A matter of time
By Charles Bogue
November 21st, 2009
November 14th, 2009
November 7th, 2009
October 31st, 2009
October 24th, 2009
How long could we go before receiving some good news about the housing market?
Faint as the light may be, data services company DataQuick reported this week that California experienced the first monthly sales gain in six months, the largest rise for that time period since 1988.
Digging for a more local interpretation of new data, I did a market search on Trendgraphics going back 6 months on homes in the city of Napa between $300,000 and $499,999, with the following results:
• Home sales increased from 11 to 24
• Homes in contract to be sold increased from 13 to 22
• Months of inventory based on sold homes was reduced from 11.2 months to 6 months
• Days on the market decreased from 135 days to 110
This correction was inevitable as money sources for home loans return to the market and declining home prices hit bottom. The Napa home market has reached “book value.”
In the world of securities, there is a difference between the “speculative value” and the “book value” of a share of stock. One doesn’t need to be an experienced investor to remember the incredible market price increases in the early dot-com stocks that had neither assets nor earnings. Built on anticipated profits, these companies rose to stock price highs on promises and projections.
The “book value” of a stock is described as a company’s value as it appears on a balance sheet; its assets minus its debts and intangibles such as goodwill. It can be thought of as the dollar value of the company, or its stock, that would be left if the company were to be sold or go out of business.
This explains why investors seeking security would favor a “book-valued” stock while the growth investors would seek a stock with greater “speculative value” in anticipation of increased earnings..
An interesting study is to suggest that real estate, just like stocks, has the same or similar “speculative value” versus “book value.” A large number of homes and investment real estate properties were purchased between 1999 and 2005 simply because the values were going up. In real estate it could be attributed to demand and scarcity and in stocks it was anticipation of future profits. In both cases, buyers had a single thought — it is going to cost me more tomorrow.
The “book value” of real estate is anchored by a set of facts. Everyone needs a place to live. Populations continue to grow. There is scarcity of land. The home serves as an investment and a place to live, even if it never appreciates. Our country encourages and provides financing programs for home ownership. Homeowners pay less income tax than non homeowners. You can live in your home, grow food on your land and create your own space.
These and other intangible factors have and will retain the long-term value of real estate, just as good management and profitability retain the long term value of a quality stock. Ultimately, the frenzy of speculative investment gives way to reality of “book value.”
Bogue is a broker with Coldwell Banker Brokers of the Valley in Napa. He can be reached at 258-5221 or cbogue@cbnapavalley.com.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
nuttinpersonal wrote on May 31, 2008 2:24 AM:
It's not rocket science. Think of how many people can afford to buy a $500K house in Napa. Can they put $100K down? Can they even put $50K down? Nah. Without bogus lending, it boils down to what you can put up and pay. It's still cheaper to rent at these levels. Never mind the effects of a recession and the plight of the dollar (gas, food, etc.)
Unit volume drops are no longer in complete free-fall. Why? Because foreclosures are making up a much larger % of Bay Area sales than normal. That's the market at work. It's laughable that the real estate industry has been reduced to comparing spring to winter volume to show that things are getting better.
It's simple supply and demand. DataQuick is still showing a drop of 8% in unit sales from April 2008 vs. April 2007 which was a pretty bad year. So demand is still down (although at least the rate of the drop is slowing down.)
But let's look at supply. There were probably at least 10% more homes for sale for April 2008 vs. April 2007. What do you think that means for prices?
The only reason sales volume is increasing is because prices are falling. How much more will prices have to fall before you see an equilibrium of supply and demand?
Things don't always go down in a straight line. But the overall trend hasn't changed. By the start of 2010, prices will easily be 15% lower than they are today. "