NVR Logo
City pressured to look at wages for workers at expected inns
Friday, May 09, 2008
Save and Share Share
Organized labor may be standing in the wings, hoping to unionize the employees of Napa’s new wave of upscale hotels.

Representatives of Unite Here, which represents workers at major hotels in the Bay Area, asked the Napa City Council this week to scrutinize wages and benefits before approving additional hotels.
Local officials should make sure Napa isn’t getting mostly low-wage jobs, burdening social services, affordable housing and local roads if new hires commute from areas with cheaper housing, said Owen Li, a research analyst with Unite Here.

In an interview, Li said it was “a possibility” that Unite Here, which represents hotel and other service workers nationally, might try to organize Napa’s non-union hotel work force.
Councilwoman Juliana Inman, who had talked to Li before the council meeting, was more certain. “It’s a union organizing effort,” she said of Unite Here’s council appearance.

Now that Napa is attracting larger, more luxurious hotels capable of paying higher wages, it has caught the attention of his union, Li said.
The new hotels include a proposed Kimpton at the site of the Chateau hotel on Solano Avenue, a Westin that is finishing construction on McKinstry Street, a Ritz-Carlton proposed for Silverado Trail and an Avia rising on First Street. A St. Regis hotel is reportedly looking at a south Napa location.

The issue before the City Council Tuesday was adoption of a revised lodging and hotel development policy to guide approval of new projects.

In 2000, the city said its highest priority was the attraction of full-service and resort hotels downtown as a way of supporting restaurants and shopping. Hotels would be encouraged to provide meeting space to support mid-week group demand.

Among the suggested new guidelines, hotels would be asked to provide a comprehensive report on employment, including wages, benefits, commute patterns and any programs to aid housing and traffic management. Until now, such information was generally not required.

In addition, hotels would have to show how they would promote shuttles and other mass transit options for guests and employees and career training programs.

Martin J. Bennett, a policy analyst with Unite Here, said hotel jobs often do not pay enough to keep a family out of poverty.

Citing a 2005 study, “The Limits of Prosperity: Growth, Inequality and Poverty in the North Bay,” Bennett said a couple with two young children each needed to earn $15.11 per hour to live in Napa County.

In fact, nearly 60 percent of the new jobs created in Napa between 2001 and 2008 paid less than $12, Bennett said.

Representatives of Unite Here asked that hotel applicants be required to hire independent consultants to analyze their pay policies and community impacts.

Council members agreed that consultants should be independent, but declined to incorporate the union’s list of questions into the city’s policy statement.

Councilwoman Inman said afterward that the city clearly needs more hotels. Because the demand now exceeds the supply, “we’re losing a lot of revenue,” she said.

At the same time, the city needs to make sure that hotel pay standards aren’t creating social service and traffic problems, Inman said.

Cassandra Walker, the city’s economic development manager, said the city needs to analyze employment demographics more broadly.

Hotels generally pay more than vineyard or retail jobs, yet until now no one has proposed that the city scrutinize these industries, she said in an interview.

Walker said the Meritage Resort retained a consultant to analyze the impacts of the 164-room expansion approved by the Planning Commission two weeks ago.

That report found that the average wage of a full-time worker at Meritage would be $32,500, which is higher than the Napa County and state hotel average of $26,000.
17 comment(s)

entity wrote on May 9, 2008 1:20 AM:

" Jobs in Napa seem to be of a very few sorts: low-paid hospitality and service jobs, a small professional (doctor/lawyer) niche, and wealthy winery owners. No in-between. You're dirt, or you're rich. There's so little for anybody in between, and it gives this whole place a horrible feeling of "class war". A town of little opportunity and one hell of a status quo. "

skippert wrote on May 9, 2008 6:31 AM:

" Thanks for noticing that we can't live on these wages. My husband and I have lived in this valley all of our lives and it has to be said it is not easy. The wages in this area need to be addressed. Just last night I read in the register about how locals can't even go out to eat because all of these great resturants are just to expensive. "

jwk wrote on May 9, 2008 7:38 AM:

" There goes Cassandra siding with all these Huge New Tourist trap Hotels again. When is enough, enough? ALot of us don't want all the extra congestion, traffic and demands on our infastructure that aren't in that Industry. Get your revenue somewhere else or Manage and control your salaries better. SPend our tax dollars more wisely. I'd like to see her try to live on a Hotel Workers salary. And The "Vineyard Jobs" wages are mostly paid under the table.. "

Sandra wrote on May 9, 2008 7:45 AM:

" I find this to be hilarious....Where will the illegal work force work, if the hotels are forced to uphold labor laws? How will all those who defend illegal labor, while enjoying their status quo, survive? Hmm...if this keeps up maybe the wineries will someday get the UFW back....Next will be the restaurants....OMG...it could become a movement...what are all the apologists for the illegal workforce to do? "

hudds5 wrote on May 9, 2008 8:27 AM:

" This has been an ongoing problem for many years now. I can remember a certain resort would take a third of the servers tips because they wanted to increase their profits. Unions are only necessary when employers fail to treat employees fairly. Unfortunately, since the economy is down, the hotel & restaurant business might be in trouble this Summer. If you haven't noticed, restaurants are either raising prices, serving smaller portions or both. "

bornin74 wrote on May 9, 2008 9:35 AM:

" bring in the unoins.... not to just the hotels, but to the wineries!

Then all workers have to be documented......

Then maybe some of the local native folk can actually get a job that will allow a modest income.... $32,000 STILL DOES NOT MAKE IT AFFORDABLE to live in Napa.....

$30 an hour combined for two people working is decent, but still not enough.

Maybe if the winery owners had to pay the field workers 15 an hour plus FULL Medical Dental, pay into a UNION retirement package we would see some positive reaction to our current situation.

It would sure DRIVE UP the Wine Prices, and the cost to stay in a hotel here!!!!!!

Just last night went to a local resturaunt (middle of the road Italian place) $125 for 2 adults and three kids! BEFORE THE TIP!!!

Applebee's looks better by the minute. "

sdnapa wrote on May 9, 2008 10:04 AM:

" to entity: your assertion that "you're dirt or your rich" is completely ridiculous. i am a middle class person who has always worked in napa. i was born here. i started my career here when i was 13 years old at a minimum wage job. I worked hard, showed up on time, improved my skills, and whoa and behold, i make a great wage now. i'm not rich and i'm not dirt. i'm right in the middle. some may say i make a lot, others may wonder how i survive on what i make. i say you make what you've educated yourself to make. i could make more than i do now if i was willing to get a better education, but i am content with what i have. this union stuff is just another way for union leaders to get dues from workers so that, in turn, those dues can promote political candidates. "

kevin wrote on May 9, 2008 10:07 AM:

" That's all we need is the City telling private business how to manage their employees. After all, the City has done such an excellent job with their employees. How about if the CITY has to provide information to the TAXPAYERS on how much employees make and their benefits? "

kbf wrote on May 9, 2008 11:14 AM:

" I think everyone would be suprised at what a vineyard worker gets paid.But if you have to be legal in order to be unionized I say go for it, but don't use the city to do the work for you. The city should stay out of it and let the unions see if the workers want to have a union. "

vocal-de-local wrote on May 9, 2008 1:04 PM:

" Since it's the city approving the top heavy low wage hospitality industry, they should also take some responsibility for the consequences of their poor planning.

To sdnapa, sure, there are some successful middle class people living and working in Napa. Statistically speaking, 60% of people who work here make less than $12 an hour, and those do not include under the table wages. My guess is it's closer to 70%. Such statistics don't leave much room for a large middle class. And even at the Meritage Hotel, the average wage of $32,500 time two, still only adds up to a total income of $65,000. How much "affordable housing" can couples in this income category really afford, even at the upper end of the hospitality wage scale?

We need the majority of people to be in the middle otherwise we head toward chaos, or even revolution if it gets bad enough. And if that happens, all of those super wealthy people with 15,000 square foot homes will be renting their rooms out. We ALL lose in the end. And the very wealthy who worked so hard protecting their loopholes and justifications for cheap labor should not just bury that thought away for another day. NOW is the time to fix this stuff.

Remember, much of our low wage Napa hospitality industry labor comes from Central America. They are on our soil now, legal or not. It's not as though they lack acquaintance with the concept of revolution. If anything goes wrong with our economy and easy fixes are not in sight, the first thing that happens is people begin stealing. Then they move onto bigger crimes and finally revolution. We need a strong middle class, Unions help to maintain it. "

musikluvr wrote on May 9, 2008 1:58 PM:

" Napa City Council has sold the city to the city employees who have contributed to the election of each of the city councilpeople. So why would we expect the Napa City Council to walk away from union demands? You buy a city councilperson you own them! "

Exasperated wrote on May 9, 2008 2:03 PM:

" sdnapa, thank you for NOT whining.

As for the rest of you, I've said it before and I'll say it again: If you can't afford to live here, MOVE!

Why is it the city/county/valley's fault that you can't afford things? It's called capitalism. Deal with it. Go live in Fairfield or Vacaville, or even the midwest for that matter.

Why is it of anyone's concern that you can't afford things? Do you think we should all be able to afford whatever we want? Everyone should share in the profits of the rich wineries? Sounds close to socialism to me! Quit being such babies! "

Joe wrote on May 9, 2008 2:06 PM:

" I just moved back to my home town of Napa after 8 years thinking that I'd have no problem finding a job that pays at least $12 an hour. I've been looking for a month and a half and find a lot of hospitality jobs that would pay good with tips but I don't have the experience. Besides that it's a dead end road. I'm a college grad and have a well rounded resume but nothing. I'm also a single male and feel that $8.50/hr. would barely be enough to pay my bills if that. $12./hr. to have a little fun once in a while. Companies definetely need to pay their workers more. "

nightwatchman wrote on May 9, 2008 3:48 PM:

" Good conversation so far, props to vocal-de-local.

Unions=strong middle class=what made our country what it is today.

What makes me laugh is that people like Exasperated are the first ones to moan about traffic when everyone that works here lives in Fairfield and Vacaville and has to commute in every day. "

NapaNana wrote on May 9, 2008 4:53 PM:

" Exasperated.....I think that you are missing the point of this whole big picture...... Property value v/s wages make it hard for 4-5 generation Napans to make a decent living here let alone buy a home here. There is a need for some kind of balance. But What? There wil not be an easy solution. Everyone is going to have to give a little. WHAT??? To tell people to move from their homes is just wrong. "

mamyt wrote on May 9, 2008 6:56 PM:

" Here is the thing I don't get. Any family that has been here for generations should be loaded. If your a 7 generation Napa family and your kids can't afford a house there is something wrong. "

lahrgsp wrote on May 9, 2008 9:07 PM:

" I was born and raised in Napa and had to move to fairfield in 2004 because houses were too expensive and my husband makes 18 + an hour and he has to commute back and forth from here to Napa 6 days a week. I would do anything to move back!! Kind of hard to live in Napa for 33 years then live in Fairfield, it is a big difference.
Napa really does need to pay more because my Husband has been working there for 10 years and barely has his wage been raised in all these years.
Sad because my whole family lives in Napa. When you are middle class things are hard. Easier on welfare and housing! But at least we are doing it on our own and have a fixed mortgage rate. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy