A Super type of Delegate
By MATT POPE
Be proud Napa: one of your own is going to Denver as one of California’s 241 delegates to the Democratic National Convention this summer.
Last Sunday, both delegate caucuses for Congressional Dist. 1 -- stretching from American Canyon out to the Sacramento valley and up to the Oregon border -- were held for both Sens. Clinton and Obama right here in Napa. Out of 53 candidates who applied to be delegates for Obama, only three and an alternate could be chosen. At the top of that list is Napa resident and tireless Democratic activist Tracy Krumpen.
In the interest of disclosure, I was also a delegate candidate but I was not elected -- which is as it should be. When I was president of the Democrats of Napa Valley, I had a chance to appreciate up close the amount of work someone like Tracy volunteers to the cause of democracy. By estimates she has registered at least 2,000 Napa County residents in the last two years, has been a delegate to the state Democratic Party convention and has sacrificed copious shoe leather to walking precincts in order to motivate others to step up to their obligations in the democratic process.
Tracy and the other elected delegates have worked harder than all other comers for the right to represent Dist.1 Democrats to this most important convention.
The big win for me was the chance to participate in the Caucus. It was a very well organized event spearheaded by local teacher Jacques Juilliard out at the fairgrounds on a perfect Napa spring afternoon. I got the chance to meet several of my readers -- which is always encouraging and enjoyable -- and many of the other candidates seeking the opportunity to go to Denver.
Among the candidates was a minister from Davis and the mother of a Marine who is about to be shipped back for another tour in Iraq.
There were senior party activists, one who withdrew his name as a candidate as he had already attended four DNC conventions and wanted to give someone else a turn -- and young students, some who drove five hours down from Humboldt to be there. In the end, it all came down to unity and a desire to make sure our votes were ensured to Obama in Denver.
Ultimately, I’m a bit of an American pragmatist. Just as our Founders agreed on a ‘president' -- an executive administrator who was understood to be a real person, distinct from the European monarchy’s notions of a divinely selected regent -- I don’t have any illusions about the next president’s humanity. There are no saviors in the current crop of candidates. What it comes down to is who best represents what we want to see for our country.
To my way of thinking, the country is struggling right now. A faltering economy that increasingly serves only the needs of corporations and the ultra-wealthy; the largest rate of home foreclosures since the Great Depression; a draining campaign in Iraq that shows no end in sight and is straining our military while wracking up an unimaginable debt; and crumbling schools and infrastructure. There is only one way this election can be positioned: change versus constancy.
Sen. McCain has staked out constancy and, in order to win his party’s nomination, has pledged to perpetuate the policies that have led us to these difficulties.
Sen. Clinton has repeatedly asserted that experience she claims to have and that Sen. Obama does not -- is the principle requirement to be president. In this she has painted herself into an unwinnable corner: if she was to somehow win the Democratic nomination she will up against John McCain who has much more tangible experience than she does. All the McCain campaign will have to do is run clips of Clinton talking about experience from now until November in order to win.
Only Obama represents a 21st century sensibility. It doesn’t mean his policy positions are wildly different right now or that he will save the country. But he does reflect to me an understanding that the national dialogue desperately needs to change, that old ideological entrenchments fail to address contemporary challenges. Simply put, only Barack Obama represents the possibility for real change.
So with that, I feel confident that Tracy and the other delegates will go to Denver, dig in their heels and keep fighting until my vote and the votes of the majority of Dist.1 Democrats who voted for Obama in the primary are heard and counted.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Kevin wrote on Apr 15, 2008 8:43 PM:
JimClark wrote on Apr 16, 2008 1:51 AM:
Knowing the history of the Clinton machine, they will use whatever means to insure Hillbillery is the nominee.
This is one primary reason why we should not be referring to the democrat party as the "democratic" party. There is nothing democratic about them. "
Hear Ye wrote on Apr 16, 2008 9:39 AM:
"
Bill wrote on Apr 18, 2008 1:24 PM:
Essentially disenfranchising voters in two major states is more important a controversy than super delegates and the last mundane no policy all perception debate. The more the three candidates talk about themselves and fantasy social groups the more they avoid addressing issues.
Some times I truly believe it would be more representative to go back to the ward boss system at least then you knew who to complain to. Skelfington where are you, save us from good government and let us have a few more active parties instead of the lukewarm substance we are left with.
"
Bill wrote on Apr 18, 2008 3:22 PM:
matt@newspeak wrote on Apr 18, 2008 6:28 PM:
Oh BTW, I did finally see your question on the Farm Bill last week and posted a reply. Probably still too bland for your tastes, but I didn't want you thinking I was ducking the question. Thanks, MP. "
Bill wrote on Apr 18, 2008 9:33 PM:
Many of them believe that they can state a false hood or recreate history to suit their personal vision often enough and long enough and loud enough that it must be true. I am merely surprised that no one has come up with a terrorist plot to starve the world and lay the current food or mortgage and economic crisis at the feet of some nefarious hidden Al Queda cell. Allowing acreage to convert to bio fuel processes must certainly be a hidden islamo-fascist conspiracy. Sounds like we use a pre-emptive strike on the corn fields of …er… Nebraska.
I gave you my take on the debate and current situations I don’t like it. There is such a thing as being too nice. I think Obama could touch up a bit with Hillary and still come out ahead especially with those white beer drinking minds that love their guns as much as their god if that’s the voter to worry about. Its not the color of his language they don’t like or his pastor but the color of his skin. That part is insurmountable he should be telling those folks that Hillary should be their candidate because she is a closet NRA member with an ak47 under the couch for when she come under sniper fire from a certain Rhodes Scholar.
This is not “The Last Hurrah.”
"
JimClark wrote on Apr 20, 2008 3:33 PM:
It seems that blogs are the last bastion of free speech. Don't encumber it with vituperation. "
Bill wrote on Apr 21, 2008 10:52 AM:
I see people inventing versions of history that I know to be false cobbling together statistical data to defend their nebulous positions and repeating their imagined expertise on the same fallacy until they must believe it or have lived a lie all their lives.
If you know anything about opinion or philosophy then you must realize that it is flexible and subject to change, there is no absolute. Nowhere is this more certain than in politics.
Even St. Anselm had to adjust his theory of the proof God when challenged. That did not make him a bad philosopher but a better one.
If you feel offended I would suggest you subject your writing to some examination and see specifically where you draw offense. If it was my desire to attack your opinion I would do so quite willingly and in words as eloquent as your own, or at least as equal to your thesaurus.
As for this political season and the Democratic primary I don’t like it. Allow me to point out your propensity to insult by referring to the Democrat Party as a pejorative term, or your references to those who do not follow your particular view as socio-communists and followers of Karl Marx etc. you have blanket accusations to make and you are welcome to them
"