Animal rights headed for the ballot
Locals push state initiative on farm animal living conditions
By NATALIE HOFFMAN
Register Staff Writer
Months of hard work culminated in a preliminary victory for animal rights groups in Napa and across the state Wednesday when California Secretary of State Debra Bowen certified the Prevention of Farm Animal Cruelty Act for the November general election.
If passed, the legislation would ban three types of small structures used to house commercial farm animals, requiring larger cages for the millions of calves, pigs and egg-laying hens that live on commercial California farms.
Cris Kelly — who co-founded Napa’s Animal Action Network with her husband, Michael Christophel — said members of her organization and other local volunteers began campaigning locally for the measure and collecting signatures for the initiative in October of 2007.
Across California, Kelly said, volunteers gathered more than 536,000 signatures for the initiative from registered voters. Only 477,000 were needed to qualify the measure for the ballot, she said.
“I’m thrilled that it passed quite above the number of signatures needed,” she said. “I’m very happy and now the hard work starts.”
Kelly said the next step is to get the initiative endorsed by local veterinarians, business people and state and federal lawmakers.
In one state that passed a similar measure, supporters found themselves up against opposition from agribusiness officials, Kelly said. Yet she and other Napa volunteers didn’t run into the same trouble in Napa County.
“Locally when we were out trying to get support for this ballot, not many opposed it,” she said. “A lot of the local farmers signed it.”
Jane Albert, executive director of Napa Humane, said although her organization typically focuses on the well-being of “companion animals,” her organization endorses the measure.
“We support the hundreds of thousands of California voters who successfully campaign to place the (initiative) on the November ballot. ... (The measure) will phase out certain cruel confinement practices to make way for more humane standards in factory farming.” said Albert.
Similar laws have been passed in Arizona, Florida and Oregon, Kelly said.
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
anotherguyinnapa wrote on Apr 12, 2008 2:03 AM:
Suze wrote on Apr 12, 2008 6:58 AM:
jfz wrote on Apr 12, 2008 7:49 AM:
hudds5 wrote on Apr 12, 2008 7:57 AM:
JimClark wrote on Apr 12, 2008 10:26 AM:
Yes, we have to protect and defend our pets but, "animal rights" is merely another control device of the Liberal Intellectual Establishment (LIE). These people have entirely too much time on their hands. "
Dwayne wrote on Apr 12, 2008 11:12 AM:
greyhoundgirl wrote on Apr 12, 2008 12:09 PM:
The only line between animals and people are that people get to complain. Animals make the best of what they have so we assume that means we can treat them like garbage. They're only given one life just like people. We are responsible for allowing them to make the best of it. "
entity wrote on Apr 12, 2008 5:07 PM:
vocal-de-local wrote on Apr 12, 2008 10:00 PM:
barefoot wrote on Apr 12, 2008 10:37 PM:
beaelliott wrote on Apr 13, 2008 11:41 AM:
"Humanity" at some point has to question the validity of killing animals for food - under any circumstances.... Factory -farm, free-range, cloned or otherwise.... It all leads to the slaughterhouse -
en route - there is massive deforestation, wasteful use of resources, human health issues, greenhouse & methane gasses etc., ..... all in the manufacture of "animals as food" -Animals as food is 20th century thinking - bound in tradition, myth and money interests.
Personally, I find all factory farms and abusing/using/killing/eating animals unacceptable - Happily, I've found a substitute for all animal products and thrive on a plant based diet instead....
It's healthier for me, the environment - and yeah.... the cows, hens and pigs too - Go Vegan! "
Econut wrote on Apr 22, 2008 11:41 AM: