Grand jury calls on county to prepare for the worst
By NATALIE HOFFMAN
Register Staff Writer
The Napa County Grand Jury called on the Napa County Office of Emergency Services this week to better prepare for a Bay Area emergency, guessing that Napa County would likely be a haven for urban disaster refugees.
Recommendations ranged from implementing a Community Emergency Response Team training program in public schools to boosting the number of locals who have met national CERT standards from about 1,200 to 2,000.
The grand jury also recommended allocating a local building for exclusive use as an emergency operations center — a command station for disaster management. Right now the Napa County Board of Supervisors’ meeting room on Third Street in Napa doubles as the county’s emergency response hub. The room has a capacity for less than 100 people.
Napa County residents are no strangers to emergencies such as floods and fires in the valley.
But the grand jury report suggested that following potential large-scale emergencies in heavily populated areas of the Bay Area, Napa County would likely become a “lifeboat” for disaster refugees.
In the report, the grand jury recommended that “specific plans (be) prepared to deal with this eventuality” by making changes to the county’s existing Emergency Operations Plan.
Earthquakes topped the list of the county’s most severe potential emergencies, “followed by floods and dam failure,” the report states.
In preparation for possible large-scale emergencies, the grand jury recommended increased security and law enforcement presence at drills conducted by Napa County Health and Human Services and other agencies.
The report contained county and municipal government proposals to expand the disaster plan to better prepare for possible emergencies. The estimated annual cost for implementing the proposals totaled $3,485,000, while additional one-time project costs were projected at $74.5 million.
Elizabeth Emmett, public information officer for Napa County, said the county will present its response to the Napa County Board of Supervisors in a timeframe consistent with legal requirements.
The report is available online at www.napacourt.com.
All comments will be screened and may take several hours to be posted.
• Keep comments clear, concise and focused on the topic in the story.
• Comments exceeding 300 words will not be posted.
• Refrain from personal attacks, degrading comments or remarks that do not add to a constructive dialogue.
• Comments implying suspects in crime-related stories are guilty before they have been proven so in a court of law will be deleted.
• Do not post e-mail addresses or links except for pages on Napavalleyregister.com or government Web sites.
• Comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined.
• Comments may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
• If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact dross@napanews.com or bkennedy@napanews.com
For further information on the comment guidelines,
click here.
Sickothis wrote on May 16, 2008 11:15 AM:
Cadence wrote on May 16, 2008 1:27 PM:
I am seeing a connection here. Maybe the reason San Francisco money (Pelosi, Newsom, Getty, Rogal, et. al.) is pushing so hard for Napa Pipe's transformation into a town is because they intend to use it when the Big One hits? Just hop on those private choppers and buzz right into a pre-made home away from home?
"
reality1 wrote on May 16, 2008 2:21 PM:
Dwayne wrote on May 16, 2008 4:06 PM:
musikluvr wrote on May 16, 2008 5:43 PM: