law says these deer are not salable do you think its Ok to harvest them for my profit? Sell the meatat a roadside stand ? I think tresspassing signs should be ignored and I should be able to fish any farm pond or cross private property to fish the river, lake stream etc. (this is by the way a vieled request for farm pond access) but I respect the laws (maybe reluctantly at times) as should we all and we should SUPPORT OUR LAW ENFORCEMENT when they attempt to do the same. "

MP wrote on Jun 30, 2008 10:13 AM:

" Rudy Gulliani made a huge difference in NY when he enforced minor infractions on the theory that these were perpetrators of other crimes. To a large degree, he was right. Dan Monez' point is quite valid...if these guys observe homeowner's patterns it may be an innocuous way of casing a neighborhood for other crimes. I think that it is inhumane to have these non english speaking vendors stranded on street corners without a means to eat, drink or toilet themselves. They should be discouraged if for no other reason than the inhumanity of their circumstance. If they are illegal....that's another enforcement opportunity too. "

John Richards wrote on Jun 30, 2008 6:49 PM:

" With the hundreds who have been sickened by tomatoes recently, one would think that any raw vegetable or fruit whose pedigree is in question should be under close scrutiny. I would never purchase such items that were handled by a vendor who does not even have sanitary facilities available. "

Paddy wrote on Jun 30, 2008 10:39 PM:

" One of the best ways to push drugs on the street in mass quantities is to hide the illegal narcotic with the 'legal' wares. Nobody would bat an eye watching somebody had over cast and march away with a bag of oranges, a flat of strawberries along with two ounces of pot and half ounce of meth. "

Bloggin wrote on Jul 2, 2008 11:18 PM:

" Let's see, no health care, barely making a living and they sell strawberries. Why not communicate with them to discover a real solution so the Police who would rather not spend their time in this type of operation can focus on crime. They're not 'its' but people. Wait immigrants like us.

Maybe someone out their can help them organize into a coop and make a better life that will help both them and the community? "

Comment guidelines
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines, click here.
Search:
Advanced searchWeb Search Powered By Yahoo! Search
Copyright © 2008 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy