Government set stage for sub-prime disaster
Government set stage for sub-prime disaste
Dear editor,
Presidential candidate Hillary Clinton has proposed another socialist solution to further aggravate the current credit crisis. The history of government interference in any market-driven industry always leads to disastrous results.
The sub-prime mortgage collapse is another tale of unintended consequences. The crisis has its roots in the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977, a Carter-era law that purported to prevent “redlining,” denying mortgages to minority borrowers by pressuring banks to make home loans in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods. Under the act, banks were to be graded on their attentiveness to the “credit needs” of predominantly minority neighborhoods. To earn high ratings, banks were forced to make increasingly risky loans to borrowers who wouldn’t qualify for a mortgage under normal standards of creditworthiness. The CRA, made even more stringent during the Clinton administration, trapped lenders in a Catch-22.
A report by Thomas DiLorenzo, economist at Loyola College, stated: “If the mortgage lenders comply, they know they will have to suffer from more loan defaults. If they don’t comply, they face financial penalties, which can cost a large corporation like Bank of America billions of dollars.”
Banks nationwide thus ended up making more and more “sub-prime” loans and agreeing to dangerously lax underwriting standards, no down payment, no verification of income, interest-only payment plans, weak credit history. If they tried to compensate for the higher risks they were taking by charging higher interest rates, they were accused of unfairly steering borrowers into “predatory” loans they couldn’t afford. Trapped in a no-win situation entirely of the government’s making, lenders could only hope that home prices would continue to rise, staving off the inevitable collapse.
But once the housing bubble burst, there was no escape. Mortgage lenders have been bankrupted, thousands of sub-prime homeowners have been foreclosed on, and countless would-be borrowers can no longer get credit. The financial fallout has hurt investors around the world. And all of it thanks to the government, which was sure it understood the credit industry better than the free market did, and created the conditions that made disaster unavoidable.
Ken Larsen
Calistoga
The goal of the story comments section at NapaValleyRegister.com is to have an open, thought-provoking, civil community forum for all issues.
What gets your comment posted?
• Staying on topic
• Keeping your comment to 300 words or less
• Avoiding name-calling
• Addressing your comments to the message rather than the messenger
What gets your comment deleted?
• Personal attacks
• Derogatory remarks
• Name-calling of any sort
• Going off-topic
• Hate speech
• Racially-insensitive comments
• Implying guilt of a subject in a crime story before there is a court verdict
• Posting e-mail addresses
• Posting comments of a commercial nature
• POSTING WITH ALL CAPITAL LETTERS
• Linking multiple comments together with "to be continued..." to get around the 300 word limit.
The fine print
- Comments are either approved or denied. We do not edit comments.
- You are welcome to modify and resubmit a denied comment.
- Comments may take several hours to be posted.
- Comments posted are those of the writer, and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of NapaValleyRegister.com, its employees or its parent company.
- Do you have information on a story? Please go to our
virtual newsroom to send us a news tip.
- If you feel a posted comment has violated our guidelines, please contact
online@napanews.com or add a comment indicating you have an issue and our moderators will review the comment in question.
curious reader wrote on Mar 31, 2008 10:04 AM:
The fact is that the so-called "mortgage market" is entirely a non-market creation of the federal government that began in 1938 with the creation of the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae).
The investor guarantees provided by Fannie Mae, and its related agencies Ginnie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA, and the VA are the sole means by which the vast majority of working Americans are able to obtain home mortgages. Take away the government guarantees and virtually all of us would be renters for life, as was the case prior to 1938.
The subprime crisis resulted from political decisions to first artificially reduce interest rates to promote the so-called "ownership society" prior to the 2004 Presidential election (go back and read the President's speeches from that era), and then to steeply increase interest rates post-election at the expense of recent mortgage borrowers.
"
matt@newspeak wrote on Mar 31, 2008 11:30 AM:
As I wrote about a few weeks ago, I began to see this problem coming a few years ago when I seemed to be meeting a lot of ambitious 20-year-olds in off-the-rack suits and too much cologne who were working out of strip malls and pushing 95-100% LTV loans with zero or (almost nothing) down.
Its a bitter pill to swallow but we have to come to grips with the fact that most of America's biggest financial upheavals have come from over-confident, under-regulated markets. "
Bill wrote on Mar 31, 2008 12:02 PM:
The current mortgage crisis is not about these guaranteed loans or any socialist conspiracy as the letter writer would suggest. Rather it can be laid at the door of freemarketeers or corporate pirates who see no regulation as a license to steal. Even casinos must submit to greater government oversight than is currently practiced concerning the financial industry.
Markets need leeway to expand and contract but the invention of sub prime ARM loans in an inflated real estate market was a mouthwatering bonanza for large speculative institutions to promote as the potential for ever greater profits, by shifting the risk to institutions not regulated as strictly as the banking industry.
Laying the blame on the Community Reinvestment act of 1977 is pure red scare dogma, demonstrating a lack of economic understanding. This crisis is directly related non-regulation and lack of honest supervision. If any thing it can be laid at the feet of those calling for less regulation which has brought us the fiascos of Enron et al and the sloganeering profiteers of our current situation.
The steady call for less government regulation of the financial and other networks over the last thirty years has led to public bailouts not of misled or uninformed purchasers but the same gamblers it should have policed in the first place leaving the purchaser and the public holding the bag while faceless corporate enterprises take a pass.
The fogging of government responsibility with the free market choice assumes that free markets are actually subject to an enforceable code of ethics. The proper word is banditry.
"
Sickothis wrote on Mar 31, 2008 4:22 PM:
petebo wrote on Mar 31, 2008 8:42 PM:
rogers wrote on Mar 31, 2008 11:32 PM: