City pressured to look at wages for workers at expected inns
By KEVIN COURTNEY
Register Staff Writer
Organized labor may be standing in the wings, hoping to unionize the employees of Napa’s new wave of upscale hotels.
Representatives of Unite Here, which represents workers at major hotels in the Bay Area, asked the Napa City Council this week to scrutinize wages and benefits before approving additional hotels.
Local officials should make sure Napa isn’t getting mostly low-wage jobs, burdening social services, affordable housing and local roads if new hires commute from areas with cheaper housing, said Owen Li, a research analyst with Unite Here.
In an interview, Li said it was “a possibility” that Unite Here, which represents hotel and other service workers nationally, might try to organize Napa’s non-union hotel work force.
Councilwoman Juliana Inman, who had talked to Li before the council meeting, was more certain. “It’s a union organizing effort,” she said of Unite Here’s council appearance.
Now that Napa is attracting larger, more luxurious hotels capable of paying higher wages, it has caught the attention of his union, Li said.
The new hotels include a proposed Kimpton at the site of the Chateau hotel on Solano Avenue, a Westin that is finishing construction on McKinstry Street, a Ritz-Carlton proposed for Silverado Trail and an Avia rising on First Street. A St. Regis hotel is reportedly looking at a south Napa location.
The issue before the City Council Tuesday was adoption of a revised lodging and hotel development policy to guide approval of new projects.
In 2000, the city said its highest priority was the attraction of full-service and resort hotels downtown as a way of supporting restaurants and shopping. Hotels would be encouraged to provide meeting space to support mid-week group demand.
Among the suggested new guidelines, hotels would be asked to provide a comprehensive report on employment, including wages, benefits, commute patterns and any programs to aid housing and traffic management. Until now, such information was generally not required.
In addition, hotels would have to show how they would promote shuttles and other mass transit options for guests and employees and career training programs.
Martin J. Bennett, a policy analyst with Unite Here, said hotel jobs often do not pay enough to keep a family out of poverty.
Citing a 2005 study, “The Limits of Prosperity: Growth, Inequality and Poverty in the North Bay,” Bennett said a couple with two young children each needed to earn $15.11 per hour to live in Napa County.
In fact, nearly 60 percent of the new jobs created in Napa between 2001 and 2008 paid less than $12, Bennett said.
Representatives of Unite Here asked that hotel applicants be required to hire independent consultants to analyze their pay policies and community impacts.
Council members agreed that consultants should be independent, but declined to incorporate the union’s list of questions into the city’s policy statement.
Councilwoman Inman said afterward that the city clearly needs more hotels. Because the demand now exceeds the supply, “we’re losing a lot of revenue,” she said.
At the same time, the city needs to make sure that hotel pay standards aren’t creating social service and traffic problems, Inman said.
Cassandra Walker, the city’s economic development manager, said the city needs to analyze employment demographics more broadly.
Hotels generally pay more than vineyard or retail jobs, yet until now no one has proposed that the city scrutinize these industries, she said in an interview.
Walker said the Meritage Resort retained a consultant to analyze the impacts of the 164-room expansion approved by the Planning Commission two weeks ago.
That report found that the average wage of a full-time worker at Meritage would be $32,500, which is higher than the Napa County and state hotel average of $26,000.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
entity wrote on May 9, 2008 1:20 AM:
skippert wrote on May 9, 2008 6:31 AM:
jwk wrote on May 9, 2008 7:38 AM:
Sandra wrote on May 9, 2008 7:45 AM:
hudds5 wrote on May 9, 2008 8:27 AM:
bornin74 wrote on May 9, 2008 9:35 AM:
Then all workers have to be documented......
Then maybe some of the local native folk can actually get a job that will allow a modest income.... $32,000 STILL DOES NOT MAKE IT AFFORDABLE to live in Napa.....
$30 an hour combined for two people working is decent, but still not enough.
Maybe if the winery owners had to pay the field workers 15 an hour plus FULL Medical Dental, pay into a UNION retirement package we would see some positive reaction to our current situation.
It would sure DRIVE UP the Wine Prices, and the cost to stay in a hotel here!!!!!!
Just last night went to a local resturaunt (middle of the road Italian place) $125 for 2 adults and three kids! BEFORE THE TIP!!!
Applebee's looks better by the minute. "
sdnapa wrote on May 9, 2008 10:04 AM:
kevin wrote on May 9, 2008 10:07 AM:
kbf wrote on May 9, 2008 11:14 AM:
vocal-de-local wrote on May 9, 2008 1:04 PM:
To sdnapa, sure, there are some successful middle class people living and working in Napa. Statistically speaking, 60% of people who work here make less than $12 an hour, and those do not include under the table wages. My guess is it's closer to 70%. Such statistics don't leave much room for a large middle class. And even at the Meritage Hotel, the average wage of $32,500 time two, still only adds up to a total income of $65,000. How much "affordable housing" can couples in this income category really afford, even at the upper end of the hospitality wage scale?
We need the majority of people to be in the middle otherwise we head toward chaos, or even revolution if it gets bad enough. And if that happens, all of those super wealthy people with 15,000 square foot homes will be renting their rooms out. We ALL lose in the end. And the very wealthy who worked so hard protecting their loopholes and justifications for cheap labor should not just bury that thought away for another day. NOW is the time to fix this stuff.
Remember, much of our low wage Napa hospitality industry labor comes from Central America. They are on our soil now, legal or not. It's not as though they lack acquaintance with the concept of revolution. If anything goes wrong with our economy and easy fixes are not in sight, the first thing that happens is people begin stealing. Then they move onto bigger crimes and finally revolution. We need a strong middle class, Unions help to maintain it. "
musikluvr wrote on May 9, 2008 1:58 PM:
Exasperated wrote on May 9, 2008 2:03 PM:
As for the rest of you, I've said it before and I'll say it again: If you can't afford to live here, MOVE!
Why is it the city/county/valley's fault that you can't afford things? It's called capitalism. Deal with it. Go live in Fairfield or Vacaville, or even the midwest for that matter.
Why is it of anyone's concern that you can't afford things? Do you think we should all be able to afford whatever we want? Everyone should share in the profits of the rich wineries? Sounds close to socialism to me! Quit being such babies! "
Joe wrote on May 9, 2008 2:06 PM:
nightwatchman wrote on May 9, 2008 3:48 PM:
Unions=strong middle class=what made our country what it is today.
What makes me laugh is that people like Exasperated are the first ones to moan about traffic when everyone that works here lives in Fairfield and Vacaville and has to commute in every day. "
NapaNana wrote on May 9, 2008 4:53 PM:
mamyt wrote on May 9, 2008 6:56 PM:
lahrgsp wrote on May 9, 2008 9:07 PM:
Napa really does need to pay more because my Husband has been working there for 10 years and barely has his wage been raised in all these years.
Sad because my whole family lives in Napa. When you are middle class things are hard. Easier on welfare and housing! But at least we are doing it on our own and have a fixed mortgage rate. "