The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
skippert wrote on May 29, 2008 6:16 AM:
Dwayne wrote on May 29, 2008 8:41 AM:
Demo Cracy wrote on May 29, 2008 8:54 AM:
petebo wrote on May 29, 2008 9:05 AM:
MarshaMarsha wrote on May 29, 2008 9:29 AM:
since1976 wrote on May 29, 2008 9:52 AM:
hudds5 wrote on May 29, 2008 10:38 AM:
Baraki wrote on May 29, 2008 11:10 AM:
average_jane wrote on May 29, 2008 11:36 AM:
Dwayne that is too bad for your friend and the city should have removed all the fines and ticket from his record. If he was not drinking and had a legitimate reason he should go after the city for his money. This is completely unacceptable behaviour from the city of napa. "
my2cents68 wrote on May 29, 2008 12:22 PM:
MarshaMarsha wrote on May 29, 2008 1:04 PM:
I agree that there are Sheriffs and CHPs doing routine patrol north of Yountville, I see them there all the time as well. My concern is that Napa Valley encourages alcohol consumption, either by tasting at multiple wineries or pairing wine with world-class cuisine, creating hundreds of drivers with alcohol in their bloodstream. I believe that the DUI checkpoints are set up close to town so law enforcement can say they are spending money for the purpose it was appointed, yet without stepping on the toes of the tourist industry. While a single officer has someone pulled over north of town, dozens of alcohol-fueled drivers cruise right on by. My opinion on this is that it is biased law enforcement. You will never get the Sheriff's Dept or CHP to admit they are bowing to political pressure, but it is what it is. "
Dwayne wrote on May 29, 2008 1:54 PM:
wined0wnnapa wrote on May 29, 2008 2:48 PM:
reality1 wrote on May 29, 2008 3:47 PM:
petebo wrote on May 29, 2008 4:41 PM:
asahigo wrote on May 29, 2008 6:31 PM:
Dwayne wrote on May 29, 2008 6:56 PM:
wtrfwlr wrote on May 31, 2008 9:54 AM:
wtrfwlr wrote on May 31, 2008 10:01 AM: