NVR Logo
Schools surpass state average
Many standardized test scores show improvement
Friday, May 23, 2008
Save and Share Share
Napa schools squeaked past the state average on standardized test scores, according to California’s annual school rankings released Wednesday.

On a scale from 200 to 1,000, Napa Valley Unified School District scored 755, a slight increase over last year’s results.
The state average is 728. Eight hundred is considered “excellent.”

The news is cause for celebration, according to local school officials, who note that Napa Valley Unified School District’s demographics closely mirror those of the state.
The ranking system, known as the Academic Performance Index, measures schools’ and districts’ performance based on standardized tests administered to students the previous year.

According to Wednesday’s results, NVUSD outpaced the state average in all subgroups except among Asian students, who scored exceedingly high both locally and across the state.
White students in Napa surpassed the 800-point target by 21 points. The state average for white students is 806.

Napa’s large Hispanic student population scored about on par with Hispanic students across California, outranking them by 11 points with 677.

Students with disabilities exceeded the state average significantly, by more than 50 points, at 588.

While scores among demographic subgroups offer up good news for Napa compared to the rest of the state, most local schools have yet to reach the state’s 800-point target.

Elementary schools in Napa scored the highest, with almost half at or above 800 points.

Among middle schools, only one out of five reached 800. One out of three high schools scored above 800.

While many schools increased their API significantly, some dipped and most stayed about the same.

According to another API calculation that ranks school from one to 10 — 10 being the best — 12 NVUSD schools maintained the same state ranking as the previous year, 12 moved up one to three ranks, and nine moved down one to two ranks.

Three-fourths of NVUSD schools rank between five and 10.

Overall, the results yield only a slight increase. Still, local schools are inching their way up slowly. Over the last five years, NVUSD’s scores have increased by 77-points. All but a small handful of schools have improved over the last three years.

These overall scores will later contribute to a new ranking that will determine whether a school is designated as being in “Program Improvement.” Schools in Program Improvement can be subject to multiple requirements, including having to work with an outside administrative team that makes decisions about how the school is run.

Currently, eight schools in the district are in Program Improvement.

Upvalley, Calistoga Joint Unified dipped by seven points, from 702 last year to 695. Of the 602 students included in Calistoga’s API calculation, 355 are designated as English learners, an obstacle school officials have cited in the past as the district’s biggest challenge when it comes to standardized tests.

St. Helena Unified hardly budged at all, moving from 777 to 778. The district outscored the state by 50 points, putting it only 22 points from the 800-point goal.
18 comment(s)

Margo wrote on May 23, 2008 7:53 AM:

" Would have been nice to see which schools scored what. In the Marin IJ today, they had a very similar article but it was more specific. This article just barely glazed over the great scores our school got. "

bubble wrote on May 23, 2008 8:09 AM:

" Margo, click on the "Related" box at the top of the article, where it says "API scores, PDF file." You can see all the specifics there. And most of them are pretty great! "

MP wrote on May 23, 2008 8:38 AM:

" The paper version of the article in the newspaper includes a chart that shows the scores for each school. Congratulations are in order. It is clear that the schools have been working hard. My only concern is whether the standardized tests are really measuring education of the student rather than a set of facts that will soon be forgotten. "

athought wrote on May 23, 2008 9:07 AM:

" Margo- I agree completely. This article is nice to read but some specifics would be great. Why mention that one middle school and one high school met a goal and then not name those schools? If you make a claim, back it up with the details and facts! "

funnyme wrote on May 23, 2008 9:22 AM:

" Margo, you have to click on the link above "PDF files".

What does these numbers mean?
Our District has GOOD teachers, or GOOD students, a combination of both?
Is there a test that "measures" teachers abilities?
I'm not trying to be sarcastic, I am just curious :) "

M.G. wrote on May 23, 2008 10:01 AM:

" athought, try clicking on the pdf link at the top... it takes you right to all the information. and save the outrage. just... athought. "

musikluvr wrote on May 23, 2008 1:18 PM:

" 1,000 is perfect. Why is NVUSD striving for 800? What kid is going to try hard and learn more when the schools don't encourage them? What is wrong with academic excellence of the highest degree? We live in little paradise here in Napa. Great community, close to everything but tucked away from the problems of innercities and distractions to learning - Yet our schools can't do any better that this. How sad for our kids who have so much potential to have schools with so little potential. "

athought wrote on May 23, 2008 3:40 PM:

" MP- you raise a great point. One reason teachers dislike these tests is because they focus on facts which are not all that important in the overall scheme of things. Yet pressure on the teachers forces them to spend most of their time teaching facts at the expense of more meaningful projects, novels, etc.

Musiklovr- Do you know very much about standardized tests? Students taking standardized tests are assessed using the bell curve. That means that half the students will be above the average of the norm group, and be definition, the other half will be below average. These tests are purposefully designed so that half the students fall short. Dont blame the schools. "So little potential." That makes me laugh. You have no idea what you are talking about and are obviously out of touch with what is going on in our local schools. I would challenge you to go into a school, watch how hard the teachers AND students are working, and then tell us what you think about the potential.

Let me make music analogy, since your name hints at an appreciation of music. Say you are a composer. You write wonderful music. However, you are given a grade based upon how well other people Play your music. Does that situation trully measure your talent as a composer? Or for that matter, does it trully measure the talent of the people being asked to play your music? I am guessing that you will answer NO to both of those questions; if you don't, it will reveal how trully out of touch you are. "

Dwayne wrote on May 23, 2008 3:44 PM:

" Way to go, West Park Elementary...!!! "

hudds5 wrote on May 23, 2008 6:25 PM:

" Why not just name off the schools that did well? These kids worked hard and they should be recognized for their efforts. "

hudds5 wrote on May 23, 2008 6:28 PM:

" After clicking on the pdf, it was nice to see how GREAT River school did compared to the other middle schools. "

funnyme wrote on May 23, 2008 8:10 PM:

" Some of you seem to be very well informed on how these scores work and what is what they measure.
Looking at the numbers again, all they speak to me is the corelation between the size of the school and its demography.
***What does the asterisk mean?***
As far as River School goes, I had to pull my kid out of there because River was unable to provide her with advance alternatives to Math or L.A. (85% of the kids in her class couldn't get even 75% accuracy in homework or assignments).
I guess this proves my point again that these numbers don't mean much in terms of how good the teachers are from one school to another, it's THE KIDS and their family support! "

musikluvr wrote on May 23, 2008 8:21 PM:

" Atthought: An old adage about accountants is that figures lie and liars figure...Could it be similarly said about schools? From your explanation I think it very well could. "

steph wrote on May 23, 2008 11:11 PM:

" Thank you to all the hard-working teachers and administrators of NVUSD! I think these scores reflect a lot of creative thought and over-the-top efforts to give all the children of Napa a good start in life. It's not been easy, but progress is being made. Good job! "

Maya wrote on May 26, 2008 2:11 PM:

" Nice. The two schools closest to me are two out of the three that have a negative trend over the past 3 years. That's another reason why we homeschool. The improvement is just not enough. Parental involvement is just not enough either. "

athought wrote on May 28, 2008 9:23 PM:

" musikluvr- what are you talking about? Your metaphor doesn't make any sense and does not hide the fact that you didn't address my challenge. Will you visit our schools to see how hard the teachers and students are working, or will you continue to make critical, uniformed accusations? It is a simple question. "

athought wrote on May 28, 2008 9:50 PM:

" funnyme- I agree that parents contribute greatly to the education of their children, and that the students themselves have the most important role in their education.

However, you give statistics regarding River students (85% couldn't get 75% accuracy...) that are incorrect. How did you get these figures? Teachers generally aren't in the habit of releasing the grades of their students, so perhaps your stats are based on a generalization made by your child? If you look at the honor roll for River, you will notice that around 40% of the students are on that list, which doesn't quite fit with what you are saying. If 85% can't get Cs, then 40% couldn't be on the honor roll. To be blunt, your figures are wrong. "

funnyme wrote on May 29, 2008 12:06 PM:

" althought,
I wish they were wrong.
At River you commit to volunteer 50 hours and one of the ways to cover those hours is by correcting assignments and homework for a specific tecaher (It doesn't have to be your kid's teacher either). "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy