NVR Logo
Group calls Thompson's pest study pork
Earmark for olive study in France;
Congressman defends USDA program
Wednesday, April 09, 2008
Save and Share Share
One group’s pork is another group’s treasure.

A conservative fiscal watchdog group recently gave Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, the “French Kiss Off Award” for sending $211,000 to France to study an agricultural pest.
The mock honor came from Washington, D.C.-based Citizens Against Government Waste, which publishes an annual compendium of what the group considers pork barrel legislation.

Rep. Thompson vigorously defended the earmark, which went to fight the grapevine-devastating Pierce’s Disease, olive pests and Sudden Oak Death, among other purposes.
CAGW officials did not return phone calls regarding this story. But the group’s Web Site said its mission is to “eliminate waste, mismanagement and inefficiency in the federal government.” The group was created in 1984 by industrialist Peter J. Grace and the columnist Jack Anderson as the legacy of President Ronald Reagan’s Private Sector Survey on Cost Control, known as the Grace Commission.

CAGW’s best-known product is the annual “Pig Book,” a compendium of U.S. Congressional earmarks. This year, the database linked the names of members of Congress to their earmarks.
A search of the database revealed Thompson had authorized spending for nearly $18 million in earmarks, the largest being a $3.3 million earmark for Glassy-Winged Sharpshooter research at U.C. Davis.

In a prepared statement, Thompson took issue with the “French Kiss Off Award.”

“The Olive Fruit Fly has infested thousands of California olive groves and is the single largest threat to the U.S. olive and olive oil industries,” he said. “I secured $748,000 for olive fruit fly research and irradiation in the (fiscal year 2008) appropriations bill for the U.S. Department of Agriculture. The USDA will use some of that funding for their research facility in France. This USDA research facility is located in France because Mediterranean countries like France have dealt with the Olive Fruit Fly for decades, while California has only been exposed since the late 1990s. This is not uncommon; the USDA has several international research facilities throughout the world, including Australia, China and Argentina.”

 Thompson’s office said Citizens Against Government Waste did not contact the congressman before it issued the award.

“Had the CAGW spent any time even talking to the USDA, they would have learned that our government does research in multiple USDA facilities around the world and that none of this money goes to other governments or for other government projects,” Thompson said.

Olives are the second-largest cash crop in Napa County, running a very distant second to wine grapes.

Dave Whitmer, Napa County Agricultural Commissioner said, Napa County had more than 220 acres of olive  groves, and  that the olives mostly go into olive oil production.

“(For) most of the coastal counties and a lot of the valley counties and the foothill counties that have olive producers, this olive fly is really turning out to be a really significant pest for olive producers to got a handle on,” he said. “Particularly for people who do fresh olives or olive oil production.”
15 comment(s)

anotherguyinnapa wrote on Apr 9, 2008 8:38 AM:

" It's funny how these groups who know nothing about agriculture, science or economics scream "PORK" anytime money is spent on something they do not understand. I don't know how much tax revenue the wine industry generates for the federal government, but $3 million has gotta be a lot less than what the government would lose if the glassy-winged sharpshooter came back.
But, on the other hand, why can't the wine industry pay for this research? They can certainly afford it, and it benefits them too. "

anotherguyinnapa wrote on Apr 9, 2008 8:42 AM:

" This is nothing compared to the pork spent on police. CAGW ought to put the Napa Police in the "Pig Book." "

JimClark wrote on Apr 9, 2008 9:35 AM:

" We, as citizens, are footing the bills of government via taxation via misrepresentation. Yet, these bozos continue to create tempests in teapots.

The bozo prescription is to raise taxes.
The People’s prescription is to remove the bozos. A budget deficit is unacceptable to those who make loans to The People. Government sees a deficit as means to extract more of the incomes of The People. Will they satisfy the deficit? Simple answer? NO!!! They find ways to use that fresh income to waste on programs, perks, and pay raises they clearly do not deserve.

This is not much different than what we are subject when we watch television these days. Much ado about absolutely nothing. Personally, I don’t really believe anything Brad Pitt or George C Looney does or doesn’t do will change the course of real history. "

another voice wrote on Apr 9, 2008 11:29 AM:

" I often disagree with Mr Thompson, but I totally agree we need to protect our agriculture. These are pests that can completely wipe out the crops that makes our area and state so beautiful. While the wine industry should certainly contribute, Sudden Oak Death and the olive pests affect us all, and homeowners who are simply not educated as to what a severe problem these pests are can put our entire way of life at risk.
This is one instance where we are really getting our tax dollar's worth. "

kevin wrote on Apr 9, 2008 1:35 PM:

" This is small potatos compared to the $200 MILLION "pork" involved in the so called "flood control" project... "

Dwayne wrote on Apr 9, 2008 2:02 PM:

" Thompson is bought and paid for by his special interests. 'Saving our agriculture' is just lip service for the very rich wine industry. They (private enterprise) should be paying their own bills to save their business, not a liberal government who wants them dependent and beholden.

We, who have purchased homes that we can afford and live within our means, are now going to suffer financially because of the glut of repossessed homes from people who weren't responsible enough to read the fine print on their mortgages. Democrats like Thompson want to bail out those incompetents, while the rest of us endure lowering home values because of it.

Just wait until liberal government gets their hands on your health care. "

doug pharr wrote on Apr 10, 2008 10:52 AM:

" Supporting our agricultural base is not what I would call wasteful spending. But the assumption that only Mike Thompson could get this done is false. As a matter of fact, since he shot himself in the foot by going to Iraq in 2002, he has not been very effective in obtaining funds for his district. He wasted his political capital, and ended up as a propaganda tool for Saddam Hussein. He hasn't been working across the aisle, because he wasn't welcome any more. Perahps this explains his gravitation toward Nancy Pelosi and much more liberal stances than his earlier reputation would indicate. But make no mistake, his votinig records shows he is NOT the centrist that many want to believe him to be.
But either way, he is backing the wrong horse once again. Whether McCain or Obama is elected, they will remember he was backing Hillary Clinton. Thompson does not appear to have the political clout he should have for a Congressman of his seniority. If he did, why can't he get the flood project funded?

Doug Pharr
Ready to Make a Difference "

paul karsten wrote on Apr 10, 2008 1:56 PM:

" I greatly appreciate Representative Thompson for looking protecting us from invasive species that could cripple the only other significant agriculture we have in the Valley.

The thought that a member of Ways and Means is not effective at securing funding for the interests of Napa only shows how ignorant Pharr is to national politics. "

nightwatchman wrote on Apr 10, 2008 2:15 PM:

" "Doug Pharr: Ready to be totally delusional."

Isn't it a good thing to have a relationship with the most powerful person in Congress? I just checked my 4th grade civics textbook and it said that Speaker of the House is an important position.

Doug is right though: Thompson has blown so much political capital being 100% correct about the Iraq debacle that he sits on the most powerful committee in Congress and has gotten millions for the flood project even with a Republican president. Get a clue buddy. "

Doug Pharr wrote on Apr 11, 2008 5:57 PM:

" To be fair, I will only compare Democrats on the Ways and Means Committee. For the sake of argument, we will assume all of these projects serve the greater good and do not qualify as “pork.”

Mike Thompson (CA) elected 1998 brought home $34 million in earmarks.

Earl Blumenauer(OR) elected in 1996 brought home $37 million in earmarks.

Allyson Y. Schwartz( PA) elected in 2005 brought home $52 million in earmarks.

Rahm Emanuel (IL) elected in 2003 brought home $52 million in earmarks.

Earl Pomeroy (ND) elected in 1996 brought home $130 million in earmarks.

Shelley Berkley (NV) elected in 1999 brought home $390 million in earmarks.

Schwartz is only a second term Representative and she brought home over 150% more money to her District. Thompson has been there longer than Berkley, and she brought home 559% more money.

If he is so powerful, shouldn’t he have brought home more?

Doug Pharr
Ready to make a Difference
"

anotherguyinnapa wrote on Apr 11, 2008 11:05 PM:

" Doug,
You are hitting soft balls and dodging the hard balls.
And your math is off.
OK let's assume it's not a waste to spend the money. The next question is *who* should spend the money, efficient private sector or inefficient big government? [this should be a soft ball for a republican]
Have some courage and stand up for the working taxpayer rather than the rich wine establishment, and you just might get some votes.
And let's break down the math:
52-34=18
18/34=53%
So I calculate that Schwarz brought home 53% (not 150%) more than Thompson in earmarks.
Math skills are very important for the job you're applying for. You will be controlling $2 trillion dollars a year that 300 million people worked very hard for.
And nightwatchman wants to know, "Isn't it a good thing to have a relationship with the most powerful person in Congress?" I bet Nightwatchman votes. "

revers wrote on Apr 12, 2008 8:16 AM:

" What this article doesn't show is that the olive fly -- a perennial and serious problem all around the Mediterranean, where olive trees originate -- has turned into a serious threat to olive production in the US. This is an increasingly important crop here, not in Napa or Sonoma perhaps (although it certainly is to our family), but absolutely in the Central Valley.

Research has been underway in Europe for many years, and it makes perfect sense to spend money there to learn what they know ($211K is a tiny fraction of what the EU spends every year), rather than trying to set up a parallel research system her.

In fact makes tremendous sense. It's the kind of decision that any of us would make, because it's fiscally responsible -- but it's quite unusual to see in a politician exactly because it runs the risk of engendering this kind of knee-jerk reaction from people trying to score points.

For the record, I'm a founder of the California Olive Oil Council, and have been deeply impressed by the way that Mike Thompson and his office have listened to our problems and tried to be responsive to our needs.

While in the aggregate the olive and olive oil industry in California has significant revenues, I can tell you with certainty that nobody farming olives in California is getting rich.

But we're trying to make farming at least support us, and like most farmers we appreciate the help of our neighbors. "

Doug Pharr wrote on Apr 14, 2008 6:44 AM:

" Thank you for your response, anotherguyinnapa.

First of all, regarding my math. The relationship between two numbers can always be expressed in at least two ways. But 52 is 159% greater than 34. 34 x 1.59 = 54.06. I figured somebody would try to claim my math was off by expressing the relationship in a different way, but I had expected it to be a Dem.

Regarding the bigger issue. Should Government pass a bunch of laws telling olive growers how to grow olives? Absolutely not. But if you ask the Olive Growers Association whether they could have afforded that research, my guess is they would say no.

Needed basic research and appropriate public works are two areas I believe the Federal Government should support. The key is deciding what is needed and what is appropriate. That requires judgment. Not all Government spending is wise, but neither is all government spending pork.

But the current budgetary system of earmarks is ripe for pork projects that are intended to do nothing more than funnel money to an incumbent’s friends and supporters. There is much room for abuse. That system should be changed.

When I looked at Mike Thompson’s earmarks and saw he sent money to France, I recognized it as a red flag. But when I looked more closely, I had to admit that particular choice of his made sense. Too bad all his judgment isn’t that good.

Doug Pharr
"

Annabella wrote on Oct 29, 2008 9:02 PM:

" Say what you will...I am for NO earmarks for any district anywhere. It is time to pay up the deficits. There should be a Moratorium on ALL earmarks. "

4gnapan wrote on Oct 31, 2008 12:45 PM:

" uh.. my math is pretty rusty.. but im pretty sure 52 is not "159%" greater than 34. "

Comment Guidelines
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
Search:
Web Search Powered
By Yahoo! Search
Napa Valley Register on Facebook
Copyright © 2009 Napa Valley Publishing, a member of Lee Enterprises, Inc.
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy