NVR Logo
First Street closing Tuesday for 14 months
Napa River bridge segment being rebuilt
Monday, June 09, 2008
Save and Share Share
1 p.m.First Street on each side of the Napa River closes Tuesday for the next 14 months as crew work to replace the street's bridge over the river.

Demolition of the existing bridge, which dates from 1914, is scheduled to begin in June, said Jason Holley, the city engineer in charge of the project.
First Street is likely to reopen by late August 2009, Holley said. In the meantime, east-west traffic will be encouraged to detour to Third Street or Lincoln Avenue to cross the river.

The new First Street span is the last of five major bridges tied to the Napa River flood control project. The new bridge will be five feet higher and slightly longer than the existing bridge so that it will not obstruct floodwaters, Holley said.
The First Street bridge has a total budget of $14 million, including design and construction supervision. The federal government is paying 88.5 percent, the city the remainder.

Caltrans, on behalf of the federal government, is expected to approve the additional $97,000 cost. The city’s share will be an extra $11,000, Holley said.
Access to Oxbow District area like the Napa Valley Wine Train, Oxbow Public Market, and Copia will be maintained from Soscol Avenue on the west, and both parking lots at Copia will remain unaffected by the closure, according to information from the city of Napa.
16 comment(s)

truthteller wrote on Jun 9, 2008 1:24 PM:

" I think it has been something like 14 months to install a pre-fab bridge by the bus station. This could take 14 years. "

rogers wrote on Jun 9, 2008 1:38 PM:

" Really wish they would keep the design of this newest bridge in line with our other bridges. There is a wonderful old town unity with the current designs. Suppose Copia and new hotel builder want something more contemporary. I don't much care for the modern design I saw in the local paper. "

JustMy$.02 wrote on Jun 9, 2008 2:06 PM:

" I agree with rogers, if this bridge doesent match the design of the other bridges recently done its ridiculous.

But I quess that would be just another example of the incompetence of the people running things in this town. "

napaao wrote on Jun 9, 2008 2:11 PM:

" seems like a while!! it will go by though. i hope its like the other bridges too. "

jimmie wrote on Jun 9, 2008 2:38 PM:

" The other bridges are in a totally different situation. I am excited to see the new one and get a glimpse of the river, for a change. It's in our neighborhood so hold your outrage! 14 months seems like a tidy schedule and I trust the city's efforts to get it done. It's so nice to see some LIFE in this town. We are SO lucky to call this our home. "

cathyodom wrote on Jun 9, 2008 3:29 PM:

" What does it look like, where's the picture or is that in tomorrow's paper? "

Barry Martin wrote on Jun 9, 2008 3:58 PM:

" There is more information about the bridge replacement, including images, on the front page at www dot cityofnapa dot org. "

nwnapan wrote on Jun 9, 2008 5:21 PM:

" justmy$.02: Maybe it's the past leaders that have been incompetent. It seems to me that the current group has done a pretty fantastic job of turning downtown Napa around. I moved to Napa County in 1999 and was a visitor for 10 years prior to that. There was no reason for me to ever go downtown. Now there's no reason for me to go anywhere else. Try looking at the world from a different perspective. You might find it more enjoyable. "

skippert wrote on Jun 9, 2008 8:11 PM:

" Did you see the someone tagged the new $25 million Veterans Park last night. You would think for that price they could have installed some cameras. "

Justmy$.02 wrote on Jun 9, 2008 8:17 PM:

" nwnapan, How about I look at it from the perspective of a local whos been here for over 30 years (and that aint much compared to some)? All I see is big money development (mostly out-of-towners). Granted there is potential for downtown to be rejuveinated if the river walk concept pans out (it wont be a San Antonio, but could be successful).
But again, hotels, hotels, hotels, and high end brand new homes is all I see coming out of the city council.
What are they doing about gangs?
What are they doing about our roads?
What are they doing about our schools?
What are they doing about local jobs beyond hospitality services?
What are they doing about ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION beyond shutting down fruit stands?
What are they really doing for the average Napan?
Speaking from the perspective of an average Napan I dont see much. :( "

napa wrote on Jun 9, 2008 8:50 PM:

" I agree with "Just My 2 Cents" We need to vote Jill Techel out of office in the upcoming citywide elections. All she has promoted is more and more hotels, parking garages, and flaked out of a campaign promise to repave our streets.
All the city government is doing is catering to the eliete and tourism not giving a hoot in heck for the Napa citizen. I for one am tired of it and will vote for change in the next election. "

raybo wrote on Jun 9, 2008 11:25 PM:

" What is the "additional $97,000" for? "

someguyinnapa wrote on Jun 10, 2008 3:35 AM:

" 14 months to build a two lane bridge? what kind of engineer did yousay you were Jason Holley? a lego engineer? or was that an erector set?

obviuosly back when engineers were really engineers, they built real bridges that stand the test of time in less time. after all the GOLDEN GATE BRIDGE only took 3 years to reach completion and it was built in the 30's... THE 1930s! so how does this piddley little bridge of two lanes and maybe 150ft length take so long? did you need to borrow some of my kids erector set parts?

what a joke; 14 months... babies take less time than that from womb to walking... H.. E.. double hockey sticks (for those following along that's two L's)! babies do not even take that long to brew in the womb! 14 months.... "

ADark1 wrote on Jun 10, 2008 8:13 AM:

" Justmy$.02 is right!

Then again I have a sidewalk that hasn't been filled in in the 25 years my wife has owned the house soooo...I guess it takes 5 years to fill a pothole, 25 years for missing concrete on a street,.maybe 10 years per needed stop sign!

14 months on a tiny bridge is a bargain! "

Barry Martin wrote on Jun 10, 2008 8:26 AM:

" It's unclear to me why "someguyinnapa" feels the need to insult a trained and qualified engineer. It's uncalled for. I am happy to try and provide some information on the topic. Here are two things to consider:
1. Four of the major bridge replacements in Napa in the last few years have involved "in-water" work. To protect migrating fish and the river ecology, there are strict rules about when the water can be disturbed. As a result, construction in-water can only occur for 4-5 months of the year. The restriction causes these bridge projects to take a lot more time. There was no EPA or CEQA when the Golden Gate Bridge was built.
2. Heavy construction can often be completed in a short amount of time if you have large amounts of money to apply to the effort. For example, the rapid reconstruction at the MacArthur Maze after the recent accident and fire - or fast repairs to Southern California highways after the Northridge quake - that work was done in a very short time but at a very great cost. Our local bridge replacements have not had that kind of emergency funding, which would not be appropriate for this kind of project.

There have been a number of other comments on this story on various topics. I don't have enough words left to write more, so if anyone has questions about this project I can be reached directly at 258-7843 or bmartin at cityofnapa dot org. It's my job to provide public information so I will be happy to answer your questions. "

jimmie wrote on Jun 10, 2008 11:22 AM:

" Man, whinerville, USA. This town has a lot of romance a seedy, rotten past "for the locals." Alturas, Susanville, Oroville, Redding await you.

Thanks for weathering all this nonsense, Barry. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy